Episode 8: March Madness

FromThe National Security Law Podcast

Start listening View podcast show

Episode 8: March Madness

FromThe National Security Law Podcast

ratings:

Length:

58 minutes

Released:

Mar 17, 2017

Format:

Podcast episode

Description

Episode 8 (about 58 minutes long) finds Professors Vladeck and Chesney discussing the legal, policy, and institutional issues raised by reports that President Trump has authorized CIA to resume control of drone operations in some circumstances,...

Released:

Mar 17, 2017

Format:

Podcast episode

Titles in the series (100)

Unpacking the Legal Issues Behind the Headlines

Skip carousel

Episode 26: The Impenetrable Podcast Unit: In today’s episode, Professors Chesney and Vladeck focus on three sets of issues. First, they explore the D.C. Circuit’s June 30th ruling in Jaber v. United States, in which the court on political question grounds affirmed dismissal... by The National Security Law Podcast
72 min listen
Episode 5: Does this Podcast Apply Extraterritorially?: In this episode, Professors Chesney and Vladeck consider whether the Supreme Court is poised to use a border-shooting case (Hernandez v. Mesa) to expand Fourth or Fifth Amendment rights for non-citizens outside the United States, and what... by The National Security Law Podcast
46 min listen
Episode 9: [USperson 1] and [USperson 2] Discuss [Redacted]: In this episode, [USperson 1] and [USperson 2] discuss whether the law was violated by [USperson 3] when [he/she] spoke to [USpersons 4-17] about alleged surveillance of [USperson 18] or perhaps various [USpersons] working for... by The National Security Law Podcast
52 min listen
Episode 2: If You Thought That Last Executive Order Was Controversial…: Professors Vladeck and Chesney focus on two major developments: the Trump Administration’s sudden decision to suspend entry into the United States for persons hailing from seven countries, and a rare boots-on-the-ground raid conducted by U.S. by The National Security Law Podcast
31 min listen
Episode 1: What the World Needs Now Is a New Podcast: Professors Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck walk listeners through some of the key issues raised by an alleged draft executive order on interrogation, detention, and prosecution of terrorism suspects. by The National Security Law Podcast
38 min listen
Episode 19: Inherent Contempt Works Better With a Congressional Jail: School’s out for summer…but the National Security Law Podcast keeps trucking along. In Episode 19, we find that the suddenly-student-less professors have used their newfound free time to…wait for it…add music to their intro. And just... by The National Security Law Podcast
45 min listen
Episode 13: This Podcast Did Not Go Through the VEP But We Are Releasing It Anyway: Listeners who are tired of listening to just Professors Vladeck and Chesney on this show can take heart! This week they are joined by special guest Matt Tait, better known online as Pwn All the... by The National Security Law Podcast
44 min listen
Episode 4: A New Hope: From Mike Flynn to border shootings to Guantanamo, a tour of this week's NSL news. by The National Security Law Podcast
38 min listen
Episode 8: March Madness: Episode 8 (about 58 minutes long) finds Professors Vladeck and Chesney discussing the legal, policy, and institutional issues raised by reports that President Trump has authorized CIA to resume control of drone operations in some circumstances,... by The National Security Law Podcast
58 min listen
Episode 35: Will This Be the Year of Military Courts at the Supreme Court?: Will this year’s Supreme Court term be packed with cases relating to military courts? In this week’s show, Professors Chesney and Vladeck explore the possibility. The Supreme Court currently has before it an array of... by The National Security Law Podcast
65 min listen
Episode 6: A Sessions Session: In this episode, Professors Vladeck and Chesney get into the weeds of the controversy surrounding the statements Attorney General Sessions made during his confirmation process concerning contacts with Russians. Is there a credible case for... by The National Security Law Podcast
40 min listen
Episode 3: Sometimes an Executive Order Is Really Just…An Invitation to Talk about AUMFs and Habeas Corpus: Professors Chesney and Vladeck dive deep into the latest iteration of the Trump Administration’s draft executive order on military detention, Guantanamo, and the Islamic State by The National Security Law Podcast
38 min listen
Episode 7: The Less Prep the Better: In this episode, Professors Chesney and Vladeck live up to their new motto (see the episode title) by wading into the confusion surrounding a pair of recent presidential claims with significant national security law implications:... by The National Security Law Podcast
49 min listen
Episode 10: Is This Podcast Cert-Worthy?: In this hour-long episode, Professors Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney open by unpacking the ins-and-outs of two Guantanamo military commissions cases currently seeking Supreme Court review: the al-Nashiri case (which could give the Court a... by The National Security Law Podcast
60 min listen
