Sheltered Injustice: From Jim Crow to Martial Law: The Struggle For Fair Housing

By Amy McCoy

With 19 years of real estate expertise, Amy McCoy is not just a seasoned Realtor and Broker; she's a dedicated Housing Advocate and Civil Rights leader. Her unwavering commitment to ensuring equitable access to housing and championing civil liberties has made her a respected voice in the industry and beyond. Amy's story is one of passion, dedication, and the relentless pursuit of justice, making her a architect of change in communities nationwide.
TheAmyMcCoy.com

• Language: English
• Publisher: BooxAi
• Release date: Jan 27, 2024
• ISBN: 9789655787146

Book preview

INTRODUCTION

Ours is not the struggle of one day, one week, or one year. Ours is not the struggle of one judicial appointment or presidential term. Ours is the struggle of a lifetime, or maybe even many lifetimes, and each one of us in every generation must do our part.

– John Lewis

In the vast tapestry of human rights and social justice, one fundamental aspect often lies at the heart of a just society: fair housing. The concept of fair housing encompasses much more than bricks and mortar; it embodies the principles of equality, dignity, and opportunity for all individuals, regardless of their race, ethnicity, gender, or socioeconomic status. Understanding the significance and historical context of fair housing is essential in our collective journey toward a more inclusive and equitable society.

To fully grasp the imperative of fair housing, we must first set the stage by delving into the tumultuous chapters of slavery and the era of Jim Crow laws. The legacy of these dark periods in American history continues to cast a long shadow over our present-day struggles for justice. The injustices perpetrated against African Americans and other marginalized communities during this time laid the foundation for the necessity of fair housing legislation.

The 1968 Fair Housing Act emerged as a watershed moment in the fight against discrimination and segregation. Enacted in the wake of the civil rights movement, this landmark legislation aimed to dismantle the barriers that prevented marginalized groups from accessing safe, affordable, and quality housing. By outlawing housing discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, the Fair Housing Act sought to create a more level playing field and cultivate a society where every individual had an equal opportunity to secure a home of their choosing.

Understanding the significance of the Fair Housing Act requires recognizing the injustices it sought to rectify. It stands as a testament to the courage and perseverance of countless activists who tirelessly fought against the oppressive systems that were designed to confine and limit people based on their background. By challenging discriminatory practices and promoting equal opportunity, the Fair Housing Act represented a step forward on the path toward dismantling systemic racism and fostering a more inclusive society.

As we embark on this journey to explore the multifaceted dimensions of fair housing, it is essential to grasp its profound importance in shaping our collective future. It is not merely an abstract concept, but a tangible expression of our commitment to justice, equality, and the inherent worth of every individual. Through this exploration, we will unravel the complexities of fair housing, delve into its historical roots, and ultimately seek ways to advance its principles in our contemporary world.

Together, let us embark on this thought-provoking journey—a journey that illuminates the past challenges the present, and inspires a future where fair housing is not just an aspiration, but a lived reality for all through current law.

The United States Constitution: An Exploration of its Equality Principle

The United States Constitution, a seminal document in the annals of human rights, is lauded globally as a beacon of freedom and equality. Since its inception in 1787, the Constitution has come to represent the triumph of human dignity over tyranny, of equality over subjugation, and of the people's will over the dictatorial whim. It is universally hailed as a charter of freedom, a guarantor of equality, and an arbiter of justice. The million-dollar question is whether the Constitution truly provides an equitable platform for all. This essay aims to delve into the heart of the matter, exploring the Constitution's intricate balance between promise and performance.

The constitutional framework begins with an inspiring declaration, We the People, signifying its commitment to the people's collective will, regardless of class, color, or creed. This proclamation forms the backbone of the Constitution's ethos, underscoring its commitment to a democratic, egalitarian society. However, as we journey through its articles and amendments, we encounter various dimensions of equality—political, economic, and social—and the question of how equitably these are dispensed becomes more complex.

On political equality, the Constitution unequivocally provides a framework for equal representation. Each citizen, regardless of socioeconomic background, possesses the right to vote and elect their representatives. The 15th, 19th, and 26th Amendments expanded this right, ensuring suffrage could not be denied on the grounds of race, sex, or age (for those 18 or older). In this dimension, the Constitution appears to have striven towards a more equitable society, rectifying earlier exclusions.

Economic equality, on the other hand, is a more convoluted arena. The Constitution implicitly promotes economic equality by empowering Congress to regulate commerce, levy taxes, and provide for the common defense and general welfare. Yet, it does not directly address wealth disparities, and the capitalist system it upholds has led to considerable inequality. This economic stratification challenges the Constitution's promise of equality, forcing us to question whether it indeed facilitates equal opportunity.

Social equality is perhaps the most contentious domain. It wasn't until the 14th Amendment, nearly a century after the Constitution's ratification, that a broader scope of social equality—extending to all races—was legally codified. Added in 1868, the amendment addresses several important aspects of civil rights and citizenship, including defining citizenship, due process, and equal protection under the law. It was a direct response to the aftermath of the Civil War, designed to protect the rights of newly freed slaves and ensure equal treatment for all citizens.

The subsequent struggle for civil rights, further entrenched through the 1964 Civil Rights Act, showcases a palpable disconnect between the Constitution's egalitarian principles and their execution in the social sphere. This disjunction has sparked critical debates about the Constitution's effectiveness in promoting social equality.

