Amerika Year One+

By Daniel De Prophet

After exposing in Part I the continuous violations of the Constitution and human rights for a year, the author takes a flashback on the facts that led to the present totalitarian grab of power. From the manipulation of the government institutions by one party to create a Russian plot with methods worse than the ones used in the Watergate Case, to the obstruction of the transition to presidency 2016-2017, and to the actions taken to unseat the elected president throughout 2017-2020, the author gives what he considers the real causes that led to the events of January 6, 2021, themselves exploited to tighten the unconstitutional suppression of our liberties. At the end, the author summarizes the ten most important issues in our country and suggests actions to put an end to the totalitarian regime that now controls the United States.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Page Publishing, Inc.
• Release date: Jul 31, 2023
• ISBN: 9798887937502

Book preview

cover.jpg

Amerika Year One+

Daniel De Prophet

Copyright © 2023 Daniel De Prophet

All rights reserved

First Edition

PAGE PUBLISHING

Conneaut Lake, PA

First originally published by Page Publishing 2023

ISBN 979-8-88793-731-1 (pbk)

ISBN 979-8-88793-750-2 (digital)

Printed in the United States of America

Table of Contents

Introduction

XXXIX

How Long Are We Going to Put Up with This?

The Coup: Origins

XL

How Long Are We Going to Put Up with This?

Coup Precedents: Transition

XLI

How Long Are We Going to Put Up with This?

Presidency 2017: The Coup Begins

XLII

How Long Are We Going to Put Up with This?

2018–2019: Second Coup Attempt I

XLIII

How Long Are We Going to Put Up with This?

2018–2019: Second Coup Attempt II

XLIV

How Long Are We Going to Put Up with This?

From the Coup to January 6

XLV

How Long Are We Going to Put Up with This?

Amerika Year 1: The Great Awakening

Conclusion

About the Author

XLVI: How Long Are We Going to Put Up with This?

Introduction

After one year of dictatorship (February 21, 2022), I let my friends rest and did not send them more political analyses.

The last one was actually finished in March; and then I felt like something was needed to make them see in a detailed way how the extreme positions assumed by the Totalitarian Party during Donald Trump's election, transition period, and presidency were the root causes of the events of January 6.

Initially, I thought it would take a couple of weeks and a few pages more. As I dug deeper into the information I already had, the details overwhelmed me. This was so serious that you could not leave them out of the general analysis. It took me five months to connect and order them.

During that period, several important events, like Russia's invasion of Ukraine, added fuel to the matter. The product was much longer than expected. I thought, If my friends didn't read the previous analyses, they won't read these.

However, I couldn't stop writing about this obvious link between the coup attempts and its consummation in November 2020 and the desperate reaction of the people offended, ignored, and humiliated by the perpetrators. That was why I composed the last seven analyses. I never sent them to my friends, and that had a heavy weight on my decision to publish the book.

Why a part 2? Because the first one was already long, and honestly, I wanted it out before the midterm elections. Finding a publisher and certain technical requirements have delayed it beyond my expectations. Hopefully, it can still be useful.

XXXIX

How Long Are We Going to Put Up with This?

The Coup: Origins

You can't judge the events of January 6 without acknowledging the causes, and the fundamental cause is the ongoing coup attempted against President Trump since he assumed the presidency—failed during the first impeachment and consummated during the fake 2020 election.

The origin, however, is older, tracing back to 2016. Recent revelations have solidified my interpretation. In the following points, I try to summarize the evolution of the attacks against Donald Trump—from the attempt to rig his election, to the obstruction of his transition to power, to the assault versus his presidency.

From May to June 2016, the office of the inspector general reports that Hillary Clinton has stored more than one hundred documents in a private server; about ninety of them are classified as secret, and some top secret. Peter Strzok, chief of the FBI's Counterespionage Section, is assigned to the case. In a few weeks, FBI director James Comey dismisses the case, because she did not act with criminal intentions, and no jury would prosecute her for that.

Perkins Coie, legal server of the DNC and Hillary's campaign counsel, contracts Fusion GPS to investigate the opposition (Trump and his team). Fusion GPS contracts Christopher Steele, a retired British intel agent and specialist on Russian affairs. Then Hillary and her campaign chief John Podesta accuse Roger Stone of using Russian spies to pirate emails and information from the Democratic Party. Marc Elias of Fusion GPS receives info from Steele, and Michael Sussmann of Perkins Coie is Hillary's contact (the invoices are signed by her).