Episode 16: Authorizing Force Against the Islamic State: In this episode, Professors Vladeck and Chesney walk listeners through a recent proposal by Rep. Adam Schiff to replace the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs with a new “consolidated” AUMF that would explicitly name the Islamic... by The National Security Law Podcast
61 min listen
Episode 11: All of This Has Happened Before, and Will Happen Again: In today’s episode, Professors Vladeck and Chesney come to grips yet again with surveillance law and policy issues thanks to the ever-fascinating Trump/Russia story, this time accounting for the President’s accusation that then-National Security Adviso... by The National Security Law Podcast
61 min listen
Episode 14: Potential Assange Charges, and More From Some Island in the Pacific: In this episode, Professors Chesney and Vladeck run through the array of potential criminal charges against Julian Assange and Wikileaks (in light of recent rumblings that DOJ has revived that possibility), and they discuss the prospects... by The National Security Law Podcast
53 min listen
Episode 47: Donuts and Depth Charges: And…they’re back! Fresh off of Thanksgiving, Professors Chesney and Vladeck are (all too) fired up to discuss the latest national security law news (not to mention a bunch of stuff that just isn’t relevant to... by The National Security Law Podcast
65 min listen
Episode 15: Skirmishes in the Surveillance Wars: In this surveillance-heavy episode, Professors Chesney and Vladeck dig into a raft of news about foreign-intelligence collection authorities. They open with an overview of how Section 702 collection authority works, and then unpack the recent... by The National Security Law Podcast
56 min listen
Episode 24: An AUMF for Westeros?: In today’s episode, Professors Chesney and Vladeck discuss the Supreme Court’s decision in Ziglar v. Abbasi in more detail than you could possibly want. What’s that one even about, you ask?Damages for alleged violations of... by The National Security Law Podcast
76 min listen
Episode 21: A Military Commissions Deep Dive: This episode is a bit different than normal. Instead of tearing through the latest developments in the wide world of national security law, Professors Vladeck and Chesney instead provide a deep-dive overview of military commissions.... by The National Security Law Podcast
34 min listen
Episode 23: She Could Be the Ruckelshaus to Rosenstein’s Richardson: In this episode, Professors Vladeck and Chesney come up with a tongue-twister of a title while exploring the legal fallout from the Comey testimony last week, including discussions of (1) whether Comey’s actions were illegal... by The National Security Law Podcast
64 min listen
Episode 32: Back to the Future…of Afghanistan and GTMO?: Never a dull moment in 2017. In this week’s episode, Professors Vladeck and Chesney take on four topics (well, four relevant topics…do try to stay with them past their musings on home runs at the Little League... by The National Security Law Podcast
52 min listen
Episode 12: R2P From Above? The Shayrat Airfield Strike and More: In this episode, Professors Chesney and Vladeck go deep into the weeds regarding the legal issues raised by President Trump’s decision to launch missiles at the Shayrat Airfield in Syria, in the wake of the sarin... by The National Security Law Podcast
63 min listen
Episode 30: Don’t Pop the Accountability Champagne Quite Yet: In this bizarrely-titled episode (ok, they pretty much all have bizarre titles, Professors Vladeck and Chesney take on four national security law developments from the past week. First, they explore the district court ruling in Salim... by The National Security Law Podcast
65 min listen
Episode 33: How About a Presidential Pardon…For This Episode: In this week’s episode, Professors Chesney and Vladeck take advantage of a relatively quiet week for national security law developments in order to range across a number of topics. Being in Texas, we are all... by The National Security Law Podcast
58 min listen
Episode 17: On the Firing of Jim Comey: Yes Episode 16 just dropped yesterday, but given the firing of Jim Comey we felt duty bound to get back to the microphones ASAP. And so here you will find Bobby and Steve reviewing and debating... by The National Security Law Podcast
33 min listen
Episode 25: So Much National Security Law News…We’ve Reached Our Limitrophe: Had you seen the word “limitrophe” before Justice Breyer used it in his dissent in Herndandez v. Mesa? Neither had Professors Vladeck and Chesney, but that doesn’t stop them from exploring the Supreme Court’s action in... by The National Security Law Podcast
71 min listen
Episode 40: It’s a Conspiracy: In this week’s episode, Professors Chesney and Vladeck zero in on four recent developments involving law and national security. First, they explore the Supreme Court’s decision not to review the splintered decision of the en... by The National Security Law Podcast
48 min listen
Episode 38: How Did We Get Through This One Without Saying “Posse Comitatus”?: Seriously, how did they manage not to say “posse comitatus” during this episode? Sigh. In this week’s episode, Professors Vladeck and Chesney do talk at length about various legal issues raised by the devastation in... by The National Security Law Podcast
62 min listen

