The Art of Controversy: from the Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
Arthur Schopenhauer
Nació en Danzig en 1788. Hijo de un próspero comerciante, la muerte prematura de su padre le liberó de dedicarse a los negocios y le procuró un patrimonio que le permitió vivir de las rentas, pudiéndose consagrar de lleno a la filosofía. Fue un hombre solitario y metódico, de carácter irascible y de una acentuada misoginia. Enemigo personal y filosófico de Hegel, despreció siempre el Idealismo alemán y se consideró a sí mismo como el verdadero continuador de Kant, en cuyo criticismo encontró la clave para su metafísica de la voluntad. Su pensamiento no conoció la fama hasta pocos años después de su muerte, acaecida en Fráncfort en 1860. Schopenhauer ha pasado a la historia como el filósofo pesimista por excelencia. Admirador de Calderón y Gracián, tradujo al alemán el «Oráculo manual» del segundo. Hoy es uno de los clásicos de la filosofía más apreciados y leídos debido a la claridad de su pensamiento. Sus escritos marcaron hitos culturales y continúan influyendo en la actualidad. En esta misma Editorial han sido publicadas sus obras «Metafísica de las costumbres» (2001), «Diarios de viaje. Los Diarios de viaje de los años 1800 y 1803-1804» (2012), «Sobre la visión y los colores seguido de la correspondencia con Johann Wolfgang Goethe» (2013), «Parerga y paralipómena» I (2.ª ed., 2020) y II (2020), «El mundo como voluntad y representación» I (2.ª ed., 2022) y II (3.ª ed., 2022) y «Dialéctica erística o Arte de tener razón en 38 artimañas» (2023).
Read more from Arthur Schopenhauer
The Essential Schopenhauer: Key Selections from The World as Will and Representation and Other Writings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The World as Will and Representation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The World As Will And Idea (Vol. 1 of 3) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Suffering of the World: From the Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Being Right Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The World as Will and Idea - Vol. I. Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Being Right Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Wisdom of Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe World as Will and Representation or Idea III Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Complete Works of Arthur Schopenhauer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Suffering of the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficien and On the Will in Nature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Art of Controversy
Related ebooks
Child of the Cosmos: Strengthening Our Intrinsic Being Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Scientific Aspect of the Supernatural Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Human Spirit: Past and Present - Occult Fraternities and the Mystery of Golgotha Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wisdom Teachings Meet the New Age: Tools for Healing in a New Paradigm Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLIFE OF THE HUMAN SOUL: and its Relation to World Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Temple and the Grail: The Mysteries of the Order of the Templars and the Grail and their Significance for Our Time Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Logia or Sayings of The Master Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Esoteric Aspect of the Social Question: The Individual and Society Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Sunspots to Strawberries: Answers to Questions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Russia: Its People and Its Literature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAtlantis Bible 4: Fathers of Jesus Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Alchemy to Chemistry in Picture and Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRedemption: Christ's Resurrection and the Future of Humanity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe evolution of Philosophy: From pre-socratics to post-kantians Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHorizons of Difference: Engaging with Others Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Power Of Darkness: “Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.” Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHumanity's Last Stand: The Challenge of Artificial Intelligence, A Spiritual-Scientific Respose Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpeaking with Angels: Life Lessons from the Angelic World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe PHILOSOPHY OF FREEDOM of Rudolf Steiner a cure by Silvano Angelini Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Jonathan Swift's "A Satirical Elegy on the Death of a Late Famous General" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHints towards the formation of a more comprehensive theory of life. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMyths of the Origin of Fire - An Essay Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Heart of Peace: Meditations for Courage and Tranquility Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElectrical Interactions in Molecular Biophysics: An Introduction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWar in the Hearts of Men Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWriting Through the Year: All Four Seasons Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Two Seeds: Th E Dominion Lost Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAll Life Is Yoga: Yoga and Religion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar...: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Human Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The City of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mindfulness in Plain English: 20th Anniversary Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Tao Te Ching: Six Translations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Allegory of the Cave Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5No Man Is an Island Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Art of Controversy
176 ratings2 reviews
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I mean, this is basically the single greatest self-help book ever written, so there's that. It's hilarious, too. Schopenhauer was a real dreamboat.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Herr Schopenhauer is the master of understanding a conflict; its- versions, progression and the knack of its decimation. This book makes a wonderful complement for his other book The art of always being Right. If you are sort of a being who would consider yourself philosophically inclined, you should not let go of the wisdom in both these books. They would, if understood rightly and applied aptly, come most handy in feverish University debates to Boardroom meetings than any other self help nonsense that would be found floating around out there. The only drawback being, most of it has to be used when people are reasonable; unfortunately in most disagreements, people become unreasonable.
PS- Philosophically inclined would presuppose basic understanding of premises and schools; not Bachs, Coelho, Pirsigs. Thanks.
Book preview
The Art of Controversy - Arthur Schopenhauer
The Art of Controversy From the Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer
by Arthur Schopenhauer
© 2022 SMK Books
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, used, or transmitted in any form or manner by any means: electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the express, prior written permission of the author and/or publisher, except for brief quotations for review purposes only.
