World War II Aeronautical Research at Langley
()
About this ebook
The effort to win the war began at home--and for the researchers at Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory, enhancing America's military aviation arsenal was the key to victory.
Formed in 1915, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics established itself over the next 25 years as one of the world's finest research organizations. When World War II began in 1939, the NACA employed a mere 500 workers and maintained a budget slightly in excess of $4 million. To meet the demands of the war, a special partnership was quickly forged between NACA researchers, industry designers, and military planners. The Langley laboratory possessed world class aeronautical research facilities and flight research operations, making it ideally suited to help America win the war.
Military historian Mark Chambers tells the story of the monumental task of developing the planes that spurred Allied victory in World War II.
Mark A. Chambers
Mark A. Chambers works as a technical writer for Huntington Ingalls Industries/Newport News Shipbuilding in Newport News, Virginia. He is the author of six Arcadia Publishing/The History Press titles: Flight Research at NASA Langley Research Center, Naval Air Station Patuxent River, NASA Kennedy Space Center, Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Naval Air Station Norfolk and Naval Air Station Oceana Fleet Defenders.
Read more from Mark A. Chambers
Naval Air Station Patuxent River Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNaval Air Station Norfolk Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJoint Base Langley-Eustis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNASA Kennedy Space Center Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to World War II Aeronautical Research at Langley
Related ebooks
Battle Line: The United States Navy, 1919-1939 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Naval Institute on the Panama Canal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVirginia Aviation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow Carriers Fought: Carrier Operations in World War II Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Conduct And Support Of Amphibious Operations From United States Submarines In World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerica's First Aircraft Carrier: USS Langley and the Dawn of U.S. Naval Aviation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Untaken Road: Strategy, Technology, and the Hidden History of America's Mobile ICBMs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWarriors and Wizards: The Development and Defeat of Radio-Controlled Glide Bombs of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Total Undersea War: The Evolutionary Role of the Snorkel in Dönitz's U-Boat Fleet, 1944–1945 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tanks: 100 years of evolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gators of Neptune: Naval Amphibious Planning for the Normandy Invasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Striking the Hornets' Nest: Naval Aviation and the Origins of Strategic Bombing in World War I Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAircraft Carriers of the United States Navy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Destined for Glory: Dive Bombing, Midway, and the Evolution of Carrier Airpower Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5World War 2 In Review No. 38 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBritish Aircraft Carriers: Design, Development & Service Histories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Builders and Fighters: U.S. Army Engineers in World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScientists Against Time: The Role of Scientists in World War Ii Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCaptured Eagles: Secrets of the Luftwaffe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Rise of the War Machines: The Birth of Precision Bombing in World War II Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5On Seas Contested: The Seven Great Navies of the Second World War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Marine Close Air Support In World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsD-Day Encyclopedia: Everything You Want to Know About the Normandy Invasion Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Naval Firepower: Battleship Guns and Gunnery in the Dreadnought Era Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On Wave and Wing: The 100 Year Quest to Perfect the Aircraft Carrier Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mighty Eighth: Masters of the Air over Europe 1942–45 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAssured Destruction: Building the Ballistic Missile Culture of the U.S. Air Force Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5At the Dawn of Airpower: The U.S. Army, Navy, and Marine Corps' Approach to the Airplane, 1907–1917 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUS Airborne Tanks, 1939–1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat Kept The Tank From Being The Decisive Weapon Of World War One? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Wars & Military For You
How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The History of the Peloponnesian War: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5When I Come Home Again: 'A page-turning literary gem' THE TIMES, BEST BOOKS OF 2020 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Plane in the Sky: An Oral History of 9/11 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Faithful Spy: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Plot to Kill Hitler Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Washington: The Indispensable Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Heart of Everything That Is: The Untold Story of Red Cloud, An American Legend Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Afghanistan Papers: A Secret History of the War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mein Kampf: The Original, Accurate, and Complete English Translation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings77 Days of February: Living and Dying in Ukraine, Told by the Nation’s Own Journalists Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for World War II Aeronautical Research at Langley
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
World War II Aeronautical Research at Langley - Mark A. Chambers
INTRODUCTION
When America entered World War II on December 8, 1941, it was ill prepared for battle. The nation’s naval, army and marine corps air forces possessed air fleets that featured largely obsolescent aircraft that were inferior performance-wise and outnumbered by the Axis nations’ military air fleets. By 1945, however, the United States’ air forces were equipped with some of the world’s most advanced combat aircraft and technologies, largely thanks to the war-winning aeronautical research efforts conducted by the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics’ (NACA’s) Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory (LMAL) in Hampton, Virginia. These remarkable research efforts, as described in this book, ultimately helped spur Allied victory in the war.
During the early years of the war, America’s military air fleets were outclassed by enemy opposition in the air. For example, during the Battles of the Coral Sea and Midway, the U.S. Navy was still using obsolescent Douglas TBD Devastator torpedo bombers, which were often easily shot down by fast, nimble Japanese Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero fighters. When the venerable Devastator’s replacement, the more advanced Grumman TBF Avenger, came online, the prototype aircraft was sent to the LMAL for extensive wind-tunnel and flight testing that helped make the aircraft one of the most advanced torpedo bombers of World War II. In addition, the U.S. Navy’s premier fleet defender at the time, the Grumman F4F Wildcat, was inferior to the Japanese Zero in terms of performance. The U.S. Army’s premier air-superiority fighter at the time, the Curtiss P-40 Tomahawk/Warhawk, was inferior to German fighters such as the Messerschmitt Bf-109 and Focke-Wulf Fw-190. U.S. Army heavy bombers, such as the Consolidated B-24 Liberator and Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, during the early years of the war, suffered heavy losses from enemy fighters and flak, and many invaluable bomber aircrews were lost when their aircraft were forced to make water landings (ditch) in the oceans due to extensive damage sustained in combat. These were some of the issues confronting U.S. war planners, aircraft industry leaders and the military services during the early years of World War II.
