Spirit Whirled: The Holy Sailors

By Dylan Saccoccio

Book V takes the reader to Ancient Britain and uses its languages to unlock its history. The Etrusco-Phoenician origins of the ancient Britons connect them to the ancient universal empire that was forgotten about or covered up to preserve Mosaic history. Architecture and religious rites are also unveiled to demonstrate the interconnectedness of cultures we were told had nothing to do with each other. When you are ready, embark on the journey of the Holy Sailors.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Dylan Michael Saccoccio
• Release date: Nov 2, 2022
• ISBN: 9798357054098

Dylan Saccoccio

Ancient History • Astrotheology • Language MasteryMy work will save you thousands of hours and millions of dollars (should you be an entrepreneur) so you can learn the system of priestcraft that governs this world without sacrificing your health, your mental well-being, and the best years of your life trying to figure it out on your own. Not only will you become unhexable, if you do the work in Get Mad or Get Realistic, you will dial in your physique and become top-shelf. Only the strong survive.

Book preview

Spirit Whirled:

The Holy Sailors

DYLAN SACCOCCIO

Copyright © 2022 Dylan Michael Saccoccio

All rights reserved.

DEDICATION

To my mother, Kathryn of Troy

To Ric & Deb of Troy

To my grandmother Catherine of Cæsar, who freed me from the shackles of debt.

All glory to Æsar, the Creator of this realm. In the words of Wordsworth, Nature never did betray the heart that loved her.

CONTENTS

Acknowledgments

1 The Furthest Settlement

2 Ancient Britain

3 Dioi Pelasgoi

4 Etrusco-Phoenician Celtæ

5 Irish Language

6 The Old Beginning of Time

7 Druids

8 Universal Frozen Music

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Thank you to those who give me a voice while I am censored by all of the major social media platforms: Corvus Thrice Seven, Chance Garton, Patrick Daly, Rob Edward, Rose777, Jason Lindgren, The Lady Palace Podcast, and those of you who have shared my work with others. None of this would be possible without you.

1 The Furthest Settlement

An ancient universal empire has been forgotten or covered up. I suspect the later, but I will concede it’s possible that once those who knew the Truth passed away, the knowledge became lost. The purpose of this work is to support others who’ve concluded the same but were running out of artifacts to prove their claims. There are only so many peculiar superstitions (that have no scientific validity), religious rites, astronomical observations and errors, calendar systems (and their mistakes), languages, idioms, allegorical stories taught as history, architecture, systems of government and conveyance, and other patterns that a culture can share before it becomes mathematically impossible for these customs not to be introduced by a common source or for them not to be descended from the same empire or people. Woodward on the Wisdom of Egypt wrote, "The colonies all carried these customs along with them to their several abodes: and there were from the very beginning priests, sacrifices, temples, festivals, and lustrations, as well among the ancient Germans and Gauls, in Peru and Mexico, in Siam, China, and Japan, as in Egypt."

Rev. Faber wrote (Orig. Pag. Idol. Bk. IV. ch. v. ed. 4to. P. 360.), The religion of the Celts, as professed in Gaul and Britain, is palpably the same as that of the Hindoos and Egyptians; the same also as that of the Canaanites, the Phrygians, the Greeks, and the Romans.

Again (Ib. Bk. III. ch. iii.), Conon says, that the Phœnicians once possessed the empire of Asia; that they made Egyptian Thebes their capital; and that Cadmus, migrating thence into Europe, built Boeotian Thebes, and called it after the name of his native town.

I don’t know if this is fantasy or if there is Truth in it, but it’s worthy of considering in case it inspires you to look somewhere you might have otherwise disregarded. Camden wrote (Gough’s Camd. Brit. pref. p. lxxiii.), "Britain is described by Orpheus, in the poems which were really written by Onomacritus, who lived in the time of the Pisistratidæ, according to Clemens Alexandrinus and Tatian, all which proves that Britain was known near 200 years before Aristotle (384 – 322 BC), and the ancient geographers Dicearchus and Eratosthenes, and still more ancient Pytheas."

