In the ever-unfolding saga of Alex Murdaugh, a new chapter may be on the horizon. The evidentiary hearing scheduled for late January 2024 could potentially lead to a new trial for Murdaugh, largely due to the controversial actions of Becky Hill, the clerk of court during his trial. Former Federal prosecutor and esteemed attorney Neama Rahmani joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to dissect the complexities of this unprecedented situation.
 
 Hill, embroiled in accusations of jury tampering, is also facing scrutiny for her son’s involvement in wiretapping, abuse of office, and recent allegations of plagiarism. Rahmani explained the gravity of these accusations, stating, “You have the potential criminal charges of jury tampering...and, of course, she has her ethics violations for allegedly misusing her position.”
 
 As the date for the evidentiary hearing draws near, Rahmani shed light on what to expect. Unlike a jury trial, this hearing will be presided over by a judge, and the rules of evidence do not necessarily apply. “It's essentially a mini trial,” Rahmani explained. “The defense is going to try to bring all of it in order to attack her credibility.”
 
 The role of the jurors from Murdaugh's trial will be critical in this hearing. Rahmani noted that while some jurors might defend Hill, others have provided declarations suggesting ex parte communications. The question now is whether Hill will testify or plead the fifth, given her multiple allegations.
 
 This hearing is not just about Murdaugh's fate; it's also about the integrity of the judicial system. “This is a big issue and a very high-profile case, one of the biggest cases in state history,” Rahmani emphasized. The stakes are high, and the outcome could set a precedent for future cases in South Carolina.
 
 The prosecution, according to Rahmani, faces a daunting task. They must prove that any alleged misconduct by Hill did not influence the jury's verdict. This becomes particularly challenging in light of Hill's diminishing credibility and the growing number of allegations against her.
 
 Rahmani predicts the hearing will not immediately yield a decision. “The judge will probably take days, maybe even weeks to prepare a written order because this is going to be subject to some pretty intense scrutiny,” he said. The decision, whatever it may be, is expected to be appealed, prolonging a legal battle that has already captivated the nation.
 
 The implications of this hearing extend beyond Murdaugh. Rahmani cautioned about creating a precedent where any guilty verdict could be challenged based on after-the-fact affidavits by jurors. “You don't want to create bad law,” he warned, highlighting the broader consequences for the judicial system.
 
 As the podcast episode concluded, Brueski and Rahmani pondered the broader impact of this case. If Hill's actions lead to a retrial for Murdaugh, it could open the floodgates for similar appeals in other cases, challenging the very foundations of the justice system in South Carolina.
 
 The upcoming hearing promises to be a pivotal moment in the Murdaugh case, with potential ramifications that extend far beyond the courtroom. Will Becky Hill's actions indeed pave the way for a new trial for Alex Murdaugh? And if so, what precedent will it set for future cases? The legal community and the public alike await the judge's decision with bated breath.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen