PROGRESSIVES IN AMERICA 1900-2020: Liberals with Attitude!
By David Wagner
()
About this ebook
This is the first history of the three progressive movements in the twentieth and twentieth-first century: The original Progressives primarily in the first two decades of the twentieth century; the Popular Front progressives of the 1930s and 1940s; and recent progressives in the Democratic Party from Jesse Jackson to Bernie Sanders. Although cha
Read more from David Wagner
NO LONGER HOMELESS: How the Ex-Homeless Get and Stay off the Street Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLife as a Daymaker: How to Change the World Simply by Making Someone's Day! Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Poorhouse: America's Forgotten Institution: America's Forgotten: America's Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTHE NEW TEMPERANCE: THE AMERICAN OBSESSION WITH SIN AND VICE Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnlikely Fame: Poor People Who Made History: Poor People Who Made: Poor People Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsORDINARY PEOPLE Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCHECKERBOARD SQUARE: Culture and Resistance in a Homeless Community Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to PROGRESSIVES IN AMERICA 1900-2020
Related ebooks
Progressives in America 1900-2020: Liberals with Attitude! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBreaking the Impasse: Electoral Politics, Mass Action, and the New Socialist Movement in the United States Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFight the Constitution: For a Democratic Socialist Republic - Selected Writings from Marxist Unity Group Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Vanishing Tradition: Perspectives on American Conservatism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Polarizers: Postwar Architects of Our Partisan Era Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5In Search of Progressive America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Save a Constitutional Democracy Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Once and Future Liberal: After Identity Politics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Troubled Birth: The 1930s and American Public Opinion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Socialist Awakening: What's Different Now About the Left Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5More Meditations of a Militant Moderate Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Failure of Vision: Michael Harrington and the Limits of Democratic Socialism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCountermobilization: Policy Feedback and Backlash in a Polarized Age Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Emerging Democratic Majority Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5How Democracies Die: by Steven Levitsky | Conversation Starters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSaving Democracy: A User's Manual for Every American Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy I Turned Right: Leading Baby Boom Conservatives Chronicle Their Political Journeys Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Takeover: How the Left's Quest for Social Justice Corrupted Liberalism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWe Own the Future: Democratic Socialism—American Style Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFascism Today: What It Is and How to End It Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Respect and Loathing in American Democracy: Polarization, Moralization, and the Undermining of Equality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLiberalism and the Free Society in 2021 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Radical Mind: The Destructive Plans of the Woke Left Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComing Out Republican: A History of the Gay Right Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA New American Creed: The Eclipse of Citizenship and Rise of Populism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Socialist Challenge Today: Syriza, Corbyn, Sanders Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In Defense of Populism: Protest and American Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary, Analysis & Review of Glenn Beck's Liars Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMedia Sociology and Journalism: Studies in Truth and Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Social History For You
Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters--And How to Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Seven Basic Plots: Why We Tell Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A People's History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wordslut: A Feminist Guide to Taking Back the English Language Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Whore Stories: A Revealing History of the World's Oldest Profession Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Lost Continent: Travels in Small Town America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Three Women Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A People's History of the United States: Teaching Edition Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5made in america: An Informal History of the English Language in the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Five: The Untold Lives of the Women Killed by Jack the Ripper Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Flight of the WASP: The Rise, Fall, and Future of America’s Original Ruling Class Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Mother Tongue: English and How it Got that Way Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A History of Magic and Witchcraft: Sabbats, Satan & Superstitions in the West Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Untold History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 2]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Renegade History of the United States Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Scapegoat: A History of Blaming Other People Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stories of Rootworkers & Hoodoo in the Mid-South Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Working: People Talk About What They Do All Day and How They Feel About What They Do Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Day the World Came to Town: 9/11 in Gander, Newfoundland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Library Book Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for PROGRESSIVES IN AMERICA 1900-2020
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
PROGRESSIVES IN AMERICA 1900-2020 - David Wagner
Gotham Books
30 N Gould St.
Ste. 20820, Sheridan, WY 82801
https://gothambooksinc.com/
Phone: 1 (307) 464-7800
© 2021 David Wagner. All rights reserved.
No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means without the written permission of the author.
Published by Gotham Books (date published Jan 1, 2022)
First edition (2020)
ISBN: 978-1-956349-16-0 (sc)
ISBN: 978-1-956349-17-7 (e)
Library of Congress Control Number: 2021920257
Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by iStock are models, and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only.
certain stock imagery © iStock.
Because of the dynamic nature of the Internet, any web addresses or links contained in this book may have changed since publication and may no longer be valid. The views expressed in this work are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher, and the publisher hereby disclaims any responsibility for them.
Contents
Notes on the Use of Progressive
One: Who and What Are Progressives?
Introduction
History of Progressives
Analysis and Critique
The Discredited Name Progressive
The Elusive Progressive
Not-So-Radical Radicals
Progressives = Liberals with Attitude!
What Would Be Radical?
Book Organization
Table I Crib Sheet: Progressives, Liberals, Radicals on Issues; A Historical Charting (1900–2020)
Two: The Original Progressives: The Radical Movement Under Conservative Direction
Context
Muckrakers
Radicals
Progressives: Who They Were
Progressives: Issue Consensus and Conflict
From Progressives to the Progressive Party of 1924
Why All the Fuss? The Limited Accomplishments of the Progressives
Table II Progressive Party in National Presidential Elections
Three: Progressives II: Fellow Travelers of Stalinism
What’s in a Name?
Context
The Popular Front: A Quick Deradicalization
Why Did They Do It? Progressive Motivations
The Hitler-Stalin Pact
World War II
The Cold War and the Progressive Party of 1948
Takeaways: Continuity and Change
Four: Progressives III: The Rapid Decline of Liberalism and Progressive as a New Name
Liberalism’s Collapse
Moving to the Right: The New Right and the Centrist DLC
Why Progressive? The Popularity of Vagueness
Jesse Jackson: Not Radical but Liberal
Nader Tries Progressivism outside the Two Parties
More Powerful than Elections?
Five: Progressives IV: More Progressive than Thou
Clinton versus Obama: Will the Real Progressive Please Stand Up?
The Cooling-Off of the Obama Love Affair
Sanders against Clinton: A Tale of Two Progressives
The Trump Era: The Daily Battle
The Battle of Progressives Rejoined: The Election Season
Progressives = Liberals with Attitude!
Democrats as the Party of Finance and Technology
Summary
Six: The Left: Left Behind?
The Failed Left
Five Criticisms of the Left
How Progressivism Has Made Problems Worse in Recent Decades
Things Can Change Quickly Sometimes
References
index
Endnotes
Notes on the Use of Progressive
I have listed the progressive movements as follows: the first the Progressive movement of the same era (1900-1917), the second the progressives
of the Popular Front Period in the 1930s and 1940s, and thirdly the progressives
of the past four decades and now. It is possible to argue that the 1924 Progressive Party was still another period, however, it is not generally accorded this status by historians, and it lasted less than one year.
Words like progressive,
communist,
capitalist,
and socialist,
for example, are used in different ways. I have used proper names for groups or individuals connected with a party or movement which is clearly labeled and identified as distinct political entities. Hence, the Progressives of the Progressive Era are capitalized, while those who were called this name in the 1930s and 1940s or those of the last decades are not capitalized (e.g. progressives
). Similarly, those who were affiliated with the Communist Party or Socialist Party are capitalized but those who have held these opinions but are not affiliated (or otherwise affiliated) are communists
or socialists,
etc.
One
Who and What Are Progressives?
Introduction
The current political news in America is rife with references to progressives. Within the Democratic Party, at least three major candidates for president—Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and (at least for a while) Kamala Harris—answer to the term progressive; but many other candidates, at least at times, use the term as a descriptor. Progressives have a large influence on the political debate, particularly in areas such as expanding health care, attacking climate change, and healing and remediating social justice issues. Only a few years ago, the term was far less used.
Some observers have waxed optimistically that now is the time for progressives. Mark Green’s (a former Nader’s Raider and an active New York Democratic office seeker for many decades) 2016 book Bright, Infinite Future suggests that
"the core premise of Bright, Infinite Future is that there’s a rising progressive majority and era in this country due to a combination of demographic and social trends and a Republican lurch from the mainstream to the extreme." (Green 2016, p. 9)
Despite the irony of Green’s book coming out shortly before Donald Trump’s surprise 2016 election, a year later, Ruy Teixeira (a demographer and political scientist) declared in his book The Optimistic Leftist: Why the 21st Century Will Be Better than You Think goes even further:
Better days are coming [he says] … a new deal is just around the corner, bringing with what [he calls] an ‘opportunity state.’ Soon enough … progressives will take back power.
