British Canals: Is their resuscitation practicable?
()
About this ebook
Read more from Edwin A. Pratt
A History of Inland Transport and Communication in England Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rise of Rail-Power in War and Conquest, 1833-1914 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBritish Canals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to British Canals
Related ebooks
British Canals: Is their resuscitation practicable? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOcean Steam Navigation and the Ocean Post Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Isthmus of Suez Question Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA History of Banks for Savings in Great Britain and Ireland Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Working and Management of an English Railway Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRailway Rates: English and Foreign Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAre Trams Socialist?: Why Britain Has No Transport Policy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Paper Currency of England Dispassionately Considered: With Suggestions Towards a Practical Solution of the Difficulty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFree Ships: The Restoration of the American Carrying Trade Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPrisons Over Seas: Deportation and Colonization; British and American Prisons of To-day Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTube, Train, Tram, and Car; or, Up-to-date locomotion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFull Steam Ahead: How the Railways Made Britain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 1852 Guide to the Great Western Railway Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDescription of the Process of Manufacturing Coal Gas: For the Lighting of Streets Houses, and Public Buildings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Country Railway Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Building of the Panama Canal in Historic Photographs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Succinct View of the Importance and Practicability of Forming a Ship Canal across the Isthmus of Panama Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Little Book of Manchester Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 05, No. 32, June, 1860 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Vale of Rheidol Railway: The Story of a Narrow Gauge Survivor Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bridge Disasters in America: The Cause and the Remedy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOur Common Land (and Other Short Essays) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTROLLEYBUS REVOLUTION - UK: The Retrofit Hybrid Revolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnglish Industries of the Middle Ages: Being an Introduction to the Industrial History of Medieval England Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnticipations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnticipations Of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific Progress upon Human life and Thought Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Classics For You
The Odyssey: (The Stephen Mitchell Translation) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Flowers for Algernon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fellowship Of The Ring: Being the First Part of The Lord of the Rings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Master & Margarita Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Little Women (Seasons Edition -- Winter) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Old Man and the Sea: The Hemingway Library Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Count of Monte-Cristo English and French Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Learn French! Apprends l'Anglais! THE PICTURE OF DORIAN GRAY: In French and English Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Confederacy of Dunces Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sense and Sensibility (Centaur Classics) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As I Lay Dying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5East of Eden Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Farewell to Arms Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Silmarillion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Jungle: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Good Man Is Hard To Find And Other Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Animal Farm: A Fairy Story Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Extremely Loud And Incredibly Close: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ulysses: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wuthering Heights (with an Introduction by Mary Augusta Ward) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bell Jar: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Titus Groan Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hell House: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Things They Carried Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5For Whom the Bell Tolls: The Hemingway Library Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Princess Bride: S. Morgenstern's Classic Tale of True Love and High Adventure Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Canterbury Tales Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Quiet American Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for British Canals
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
British Canals - Edwin A. Pratt
Edwin A. Pratt
British Canals: Is their resuscitation practicable?
EAN 8596547042976
DigiCat, 2022
Contact: DigiCat@okpublishing.info
Table of Contents
PREFACE
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS AND MAPS
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTORY
CHAPTER II EARLY DAYS
CHAPTER III RAILWAYS TO THE RESCUE
CHAPTER IV RAILWAY-CONTROLLED CANALS
CHAPTER V THE BIRMINGHAM CANAL AND ITS STORY
CHAPTER VI THE TRANSITION IN TRADE
CHAPTER VII CONTINENTAL CONDITIONS
CHAPTER VIII WATERWAYS IN THE UNITED STATES
CHAPTER IX ENGLISH CONDITIONS
CHAPTER X CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
APPENDIX THE DECLINE IN FREIGHT TRAFFIC ON THE MISSISSIPPI
INDEX
PREFACE
Table of Contents
The appointment of a Royal Commission on Canals and Waterways, which first sat to take evidence on March 21, 1906, is an event that should lead to an exhaustive and most useful enquiry into a question which has been much discussed of late years, but on which, as I hope to show, considerable misapprehension in regard to actual facts and conditions has hitherto existed.
Theoretically, there is much to be said in favour of canal restoration, and the advocates thereof have not been backward in the vigorous and frequent ventilation of their ideas. Practically, there are other all-important considerations which ought not to be overlooked, though as to these the British Public have hitherto heard very little. As a matter of detail, also, it is desirable to see whether the theory that the decline of our canals is due to their having been captured
and strangled
by the railway companies—a theory which many people seem to believe in as implicitly as they do, say, in the Multiplication Table—is really capable of proof, or whether that decline is not, rather, to be attributed to wholly different causes.
In view of the increased public interest in the general question, it has been suggested to me that the Appendix on The British Canal Problem
in my book on Railways and their Rates,
published in the Spring of 1905, should now be issued separately; but I have thought it better to deal with the subject afresh, and at somewhat greater length, in the present work. This I now offer to the world in the hope that, even if the conclusions at which I have arrived are not accepted, due weight will nevertheless be given to the important—if not (as I trust I may add) the interesting—series of facts, concerning the past and present of canals alike at home, on the Continent, and in the United States, which should still represent, I think, a not unacceptable contribution to the present controversy.
EDWIN A. PRATT.
London
, April 1906.
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS AND MAPS
Table of Contents
BRITISH CANALS
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTORY
Table of Contents
The movement in favour of resuscitating, if not also of reconstructing, the British canal system, in conjunction with such improvement as may be possible in our natural waterways, is a matter that concerns various interests, and gives rise to a number of more or less complicated problems.
It appeals in the most direct form to the British trader, from the point of view of the possibility of enabling him to secure cheaper transit for his goods. Every one must sympathise with him in that desire, and there is no need whatever for me to stay here to repeat the oft-expressed general reflections as to the important part which cheap transit necessarily plays in the development of trade and commerce. But when from the general one passes to the particular, and begins to consider how these transit questions apply directly to canal revival, one comes at once to a certain element of insincerity in the agitation which has arisen.
There is no reason whatever for doubt that, whereas one section of the traders favouring canal revival would themselves directly benefit therefrom, there is a much larger section who have joined in the movement, not because they have the slightest idea of re-organising their own businesses on a water-transport basis, but simply because they think the existence of improved canals will be a means of compelling the railway companies to grant reductions of their own rates below such point as they now find it necessary to maintain. Individuals of this type, though admitting they would not use the canals themselves, or very little, would have us believe that there are enough of other traders who would patronise them to make them pay. In any case, if only sufficient pressure could be brought to bear on the railway companies to force them to reduce their rates and charges, they would be prepared to regard with perfect equanimity the unremunerative outlay on the canals of a large sum of public money, and be quite indifferent as to who might have to bear the loss so long as they gained what they wanted for themselves.
The subject is, also, one that appeals to engineers. As originally constructed, our British canals included some of the greatest engineering triumphs of their day, and the reconstruction either of these or even of the ordinary canals (especially where the differences of level are exceptionally great), would afford much interesting work for engineers—and, also, to come to commonplace details, would put into circulation a certain number of millions of pounds sterling which might lead some of those engineers, at least, to take a still keener interest in the general situation. There is absolutely no doubt that, from an engineering standpoint, reconstruction, however costly, would present no unsurmountable technical difficulties; but I must confess that when engineers, looking at the problem exclusively from their own point of view, apart from strictly economic and practical considerations, advise canal revival as a means of improving British trade, I am reminded of the famous remark of Sganerelle, in Molière's L'Amour Médecin
—Vous êtes orfévre, M. Josse.
The subject strongly appeals, also, to a very large number of patriotic persons who, though having no personal or professional interests to serve, are rightly impressed with the need for everything that is in any way practicable being done to maintain our national welfare, and who may be inclined to assume, from the entirely inadequate facts which, up to the present, have been laid before them as to the real nature and possibilities of our canal system, that great results would follow from a generous expenditure of money on canal resuscitation here, following on the example already set in Continental countries. It is in the highest degree desirable that persons of this class should be enabled to form a clear and definite opinion on the subject in all its bearings, and especially from points of view that may not hitherto have been presented for their consideration.
