The Phantom of the Opera

By Gaston Leroux

The Phantom of the Opera is perhaps best known for its many stage and screen adaptations, but nothing beats the Gothic tension and haunting horror of Gaston Leroux's original text.

Part of the Macmillan Collector’s Library, a series of stunning, pocket-sized classics bound in real cloth with gold foiled edges and ribbon markers. These beautiful books make perfect gifts or a treat for any book lover. This edition features an afterword by dramatist Peter Harness.

Strange things are going on at the Paris Opera House; a mysterious phantom - a skeleton in dinner dress - is wreaking havoc amongst the singers and backstage staff. But when new managers take over and dismiss the rumours of the Opera Ghost, the terror really begins. Who is the curious figure stalking the stage at night? How can he be in so many places at once, entering and leaving locked rooms at will? And what is his connection to the beautiful and talented young soloist, Christine?

• Language: English
• Publisher: Pan Macmillan
• Release date: Oct 6, 2016
• ISBN: 9781509831517

Gaston Leroux

Gaston Leroux (1868-1927) was a French journalist and writer of detective fiction. Born in Paris, Leroux attended school in Normandy before returning to his home city to complete a degree in law. After squandering his inheritance, he began working as a court reporter and theater critic to avoid bankruptcy. As a journalist, Leroux earned a reputation as a leading international correspondent, particularly for his reporting on the 1905 Russian Revolution. In 1907, Leroux switched careers in order to become a professional fiction writer, focusing predominately on novels that could be turned into film scripts. With such novels as The Mystery of the Yellow Room (1908), Leroux established himself as a leading figure in detective fiction, eventually earning himself the title of Chevalier in the Legion of Honor, France’s highest award for merit. The Phantom of the Opera (1910), his most famous work, has been adapted countless times for theater, television, and film, most notably by Andrew Lloyd Webber in his 1986 musical of the same name.

Book preview

LEROUX

CHAPTER 1

Is it the Ghost?

It was the evening on which Messieurs Debienne and Poligny, the managers of the Opera, were giving a farewell gala performance to mark their retirement. Suddenly the dressing-room of La Sorelli, one of the principal dancers, was invaded by half a dozen young ladies of the ballet, who had come up from the stage after ‘dancing’ Polyeucte. They rushed in amid great confusion, some giving vent to forced and unnatural laughter, others to cries of terror. Sorelli, who wished to be alone for a moment to ‘polish up’ the speech which she was to make to the resigning managers, looked round angrily at the mad and tumultuous crowd. It was little Jammes – the girl with the tip-tilted nose, the forget-me-not eyes, the rose-red cheeks and the lily-white neck and shoulders – who gave the explanation in a trembling voice: ‘It’s the ghost!’

And she locked the door.

Sorelli’s dressing-room was fitted up with commonplace, official elegance. A pier-glass, a sofa, a dressing-table and a cupboard or two provided the necessary furniture. On the walls hung a few engravings, relics of the dancer’s mother, who had known the glories of the old Opera in the Rue Le Peletier: portraits of Vestris, Gardel, Dupont, Bigottini. But the room seemed a palace to the chits of the corps de ballet, who were lodged in common dressing-rooms where they spent their time singing, quarrelling, smacking the dressers and hairdressers and buying one another glasses of cassis, beer, or even rum, until the call-boy’s bell rang.

Sorelli was very superstitious. She shuddered, when she heard little Jammes speak of the ghost, called her a silly little fool and then, as she was the first to believe in ghosts in general and the Opera ghost in particular, at once asked for details: ‘Have you seen him?’

‘As plainly as I see you now!’ moaned little Jammes, whose legs were giving way beneath her, and she dropped into a chair.

Thereupon little Giry – the girl with eyes black as sloes, hair black as ink, a swarthy complexion and a poor little skin stretched over poor little bones – little Giry added: ‘If that’s the ghost, he’s very ugly!’

‘Oh yes!’ cried the chorus of ballet-girls.

And they all began to talk together. The ghost had appeared to them in the shape of a gentleman in dress-clothes, who had suddenly stood before them in the passage, without their knowing where he came from. He seemed to have loomed through the wall.

‘Pooh!’ said one of them, who had more or less kept her head. ‘You see the ghost everywhere!’

And it was true. For several months there had been nothing discussed at the Opera but this ghost in dress-clothes who stalked about the building, from top to bottom, like a shadow, who spoke to nobody, to whom nobody dared speak and who vanished as soon as he was seen, no one knowing how or where. As became a real ghost, he made no noise in walking. People began by laughing and making fun of this spectre clad like a man of fashion or an undertaker; but the ghost legend soon swelled to enormous proportions among the corps de ballet. All the girls pretended to have met this supernatural being more or less often. And those who laughed the loudest were not the most at ease. When he did not show himself, he betrayed his presence or his passing by accidents, comic or serious, for which the general superstition held him responsible. Had anyone met with a fall, or suffered a practical joke at the hands of one of the other girls, or lost a powder-puff, it was at once put down to the ghost, the Opera ghost.

Yet who had actually seen him? You meet so many men in dress-clothes at the Opera who are not ghosts. But this dress-suit had a peculiarity of its own: it clothed a skeleton. At least, so the ballet-girls said. And, of course, it had a death’s-head.