Justus Lipsius quoted Aristotle (Arist. in admirandis.), In mari extra Herculis columnas, insulam desertam inventam fuisse, silvâ nemorosam, fluviis navigabilem, fructibus uberem, multorum dierum navigatione distantem, in quam crebo Carthaginienses commearint, et multi sedes etiam fixerunt; sed veritos primores, ne minis loci illius opes convalescerent, et Carthaginis laberentur, edicto cavisse et pœna capitis sanxisse, nequis eò navigasse deinceps vellet.

Translated as, "In the sea outside the columns of Hercules (Pillars of Hercules at the Strait of Gibraltar), a deserted island had been found, wooded with wood, navigable by rivers, plentiful with fruits, by a distant voyage of many days, into which the Carthaginians had frequently migrated; and many also pitched their settlements; but the chief men, fearing that the wealth of that place might recover by threats, and that Carthage should fall away, had guarded against an edict, and sanctioned a capital punishment, that no one would wish to have sailed thither afterward."

Regarding this, Lipsus wrote (J. Lipsius, Vol. IV. p. 594.), "Quod verum censeo de una aliqua novarum insularum: quia multos dies navigatione impendet; neque probabile igitur Canarias, aut alias vicinas, fuisse. Noster Seneca (nam ille Tragediæ Medeæ certò auctor est) de iis ipsis prædixisse videtur, pueris jam decantatum— (Which I think is true of one of the new islands, because he spends many days on a voyage; nor was it probable, therefore, that the Canaries or other neighboring tribes were. Our Seneca (for he is certainly the author of the Tragedy of Medea) seems to have foretold about them, having already been sung to children.)

"—venient annis

Sæcula seris, quibus oceanus

Vincula rerum laxet, et ingens

Pateat tellus, Tiphysque novos

Deteget orbes, nec sit terris

Ultima Thule.

A time will come, in ages now remote,

When the vast barrier by the ocean form’d

May yield a passage; when new continents,

And other worlds, beyond the sea’s expanse,

May be explored; when Thule’s distant shores

May not be deemed the last abode of man.

Quod ille tamen propriè de Britannicis insulis intellexit, et in Claudii gratiam scripsit. (Which he, however, understood properly of the British islands, and wrote in the favor of Claudius.)

Higgins wrote (Celt. Drui. p. 90.), "There can be no doubt that the British isles were known to the ancient Phœnicians and Greeks, as Herodotus called them Cassiterides or the countries of tin; and it was chiefly on account of the abundance of this, at that time scarce metal, that they were an object of attention. This word is the Celtic Casse-tair, pronounced Cassiter, to which the Greeks added their peculiar termination os, and formed Cassiteros. Casse-tair signifies the vulgar, or base sheet or bar, to distinguish it from silver, which is called Airgad—i.e. the precious sheet or bar." (Toland, Hud., p. 341.)

In the Phoenician tongue it was Baratanac, a land of tin. One cannot ignore bara, creation or formation, in the word. The word –tan is a common termination, seen in Mauritania (land of the Moors), Aquitania (land of waters), Lusitania (land of the Lusitani, an Ibero-Celtic tribe; land of Light), Bastitania (land of the Bastuli; ancient Iberians), and Turdetania (land of the Turdetani). Is Turdetania encoding Tur (Lord) + devani (celestial goddess)? Laxe Das Rodas petroglyph looks similar to those at Ormaig. But it’s in Spain while Ormaig is in Scotland. The Turdetani are claimed to be the first to people the Iberian Peninsula, and they were Celts. However, they were in the south while Laxe Das Rodas is in the northwest. Was this a port that they used to get to Britain?

Borlase noticed what I suspected, but in coming across his words, I couldn’t help but noticing abiri (אבירי) in Britannia as well, which would be in Abury. According to Borlase (Corn. ch. i. p. 4.), It may not be amiss to refer it to the learned as a thing to be considered, whether the former part of the word Britain may not be found in the Hebrew language, which, as we are well assured, is the ground of the Phœnicians and ancient Celtic.