More Episodes from The National Security Law Podcast

Skip carousel

Episode 245: 100 Days Later…: Hello, is this thing on? Check one, check two...testing, testing. We're good? Alright alright alright... - It's been 100 days between shows. Thought maybe the world might be calmer if we waited a bit, but no such luck! We are, however, by The National Security Law Podcast
87 min listen
Episode 244: Not Our 30th Episode of 2023: Barring an unlikely spate of more than a dozen episodes happening over the next week, it sure looks like Steve has won his bet with Bobby, for this marks the 16th episode of 2023. Ouch, that's not even *close* to the 30-show target! by The National Security Law Podcast
72 min listen
Episode 243: Boiled Froggy Water Under the Bridge: Two months between episodes? Looks like someone will be buying Steve a dinner at the conclusion of 2023 (barring a pivot to posting new episodes every day). - As for what is on tap in episode 243: Israel and Gaza: a review of key international l... by The National Security Law Podcast
79 min listen
Episode 242: A Rule of Law (and Punctuation) Free Episode!: Sorry about accidentally taking the whole month off, but we're back with a classic: tune in for the 9/11 case warm-up, and stick around for 45 minutes of wrangling over the PCLOB Report on Section 702! And, yes, frivolity, by The National Security Law Podcast
20 min listen
Episode 241: Let’s Barbie!: Tune in for the latest, in which we discuss life as a fall 1L, RICO, removal, Nashiri, Bahlul, Shimari, Barbie, and Silo. And if all those names mean something to you...well, you are among the select few, and this pod is for you! by The National Security Law Podcast
76 min listen
Episode 240: Something Got Released: If you are interested in a detailed and careful explanation of the charges at issue in United States v. Trump (the recent indictment of the former president in relation to his effort to overturn the results of the election), by The National Security Law Podcast
64 min listen
Episode 239: We Have Many Tapestries!: Well, it's been about a month, so it's good we are finally back with a fresh episode! Tune in as hosts Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney kick the tires on: The New York Times story (per Charlie Savage) on the Biden Administration's October '22 revi... by The National Security Law Podcast
82 min listen
Episode 238: The World Wonders: Today's episode focuses on the indictment in United States v. Donald Trump and Waltine Nauta, S.D. Fla. (23-80101-CR). Co-hosts Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney walk you through the factual allegations, the crimes charged, by The National Security Law Podcast
59 min listen
Episode 237: Are You Not Detained???: And we're back, with co-hosts Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney breaking down the latest national security law news along with much else. This week the spotlight is on the D.C. Circuit's en banc decision in al Hela, by The National Security Law Podcast
79 min listen
Episode 236: Damn the Torpedoes!: Good morning! Episode 236 covers: - The Trump Indictment - The Biden Administration's Executive Order on Abusive Commercial Spyware - A CENTCOM strike against an IS target in Syria - The future of private prosecutors? by The National Security Law Podcast
51 min listen
Episode 235: A Drone Struck: We're back with a Spring Break edition, featuring: ICC cases emerging against Russian defendants for (1) removing children from Ukraine to Russia and (2) attacking civilian infrastructure A UK drone strike in Syria, a US drone strike in Yemen, by The National Security Law Podcast
69 min listen
Episode 234: Not *That* Linda Hamilton: Are you ready for a DEEP DIVE? We've got an extended conversation today explaining the stakes and anticipating the outcomes in two cases argued in front of SCOTUS this week: Google v. Gonzalez and Twitter v. Taamneh. by The National Security Law Podcast
68 min listen
Episode 233: This Episode Was (Not) Written by ChatGPT: We are delighted this week to feature two Texas Law students -- Sam Libby and Alex Rigby -- who earned the chance to co-host the show with us thanks to their generosity supporting the Texas Law Fellowships program (a charitable endeavor that supports T... by The National Security Law Podcast
73 min listen
Episode 232: Top Gun 3: Deflategate!: After a week with no electricity, Professors Vladeck and Chesney are back with the latest in national security law news. Tune in for discussions of: the law (or lack thereof) when it comes to balloons, altitude, and aerial espionage by The National Security Law Podcast
41 min listen
Episode 231: If You Go to Washington Don’t Crime There: What's this, a one-week turnaround between shows? Will wonders never cease? In a throwback to the days of this being a weekly show, your co-hosts Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck are back on a quick turnaround in order to debate and discuss: - by The National Security Law Podcast
