The unraveling of Indian History is an arduous task.

It is more confounding when one tries to sort out the relationship and antiquity of Sanskrit and other regional languages like Tamil Kannada( I have done some research in these but yet to study other languages, I am sure I will have more surprises when I go with an open mind).

Now that I have explored a little on Sanatana Dharma, Sanskrit and their relationship with them, Iam convinced that Tamil and Sanatana Dharma/Sanskrit is quite ancient and our present reading of History does not do just do justice to any of them.

Facts.

1.Tamil kings were present during the Swayamvara of Nala and Damayanthi,Lord Rama.

2.Shiva worship in the South preceded Vedic Texts.

3.Thiruvannamalai is 3.9 Million years old.

4.Tirupathi is 2100 million years old.

5.There is a million year old Tamil site near Chennai.

6.Jwalapuram near Cuddapah, Rayalaseema is 74000 years old where Nataraja Idol is found.

7.Agastya’s travel to  South India has been documented at around 5000 BC and another around 21 000 years ago.

8.Velirs, A Dynasty of Kings were brought from Dwaraka to South India by Agastya.

9.Tamil Brahmi script is found in Harappa.

10.Satavrata Manu, ancestor of Lord Rama migrated from Dravida Desa.

11.Satyavrata Manu meditated near Madagascar.

12.Shiva’s Trinetra Dance is performed among the Aborigines of Australia.

13.There is speculation that Daksha hid in the Antarctic.

14.Due to Tectonic plate movement India was near Arctic a long time ago.

15.It is probable that India moved near Antarctic as well.

16.The cultural exchange between South and North was quite frequent and very close.

17.Rama supported the Lemurians in their war against the Atlanteans.

18. Traces of Tamil language and Tamil culture is found among the tribes of North West of India and the South west of present Iran.

Now  a new theory suggests that Tamil Elam was present in the area surrounding Iran and Tamil in its rudimentary form is found there even new.

The word Tamil Elam is from the usage of the same word in the same sense by the Elamie civilisation.

McAlpin (1975) in his study identified some similarities between Elamite and Dravidian. He proposed that 20% of Dravidian and Elamite vocabulary are cognates while 12% are probable cognates. He further proposed that Elamite and Dravidian possess similar second-person pronouns and parallel case endings. For example the term for mother in the Elamite language and in different Dravidian languages like Tamil is “amma”.[2] They have identical derivatives, abstract nouns, and the same verb stem+tense marker+personal ending structure. Both have two positive tenses, a “past” and a “non-past”.[3]

 

Apart from the linguistic similarities, the Elamo-Dravidian Hypothesis rests on the claim that agriculture spread from the Near East to the Indus Valley region via Elam. This would suggest that agriculturalists brought a new language as well as farming from Elam. Supporting ethno-botanical data include the Near Eastern origin and name of wheat (D. Fuller). Later evidence of extensive trade between Elam and the Indus Valley Civilization suggests ongoing links between the two regions.

The distribution of living Dravidian languages, concentrated mostly in southern India but with isolated pockets in Southern Afghanistan and Pakistan (Brahui) and in Central and East India (Kurukh, Malto), suggests to some a wider past distribution of the Dravidian languages. However, there are varied opinions about the origin of northern Dravidian languages like Brahui, Kurukh and Malto[disambiguation needed].[5] The Kurukh have traditionally claimed to be from the Deccan Peninsula,[6] more specifically Karnataka. The same tradition has existed of the Brahui.[7][8] They call themselves immigrants.[9] Many scholars hold this same view of the Brahui[10] such as L. H. Horace Perera and M. Ratnasabapathy..https://ramanisblog.in/2016/02/18/tamil-elam-in-iran-elamites/

---

Send in a voice mes