(Jacobs, 2018)
Yet despite this new optimism, much writing is at such a high level of abstraction that it is impossible to see exactly what the fuss is about. Who exactly are the progressives? What do they believe in? What is the history of their ideas? Are progressives simply liberals renamed, as some have suggested (McCormack 2018)? Are predictions about the future really simply promises of a Democratic Party victory? Or is there a leftist progressivism, as some political figures and their supporters declare? As a recent National Public Radio show noted, there is now a multiplicity of people claiming the name progressive (NPR 2018). Some of them use the term without adherence to any leftist view. Finally, even if elected, what would be the actual potential for serious change with, for example, Sanders or Warren as president?
One aim of this book is to answer these questions: Who are the progressives? Where did they come from? What is their history? What is their relationship, if any, to liberalism, to social democracy, to radicalism, or to other ideologies?
Further, as any number of critics point out, progressives do not make everyone happy and are opposed not only by conservatives but also by more radical leftists and by a surprising number of Democrats who believe liberal (or some other label) is far preferable as a description. To give some examples, conservative radio talk show host and writer Mark Levin has written an entire book on the tyranny of progressivism (Levin 2017) in which he uses documents from the first Progressive movement (1900–1917, see below) by the likes of Herbert Croly and Woodrow Wilson to condemn progressivism as a statist
ideology summed up as follows (see p. 77):
Again, and again, the goal of progressives is to unmoor the individual and society from America’s heritage with populist tirades, prodding, and indoctrination, the purpose of which is to build popular support for a muscular centralized government ruled by a self-aggrandizing intellectual elite.
But some liberals have been almost as caustic in their criticism. In an Op-Ed in the New York Times, Prof. Greg Weiner declared that
both etymologically and ideologically, the switch to ‘progressive’ carries historical freight that augers poorly for Democrats and for the nation’s polarized politics.
(Weiner 2018)
While Weiner sees the problem as being one of progressivism’s rather absolutist nature-it is right and its enemies are wrong, whereas liberals can compromise with opponents—he also critiques more broadly political correctness as endemic to an ideology of progress. Another well-known liberal author Sean Wilentz distrusts progressives because
progressives are meanwhile ‘emphatically anti-liberal’—because they are hostile to capitalism and ‘deep down, harbor the hope that one day, perhaps through some catastrophic event, American capitalism will indeed be replaced by socialism’
(cited in McCormack 2018)
If conservatives and some liberals are critical of progressives, long-term radicals are likely opposed to the move en masse of many radicals (or former radicals) into the Democratic Party. As long-term leftist activist Stanley Aronowitz wrote more than twenty years ago,
the past thirty years have witnessed the incorporation of most of these (new social movements) and the older movements of the popular left into the framework of liberal democracy. From deep skepticism according to which the law and the state were seen as instruments of class, gender, and racial power, the leading organizations of the popular left have made a more or less explicit alliance with the Democratic Party (1996, p. 105)
If Aronowitz and others were critical of this move twenty years ago, now the criticism will be amplified and will be by some radicals such as the Green Party. It seems that thousands of former radicals are now actively campaigning for the Democratic Party.
The critical comments by various observers on all sides of the political spectrum bring me to my second objective: in addition to exploring the history of Progressive movements and activists, a more precise understanding of the politics of progressivism is in order. Because of the polarized political environment today, which appears simply as Trump and the Republicans on one side and the Democratic opposition on the other, political action and movements should be returned to its more complex situation than the current feuds. There is a deep continuity between today’s progressivism and those of the past, and they are clearly separate not only from conservatives but also from the radical left. Where liberalism and progressivism differ is more difficult to define, but a case can be made that there are some differences despite the fact that some liberals identify as both liberals and progressives or have moved from liberalism to progressivism. At least, progressives are militant liberals or as I say, liberals with attitude!
History of Progressives
Neither the term progressive nor its meaning sprouted from nowhere in the late twentieth and early twenty-first century. The current state of a progressive view and movement has come from two previous periods: one called the Progressive era beginning early in the twentieth century and a second one in the 1930s–1940s from left-of-center progressives allied with the Communist Party of the United States of America (CPUSA). As we shall see below, a variety of people and causes have vied since the 1970s to establish a third progressive movement. With some few exceptions, these political figures have been left of center, occupying a place that bridges the liberal wing of the Democratic Party with those to the left of it, such as socialists, pacifists, feminists, green and ecology activists, and others. I call this bridging as the term allows enough ambiguity to preserve the spirit of progressivism while presumably uniting those on the left with liberals in the Democratic Party. It reflects most directly the Popular Front period of the CPUSA, which some liberal and left writers look favorably on. ¹
The first Progressive movement and Progressive Party of 1912 led by former president Theodore Roosevelt have been well-defined by historians (see Hofstadter 1960, 1963; Kolko 1963; Nugent 2009; and Wiebe 1966). A middle class–led body of reformers (historian Richard Hofstadter refers to them as genteel) was not exactly a social movement but a loose association of those seeking reform. Progressive at the turn of the last century, history represented a left-to-centrist movement that included some US presidents, Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, as well as a large number of famous Americans such as Jane Addams, Louis Brandeis, Herbert Croly, Robert La Follette, Walter Lippman, Upton Sinclair, Ida Tarbell, and Lillian Wald. Perhaps its popularity is less in a common program (there was not one) but the fame and status of people identified with it (settlement house leaders, critical writers or muckrakers who revealed horrible conditions, jurists, presidents, etc.). Less a grassroots movement than an elite one, it saw itself as a middle ground between the radicalism of groups like the Socialist Party of Eugene V. Debs and the radical union Industrial Workers of the World (IWW or Wobblies) on the one hand and laissez-faire capitalism on the other hand. At the time, Progressivism was marked by an emphasis on regulations such as antitrust laws, the Pure Food and Drug Act, and regulation of child labor. While there were some radicals such as writer Upton Sinclair on the fringe of the movement, it was a moderate to liberal movement generally.
In 1924, Robert La Follette, a popular senator from Wisconsin, ran as a Progressive against both the Republicans led by Calvin Coolidge and a very conservative Democratic candidate John W. Davis. The La Follette Progressivism was a short and unstable alliance that included labor unions, the Socialist Party, farmer and populist groups, and Progressive organizations left over from the earlier period. Had it succeeded, it may well have changed the history of American politics, but it quickly fell apart. And while La Follette gained about 16 percent of the vote, he carried only one state (Wisconsin, his own), and many believed his vote total was more reflective of respect for him than the movement (see MacKay 1947 and Unger 2000).
The 1930s and 1940s progressivism was centered around the American Communist Party and those liberals and others on the left who were willing to ally with them. With the exception of the 1939–1941 period (the Hitler-Stalin Pact led to a suspension of the Popular Front), it reemerged in the 1940s as American and Soviet troops fought together (sometimes called the Grand Alliance) and with the third Progressive Party of 1948 in which Henry Wallace ran as the candidate. The second progressive movement was more like today’s in its emphasis on social justice, civil rights and civil liberties, and peace. Some authors speculate that the Communist Party chose the term progressive as a bid to reclaim the Americanism of radicalism in a respectable and Midwestern direction (see Howe and Coser 1962). The progressive alliance with the New Deal helped in some ways (making the party more popular for a while) but, more significantly, limited its ability to be anything but an echo of the Democratic Party. The party ceased to be radical, and in 1948, when the Wallace candidacy was widely viewed as being a CP front, Wallace received only 2.3 percent of the vote even with his vague program (see Chapter 3).
The second period of progressivism left a strong historical residue. First, the word progressive fell out of more mainstream usage for quite a while. Second, having been an activist in New York City in the late 1960s through 1980s, I met many older people who were in or had been around the Communist Party (CPUSA). Many continued to use the word progressive and, more importantly, like the 1930s–1940s party, tended to keep their identities quiet while claiming only to support progressive reforms. Third, like the transmission of the first Progressive to the second period, older people who remembered the Popular Front had a great deal of influence in the reemergence