The Best American Nonrequired Reading 2011: The Best American Series

By Dave Eggers

The Best American Series®
First, Best, and Best-Selling

The Best American series is the premier annual showcase for the country’s finest short fiction and nonfiction. For each volume, the very best pieces are selected by a leading writer in the field, making the Best American series the most respected—and most popular—of its kind.

The Best American Nonrequired Reading 2011 includes

Daniel Alarcón, Clare Beams, Sloane Crosley, Anthony Doerr, Neil Gaiman, Mohammed

Hanif, Mac McClelland, Michael Paterniti, Olivier Schrauwen,
Gary Shteyngart, and others

• Language: English
• Publisher: HarperCollins
• Release date: Oct 4, 2011
• ISBN: 9780547678450

Dave Eggers

Dave Eggers, a former professional stundman, is the editor of McSweeney's and the author of the New York Times bestseller A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius.

Reviews for The Best American Nonrequired Reading 2011

[jbd1 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

This one I was less impressed with. There are some excellent pieces: Sherman Alexie's on identity, Mark Bowden's profile of Saddam Hussein, Chuck Klosterman on a tribute band, and George Packer's on the discarded-clothing market come to mind. Many of the others didn't do much for me, but I'm still glad I read them to get the full range of the collection.

[pecochran · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

This had some really good pieces, and a number of bad ones. I thought Jonathan Safran Foer inventing punctuation to tell his story was pretty silly. I didn't get the point of that at all. Pinkerton's piece on writing a suspense novel was hysterical, and Leroy's piece on Saddam Hussein was a very good piece. Most of the rest of it was somewhere in between.

[figre · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

When I read the 2006 Best American Non-required Reading collection, I knew I’d stumbled on something special (see the review). So, when I saw the 2003 version in a bookstore, I grabbed it quickly. And, an interesting set of comparisons ensued. First would be the comparison to its younger sibling. But, a more interesting comparison arises from my just having finished the 2003 Best American Essays (see the review.) Everything that was wrong with that collection – the pretentiousness, the rambling, the “art-or-art’s-sake” feel - disappears when someone just tries to collect good stories, essays, and etc. (And, yes, I meant to say “and etc.”) These collections seem to show that Eggers (whose McSweeney’s I have never been able to embrace) does not care so much about what the critics want, instead finding what might be considered popular (in the best spirit of the word) choices that you probably missed. In this collection, standouts include Ryan Boudinot’s “The Littlest Hitler” about the Halloween he dressed as Hitler; Mark Bowden’s “Tales of the Tyrant”, an insight to Saddam that, while it might be what we expect, is more than we knew; and David Drury’s story “Things we Knew When the House Caught Fire” which works at the level of kids not accepting the new kids, the new kids not accepting their roles, and trying to determine who really is better for their misunderstanding of what is going on around them. By the way, those are just the runners-up. “A Primer for the Punctuation of Heart Disease” mixes symbols with words (aren’t they really the same thing) to tell the story of families and impending deaths. “Touching Him” by Nasdijj is… Look, I can’t come up with the right words. It is about a foster father caring for a foster child with Aids. It talks about the fears and it talks about the pains. But it also talks about the intimacies of the two – about love. If I could explain it, I would have written it. There’s more, too. David Sedaris is always great, and “Lost Boys” by John Verbos is just strange and, while I’m not sure what it was, I liked visiting it. And all this leads to the comparison to the 2006 version. Would you believe me if I said I didn’t like it as much? I guess that just goes to show the strength of the 2006 version because, this is good. The only real difference I can find is that, the weak items were weaker in 2003 than in 2006. And with the list of standouts I just provided, you can guess that the number of weak items is very small.

[johnruexp_1 · Rating: 2 out of 5 stars]

I was surprised at how TEDIOUS some of the selections are - more like typing than writing. Part of the "writing for the sake of writing" epidemic that Eggers seems to encourage in a certain population of writers.Some good stuff hidden among the dross, however.