In Marc Elias's office, a meeting is held on or about July 29, 2016 with Hillary's campaign personnel, Sussmann, and others to adjust the execution of a confidential project. Sussmann writes in the invoice to Hillary, For general political assessment.

Sussmann visits the FBI and the CIA and informs them about his discoveries of the association between Trump and his team with Russian organizations to interfere in the election. They ask Sussmann if he is representing anyone, and Sussmann hides that he's being paid by Hillary.

Now we know that Sussmann has created a task simultaneous to Elias's, in which he involves the South African tech executive Rodney Joffe, a group of computer scientists, and personnel from a university (Georgia Tech) to intercept Trump's emails and other communications to create a derogatory narrative. Joffe's motivation (confessed in an email) is, he wants Hillary to win, because she has offered him a position in the office of high cybernetic security in the United States. This is an obvious proof that she is aware of, not to mention leading, all the work done.

Two days after the special project meeting, Carter Page and, by ricochet, Trump and his team are subjected to an FBI secret investigation called Crossfire Hurricane. The documents say that the purpose is to find out whether members of the Donald Trump campaign have been involved by their own will or unwillingly [on] activities in benefit of the Russian Federation that may constitute a federal crime or a threat to national security. The FBI opens FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act) investigations to Carter Page, Paul Manafort, George Papadopoulos, and Roger Stone. Another investigation into General Michael Flynn is officially opened on August 16.

Interruption 1. Manafort was the assessor to Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych in the 2004 election. The Democratic Party, in control of the government, intervened. Obama designed Biden to deal with the Ukrainian affairs and covered the intervention of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), considered nongovernmental. Vladimir Putin blamed the NED for the violent riots of November–December 2013.

Victoria Nuland, member of the board of the NED and, at that moment, secretary of state for the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, was selected by Obama-Biden to assist in the finishing stroke to Yanukovych, developed in February 2014. There is a recorded conversation between her and the American ambassador in Kyiv, Geoffrey Pyatt, in which they offended the European Union for their sloppy delay on acting. Nuland and Pyatt also decide who must be in the national unity government to which Yanukovych tried to conform as a last resort before escaping to Russia. Nuland was sustained by a billion-dollar offer and lethal military assistance to Ukraine. If this does not look like a bribe to you, jump to Hunter Biden's business with the corrupt firm Burisma and Joe Biden's threat of retiring two billions if the Ukrainians didn't fire the attorney general who investigated Burisma.

Putin declared the NED undesirable, and his response to the formation of a Ukrainian government ready to enter the European Union and the NATO was the invasion of Crimea. Take this now: From 2014 to 2016, Christopher Steele worked for the FBI, together with Bruce Ohr (deputy attorney general of the Department of Defense of Obama-Biden), on supplying information about Russia and Ukraine and on clandestine efforts to recruit people with influence in the Russian government or linked to it in businesses. Steele's political position was very well-known by the FBI.

Three of Steele's sources are Igor Danchenko, Charles Dolan, and Olga Galkina, a Novosti reporter and Danchenko's friend during his school days in Russia. Living in the United States since the early 2000s, Danchenko worked in the Brookings Institution for six years. He was introduced to Steele by Fiona Hill (British, naturalized American in 2002), who had studied in the Soviet Union in the late 1980s.

Danchenko incorporates in his reports to Steele accusations of economic links between Trump and Russian businessmen and points out as source of information Sergei Millian, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Russia. He does not mention Dolan among his sources, who lived in Russia from 2008 to 2014, in charge of global public relations for the Russian Government according to Durham's papers. Among Dolan's contributions, there is a pornographic script that Danchenko passes to Steele, in which Trump visits a Moscow hotel and organizes an orgy with prostitutes peeing on his bed. Steele transfers it to the FBI.

We now know that the FBI does not believe the dossier is reliable, but in the FISA application to ask for permission to use surveillance means over Trump's team member Carter Page, they include Steele's narratives. One of them is that Page has met secretly in Moscow with Igor Sechin, chief of the energy firm Rosneft, when in fact Page has only given a conference in a school, and a member of the Russian government in the audience did not consider him important enough. The FBI knows all this, because they are following Page, who now in a transit in London is intercepted by the informant Stefan Halper. The insignificant story gets large when Steele adds another info: Igor Sechin has offered Trump (via Page) 19 percent of the Rosneft actions if Trump commits to canceling the sanctions against Russia if they win the election. The FBI lies to FISA and gets its approval, because there is probable cause that Page is a foreign agent involved in clandestine work with the Russian intelligence.

