In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Anne Scheel (LMU Munich) to discuss open science advocacy.
Highlights:
- How Anne became an open science advocate
- Open science is better science
- Methodological terrorists/freedom fighters
- The time Anne stood up after a conference keynote and asked a question
- Asking poor PhD students to pay for conference costs upfront and then reimbursing them 6 months later
- Is it worth if for early career researchers to push open science practices?
- How to begin with implementing open science practices
- Power analysis should be normal practice, it shouldn’t be controversial
- Anne’s going to start a podcast
- The 100%CI: A long copy blog with 4 writers
- The benefits of preprints and blogging
- Science communication in English for non-native English speakers
- Doing stuff that interests you vs. stuff that’s meant to advance your career
Twitter accounts of people/things we mentioned:
@dalejbarr - 2:10
@siminevazire - 2:45
@lakens - 2:45
@nicebread303 (Felix Schönbrodt)- 3:50
@annaveer - 21:40
@methodpodcast - 29:20
@the100ci - 30:40
@realscientists - 31:40
@upulie - 31:55
@fMRIguy (Jens Foell) - 32:20
@realsciDE (Real scientists Germany) - 32:30
@maltoesermalte, @rca, @dingdingpeng (100% CI team) - 33:55
@stuartJRitchie - 65:05
Links
- Early Career Researchers and publishing practices: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1102/full (paywalled)
- Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template” Paywalled link: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103116301925, Preprint link: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4frms/
- The CI 100%: http://www.the100.ci
Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/ Special Guest: Anne Scheel.