Dan and James choose a preprint and walk through how they would peer-review it. James also provides an update on his recent proposal that scientists should be paid for performing peer reviews for journals published by for-profit companies
Specific links and topics:
An update on the 450 movement (https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/the-450-movement-1f86132a29bd), which proposes that scientists should be paid for performing peer reviews for journals published by for-profit companies
You should follow Overly Honest Editor (https://twitter.com/Edit0r_At_Large) on Twitter
The Volkswagen fellowships (https://www.volkswagenstiftung.de/en/funding/our-funding-portfolio-at-a-glance/freigeist-fellowships)
Emma Mills (http://www.research.lancs.ac.uk/portal/en/people/emma-mills(edc1db6a-ca34-4086-b16f-95dd24534887).html), from Lancaster University, asks us how we review papers
We review this paper: "Direct perception of other people’s heart rate (https://psyarxiv.com/7f9pq)"
The tweet from Maarten van Smeeden (https://twitter.com/MaartenvSmeden/status/1310210069779316737?s=20) on data simulation
Other links
- Dan on twitter (www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
- James on twitter (www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
- Everything Hertz on twitter (www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
- Everything Hertz on Facebook (www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: Lee Rosevere (freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast) and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, October 5) "117: How we peer-review papers", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7JHFP