On Mr. Spencer's Data of Ethics
()
About this ebook
Related to On Mr. Spencer's Data of Ethics
Related ebooks
On Mr. Spencer's Data of Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpencer's Philosophy of Science The Herbert Spencer Lecture Delivered at the Museum 7 November, 1913 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIllustrations of Universal Progress: A Series of Discussions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCreative Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStalking the Wild Pendulum: On the Mechanics of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Where Is Science Going? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOur Knowledge of the External World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Treatise of Human Nature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLevolution: Cosmic Order by Means of Thermodynamic Natural Selection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPaths To Power Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn the Origin of Species (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA New Era of Thought Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMeaning in the Multiverse Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsToward an Organismic Subjectivity: Affect, Relation, Entanglement Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPragmatism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Reality Unveiled: The Reality Unveiled Collection, #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMeet Your Political Mind: The Interactions Between Instincts and Intellect and Its Impact on Human Behavior Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFramework of Reality: Understanding Our Subtle Spiritual Nature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOur Benevolent Cosmos: Embracing the Mystery of Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOutlines of Mormon Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMatter and Spirit (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMan Visible and Invisible Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Critical History of Greek Philosophy [Halls of Wisdom] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLevels of Awareness: From Microbes to Humans Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Unseen World and Other Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPragmatism and the Conception of Thruth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGerman philosophy and politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Classics For You
The Fellowship Of The Ring: Being the First Part of The Lord of the Rings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mythos Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Murder of Roger Ackroyd Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bell Jar: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Flowers for Algernon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rebecca Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Good Man Is Hard To Find And Other Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Things They Carried Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Warrior of the Light: A Manual Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Heroes: The Greek Myths Reimagined Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Odyssey: (The Stephen Mitchell Translation) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Animal Farm: A Fairy Story Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Silmarillion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jonathan Livingston Seagull: The New Complete Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We Have Always Lived in the Castle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As I Lay Dying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Learn French! Apprends l'Anglais! THE PICTURE OF DORIAN GRAY: In French and English Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5East of Eden Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Old Man and the Sea: The Hemingway Library Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Iliad: The Fitzgerald Translation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Canterbury Tales Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sun Also Rises: The Hemingway Library Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Confederacy of Dunces Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sense and Sensibility (Centaur Classics) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Titus Groan Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Poisonwood Bible: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wuthering Heights (with an Introduction by Mary Augusta Ward) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5For Whom the Bell Tolls: The Hemingway Library Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for On Mr. Spencer's Data of Ethics
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
On Mr. Spencer's Data of Ethics - Malcolm Guthrie
Malcolm Guthrie
On Mr. Spencer's Data of Ethics
EAN 8596547410539
DigiCat, 2022
Contact: DigiCat@okpublishing.info
Table of Contents
PREFACE.
CHAPTER I. Ethics and the Unification of Knowledge. The Philosophical View.
CHAPTER II. The Scientific View of the Evolution of Ethics.
CHAPTER III. The Biological View of Ethics.
Altruism in Egoism.
CHAPTER IV. The Sociological View.
CHAPTER V. The Ethical Imperative.
CHAPTER VI. Systems of Ethics.
CHAPTER VII. The Evolution of Free Will.
CHAPTER VIII. Evolution, Ethics, and Religion.
CHAPTER IX. SUMMARY.
PREFACE.
Table of Contents
This volume completes the critical examination of Mr. Spencer's system of Philosophy already pursued through two previous volumes entitled respectively On Mr. Spencer's Formula of Evolution,
and On Mr. Spencer's Unification of Knowledge.
The entire task has been undertaken by a student for the use of students. It cannot be of much use to the general reader, as it presumes and indeed requires a very intimate knowledge of Mr. Spencer's works. For those who do not wish to enter into detailed examination perhaps Chapter I. of the Unification of Knowledge
will afford a good epitome of the line of criticism; and this may be followed, if desired, by a perusal of the Formula of Evolution.
It is believed that the most serious piece of criticism against Mr. Spencer's system will be found in the examination of his re-constructive Biology in Chapter V. of the Unification,
and in the examination of the origin of organic molecules commencing at page 30 of the Formula of Evolution.
Evidently of the highest importance in a system of philosophy conceived in the manner in which Mr. Spencer presents it, this point of transition between the inorganic and the organic with its dependent histories is of the very deepest fundamental interest, and upon the question whether it is well or badly treated depends the practical value of his philosophy as applied to human concerns.
In our opinion, whatever of worth there is in Mr. Spencer's works (and there is very much), derives its value from a posteriori grounds and not from its a priori reliance upon first principles, nor from its place in a deductive system of cosmic philosophy. It has not fallen to our lot, nor has it been our object, to appraise the separate or incidental value of Mr. Spencer's works. Our view has been limited to the single object of examining them in the mode in which he presents them, as forming a connected system of philosophy. We have done so because he sets forth his works to us in this light, and evidently if they can be so accepted, it would be a gift to humanity of the highest value, for it would lend cogency to every past and confer a guidance to all future ages, forming a crowning glory to the intellectual achievements of the human race.
It is therefore to this point that we address our examination, and in no unfriendly spirit; for the object Mr. Spencer had in view was one which appealed to every sentiment and every intellectual aspiration within us. But we feel bound to say how sadly we have been disappointed. We have found the object of our admiration to be like Nebuchadnezzar's dream god, a thing apparently perfect and complete in configuration but like the image compounded of iron and clay and precious stones inevitably falling to pieces under the strain of sustained criticisms.