Then the question is one of very practical interest indeed to the British taxpayer. It seems to be generally assumed by the advocates of canal revival that it is no use depending on private enterprise. England is not yet impoverished, and there is plenty of money still available for investment where a modest return on it can be assured. But capitalists, large or small, are not apparently disposed to risk their own money in the resuscitation of English canals. Their expectation evidently is that the scheme would not pay. In the absence, therefore, of any willingness on the part of shrewd capitalists—ever on the look-out for profitable investments—to touch the business, it is proposed that either the State or the local authorities should take up the matter, and carry it through at the risk, more or less, either of taxpayers or ratepayers.
The Association of Chambers of Commerce, for instance, adopted, by a large majority, the following resolution at its annual meeting, in London, in February 1905:—
This Association recommends that the improvement and extension of the canal system of the United Kingdom should be carried out by means of a public trust, and, if necessary, in combination with local or district public trusts, and aided by a Government guarantee, and that the Executive Council be requested to take all reasonable measures to secure early legislation upon the subject.
Then Sir John T. Brunner has strongly supported a nationalisation policy. In a letter to The Times he once wrote:
I submit to you that we might begin with the nationalisation of our canals—some for the most part sadly antiquated—and bring them up to one modern standard gauge, such as the French gauge.
Another party favours municipalisation and the creation of public trusts, a Bill with the latter object in view being promoted in the Session of 1905, though it fell through owing to an informality in procedure.
It would be idle to say that a scheme of canal nationalisation, or even of public trusts with Government guarantee
(whatever the precise meaning of that term may be) involving millions of public money, could be carried through without affecting the British taxpayer. It is equally idle to say that if only the canal system were taken in hand by the local authorities they would make such a success of it that there would be absolutely no danger of the ratepayers being called upon to make good any deficiency. The experiences that Metropolitan ratepayers, at least, have had as the result of County Council management of the Thames steamboat service would not predispose them to any feeling of confidence in the control of the canal system of the country by local authorities.
At the Manchester meeting of the Association of Chambers of Commerce, in September 1904, Colonel F. N. Tannett Walker (Leeds) said, during the course of a debate on the canal question: Personally, he was not against big trusts run by local authorities. He knew no more business-like concern in the world than the Mersey Harbour Board, which was a credit to the country as showing what business men, not working for their own selfish profits, but for the good of the community, could do for an undertaking. He would be glad to see the Mersey Boards scattered all over the country.
But, even accepting the principle of canal municipalisation, what prospect would there be of Colonel Walker's aspiration being realised? The Mersey Harbour Board is an exceptional body, not necessarily capable of widespread reproduction on the same lines of efficiency. Against what is done in Liverpool may be put, in the case of London, the above-mentioned waste of public money in connection with the control of the Thames steamboat service by the London County Council. If the municipalised canals were to be worked on the same system, or any approach thereto, as these municipalised steamboats, it would be a bad look-out for the ratepayers of the country, whatever benefit might be gained by a small section of the traders.
Then one must remember that the canals, say, from the Midlands to one of the ports, run through various rural districts which would have no interest in the through traffic carried, but might be required, nevertheless, to take a share in the cost and responsibility of keeping their sections of the municipalised waterways in an efficient condition, or in helping to provide an adequate water-supply. It does not follow that such districts—even if they were willing to go to the expense or the trouble involved—would be able to provide representatives on the managing body who would in any way compare, in regard to business capacity, with the members of the Mersey Harbour Board, even if they did so in respect to public spirit, and the sinking of their local interests and prejudices to promote the welfare of manufacturers, say, in Birmingham, and shippers in Liverpool, for neither of whom they felt any direct concern.
Under the best possible conditions as regards municipalisation, it is still impossible to assume that a business so full of complications as the transport services of the country, calling for technical or expert knowledge of the most pronounced type, could be efficiently controlled by individuals who would be essentially amateurs at the business—and amateurs they would still be even if assisted by members of Chambers of Commerce who, however competent as merchants and manufacturers, would not necessarily be thoroughly versed in all these traffic problems. The result could not fail to be disastrous.
I come, at this point, in connection with the possible liability of ratepayers, to just one matter of detail that might be disposed of here. It is certainly one that seems to be worth considering. Assume, for the sake of argument, that, in accordance with the plans now being projected, (1) public trusts were formed by the local authorities for the purpose of acquiring and operating the canals; (2) that these trusts secured possession—on some fair system of compensation—of the canals now owned or controlled by railway companies; (3) that they sought to