Again, "In the British tongue there are many (see Rowland’s Mona, iii. p. 278.), some say 300 Hebrew roots to be found, which will make it not unlikely to find the root of Brit in that sacred language. There ברא bra in Pihal (Pehal, Rajasthan), signifies, to cut off or divide, and with the ת t added (an usual termination of nouns derived from verbs, as ברית brit, fœdus, &c.) will signify, a division or separation; and doubtless this is the first idea that strikes us, when we compare the situation of Britain with that of its neighbouring countries on the continent, from which it is so entirely divided:"

Et penitus toto divisos orbe Britannos.

And the Britons were scattered all over the world.

I also see berith (pronounced breet) in Brit, which is a covenant. Tin corresponds to Jupiter. Is this nation symbolic of a covenant with Jupiter?

Whitaker (Hist. of Brit. Asserted, p. 94.) inspired me to look into Aremorica, which I suspect is the real etymology of America. He wrote, "The original word appears to have been equally pronounced Brict, Brits, and Bricth, Breact, Breac, and Brig; and appears to be derived from the Gallic Bresche, a rupture, the Irish Bris, to break and Brisead, a breach. And the word occurs with all this variety of termination in the Irish Breattain or Breatin, Bretam, and in Breathnach, Briotnach, and Breagnach, a Briton; in the Armorican names of Breton, Breiz, and Brezonnec, for an individual, the country, and the language of Armorica; in the Welsh Brython and Brythoneg, the Britons and their language; and in the ancient synonymous appellations of Brigantes and Britanni. But how shall we lengthen Brit into Britanni and Britones? We cannot with Camden call in the Greek τανια, for a country, to our aid. And we must not with Pezron and Carte adopt the equivalent Tain of the Celtic."

Aremorica is a word that describes a region by the sea, meaning place in front of the sea. If there be any Truth to Celtic people in America prior to Columbus, especially on account of St. Columba, then it’d be necessary to cover up the Celts as well with the lie that America is named after Amerigo Vespucci. It would also account for the various cultures already here. Pliny listed tribes of Aremorica as the Aedui, Carnuteni, Meldi, Secusiani, Boii, Senones, Aulerci (both the Eburovices and Cenomani), the Parisii, Tricasses, Andicavi, Viducasses, Bodiocasses, Veneti, Coriovelites, Diablinti, Rhedones, Turones, and the Atseui. As the Vikings settled, Armorica became known as Normandy, with its western part becoming Brittany. You will notice the same pattern of w and m interchanging in the Latin and Sanskrit as in the Celtic word vor for sea, the v resembling the Sanskrit w. In Breton, on sea is war vor.

Lhwyd wrote (Pref. to Etymol. p. 267.), The Armoric Britons do not pretend to be Gauls, but call the neighbouring provinces such, and their language Galek; whereas they term their own Brezonek, (that British,) as indeed it is, being yet almost as intelligible to our Cornish as the language of the illiterate countrymen of the West of England to those of the North.

Higgins wrote (Celt. Drui. p. 94.), "Bochart says, that the Phœnicians called Ireland נאה-עבר obr-nae, that is ultima habitatio; and that אלבין Albin implies the East; whence Britain, to the East of Ireland."

Ultima Habitatio means furthest or last settlement. This is significant because Hebrew is Obri when transliterated.

Davies wrote (Cel. Res. p. 309.), "Amongst other nations, the dispersed and scattered members of the system appear as fragments of high antiquity, in terms, customs, and superstitions; but its fundamental principles of remote antiquity were either forgotten, or locked up amongst the mysteries of the sacred orders. The secrets of the Magi, the Orpheans, the priests of the Cabiri, and of Egypt, perished with each of their institutions. We cannot, therefore, expect from Greece and Rome, and much less from the sacred volume, a complete elucidation of their arcana. But, abating for some instances of local improvements and corruptions, we may at once pronounce the Druids to have been of the same class. The discipline they enforced, the sciences they taught, and the opinions they inculcated, were in general the same. The source from whence they had professed uniformly to have derived them was the same; viz., from the ship of Dylan, the son of the sea, who survived, with his single family, when the world was drowned."