Mr. Spencer's philosophic conception was indeed imposing, and before its magnificent proportions many have bowed down in sincere respect. But his cosmical scheme when carefully examined proved to be constructed of terms which had no fixed and definite meaning, which were in fact merely symbols of symbolic conceptions, conceptions themselves symbolic because they were not understood—and the moment we began to put them to use as having definite values they landed us forthwith in alternative contradictions! Then to effect cosmical evolution, which is a process of imperceptible objective change, what was necessary, but to adopt a system of imperceptible word changes, so that the imperceptible word changes accompanying the imperceptible objective changes should lead us in the end to the completed results, and the process of evolution should thus be made comprehensible! In this manner over the spaces of an enormous work have we been skilfully led by a master of language till we find ourselves in imagination following out mentally the actual processes of the universe. But after all it has only been a process, in our own minds, of the skilful substitution of words!
Errors to be successful must be big and bold. Fallacies of reasoning are detected on a medium scale, but when they are writ large
it is difficult to detect them. Trains of syllogisms are sometimes more effective because they are vast than because they are true. Let them be imposing in their language and grand in their proportions, we naturally bow down to power, even if it is only power of largeness. When dealing with Mr. Spencer's reasonings we feel a certain awe as if we were contradicting the forces of the universe—seemingly allied to him. We feel conscious of an impertinence in treating of such great matters, dealt with in such a mighty sweep—disdainful of precision and consistency. The transformations and evolutions of reasoning in Mr. Spencer's works are no less wonderful than his treatment of words. The mind is swept along by an indiscernable but mighty flow, and sometimes after mysterious disappearances of consecutiveness between volumes or chapters, we find ourselves landed in a satisfied but bewildered manner at a conclusion about which we cannot but wonder however we arrived there.
By such terms as equilibration, including the theory of the moving equilibrium; by such terms as polarity plastic and coercive; and by plausible similarities between modes of process, we are deluded into supposing we understand the constructive progress of nature and are made to feel happy and proud of our knowledge. A great self satisfaction attends the student who believes himself rightly to understand the universe. We are pleased with our teacher, and are still more pleased with ourselves.
But the real difficulty appears when the necessity for exposition arises. If one undertakes to explain, if one has to condense and solidify for the purpose of teaching, if one wishes to make others understand, and share the knowledge one has attained, then indeed our difficulties commence. What seemed so grand and alluring to look at will not stand the ordinary handling of scientific language and logical statement as between man and man. The illusion vanishes, the system has gone. In these remarks we speak only of Mr. Spencer's cosmical system. Of the general value of this work as a philosopher we express no opinion. In the estimation of competent thinkers it is very great. Fiske, Youmans, Carveth Read, Ribot, Maudsley, Clifford, Sully, Grant Allen, Gopinay, and others are all working on Spencerian lines, but we do not understand that they accept the cosmical explanation of Mr. Spencer. He marks not the age of complete accomplishment but the age of transition. He has not grasped the solution of problems, but he has shewn the direction of future studies. He has failed in his grand endeavour, but he has shown what to aim at and has pointed the way. Much of his detailed work has been good and effective, and therefore one feels some compunction in writing of him so severely. Nevertheless a man of such eminence must not be held sacred from criticism, but on the contrary, just by reason of his eminence and consequent influence, must his work be well examined before it is accepted and approved. This is the task we have set ourselves and which may now be considered as complete. We have approached the study without any prepossessions, and we have endeavoured, while being very strict, to be perfectly fair and honest in our presentations of Mr. Spencer's theories. Naturally the work has been long and tedious, and where so many contradictory and indistinct expressions of opinion are given it has been necessary to deal largely in quotations. This has been done in justice both to ourselves and to our author. If we have succeeded in bringing out the main lines of thought for the future use of students we shall have accomplished our end. It is only by very strict thinking and discussion that truth is finally evolved.
A few words must be added as to the teleological implications which a Westminster reviewer has discovered in our previous works, and has regarded as vitiating the whole of their reasoning. The subject of teleology is a very interesting and puzzling one, and is bound to receive careful attention from the student of nature. It requires much consideration as to what is meant by the term. There may be a natural teleology apart from a supernatural teleology. We have no very clear conceptions upon this point ourselves as yet, but are at present engaged upon the study of the question. Intention and design are exemplified in human actions, means to an end are adopted by many animals; the Moving Equilibrium
theory, and the Happy Accident
theory alike seem inadequate to account for the origin of natural teleology or even for all variations of species; and the study of biological developments suggests to us the presence and activity of a subjective factor related to physical factors by some law to which may be due the origin of some of the biological variations. Mr. Spencer's theory of biological variations as internal forces generated by external forces, and thus acting as a counterbalance in opposition to an inimical force, or in harmony with a favourable force, having for its object the protection or sustentation of the organism, is an altogether different theory from the agnostic Happy Accident
hypothesis of the naturalist school. It implies the origin of biological variations as means adapted to ends in the preservation of the organism or species, and if this is not found workable on the physical equilibration hypothesis, some extension of theory is required to account for the origin of biological variations in which teleological implications are involved, although this theory may be truly naturalistic and in perfect harmony with an orderly development in the manner of evolution. If we cannot predicate an anthropomorphic teleological mind at the beginning of things, nevertheless a teleology appears to be involved in biological developments and requires a naturalistic explanation.
M. Lionel Dauriac[1] enquires how it comes about that, while accepting the theory of Evolution, we write a book of 476 pages against its most illustrious exponent, and asks us to explain our acceptance of the