15 min listen
EPISODE 9 - The Examiner Whisperer - Power Integrations v Fairchild Part 2
EPISODE 9 - The Examiner Whisperer - Power Integrations v Fairchild Part 2
ratings:
Length:
17 minutes
Released:
Sep 24, 2013
Format:
Podcast episode
Description
In this episode of the Litigation Quality Patents® Podcast, the discussion concerns damage awards, here and gone. The ups and downs of a 33 million dollar jury award involving induced and direct infringement, remittitur and world wide sales questions.
Craige’s special guest is Jason Rosenblum, an Intellectual Property attorney specializing in Trademarks, with offices in New York.
Listen to the Podcast:
EPISODE 9 – The Examiner Whisperer – Power Integrations v Fairchild Part 2 – Apr 04 2013
Litigation Quality Patents® Podcasts
The Litigation Quality Patents® Podcast, hosted each week by Craige Thompson (a.k.a., “The Examiner Whisperer”) contains substantive discussion designed to keep you current with what’s going on in the world of patents, encompassing everything from patent prosecution and re-examination to patent licensing and litigation.
Craige’s special guest is Jason Rosenblum, an Intellectual Property attorney specializing in Trademarks, with offices in New York.
Listen to the Podcast:
EPISODE 9 – The Examiner Whisperer – Power Integrations v Fairchild Part 2 – Apr 04 2013
Litigation Quality Patents® Podcasts
The Litigation Quality Patents® Podcast, hosted each week by Craige Thompson (a.k.a., “The Examiner Whisperer”) contains substantive discussion designed to keep you current with what’s going on in the world of patents, encompassing everything from patent prosecution and re-examination to patent licensing and litigation.
Released:
Sep 24, 2013
Format:
Podcast episode
Titles in the series (82)
EPISODE 17 - The Examiner Whisperer - Commil USA v Cisco Systems - Jul 11 2013: In this episode of the Litigation Quality Patents® Podcast, does your good faith belief that a patent is invalid determine whether you have infringed on it? A recent court panel opinion says, yes it does! Further, this opinion provides... by Litigation Quality Patent PatentCast