Sessions v. Dimaya (2017)

FromSupreme Court Audio Podcast

Start listening View podcast show

Sessions v. Dimaya (2017)

FromSupreme Court Audio Podcast

ratings:

Length:

20 minutes

Released:

Oct 2, 2017

Format:

Podcast episode

Description

Re-argued 10/2/2017. First argued 1/17/2017.

Description from Oyez.org:

"A case in which the Court will decide whether the Immigration and Nationality Act’s “crime of violence” provision is unconstitutionally vague under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment."

Released:

Oct 2, 2017

Format:

Podcast episode

Titles in the series (20)

A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Skip carousel

Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis (2017): Argued on 10/2/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether the National Labor Relations Act prohibits enforcement of an agreement requiring employees to resolve disputes with the employer through individual arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Gill v. Whitford (2017): Argued 10/3/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable, and whether the district court erred in striking down Wisconsin’s redistricting plan as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Class v. United States (2017): Argued 10/4/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether a guilty plea inherently waives a defendant’s right to challenge the constitutionality of his conviction." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
District of Columbia v. Wesby (2017): Argued 10/4/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether officers have probable cause to arrest for unlawful entry under D.C. law despite a claim of good-faith entry and whether the relevant law was sufficiently clearly established to justify the denial of immunity to the officers." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Jennings v. Rodriguez (2017): Argued 10/3/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will determine whether noncitizens who are subject to mandatory detention under the Immigration and Nationality Act are entitled to bond hearings with the possibility of release if they are detained for longer than six months. The Court will also determine whether the government’s burden is to prove by clear and convincing evidence that they are dangerous to their communities and represent flight risks." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Sessions v. Dimaya (2017): Re-argued 10/2/2017. First argued 1/17/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether the Immigration and Nationality Act’s “crime of violence” provision is unconstitutionally vague under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLC. (2017): Argued 10/11/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether the Alien Tort Statute prohibits corporate liability." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Serv. of Chicago (2017): Argued 10/10/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which Court held that Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)(C), which places a time limit on appeals, is not jurisdictional because it is a court-made rule rather than a statute." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
National Assn. of Mfrs. v. Department of Defense (2017): Argued 10/11/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether the Clean Water Act grants federal courts of appeals jurisdiction to review the Environmental Protection Agency’s rule that defines the scope of United States waters." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Ayestas v. Davis (2017): Argued 10/30/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether investigative services under 18 U.S.C. §3599(f) are only “reasonably necessary” when the habeas petitioner requesting the services can meet the burden of proof for the underlying claim for habeas relief at the time of the request for the investigative services." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Wilson v. Sellers (2017): Argued 10/30/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether its decision in Harrington v. Richter implicitly abrogated the presumption that a federal court sitting in habeas proceedings should “look through” a summary state court ruling to review the last reasoned result." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Patchak v. Zinke (2017): Argued 11/7/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether a statute that directs the federal courts to "promptly dismiss” certain lawsuits without affecting any underlying laws violates the Constitution’s separation of powers principles, and whether that statute violates the due process rights of a plaintiff with a pending lawsuit affected by the statute." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
U.S. Bank Nat. Assn. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC (2017): Argued 10/31/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether a designation of non-statutory insider status is reviewable under the standard of clear error." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Artis v. District of Columbia (2017): Argued 11/1/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether the tolling provision of 28 U.S.C. Section 1367(d) suspends the limitations period for the state-law claims while the claim is pending and for 30 days after the claim is dismissed, or merely provides 30 days after the dismissal for the plaintiff to refile." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc. (2017): Argued 11/6/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will resolve a circuit split as to whether the safe harbor provision of 11 U.S.C. § 546(e), which prohibits a trustee from avoiding a transfer made by or to a financial institution, includes transfers where the benefit and detriment of the transfer impact companies that are not financial institutions." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC (2017): Argued 11/27/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether inter partes review, an adversarial process used by the Patent and Trademark Office, unconstitutionally deprives patent holders of their right to a jury and access to an Article III forum before depriving them of a property right." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers (2017): Argued 11/28/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will resolve a circuit split as to whether the anti-retaliation provision for "whistleblowers" in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 applies only to individuals who fall within the act’s specific definition of "whistleblower," that is, those who disclose allegedly unlawful activity to the Securities and Exchange Commission." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund (2017): Argued 11/28/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will determine whether state courts may exercise subject matter jurisdiction over covered class actions that allege only Securities Act of 1933 claims." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Carpenter v. United States (2017): Argued 11/29/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will determine whether the warrantless seizure and search of cell phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell phone user over the course of 127 days violates the Fourth Amendment." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
SAS Institute Inc. v. Matal (2017): Argued 11/27/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the court will determine if the Patent Trial and Appeal Board must address every claim that is challenged in a claimant’s petition in its final written decision, or if it may address only a subset of those claims, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 318(a)." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen

