35 min listen
Racial Gerrymandering, Plus Like Four Hunger Games Tangents
Racial Gerrymandering, Plus Like Four Hunger Games Tangents
ratings:
Length:
58 minutes
Released:
Jun 4, 2017
Format:
Podcast episode
Description
This week's episode covers the case of Cooper v. Harris, a recent Supreme Court case which decided (1) when a State could use the Voting Rights Act as an excuse for racial gerrymandering and (2) when a State impermissibly used race as a factor for gerrymandering as opposed to permissibly using political affiliation. This week's episode also covers the movie The Hunger Games, a recent trilogy of movies that botched the third installment, of which Brett and Nazim ruin the ending. Law starts at (04:41).
Released:
Jun 4, 2017
Format:
Podcast episode
Titles in the series (100)
Supreme Court Name Game: Brett and Nazim revel in their professional failures and discuss the nine justices that make up the Supreme Court. To solve the problem of remembering their names, the two share an acronym that is easy to remember and objectively related to... by The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court