Formed in 1915 to supervise and direct the scientific study of the problems of flight with a view to their practical solution,
the NACA established itself over the next twenty-five years as one of the world’s finest research organizations. When World War II began in 1939, the NACA employed a mere five hundred workers and maintained a budget slightly in excess of $4 million. To meet the demands of the war, a special partnership was quickly forged between NACA researchers, industry designers and military planners. The LMAL possessed world-class and unique aeronautical research facilities and flight research operations, making it ideally suited for enhancing America’s military aviation arsenal and performing the monumental task of spurring Allied victory in World War II.
PART I
AERONAUTICAL RESEARCH PERFORMED IN GROUND FACILITIES
When World War I began in 1914, the European nations each had over one thousand aircraft in their military air arsenals. In stark contrast, the United States had only twenty-three aircraft in its arsenal. To help industry jump-start aircraft development in the United States, Congress approved the formation of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), the predecessor government agency to today’s National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). In 1917, an area near Hampton, Virginia, was selected as the site for the agency’s first research laboratory. Established as the nation’s first civilian-led aeronautical research laboratory, the Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory (LMAL) would go on to profoundly impact the field of aeronautics, not only in America but also around the world. During the years between World War I and World War II, numerous aeronautical research facilities were constructed at the LMAL that would serve as crucial tools in assisting the development of the aircraft needed to fight and win the war. These facilities proved to be significant contributors to providing design theories and data, problem-solving and evaluations of emerging aircraft concepts.
Due to the increased threat of German aerial attack and the presence of German U-boats off the U.S. East Coast, the Army Air Forces decided to camouflage NACA Langley facilities by applying a coat of olive-drab paint in 1942. This photo, taken in 1943, depicts various camouflaged NACA facility buildings (from left to right): the Full-Scale Tunnel, 20-Foot Spin Tunnel, 12-Foot Free-Flight Tunnel, 15-Foot Free-Spinning Tunnel, 19-Foot Pressure Tunnel and Tow Tank.
1
VARIABLE DENSITY TUNNEL (VDT)
In 1922, a radical, new, game-changing
research that immensely affected the progress of aeronautics globally commenced in a new wind tunnel at the NACA LMAL. The wind tunnel, consisting of a steel pressure cylinder manufactured at the Newport News Shipyard in Virginia, was called the Variable Density Tunnel (VDT). The VDT was built to assist in the development and study of advanced low-drag airfoils at high Reynolds numbers. In the VDT, airfoils could be studied at a total of twenty atmospheres. In addition to consisting of a pressure shell, the VDT also possessed a drive motor and pressure line from a compressor.
A design team of researchers headed by Max M. Munk, who emigrated from Göttingen, Germany, to America and NACA Langley, designed the VDT. Munk was an ingenious student of the famous German professor Ludwig Prandtl. Munk and his American research assistants, Ira H. Abbott and Albert Von Doenhoff, worked to develop a detailed, comprehensive catalog or bible
of low-drag airfoils that were ultimately incorporated on Allied aircraft designs before and during World War II (from the late 1930s to 1945).
Over one hundred airfoils were tested in the VDT. VDT researchers, including Eastman N. Jacobs, continued to work low-drag and boundary layer problems related to airfoils in their facility during the war. They soon received encouraging laboratory results that led to the advocacy for a new low-turbulence tunnel at the NACA LMAL. This advocacy later led to the development of the NACA Langley Low Turbulence Pressure Tunnel (LTPT).
This 1928 schematic shows the VDT operational setup. The wood-built, closed-throat, annular-return VDT was enclosed in a pressurized tank and had a top speed of 51 miles per hour.
This diagram depicts the various airfoils developed in the VDT.
2
PROPELLER RESEARCH TUNNEL (PRT)
Following World War I, the NACA sought to study propeller efficiency problems precipitated by the reduction of propeller performance at the tips at high speeds.¹ Navy engineer Fred Weick recommended in 1923 that the NACA undertake the construction of a wind tunnel possessing a twenty-foot-diameter throat and the capability to attain speeds approaching 100 miles per hour (mph) to conduct full-scale propeller tests. In 1925, construction efforts led by Director of Aeronautical Research George W. Lewis, commenced at NACA Langley on what would become known as the Propeller Research Tunnel (PRT). Construction of the new facility was finished by 1927. The facility became the first large-scale wind tunnel at the NACA LMAL. The PRT was also the third wind tunnel at the laboratory.
The PRT, the primary purpose of which was to study the aerodynamic efficiency of propellers on radial engine aircraft, commenced operations in 1927 and ultimately remained operational until 1950. The facility proved to be a critical research tool in drag-reduction efforts of early American aircraft. The PRT also proved to be a critical research tool in the derivation of the NACA Cowling, for which the NACA