More Episodes from Supreme Court Audio Podcast

Skip carousel

Carpenter v. United States (2017): Argued 11/29/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will determine whether the warrantless seizure and search of cell phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell phone user over the course of 127 days violates the Fourth Amendment." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund (2017): Argued 11/28/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will determine whether state courts may exercise subject matter jurisdiction over covered class actions that allege only Securities Act of 1933 claims." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers (2017): Argued 11/28/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will resolve a circuit split as to whether the anti-retaliation provision for "whistleblowers" in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 applies only to individuals who fall within the act’s specific definition of "whistleblower," that is, those who disclose allegedly unlawful activity to the Securities and Exchange Commission." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
SAS Institute Inc. v. Matal (2017): Argued 11/27/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the court will determine if the Patent Trial and Appeal Board must address every claim that is challenged in a claimant’s petition in its final written decision, or if it may address only a subset of those claims, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 318(a)." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC (2017): Argued 11/27/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether inter partes review, an adversarial process used by the Patent and Trademark Office, unconstitutionally deprives patent holders of their right to a jury and access to an Article III forum before depriving them of a property right." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Patchak v. Zinke (2017): Argued 11/7/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether a statute that directs the federal courts to "promptly dismiss” certain lawsuits without affecting any underlying laws violates the Constitution’s separation of powers principles, and whether that statute violates the due process rights of a plaintiff with a pending lawsuit affected by the statute." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc. (2017): Argued 11/6/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will resolve a circuit split as to whether the safe harbor provision of 11 U.S.C. § 546(e), which prohibits a trustee from avoiding a transfer made by or to a financial institution, includes transfers where the benefit and detriment of the transfer impact companies that are not financial institutions." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Artis v. District of Columbia (2017): Argued 11/1/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether the tolling provision of 28 U.S.C. Section 1367(d) suspends the limitations period for the state-law claims while the claim is pending and for 30 days after the claim is dismissed, or merely provides 30 days after the dismissal for the plaintiff to refile." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
U.S. Bank Nat. Assn. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC (2017): Argued 10/31/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether a designation of non-statutory insider status is reviewable under the standard of clear error." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Wilson v. Sellers (2017): Argued 10/30/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether its decision in Harrington v. Richter implicitly abrogated the presumption that a federal court sitting in habeas proceedings should “look through” a summary state court ruling to review the last reasoned result." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Ayestas v. Davis (2017): Argued 10/30/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether investigative services under 18 U.S.C. §3599(f) are only “reasonably necessary” when the habeas petitioner requesting the services can meet the burden of proof for the underlying claim for habeas relief at the time of the request for the investigative services." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLC. (2017): Argued 10/11/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether the Alien Tort Statute prohibits corporate liability." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
National Assn. of Mfrs. v. Department of Defense (2017): Argued 10/11/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether the Clean Water Act grants federal courts of appeals jurisdiction to review the Environmental Protection Agency’s rule that defines the scope of United States waters." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Serv. of Chicago (2017): Argued 10/10/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which Court held that Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)(C), which places a time limit on appeals, is not jurisdictional because it is a court-made rule rather than a statute." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Class v. United States (2017): Argued 10/4/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether a guilty plea inherently waives a defendant’s right to challenge the constitutionality of his conviction." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
District of Columbia v. Wesby (2017): Argued 10/4/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether officers have probable cause to arrest for unlawful entry under D.C. law despite a claim of good-faith entry and whether the relevant law was sufficiently clearly established to justify the denial of immunity to the officers." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Gill v. Whitford (2017): Argued 10/3/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable, and whether the district court erred in striking down Wisconsin’s redistricting plan as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Jennings v. Rodriguez (2017): Argued 10/3/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will determine whether noncitizens who are subject to mandatory detention under the Immigration and Nationality Act are entitled to bond hearings with the possibility of release if they are detained for longer than six months. The Court will also determine whether the government’s burden is to prove by clear and convincing evidence that they are dangerous to their communities and represent flight risks." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis (2017): Argued on 10/2/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether the National Labor Relations Act prohibits enforcement of an agreement requiring employees to resolve disputes with the employer through individual arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen

Related podcast episodes

Skip carousel

Jennings v. Rodriguez (2017): Argued 10/3/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will determine whether noncitizens who are subject to mandatory detention under the Immigration and Nationality Act are entitled to bond hearings with the possibility of release if they are detained for longer than six months. The Court will also determine whether the government’s burden is to prove by clear and convincing evidence that they are dangerous to their communities and represent flight risks." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis (2017): Argued on 10/2/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether the National Labor Relations Act prohibits enforcement of an agreement requiring employees to resolve disputes with the employer through individual arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
District of Columbia v. Wesby (2017): Argued 10/4/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether officers have probable cause to arrest for unlawful entry under D.C. law despite a claim of good-faith entry and whether the relevant law was sufficiently clearly established to justify the denial of immunity to the officers." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
Gill v. Whitford (2017): Argued 10/3/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable, and whether the district court erred in striking down Wisconsin’s redistricting plan as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
[17-1618] Bostock v. Clayton County by Supreme Court Oral Arguments
62 min listen
Ayestas v. Davis (2017): Argued 10/30/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether investigative services under 18 U.S.C. §3599(f) are only “reasonably necessary” when the habeas petitioner requesting the services can meet the burden of proof for the underlying claim for habeas relief at the time of the request for the investigative services." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
[20-7622] Denezpi v. United States by Supreme Court Oral Arguments
66 min listen
[18-107] R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by Supreme Court Oral Arguments
57 min listen
[18-5924] Ramos v. Louisiana by Supreme Court Oral Arguments
62 min listen
Bill Cosby verdict watch: Will ‘America’s dad’ go to jail? by Crime Stories with Nancy Grace
22 min listen
Episode 8 - The 17th Amendment, Double Jeopardy, and Habeas Corpus for Elephants by Lex Rex Institute Podcast
75 min listen
SYMHC Classics: Hernandez v. Texas by Stuff You Missed in History Class
35 min listen
National Assn. of Mfrs. v. Department of Defense (2017): Argued 10/11/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether the Clean Water Act grants federal courts of appeals jurisdiction to review the Environmental Protection Agency’s rule that defines the scope of United States waters." by Supreme Court Audio Podcast
20 min listen
[17-765] United States v. Stitt by Supreme Court Oral Arguments
60 min listen
Moscow drone attack, first debt deal hurdle, CEO enters prison by CNN This Morning
127 min listen
How the Racial Justice Act Could Shake Up California’s Criminal Court System by The Bay
23 min listen
News Brief: Media, Billionaires' Attacks on Homeless People May Pay Off Big at Supreme Court: On this News Brief, we are joined by Jesse Rabinowitz of the National Homelessness Law Center to discuss the upcoming Johnson v. Grants Pass case, which will be heard by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 22nd 2024. This is the most... by Citations Needed
24 min listen
Why Do So Few Public Defenders Become Judges?: Senate confirmation hearings begin next week for Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. If confirmed, she will be the first public defender on the high court. by Consider This from NPR
14 min listen
[23-175] City of Grants Pass v. Johnson by Supreme Court Oral Arguments
146 min listen
American Indian Child Welfare Gets High-Court Hearing by Cases and Controversies
23 min listen
Love is Love: John Adams and Marriage Equality (episode 134): 15 years ago, the landmark case Goodridge v. Department of Public Health granted marriage rights to same-sex couples in Massachusetts. The November 18, 2003, decision was the first by a U.S. state’s highest court to find that same-sex couples had th ... by HUB History - Our Favorite Stories from Boston History
39 min listen
National Politics With Political Junkie Ken Rudin: Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta on Wednesday defended a 10-year-old plea agreement with accused sex trafficker Jeffery Epstein. As the top federal prosecutor in Miami at the time, Acosta negotiated what has been deemed a sweetheart deal for Epstein, who by All Sides with Ann Fisher Podcast
50 min listen
[21-846] Cruz v. Arizona by Supreme Court Oral Arguments
62 min listen
U.C. Berkeley Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky: The Supreme Court and Racist Policing: Come hear Dean Chemerinsky's thoughts on necessary steps to create a more robust court system that will enhance civil rights. by Commonwealth Club of California Podcast
67 min listen
MI Hate Speech Bill -Disaffected A107 by Disaffected
31 min listen
The Constitutionality of Vampire Laws: Look out drunks, because Wisconsin is coming for your blood. This week's episode covers the case of Mitchell v. Wisconsin, which asks whether the police can take the blood of a passed out drunk driver without a warrant. Brett and Nazim... by The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
52 min listen
[22-179] United States v. Hansen by Supreme Court Oral Arguments
82 min listen
The Occassionally Armed Career Guide to the Supreme Court: Gather round, all ye violent individuals, as we are discussing the text of the Armed Career Criminals Act through the case of Wooden v. U.S. Brett and Nazim discuss a few background cases on the ACCA, what Due Process requires of a criminal... by The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
51 min listen
Results in Hurst v. Florida + Making a Murderer + Listener Mail: This week's episode starts with discussing the recent opinion in Hurst v. Florida, the case which considered whether the Florida Death Penalty procedure was Constitutional. After that, Brett and Nazim go through listener emails, which cover... by The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
55 min listen
MID-SEASON FINALE - Oral Argument Re-Runs: Brett and Nazim revisit three cases that were covered last term through their recent oral arguments, including Bostock v. Clayton County (considering the applicability of "sex" discrimination to sexual orientation under Title VII), R.G. v. G.R. Harris... by The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
52 min listen

Discover this podcast and so much more

Sessions v. Dimaya (2017)

Sessions v. Dimaya (2017)

Description

Titles in the series (20)

More Episodes from Supreme Court Audio Podcast

Related podcast episodes