The etymology of Cabiri comes from cbir, כביר (with the supplied vowel), which is identical to the Phoenician version according to Higgins (Ib. 178.). It means strong, or powerful, similar to the Arabic Kabir. Kavi in Sanskrit means a poet or great thinker. Why not call it a sage? The Cabiri are the first three powers of God, the Creation, Preservation, and Destruction. Some had them at three; other countries at eight, or twelve, but the idea laid up in them is that they are omnipotent Gods. It is clear they are astrotheological or took their names after astrotheological symbolism.

M. Baillie wrote (Let. VIII. to Voltaire, p. 233.), After what we have said of the difficulty of the communications, we cannot imagine that the Druids have quitted their forests two or three thousand years ago to go to school with the Bramins or the Magi, or that the latter have visited our ancestors. The probability is, that the world has been peopled or conquered by natives of the North of Asia, who have extended themselves into all parts, East, West, and South.

The biggest challenge is accounting for how these systems exist in places where the DNA doesn’t match between the natives and those who allegedly brought the systems there. Surely there would have been prominent cultures that had Asian or Indian looking leaders left behind, but we do not see that directly. However, I’ve noticed quite a bit of European rulers don’t have the Gallic or Celtic phenotypes. So perhaps the ethnicity is there but only in trace amounts on account of how long ago the regions were peopled and how many different cultures have since peopled them. But where ethnicity may be bred out of a people, the language still connects them. Samhan is the image of the sun. In Arabic it is Schams, the sun; in Hebrew, שמש (shemesh); in Chaldee, שמשא, shemesha; in Syrian, Schemscho; in Pehlvi, Schemsia; in Sanskrit, Hamsa. (Bryant’s Anal. Vol. I. p. 284.)

Some of you will be amazed to learn the connections of these cultures. You will wonder why you were taught a historical narrative contrary to reality, a complete inversion of the Truth. If you have not read the previous books in this series, it is imperative that you do to bring yourself up to speed with the most common objection of the ignorant, Why would they lie?

The answer is simple. It is human nature, the primary motivator that drives all life: self-preservation. The institutions that control the nations destroy cultures and forge history in order to preserve the narratives they’ve taught their subjects, because the narratives justify their positions of authority and their control of the system. Three can keep a secret if two are dead. If a secret would destroy someone, but that individual could destroy the evidence that reveals the secret, and it is within his means, he will likely destroy the evidence rather than incriminate himself. We see this on the micro scale in things like witness protection, a service created to prevent the murder of witnesses so they can testify against powerful and influential criminals. We also see it on the macro scale in the destruction of cultures like the Americans, by the Spanish Empire at the behest of the Inquisition, because the things found in their culture debunk the narrative of Mosaic history. Higgins observed (Anac. Vol. II. p. 225.), When the priest cannot darken or throw into confusion, he burns, he forges, and he lies.

Why is it worth my time to expose a lie? An old proverb says it best: a lie uncontradicted for a fortnight is as good as a Truth. From the initial lies, the unsuspecting consumers process bad information and then evangelize nonsense. Before long, the masses have accepted falsehood as Truth. Why did I have to expose the fraud that is Scripture? Because the majority of people believe in nonsense and use it to justify their behavior, just like the so-called Semites believed Scripture authorized them to enslave the Africans, who were thought to be the descendants of Ham on account of Ham meaning blackness. Gen9:25, Cursed is Canaan, Servant of servants he is to his brethren.

But there was no Noah, and thus no Shem, Japheth, or Ham. The presumptions of this iniquitous system must be defeated. Faber wrote (Pag. Idol. Vol. III. p. 650.), It is said to have been a regular part of the atheistical system, on the continent, to misquote and misrepresent ancient authors; and the honest principle of it is this: where one reader is capable of following the citer, ten will be incapable; of those who are capable, where one takes the trouble to do it, ten will not take the trouble; and of those who detect the falsehood, where one steps forward to expose it, ten will be silent. It may, therefore, never be detected; and if it be detected, the voice of a single individual, when the efforts of a whole conspiracy are employed to drown it, will be heard to a very little distance.