The Steele dossier contains absurd errors, like accusing the Russian consulate in Miami of interference when there is no such consulate in that city. The FBI also knows that Page has been an operational contact for the CIA, because this agency told them in August 2016, but agent Kevin Clinesmith doctored the email and added, But not a source. Further, in January 2017, Danchenko admits he is creating reports just to satisfy Steele's demands. In March 2016, they ask for a task on Manafort, then on Trump, then on Sergei Ivanov (Russian deputy prime minister), then on Page again and on Cohen (Trump's lawyer). Despite all that, the FBI goes on with the hunting. This can't be naivete; it points out to complicity, which will probably be deciphered in the future.

Add to the previous point that an FBI team travels to London and meets with Steele (remember, he was still working for the FBI in 2016), who ratifies his stories about Trump, including the one in Hotel Moscow, and to the purpose, he shows another dossier prepared by CodyShearer, which coincides with what I have, he declares.

Who is private investigator Cody Shearer? He is the brother-in-law of Strobe Talbott, directorof Brookings, where Danchenko works! Doesn't the FBI know this? How can they corroborate Steele's dossier with a similar one connected to the same source? And Shearer was HillaryClinton's investigator (informant) when she was the secretary of state! The FBI and the CIA don't know this? Do they know that Shearer reported false information about Libya during that time, which harmed the Obama administration's intervention on that war? This fraud reveals that he has another dossier on Trump, which ratifies Steele's, and the FBI swallows that? And how can they explain the leak to the media, immediately raining news on this verification of Trump's crimes?

The FBI is not alone in this hunt and harassment. On July 31, John Brennan, CIA director, creates an expanded task group, which includes both institutions and the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Department of the Treasury (reinforcement net against financial crimes). Why the latter? Because the second group's fabrication against Trump is ready.

We have not forgotten that group, led by Sussmann, whose work, like Elias's, has produced equally damaging results. In fact, this work extends beyond the campaign phase, and we'll see more of it later. The first fruit is the discovery of a hidden channel of fund transfer betweenTrump and two Russian banks, one of them being the Alfa-Bank, linked to Putin. A secret line between Trump and Putin! This is high treason! Brennan warns Russia to report the news! How do the media get secret info so fast?

And how did Sussmann get this information? Rodney Joffe's work. Sussmann has paid for them to exploit access to public and not public data from his Internet companies (Joffe owns two). With access to Trump Tower in New York and his apartment building in Central Park West, Joffe's team of computer scientists has invaded emails and other communications and drawn conclusions about complicity and other compromising actions. In crude words, a team ofhackers has stolen private information from Trump, selected what could be interpreted negatively, and delivered it to Sussmann. But he is not the final recipient. This reference to computer scientists to justify the accusations versus Trump is used by the FBI, the media, and Hillary Clinton. All roads lead to her but also to a higher destination.

Interruption 2. The Brookings Institution is another example of how totalitarians turn to mud everything they touch. Founded more than one hundred years ago, its purpose was to promote an independent and honest political analysis. Of course, there was always some preference for one side, but it never fell into as much shameful bias as when Strobe Talbot assumed its direction in 2002. Follow the clues: After graduating from Yale in 1968, he went to Oxford, England, to complete his studies, and there he translated Nikita Khrushchev's memoirs. While writing for Time magazine, Talbot revealed his globalist philosophy in 1992: In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all. It is easy to infer that Talbot envisions the same for the United States and favors a global authority in Washington. Shortly after, Bill Clinton, his mate in Oxford, called him to work for his government. Talbot served for the complete two periods until 2001. The next year, we found him as head of Brookings. The institution became a one-party nest. Their globalization concept was linked to the Totalitarian Party, hence the hate for Donald Trump and the Make America Great Again movement. Now you can imagine why Susan Hennessey, Danchenko, Jake Sullivan, and Benjamin Wittes blindly follow anything that helps their totalitarian vision of the world, although it is nothing but a string of red herrings in the Steele dossier. Even after the trash in the dossier is exposed, Susan still defended it:

The origins and conduct of the Russian investigation happened exactly how former officials had been saying it did all along. And that there was some misconduct by lower-level employees doesn't implicate the substantive investigation.