55 min listen
Episode 230, Not Section 230: Wouldn't want you to be misled by the episode number (though we do actually foreshadow some future Section 230 coverage in light of an upcoming pair of SCOTUS cases)! At any rate: tune in as Professors Chesney and Vladeck discuss what is and isn't sim... by The National Security Law Podcast
55 min listen
Episode 229: We Are Not Not Going to Post Weekly in 2023 Maybe: Happy 2023 y'all! We are off to a quick start this year. Tune in as Professors Vladeck and Chesney discuss recent developments, including: The Supreme Court's "Title 42"-related action in Arizona v. Mayorkas by The National Security Law Podcast
75 min listen
Episode 228: Not *That* George Clinton!: Holiday edition! Tune in as co-hosts Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney discuss the rapid demise of the attempt by Donald Trump's lawyers to use Executive Privilege in relation to the classified documents found at Mar a Lago, by The National Security Law Podcast
66 min listen
Episode 227: Maybe This Episode Should Pay to Get Verified: Hello friends! We're back with a new episode. Tune in as Professor Steve Vladeck and Dean Bobby Chesney chat about (1) the fate of Twitter, (2) the national security implications of the election results, (3) a just-released 2016 NSA IG report, by The National Security Law Podcast
72 min listen
Episode 226: What Is a Court Anyway?: So, it's been a while...but we're back! And it's time to buy Steve's book on the Supreme Court's Shadow Docket: tinyurl.com/shadowdocket - Meanwhile, in today's episode, we'll review the ongoing Mar-a-Lago documents litigation, the Jan. by The National Security Law Podcast
51 min listen
Episode 225: Appetite for Obstruction: Hello, and welcome back to the National Security Law Podcast, with co-hosts Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck! In this episode, we dig into the latest filings in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents/presidential records litigation, by The National Security Law Podcast
54 min listen
Episode 224: Mar-a-Lag-o-Palooza: After just one week, incredibly, we are back! And we're joined by two of our fantastic Texas Law students. Ryan Brown and Adam Goodrum won the right to guest host at last year's public-interest auction at Texas Law, by The National Security Law Podcast
92 min listen
Episode 223: The Search for Episode 222!: Well, the original idea was to have a short episode about the strike that killed al Zawahiri, and to recap the D.C. Circuit's Larabee ruling. But then just before showtime, we learned of the FBI executing a warrant at Mar-a-Lago, by The National Security Law Podcast
83 min listen
Episode 221: GWOT Shots, Part Deux: And we're back, with yet another interminable window of extemporaneous frivolity at the front end of what otherwise is a somewhat serious show about the latest national security law developments and debates (seriously). by The National Security Law Podcast
52 min listen
Episode 220: This Podcast Made the Kessel Run In Less than 12 Parsecs: And...we're back, and in less than a month, remarkably! Tune in as co-hosts Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney discuss (1) the latest seditious conspiracy indictment arising out of January 6th, (2) the Navarro contempt of Congress charge, by The National Security Law Podcast
63 min listen
Episode 219: And the Podcast Host-Designate Is …: Some of y'all were wondering if the show was done-for now that co-host Bobby Chesney has been named the next dean of the University of Texas School of Law. But as it turns out, the main impact of that on the show probably will be no more and no less t... by The National Security Law Podcast
52 min listen
Episode 218: From 28(j) to Enterprise-J: Ok, ok, it's been a full month since the last episode. But good things come to those who wait! We are back, and hope you'll tune in as co-hosts Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck discuss the latest in national security legal news, including: - by The National Security Law Podcast
58 min listen
Episode 216: This Podcast Does Not Constitute Legal Advice: And we're back! Tune in as Professors Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck discuss and debate: ICC jurisdiction over war crimes on Ukraine's territory Limits on sharing tactical intel and arms? The Neutrality Act and its implications for those in... by The National Security Law Podcast
63 min listen
Episode 215: Rhyming or Outright Repeating?: We are back with a fresh episode, hot on the heels of Russia's latest incursion into Ukraine. Tune in as we survey some of the legal dimensions to this latest development (including discussion of the impact of diplomatic recognition on UN Charter Artic... by The National Security Law Podcast
61 min listen