An empire spanning continents requires one thing: advanced nautical navigation. The only culture that satisfies this skill, combined with the use of letters, skills in trade and commerce, secrets preserved in allegories, advanced astronomy, and compasses to navigate by night and day, enabling them to make long journeys across oceans, is the Phoenicians. Before we can explain the Americas, namely Peru and Mexico, we must explore the great maritime culture and their secret treasure that gave them an advantage for a long time: the islands of Britain. As we delve into Britain, we see systems of control that trace all the way back to Asia. Throughout this book you will read quotes from centuries ago, a time when words were spelled differently and grammar rules were different. I have done my best to preserve the original spellings for most of it, but if it is unpleasant to the eyes, I apologize in advance. However, I think there is benefit in these studies to see how your own language used to look.

Fabius Pictor wrote (Raleigh’s Hist. Par. I. p. 91.), In the time of Janus there was no monarchy, for the desire of rule had not then folded itself about the hearts of men. Janus first taught the people to sacrifice wine and bread: he first set up alters, and instituted gardens and solitary groves, wherein they used to pray; with other holy rites and ceremonies. (Latin on p. 254, Anac. Vol. II.)

An example of astrological allegories being used as historical pretext is shown in the Gauls. However, to be Gaulish is predicated on being descended from Noah, on account of being the eldest son of Japheth, just like the first king of Britain (Silvius) is also predicated on being a descendent of Noah by way of Japheth. How would we describe the Gauls in a historical context without this lie of being Gomerites? André Duchesne wrote (Les Antiquitez et Recherches des Villes, &c., 1609, pp. 292, 294-296.), Cette ville est l’une des plus antiques, non de l’Europe, mais de toute la Terre. Les Gomerites envoyés pour peupler la Gaule Celtique, en jettèrent les premiers fondemens du temps de Noé, ce second père et ancêtre de la race des hommes, sous la conduite du grand Samothes.—Aujourd-hui la ville de Chartres se glorifie de son Eglise Cathédrale comme du plus ancien temple de la Chrétienté.—Avant que Cæsar l’eût assujettie à la grandeur de l’Empire, par tant de diverses guerres, les Seigneurs et Roitelets qui eurent la reserve de son gouvernement avoient puisé quelque créance dans la doctrine des Druides que d’une Vierge devoit naître au monde le Rédempteur des humains. Créance qui occasionna le gouverneur Priscus de la faire tirer et figurer embrassant un petit enfant, lui donner rang parmi les statues des ses Dieux et lui offrir des sacrifices.

Translated as, This city is one of the most ancient, not in Europe, but in all the Earth. The Gomerites sent to populate Celtic Gaul, laid its first foundations in the time of Noah, that second father and ancestor of the race of men, under the leadership of the great Samothes.—Today the city of Chartres boasts of its Cathedral Church as the oldest temple of Christianity.—Before Cæsar had subjugated her to the greatness of the Empire, by so many various wars, the Lords and Wrens who had the reserve of her government had drawn some credence from the doctrine of the Druids that of a Virgin, the Redeemer of mankind must be born into the world. A creed which occasioned Governor Priscus to have it drawn and depicted embracing a small child, giving it rank among the statues of its gods and offering sacrifices to it.

Again, "Miracle qui l’emporta aisément avec Priscus au bâtiment d’un temple à l’honneur de cette Vierge laquell n’avoit encore vu la lumière du Soleil, et qui ne la vit de plusieurs centaines d’ans après.—St. Pierre, chef des Apôtres, délégua les bien-heureux saints Savinian et Potentian en la Guale, les quells s’étant arrêtés à Chartres, trouvèrent que ce peuple honoroit déja la mémoire de la Vierge, qui devoit nous produire le Fils de Dieu, et que pour relever davantage son honneur et sa gloire ils lui avoient superbement bâti ce