Hardcover ISBN 13: 978-1-5154-3424-5
Trade Paperback ISBN 13: 978-1-6045-9571-0
E-book ISBN 13: 978-1-5154-5548-6
Table of Contents
The Basis of All Dialectic
Stratagems
On the Comparative Place of Interest and Beauty in Works of Art
Psychological Observations
On the Wisdom of Life: Aphorisms
Genius and Virtue
The Basis of All Dialectic
First of all, we must consider the essential nature of every dispute: what it is that really takes place in it.
Our opponent has stated a thesis, or we ourselves,–it is all one. There are two modes of refuting it, and two courses that we may pursue.
I. The modes are (1) ad rem, (2) ad hominem or ex concessis. That is to say: We may show either that the proposition is not in accordance with the nature of things, i.e., with absolute, objective truth; or that it is inconsistent with other statements or admissions of our opponent, i.e., with truth as it appears to him. The latter mode of arguing a question produces only a relative conviction, and makes no difference whatever to the objective truth of the matter.
II. The two courses that we may pursue are (1) the direct, and (2) the indirect refutation. The direct attacks the reason for the thesis; the indirect, its results. The direct refutation shows that the thesis is not true; the indirect, that it cannot be true.
The direct course admits of a twofold procedure. Either we may show that the reasons for the statement are false (nego majorem, minorem); or we may admit the reasons or premisses, but show that the statement does not follow from them (nego consequentiam); that is, we attack the conclusion or form of the syllogism.
The direct refutation makes use either of the diversion or of the instance.
(a) The diversion.–We accept our opponent’s proposition as true, and then show what follows from it when we bring it into connection with some other proposition acknowledged to be true. We use the two propositions as the premisses of a syllogism giving a conclusion which is manifestly false, as contradicting either the nature of things, or other statements of our opponent himself; that is to say, the conclusion is false either ad rem or ad hominem. Consequently, our opponent’s proposition must have been false; for, while true premisses can give only a true conclusion, false premisses need not always give a false one.
(b) The instance, or the example to the contrary.–This consists in refuting the general proposition by direct reference to particular cases which are included in it in the way in which it is stated, but to which it does not apply, and by which it is therefore shown to be necessarily false.
Such is the framework or skeleton of all forms of disputation; for to this every kind of controversy may be ultimately reduced. The whole of a controversy may, however, actually proceed in the manner described, or only appear to do so; and it may be supported by genuine or spurious arguments. It is just because it is not easy to make out the truth in regard to this matter, that debates are so long and so obstinate.
Nor can we, in ordering the argument, separate actual from apparent truth, since even the disputants are not certain about it beforehand. Therefore I shall describe the various tricks or stratagems without regard to questions of objective truth or falsity; for that is a matter on which we have no assurance, and which cannot be determined previously. Moreover, in every disputation or argument on any subject we must agree about something; and by this, as a principle, we must be willing to judge the matter in question. We cannot argue with those who deny principles: Contra negantem principia non est disputandum.
Stratagems
I. The Extension.–This consists in carrying your opponent’s proposition beyond its natural limits; in giving it as general a signification and as wide a sense as possible, so as to exaggerate it; and, on the other hand, in giving your own proposition as restricted a sense and as narrow limits as you can, because the more general a statement becomes, the more numerous are the objections to which it is open. The defence consists in an accurate statement of the point or essential question at issue.
Example 1.–I asserted that the English were supreme in drama. My opponent attempted to give an instance to the contrary, and replied that it was a well-known fact that in music, and consequently in opera, they could do nothing at all. I repelled the attack by reminding him that music was not included in dramatic art, which covered tragedy and comedy alone. This he knew very well. What he had done was to try to generalise my proposition, so that it would apply to all theatrical representations, and, consequently, to opera and then to music, in order to make certain of defeating me. Contrarily, we may save our proposition by reducing it within narrower limits than we had first intended, if our way of expressing it favours this expedient.
Example 2.–A. declares that the Peace of 1814 gave back their independence to all the German towns of the Hanseatic League. B. gives an instance to the contrary by reciting the fact that Dantzig, which received its independence from Buonaparte, lost it by that Peace. A. saves himself thus: I said ‘all German towns,’ and Dantzig was in Poland.
This trick was mentioned by Aristotle in the Topica (bk. viii., cc. 11, 12).
Example 3.–Lamarck, in his Philosophic Zoologique (vol. i., p. 208), states that the polype has no feeling, because it has no nerves. It is certain, however, that it has some sort of perception; for it advances towards light by moving in an ingenious fashion from branch to branch, and it seizes its prey. Hence it has been assumed that its nervous system is spread over the whole of its body in equal measure, as though it were blended with it; for it is obvious that the polype possesses some faculty of perception without having any separate organs of sense. Since this assumption refutes Lamarck’s position, he argues thus: In that case all parts of its body must be capable of every kind of feeling, and also of motion, of will, of thought. The polype would have all the organs of the most perfect animal in every point of its body; every point could see, smell, taste, hear, and so on; nay, it could think, judge, and draw conclusions; every particle of its body would be a perfect animal and it would stand higher than man, as every part of it would possess all the faculties which man possesses only in the whole of him. Further, there would be no reason for not extending what is true of the polype to all monads, the most imperfect of all creatures, and ultimately to the plants, which are also alive, etc., etc.
By using dialectical tricks of this kind a writer betrays that he is secretly conscious of being in the wrong. Because it was said that the creature’s whole body is sensitive to light, and is therefore possessed