The Delphi murder investigation continues to grip the nation, but not always for the right reasons. Just when you thought you'd seen it all, the mystery took an unexpected turn with an unsettling leak of evidence. But where did it come from? And more importantly, why?
 
 In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers", host Tony Brueski and former Federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani discussed the chilling developments in this cold case. "The leaks this time are very sickening," Tony commented, referencing leaked photos of the victims that have recently surfaced. He continued, "What possibly could be the motive to have leaked photos like this to the public?"
 
 Rahmani, bringing a unique perspective from his years as a prosecutor, highlighted the significance of these leaks and the potential source. "I mean, the last thing you want is your law enforcement or folks in the district attorney's office to be leaking this type of information," Rahmani opined, stressing that the dissemination of such sensitive evidence can jeopardize the fairness of a trial. If these leaks indeed came from the defense, as speculated, it would further complicate what is already a challenging prosecution.
 
 The core of the conversation revolved around Richard Allen, a central figure in this investigation. The discourse took a probing turn as Brueski questioned the earlier decision to explore Odinism in Allen's defense. Rahmani responded, "It's tough to defend these types of cases because whether it's a death penalty case or not, you're usually not getting any type of discount." He pointed out that if Allen's confession stands, the defense would be "swinging for the fences," looking for any and every argument to save their client.
 
 What's especially intriguing is Allen's own role in his arrest. As Brueski remarked, "He's the one who raised his hand and said, 'Hey, I was there, how can I help?' And then he ends up getting arrested for this." This paints a puzzling picture of a man confessing involuntarily, perhaps backed into a corner, desperately trying to prove his innocence.
 
 The subject of Allen's confession served as a central pivot for the podcast. Rahmani believes that the chance of the confession being suppressed is slim. "These confessions usually are videotaped, recorded. They've had years. It's not like, you know, this just happened today. I imagine at some point we will hear the audio of that confession," Rahmani speculated.
 
 If Rahmani's predictions hold true, then the tone and content of Allen's confession will be critical. Brueski shared his thoughts, saying, "I'm wondering if this is going to come down to be either the nail in Richard Allen's coffin or if it's going to be the thing that sets him free." The implications are significant. Depending on how the jury interprets the confession – particularly the tone and demeanor of Allen – it could make or break the case.
 
 In summarizing potential challenges for the defense, Rahmani pinpointed two main issues. The first is the Miranda warnings and the waiver. "They've given those warnings. They gotta make a knowing and voluntary waiver of those rights," Rahmani explained. The second challenge is establishing that the confession was coerced or involuntary. If the defense can't suppress the confession based on these two grounds, the jury is likely to hear it, and as Rahmani put it, "usually, often that's enough to get someone convicted."
 
 In an investigation marred by twists, turns, and now disturbing leaks, one must wonder: If someone inside the defense did leak crucial evidence, what else might be lurking in the shadows of this convoluted case? Can justice be served amidst such controversy and confusion? And finally, will the truth about Richard Allen and the Delphi murders ever genuinely come to light?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod