Letter To My Grandchildren: The Living Universe

By Ronald Simonar

You are told that mathematics validates particle physics.

 

This is untrue. Literally no result in quantum physics relies on its exquisite math. Literally every result in quantum physics relies on a multitude of underlying assumptions, all unproven, hidden behind brilliant math to give an appearance of legitimac

• Language: English
• Publisher: Eventhor Media
• Release date: Jan 3, 2022
• ISBN: 9789198745214

Book preview

THE BIG PICTURE

PHYSICAL LIMITS LEAVE us blind at both ends of the chain of structural systems within the universe. We are unable to see beyond the observable universe and unable to observe anything in the minuscule quantum field. Beyond these limits, all is speculation, the Primal Code included.

Before I kick off creation, I want you to come with me and step out into the garden to look closely at the spherical corporeal structures in the sky above us. Although in plain view, it seems that nobody has asked the important question of why all these different structures are arranged within each other like a chain of diminishing Russian stacking dolls.

OUR UNIVERSE is the largest of these observable structural systems, the largest Matryoshka doll. We have no firm take on its size or mass.

SUPER CLUSTERS are the biggest building blocks of our observable universe; the second link in the universal chain of structures. They are huge. It takes thousands of large galaxies to form a supercluster like the local Laniakea Supercluster, a matryoshka doll that includes our Milky Way and Andromeda galaxy as a minute part of its mass.

GALAXIES that nestle as building blocks within these super clusters serve as the third link in the universal chain of mass structures, stacked within each other. Astronomers have long observed that it takes a far greater number of suns to build a galaxy than it takes to build a super cluster out of a few thousand galaxies.

SUNS, nestle as building blocks within galaxies. They represent the fourth link in the universal structural chain; the fourth stacking doll. Science tells us it takes an exponentially greater number of ‘elementary particles’ to build a sun than it takes of suns to build a small galaxy.

We are bound by old traditions, but why are we unable to see what is staring us in the face? Why has nobody in our enlightened world observed the consistent pattern that stares back at us from the night sky.

And, down the rabbit hole we go, blind as bats.

Nothing but tradition tells us that the laws that govern universal chain structures must stop with so-called fundamental particles, whether we can see them or not. Especially not after quantum science had to grudgingly accept that they are composite structures composed of 3 quarks (please stop laughing).

The so called fundamental particles, Neutrons, Protons and Electrons are the fifth link in the universal chain of mass structures. The pattern of the universal chain demands there be exponentially more building blocks inside a proton than within our sun that in itself contains 10⁵⁷ of these subatomic particles.

MATTRONS (according to the Primal Code), as the sixth link. They are the first composite structure in the universal chain, and serve as the building blocks of subatomic particles.

THE PRIMAL ATOM is the seventh and last link in the universal chain. The primal atom is the only link in the chain that is not composite. It is a corporeal mass digit built of nothing but itself.

There is nothing in our universe but primal atoms.

At the bottom of my rabbit hole, we can take the opportunity to reverse the chain and count the primal atom as the first link in the chain of universal mass structures.

Let us take a look at the vast numbers of primal atoms within the first two composite stacking dolls; the Mattron and the Proton. But first we must take another look at the sky where the truth is hiding in plain view. Can you kids see any pattern to this chain of structural links?

Science has counted the building units within each link in the observable Cosmic Model. The divergence of building block numbers within each stacking doll is not by a whisker (relative to the composite structure below it or above it). The difference is profound and systematic. In lieu of available local mass, structural masses in the universal chain can only vary within a narrow band.

Although this general divergence continues systematically down the chain of super clusters, galaxies, and suns, we have through the ages accepted this great divergence as no more than an anecdotal detail.

You can use a simple (m²)² equation to quantify the rough correlation of building blocks within each of the stacking doll in the universal chain, up and down, link after link. (When you kids multiply powers, just add them up as 14 plus 14 is 28 and (28)² is 56 etc.).

The estimated mass of our local Laniakea supercluster is 10¹⁷ solar masses. You can also count them as roughly 3200 heavy galaxies that can serve as the superclusters benchmark building blocks.

You can instead use the (m²)² correlation by squaring the 3200 galactic number and squaring the result. This tells you that the next lower Matryoshka doll would be a massive galaxy that should hold 10¹⁴ suns. This is indeed is the correct number of suns within the most massive galaxies.

Is this a pattern or a fluke?

Feeding 10¹⁴ suns to (m²)² tells us that the next lower stacking doll, the next link in the universal chain, which is the average sun, should be built of 10⁵⁶ internal entities. In fact, science estimates that the average universal sun is built of 10⁵⁶ subatomic particles. No surprise there.

Three stacking dolls forming a pattern cannot be coincidence.

Now we have reached down to so-called fundamental particles. I am old enough to recall the proclamation nailed to the Church door that subatomic particles are indivisible. With physics on the ropes when Hadron properties could not be tamed in the 1960’, quantum science demanded some way to fine-tune its math and the ‘particle’ conclave grudgingly accepted Hadrons to be composite structures.

Their consensus was not built on cosmic models. Their aim with this diminutive change was to sooth nerves, - not to rock the boat. Three quarks were the minimum needed to deal mathematically with the unruly Hadron behavior. A new proclamation was nailed to the Church door. Hadrons are composite structures built of smaller fundamental entities. Savor the epiphany of an expedient decision.

As it turned out, the three quarks could not save the day. I am not being fair, but mathematicians, jumping like cows turned to pasture, realized that nobody could argue against any outrageous additional assumption while it remained hidden behind the quantum wall.

If a string of assumptions dovetailed with experimental outcome, all was fine. This is where quantum math lost the battle for the soul of physics. From that point, the end result justified the means.

The first stapling solutions were simple adjustments to give the quarks a growing number of mathematical properties. This exhilaration of new degrees of freedom was soon to escalate into infinite numbers of virtual entities and untold armies of quark-antiquark pairs. 

As we instead pursue the real universe, following the universal chain of corporeal structures, you kids can take the 10⁵⁷ subatomic particles that form Our Sun and feed that mass number into (m²)², which brings the number of mattron building blocks within a proton to 10²²⁸.

There is no question that a number with 228 zeros is a big enough to rattle anybody, although I must point out that we already accept 57 zeros in the number of building blocks within Our Sun. Surely, a big number is not a scientific reason to shy away from a clear pattern.

And the rabbit hole goes deeper. The mattron is the first composite structure in the universal chain. Feeding 10²²⁸ to (m²)², the mattron must condense into a collapsing cloud of 10⁹¹² primal atoms that dramatically trump three quarks.

A proton contains 10¹¹⁴⁰ atoms, divided upon its 10²²⁸ mattrons.

You must use relativity to adjust your conceptual image of these many minuscule composite structures. You kids are seriously underestimating your own gargantuan vastness. Allow your mind’s eye to adjust all these gargantuan composite building blocks to even more outrageously gargantuan empty volumes.

THE WHISKY VERSION

THE ROADMAP IS deceivingly simple, and you have a ring-side view. As I want to avoid the lack of direction in a published Primal Code working document, it may be better to offer a childish roadmap version up front. Read it as a pirate map of buried treasures. I call it the whisky version.

In the beginning there is nothing. Look at this singular void through your mind’s eye and call it ‘zero’.

A part volume of this boundless zero splits into +1 and -1. They are not imaginary numbers, but two corporeal atoms of adverse nature. Think two billiard balls, one black and the other white. There are at this time no composite structures, no gravity, no forces.

There are only the two mirrored primal atoms, - intimately related, not at all the Greek atoms of yore. All primal atoms are of same shape and size, split out of the zero void in adverse pairs. Plus and minus (+ and –) is a good way to describe these adverse entities.

First, - take a tour with me to look at the system of major objects in our observable universe. This chain of stacking dolls has been extensively studied by astronomers. Superclusters are the largest structural cloud formations, built of (relatively) tiny building blocks called Galaxies that are cloud formations of (relatively) tiny suns. Suns are cloud formations of (relatively) tiny subatomic particles, - too small to directly observe.

Astronomers describe another important attribute of the universal chain: The bigger the object, - the fewer its internal building blocks. The smaller the object, the more numerous its building blocks.

The Primal Code uses a simple equation to set the numbers of internal building blocks within every level in this universal chain of stacking dolls; square the number of the objects building blocks (m), and then square the result.

(10²)²

Our local Laniakea supercluster (with our Milky Way as a tiny part), is truly massive. Using identical heavy galaxies as benchmark, this supercluster would contain 3200 such galaxies.

If you take the 3200 heavy galaxy number in our local supercluster and square it, and square the result, the result predicts that the average universal sun should contain 10⁵⁶ subatomic particles. This is also a number that science agrees on, so the logical pattern holds.

After our tour of a universal structural chain of diminishing sizes and increasing numbers, it seems logical to give a neutron or a proton vastly more numerous building blocks than our sun, but history tells a sad truth. In their attempts to tame the unruly behavior of hadrons, quantum mathematicians shied away from kicking the feet from under Quantum Mechanics and, in order not to rock the boat, agreed that 3 quarks were all they "needed" (as if our universe would jump to heel).

I have used the 10⁵⁷ number of particles within Our Sun to square it and square the result. The outcome predicts that the number of internal entities within a neutron or a proton (that I call HYDRONS) is 10²²⁸.

Please ignore the shocked screams from the mathematical conclave of the quantum church, . . . STOP THIS HERESY!

The 10²²⁸ entities within neutrons and protons are tiny globular cloud formation called MATTRONS, which are cloud formations of PRIMAL ATOMS, the only non-composite object in our corporeal universe.

Insert the 10²²⁸ number of mattrons in a neutron; square it and square the result, which predicts 10⁹¹² primal atoms within a single mattron. Consequently, it takes 10¹¹⁴⁰ primal atoms to form one neutron or proton.

From the very start, quantum particle equations were designed to use in a measuring instrument. And know this; your desk calculator is not built to understand.

Follow the unbroken Primal Code logic for understanding, - for the why's and how's. Here is a list, but I hope you kids find other buried treasures along the way:

Duality of mass and movement. Photons. Light frequency, and wavelength. The why and how of electromagnetic radiation. The double slit experiment. Nature of Electric Charges. Why and how adverse charges attract, and allied charges repel. Why and how a Neutron splits into protons and electrons. The stable formation of Hydrogen and Deuterium atoms. The truth about the Strong Force and our elusive Gravity.

Surely that is worth your time.

CREATION

UNLIKE PADRE LEMAÎTRE, The Primal Code has no team of mathematical midwifes to direct its immaculate birth, like that of a Big Bang universe. We need not pray for an uncomplicated delivery of a plasma soup of quarks and gluons, especially while the Primal universe is composed of two boringly simple twins of adverse primal atoms.

Snap your fingers to make everything in the universe disappear. The zero void is imaginary, but even without corporeal objects, let your mind’s eye mark out a part volume within the zero void. Imagine this part of the void as an empty three-dimensional primal volume.

You better squint to catch the creational launch of the Primal Code, or you’ll miss the birth of a universe.

I invite you along with me to follow the phases of universal creation where the living universe as we know it comes into existence and evolves, step by step. It starts with the swift, uncomplicated, incredibly tiny, split of the part volume your mind’s eye marked out in the zero void.

You kids have seen the short 3000 years old pre-Hellenic bronze sword on my desk. Hiding beneath its green patina is the blood of innocents from a time when Greek philosopher Leucippus posited an indivisible atom. That corporeal quantum has been a long time coming.

Two adverse but otherwise identical primal atoms split out of part zero volume (+1 and -1).

Mathematically speaking, you cannot find a better quantum, but make no mistake, these two billiard balls are not mathematical quanta. They are corporeal, one plus and one minus. You can see and touch them with your mind’s eye. They may well be the fundamental reason why math so often tends to dovetail to reality.

Why two material primal atoms separate spatially out of zero to become different from nothing is an integral unprovable part of the Primal Code. It is not as abrasive to our senses as an unprovable Creational Big Bang giving birth to an entire universal shebang in a micro-second (priests get away with so much more than heretics).

In the Primal Code, each primal atom is an indivisible block of matter as it enters reality. Do not mistake it for a mathematical equation model. The only inviolable caveat of its birth is that it enters our world in the company of an ‘adverse’ twin of equal size and shape.

There is no material division within an atom. There is no within!

The zero void remains unaltered as well it should (it does not exist). The conceptual changes brought by this insignificant creation do not alter the mathematical sum of the Universe. Its sum will always remain zero. And should two adverse material twin atoms (+1 and -1) inhabit a common volume, they can revert into zero or part thereof, if circumstances allow.

The shape of the primal atom is not of critical importance (the outcome is similar but as our race will mostly be noted in the annals of the universe for playing with balls, I set every diameter of a primal atom as identical in three-dimensional Euclidean space. A spherical digit simplifies your mind’s vision. The split signifies the birth of a conceptual universe. If it seems simple, let me assure you, it will tax your mind soon enough.

With a spherical shape, there now exists a definite unit of length.

Do not think of opposite twin atoms as entities of matter and antimatter (derived from Dirac’s equation combining modern quantum theory and special relativity). There is no antimatter in our universe. There is only matter, albeit in two signs. At this crucial beginning of our newborn corporeal universe, its observer frames of reference are astonishingly easy to grasp.

Einstein’s Theory of Relativity concerns observer reference frames that are inertial, nonaccelerating, and nonrotating, while a Special Theory dealt with accelerating rotating observer frames. Both insights increased our mathematical ability to compute universal effects more precisely. His insight that mass equals energy and vice versa was brilliant, but none of that gave us any insights into the nature of mass or energy.

You kids must come to terms with another surprising fact; already after this first zero volume split, the first birth of two progenitor atoms, our entire corporeal universe has entered tangible existence.

All existing laws of physics are already in play and in plain sight.

It is really that simple. I can’t emphasize enough how this early simplicity clarifies how the universe is governed by primal atoms.

The Primal Code is a foundation for a theory in classical physics. When I say field, it is not a vacuum field in the state of least spacetime excitation, bereft of objects or quanta like the ground state in quantum theory. My fields refer to corporeal objects strewn across zero space. The universe is a field of material primal atoms and gathering mattrons, hydrons, sun and galaxies etc.

At this dawn of creation, there are no collective field effects such as gravity, energy, or electromagnetic field. All the composite Matryoshka dolls belong to a distant future. Despite all of that, you will find all the laws of physics to be present and in plain sight.

You can view two blocks of indivisible corporeal mass that have no facility to communicate across empty space (without a split of new atoms). How could they? They are all that exists. At this point there is no allied atom. Collisions must await future creation of more primal pairs.

A primal atom cannot exert any influence across empty space.

Every primal atom is always at the center of its private universe, no exceptions. The primal atom has an exclusive one-point relation to the rest of the universe, now and for all time. Its private coordinate system is the supreme reality of every primal atom, its eigenstate.

An observer like your mind’s eye uses a three-point reference to study the path or spatial movement of two receding spinning atoms. This does not in any way alter each primal atoms one-point reference. Only in theory, by observing from the surface of either atom with your mind's eye, can you gain a two-point reference.

Both +1 atom and -1 atom have an unstated aspect of huge importance; their volume includes the zero volume (composed of +1 and -1). The correct atom description is therefore either ++- or the adverse --+.

If you snap your fingers to make the atom disappear, the zero space around it does not flow into it. It was there from the beginning of the Primal Code.

The internal conflict of two allied digits that alternate within one atom as its corporeal aspect is an unprovable part of the Primal Code, but the internal conflicting mechanism allows future imbalance within the individual zero volumes and beds for