Her presence in the current Department of Injustice makes us fear a possible dossier rehab. And what can we add about Jake Sullivan, who worked directly with Talbot in the Yale Center for the Study of Globalization? Sullivan is another link between the dossier corruption and the higher spheres of the party. He was Obama's deputy assistant, Hillary's chief policy adviser, and National Security Affairs adviser for VP Biden. He knows Danchenko from Brookings, and a publication has suggested him as a source for the dossier. If this is verified, it would require more than qualifying him as a liar for spreading the falsehood of Trump's connection with the Russian banks and asking the federal authorities to investigate that. He deserves to be put on trial and, surely, in jail.

Before arriving at the end of the road, let's stop at the content. In August, Joffe exchanges emails with Sussmann, who takes the discoveries to the FBI. Time flies, and Joffe urges the computer scientists but goes to a third Internet company and sends them a five-page document with a list of Trump's associates, their emails, addresses, business websites, and even spouses' data. The third-company personnel is uncomfortable. They think it's inappropriate to use data to create a narrative. But Joffe is a powerful figure, and so they continue the task.

Around August 20, Originator 1 sends an email to Joffe and two investigators: "Although we find what you're asking in [Trump's site], we see neither money flow nor messages saying, ‘send money here.' It's a valid relationship between a company and its client. Then he suggests that it is possible to [fill] an invoice in both sites (Trump's and the Russian bank's) and [to] simulate they are communicating. Originator 1 concludes, If Joffe accepts the implication we win with this team exercise…then we could work to develop an implication that might function." You can read Durham's charges to learn more about this shameful episode.

To be clear, when they can't find illegal connections between Trump and the Russian banks, they decide to create them. According to Durham, Joffe has expressed, probably to Sussmann, that there is no secret channel between Trump and the Alfa-Bank and that it is a red herring. Now comes the dirty blow: the story goes to the FBI. Hillary needs dirt on Trump.

On August 17, the FBI calls Trump, Flynn, and Chris Christie (New Jersey governor) to brief them about the Crossfire Hurricane investigation (Flynn's is named Crossfire Razor). The act from the meeting is declassified, and you can read it online. There is not a single mention of the surveillance! The act has a reference to documents approved by Clinesmith and Strzok. Agent Edward Gistaro begins with a dissertation about the history of briefings. Next, Joe Pientka III explains the methodology used by foreign intelligence services (FIS). Then he pronounces the only phrase that may be considered an accusation: This brief will advise you that, if you are not already a target of a FIS, due to the fact that you are receiving this classified briefing, you will be. In other words, the guilt is not theirs but the foreign spies' who are trying to penetrate their campaign. The remaining time (the meeting lasted thirteen minutes in total) is occupied by a conversation about the methods applied by the Chinese and the Russians, Trump's (and Flynn's) questions about the number of spies from both countries, and their surprise when Pientka tells them the Russians are many more. A handshake and it is over. They never tell Flynn that the same day, they are opening a FARA investigation on him!

John Brennan (CIA director) notifies Nancy Pelosi (August 11), Adam Schiff (August 17), and Harry Reid, chief of the Democrat minority in the Senate (later), as well as the rest of the so-called Gang of Eight, about Russian interference in the election process, words they never tell Trump in the August 17 meeting.

Interruption 3. You must be wondering how all this can happen without the knowledge of PresidentObama and VP Biden. Isn't it clear that the FBI and the CIA or other agencies won't take such biased actions against one party on their own? Must we believe that Elias and Sussmann acted on their own will without Hillary's instructions or without reporting the work they were doing? Was she paying the invoices for meetings and travel without questioning the results? Keep reading.

Peter Strzok, in charge of Crossfire Hurricane and Crossfire Razor, and Lisa Page, FBI lawyer, have an extramarital relationship (they double-cheat on their spouses) and a copious email exchange. In March, Lisa writes, This man cannot be President; in July, She just has to win now. Then more directly, she states, I'm not going to lie, I got a flash of nervousness yesterday about Trump. Fear of Trump's victory eats her, but he calms her down. Strzok calls Trump an idiot and other offenses and promises, I will stop Trump from being President.

Clinesmith always hides his action against Carter Page behind a fake innocence: I thought that what I wrote was true and I was only trying to save time and work. Really? A change that allows accusing a man of being a Russian spy and destroying his life forever? Let's jump a little ahead to see who Clinesmith really is. This is what he writes when Trump wins: "I just can't imagine the systematic disassembly of the progress we made over the last 8 years [under Obama]. [Obamacare] is gone. Who knows if the rhetoric about deporting people, walls, and crap is true. I honestly think that there is going to be a lot more gun issues, too. The crazies won finally. This is the tea party on steroids. And the GOP is going to be lost,