Related podcast episodes

Skip carousel

The Legality of Presidents Doing Whatever They Want: Melissa, Kate, and Leah recap oral arguments in cases about the No Fly List, the confrontation clause, and what qualifies as a government taking. by Strict Scrutiny
68 min listen
Episode 62: You’re Fired: Tech error fixed: Professor Peter Shane describes the court case that could give the president new authority to fire any federal official, for any reason. He explains the history of the theory behind the court’s ruling and arguments for and against it. by Scholars Strategy Network's No Jargon
28 min listen
AITA? SCOTUS Edition: Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a pair of cases that threaten to topple four decades of precedent about federal agencies' authority to interpret statutes. by Strict Scrutiny
66 min listen
Content Moderation, Machine Guns, and Trump's Trial Calendar: Leah and Kate analyze the ramifications of the Supreme Court agreeing to hear Trump's immunity case... seven whole weeks from now. They also recap the arguments in a case about whether the federal government can ban bump stocks, a device that turns a semi-automatic rifle into, essentially, a machine gun. Plus, evelyn douek joins the pod to recap arguments in a case about whether social media content moderation is censorship and therefore violates the First Amendment. by Strict Scrutiny
86 min listen
Worked Up Into a Blue Snit: The faculty lounge is open for visitors as Professors Richard Epstein and John Yoo tackle the latest legal controversies: will the Supreme Court open the door to challenges to the controversial Texas abortion law? Can Donald Trump use executive privilege... by Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Senik
67 min listen
SCOTUS 2024: Conflict at the Texas Border, Bump Stocks, the NRA & Free Speech by Lawyer 2 Lawyer
39 min listen
OA597: 5th Circuit Tells SCOTUS Hold My Beer: The 5th Circuit has never been in the top 10 circuits in terms of not being insane, but now it has gone even more off the rails. Andrew takes us through the deep dive on a terrible decision that will decimate the SEC's ability to do anything, and why... by Opening Arguments
71 min listen
Rational Security: The “So Much for that Menendez Rest Stop” Edition by The Lawfare Podcast
66 min listen
What If We Tried Treating Donald Trump Like Everyone Else? by The New Abnormal
57 min listen
BARD - Stephen Vladeck on the SCOTUS 'Shadow Docket': Mark and Gary are joined by University of Texas law professor Stephen Vladeck to discuss the contents of his new book 'The Shadow Docket: How the Supreme Court Uses Stealth Rulings to Amass Power and Undermine the Republic' Watch... by Reasonable Doubt
25 min listen
Did Judge Toal Simply Not Want To Be 'The One' To Give Alex Murdaugh A New Trial? by The Trial Of Alex Murdaugh
8 min listen
Prop 8 on Issues, Etc (Part 2): (December 7, 2010) Dr J appears on Issues, Etc, where she and Todd Wilken discuss the start of the Prop 8 appeals trial (technically the 3-judge panel--Reinhardt, Smith, and Hawkins--is evaluating whether there is grounds for an appeal) and what we... by The Ruth Institute Podcast
13 min listen
The Impeachment of a Former President, with Richard Epstein, Andrew McCarthy, and John Yoo: The second impeachment trial of Donald Trump begins on February 9, 2021, but a fierce debate as to the constitutionality of trying a former president in this manner has been ongoing in the legal community for weeks. To bring some possible clarity and res... by Uncommon Knowledge
79 min listen
Intelligence Under a Trump Administration: Episode #201 by The Lawfare Podcast
65 min listen
How unreported gifts and luxury travel are harming the Supreme Court’s legitimacy by Apple News In Conversation
34 min listen
‘The Shadow Docket’ shines light on an increasingly uncommunicative Supreme Court by ABA Journal Podcasts - Legal Talk Network
47 min listen
‘The Shadow Docket’ shines light on an increasingly uncommunicative Supreme Court by ABA Journal: Modern Law Library
47 min listen
