On Episode 26, we tell you about the debate over whether the judge hearing the challenge to the Saskatchewan gender pronouns policy is allowed to make a declaration now that the notwithstanding clause has been invoked; we explain our application to intervene in the federal plastics appeal; and we tell you what we've heard about the upcoming "online harms" and hate speech bill.Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:Disinformation Law Is Dead Dérives sectaires : on vous explique le délit de "provocation à l'abstention de soins", voté par l'Assemblée nationale Yes, the feds can actually override provincial anti-trans school policies. Here's how.School closures may not have been necessary to prevent spread of COVID-19, researchers at McMaster findCan job postings in Canada exclude white people? Short answer: yes Judge rules challenge of Saskatchewan’s pronoun law can proceedJosh Dehaas: P.E.I. puts politeness over free speech by persecuting town councillorThe Evolving Debate Over Section 33 of the Charter The faulty received wisdom around the notwithstanding clause The Notwithstanding Clause: Legislatures, Courts, and the ElectorateThe Truck and the Brakes: Understanding the Charter's Limitations and Notwithstanding Clauses SymmetricallyNot Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.