The United States Constitution, therefore, while projecting an image of equality, manifests it unevenly across different societal dimensions. Its language and spirit embody the ethos of equality, a concept deep-rooted in American identity. Its commitment to political equality is significant and mostly actualized. Yet, it treads more ambiguously in the realms of economic and social equality, where its promise often outpaces its performance.

In conclusion, it is essential to view the Constitution not as a static document, but as a living one, continually evolving through amendments and interpretations. Its strengths lie in its adaptability, its capacity to rectify past wrongs, and its potential to mold itself in accordance with the changing tenets of societal justice. It is within this framework of dynamic evolution that the Constitution's true promise of equality must be understood. While the Constitution may not be equal to all at every point in history, it carries the potential to be. It is this ceaseless striving towards the ideal of equality that underscores the Constitution's enduring relevance and its promise to the American people.

1

THE LEGACY OF SLAVERY AND JIM CROW

The echoes of history reverberate through the present, shaping the inequalities and injustices that persist within our society. Nowhere is this more evident than in the realm of housing, where the legacy of slavery and the era of Jim Crow laws have left an indelible mark.

In this chapter, we will embark on a journey to understand how centuries of racial oppression have deeply impacted housing inequality, examining the systemic barriers that limited housing options for minority communities. We will delve into the historical context of housing segregation and redlining, shedding light on the policies that perpetuated racial divisions and their lasting impact on communities today.

The Lingering Effects of Slavery: Examining Centuries of Racial Oppression

The haunting specter of slavery casts a long, indelible shadow over the tapestry of American history, leaving in its wake an enduring testament to racial disparity. As we delve deeper into this historical period, we uncover the profound influences of this dehumanizing institution on the persistent issue of housing inequality. The journey traces its roots back to the chilling days of slavery when African Americans were ruthlessly deprived of property rights and the ability to create homes. This exploration will unravel the far-reaching economic and social aftermath of this inhumane system, illuminating the deeply ingrained origins of current housing disparities that plague our society.

In her seminal work, The History of White People ¹, the distinguished historian Nell Irvin Painter embarks on an incisive exploration into the intricate maze of history and sociology that birthed the concept of whiteness. Through her vivid narrative, she illustrates the complex metamorphosis of the term white over centuries, a term that has continually morphed, diversified, and cemented its place in our societal lexicon. Her book makes for a compelling read, and I wholeheartedly recommend it.

Painter commences her historical voyage in the era of antiquity, unearthing the initial perceptions of whiteness within the confines of Greek and Roman racial distinctions, which were primarily influenced by culture and geography rather than complexion. As the narrative shifts into the early modern period, we witness the transformation of whiteness as it started to wear the hues of race, spurred by the advent of the trans-Atlantic slave trade and colonization.

The narrative then traverses the terrain of the 18th and 19th centuries, shedding light on the rise

B

of scientific racism, a dark epoch where fallacious science was wielded as a tool to validate a racial hierarchy, with white people ensconced at the pinnacle. This journey unfolds further into the discrediting of these pseudo-scientific ideologies, yet their lingering shadow continues to mold societal perceptions of race.

Painter also unravels the impact of immigration on the perception of whiteness. She elucidates how groups such as the Irish, Italians, and Jews, who were once considered non-white in America, were gradually woven into the fabric of whiteness, influenced by the ebb and flow of societal and political landscapes.

As the book transitions into its final chapters, spanning the 20th century to the present, the discussion centers on how whiteness ceaselessly shapes societal interactions, political discourse, and personal identities. Painter boldly critiques contemporary notions of a post-racial society, asserting that the roots of whiteness run deep and cannot be effortlessly eradicated.

Throughout The History of White People, Painter presents an exhaustive dissection of the socio-historical construct of whiteness. She emphasizes its profound implications in shaping societal norms, institutional frameworks, and individual life trajectories. By exposing the multifaceted complexities and the historical fluidity of whiteness, Painter challenges readers to critically reassess how we perceive race, urging us to dismantle harmful racial hierarchies. Her work underscores the reality that whiteness, as it's perceived today, is not a mere biological attribute but a construct meticulously molded over centuries. This potent revelation stands as a forceful call to arms, prompting us to collectively confront and redefine our understanding of race.

As we delve further into the complexities of Painter's extensive study on whiteness, we are forced to contemplate how, in our modern world, we have allowed a construct born of bias and a desire for control to define societal norms and individual identities. Painter's work doesn't only provide us with a historical account; it provides us with a mirror, reflecting our societal norms, biases, and unspoken hierarchies.

The resonant implications of whiteness, as detailed by Painter, extend beyond mere societal structures and personal identities, reaching into the realm of economic disparities and access to resources. The legacy of whiteness as a tool for social and economic control has left a lasting mark on the American landscape. It has effectively propagated housing inequality, influenced educational opportunities, and impacted criminal justice policies, among other things.

In understanding the roots of whiteness, Painter shows us that the concept has consistently served as a moving goalpost. Depending on the era, different ethnicities were brought into or excluded from the fold of whiteness, always to maintain a racial and social hierarchy. It was, and still is, an arbitrary boundary with profound implications, not just a color line but a privilege