“The Shadow Docket” with Steve Vladeck: The Supreme Court has long had incredible authority to make decisions that affect millions of Americans. But in recent years, it has increasingly used its power to make stealth emergency decisions without public hearings or explanations. The cases that we often hear about on the high court’s so-called merits docket only represent about one percent of what the court decides. Since the mid-2010s, 99 percent of SCOTUS rulings, including ones increasingly related to consequential issues like abortion, immigration and COVID restrictions, have taken place on what some legal scholars have taken to calling “the shadow docket.” What does this obscure procedure mean for each of us? Steve Vladeck is the Charles Alan Wright Chair in Federal Courts at The University of Texas School of Law. He’s also author of a new book, “The Shadow Docket: How the Supreme Court Uses Stealth Rulings to Amass Power and Undermine the Republic.” He joins WITHpod to discuss how w by Why Is This Happening? The Chris Hayes Podcast
54 min listen
Episode 11: All of This Has Happened Before, and Will Happen Again: In today’s episode, Professors Vladeck and Chesney come to grips yet again with surveillance law and policy issues thanks to the ever-fascinating Trump/Russia story, this time accounting for the President’s accusation that then-National Security Adviso... by The National Security Law Podcast
61 min listen
Sneak Peek: How unreported gifts and luxury travel are harming the Supreme Court’s legitimacy by Apple News Today
2 min listen
Ep. 66 - Trump on Trial (Again) by Verdict with Ted Cruz
46 min listen
What Happens to Docs Case if Donald Trump Wins 2024 U.S. Presidency? by The New Abnormal
63 min listen
Meager Sentences: Kate and Leah are joined by Elizabeth Wydra and Aaron Reichlin-Melnick to discuss more of the Supreme Court's orders coming out of the shadow docket. First up is the Migrant Protection Protocol, also known as the "Remain in Mexico" program from the Trump Administration. Then it's a look at the Court's decision to vacate the CDC's latest eviction moratorium, which allows evictions to resume. Both orders ruled against the Biden administration and were divided along ideological lines. by Strict Scrutiny
54 min listen
Sing a Song (of) Mike Pence: Former Vice President Mike Pence has received subpoenas from Special Counsel Jack Smith. Pence claims that he has grounds to challenge this subpoena; he locates this in the so-called “speech and debate” clause, and some claim that executive privileg... by Amarica's Constitution
107 min listen
The social media content moderation laws before SCOTUS today: The Supreme Court will hear arguments in two lawsuits today -- the outcomes of which could shape the way governments regulate social media. At issue are laws in Texas and Florida that put restrictions on how platforms like Facebook, YouTube and X police online material. On POLITICO Tech, host Steven Overly talks to Carl Szabo, the general counsel at NetChoice, a tech association challenging the social media laws in Texas and Florida. by POLITICO Tech
17 min listen
The Fight to Save the Republic & SCOTUS Caught in the Cross-Hairs by Legal AF by MeidasTouch
80 min listen
A Quick Legal Update: Justice Alito's Roe v. Wade 'Truthiness" & Trump's Documents Subpoena by Passing Judgment
1 min listen
A Week of Unimaginable Judicial Hell Destroying What’s Left of America Ep. 158: In this episode of the Conservative Conscience, we speak the truth about the severity of the judicial crisis, how it happened, what is happening now that makes this issue an emergency, why it won’t be fixed with traditional methods, how conservative legal elites have screwed us, and what we can do about it. We begin by addressing almost a dozen mind-boggling decisions by the courts recently and how they are shutting down our country and nobody is talking about it. Next, we address the stratagem and philosophy behind what they are doing and how it will succeed no matter how many new judges Trump appoints. Finally, we conclude with a lesson on the difference between judicial review and judicial supremacy, how “conservative” legal activists are part of the problem and misunderstand this lesson, and what we can do to educate people and change course. Key quotes: “If god gave me one political wish, it by Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz
62 min listen
TICK TOCK by The Dinesh D'Souza Podcast
48 min listen
Amicus: Abortion, Surveillance, and Vigilantism : An American Story: SB 8 is unconstitutional and good to go in Texas (and probably a bunch of other states too). by Slate Daily Feed
65 min listen

Discover this podcast and so much more

Episode 8: March Madness

Episode 8: March Madness

Description

Titles in the series (100)

More Episodes from The National Security Law Podcast

Related podcast episodes