Was all this serious? The truth is that the idea of the skeleton came from the description of the ghost given by Joseph Buquet, the chief scene-shifter, who had really seen the ghost. He had run up against the ghost on the little staircase, by the footlights, which leads straight down to the ‘cellars’. He had seen him for a second – for the ghost had fled – and to anyone who cared to listen to him he said: ‘He is extraordinarily thin and his dress-coat hangs on a skeleton frame. His eyes are so deep that you can hardly see the fixed pupils. All you see is two big black holes, as in a dead man’s skull. His skin, which is stretched across his bones like a drumhead, is not white, but a dirty yellow. His nose is so little worth talking about that you can’t see it side-face; and the absence of that nose is a horrible thing to look at. All the hair he has is three or four long dark locks on his forehead and behind the ears.’

This chief scene-shifter was a serious, sober, steady man, very slow at imagining things. His words were received with interest and amazement; and soon there were other people to say that they too had met a man in dress-clothes with a death’s-head on his shoulders. Sensible men, hearing the story, began by saying that Joseph Buquet had been the victim of a joke played by one of his assistants. And then, one after the other, there came a series of incidents so curious and so inexplicable that the very shrewdest people began to feel uneasy.

For instance, a fireman is a brave fellow! He fears nothing, least of all fire! Well, the fireman in question,¹ who had gone to make a round of inspection in the cellars and who seems to have ventured a little further than usual, suddenly reappeared on the stage, pale, scared, trembling, with his eyes starting out of his head, and practically fainted in the arms of the proud mother of little Jammes. And why? Because he had seen, coming towards him, at the level of his head, but without a body attached to it, a head of fire! And, as I said, a fireman is not afraid of fire.

The fireman’s name was Pampin.

The corps de ballet was flung into consternation. At first sight, this fiery head in no way corresponded with Joseph Buquet’s description of the ghost. But the young ladies soon persuaded themselves that the ghost had several heads, which he changed about as he pleased. And, of course, they at once imagined that they were in the greatest danger. Once a fireman did not hesitate to faint, leaders and front-row and back-row girls alike had plenty of excuses for the fright that made them quicken their pace when passing some dark corner or ill-lighted corridor. Sorelli herself, on the day after the adventure of the fireman, placed a horseshoe on the table in front of the stage-door-keeper’s box, for everyone who entered the Opera other than as a spectator to touch before setting foot on the first tread of the staircase. This horseshoe was not invented by me – any more than any other part of this story, alas – and may still be seen on the table in the passage outside the stage-door-keeper’s box, when you enter the Opera through the yard known as the Cour de l’Administration.

To return to the evening in question: ‘It’s the ghost!’ Little Jammes had cried.

An agonising silence now reigned in the dressing-room. Nothing was heard but the hard breathing of the girls. At last, Jammes, flinging herself into the furthest corner of the wall, with every mark of real terror on her face, whispered: ‘Listen!’

Everybody seemed to hear a rustling outside the door. There was no sound of footsteps. It was like light silk gliding along the panel. Then it stopped.

Sorelli tried to show more pluck than the others. She went up to the door and, in a quavering voice, asked: ‘Who’s there?’

But nobody answered. Then, feeling all eyes upon her, watching her least movement, she made an effort to show courage and said, very loudly: ‘Is there anyone behind the door?’

‘Oh yes, there is! Of course there is!’ cried that little dried plum of a Meg Giry, heroically holding Sorelli back by her gauze skirt. ‘Whatever you do, don’t open the door! Oh lord, don’t open the door!’

But Sorelli, armed with a dagger which she always carried, turned the key and drew back the door, while the ballet-girls retreated to the inner dressing-room and Meg Giry moaned: ‘Mother! Mother!’

Sorelli looked into the passage bravely. It was empty: a gas-flame, in its glass prison, cast a red and sinister light into the surrounding darkness, without succeeding in dispelling it. And the dancer slammed the door again, with a deep sigh: ‘No’, she said, ‘there is no one there.’

‘Still, we saw him!’ Jammes declared, returning with timid little steps to her place beside Sorelli. ‘He must be somewhere, prowling about. I shan’t go back to dress. We had better all go down to the foyer together, at once, for the speech, and then come up again together.’

And the child reverently touched the little coral finger which she wore as a charm against bad luck, while Sorelli stealthily, with the tip of her pink right thumbnail, made a St Andrew’s cross on the wooden ring which adorned the fourth finger of her left hand. She said to the little ballet-girls: ‘Come, children, pull yourselves together! I dare say no one has ever seen the ghost . . . ’

‘Yes, yes, we saw him . . . we saw him just now!’ cried the girls. ‘He had his death’s-head and his dress-coat, just as when he appeared to Joseph Buquet!’

‘And Gabriel saw him too!’ said Jammes. ‘Only yesterday! Yesterday afternoon . . . in broad daylight.’

‘Gabriel, the chorus-master?’

‘Why, yes, didn’t you know?’

‘And he was wearing his dress-clothes, in broad daylight?’

‘Who? Gabriel?’

‘Why, no, the ghost!’

‘Certainly! Gabriel told me so himself. That’s what he knew him by. Gabriel was in the stage-manager’s office. Suddenly, the door opened and the Persian entered. You know, the Persian has the evil eye . . . ’

‘Oh yes!’ answered the little ballet-girls in chorus, warding off ill-luck by pointing their forefinger and little finger at the absent Persian, while their second and third fingers were bent on the palm and held down by the thumb.

‘And you know how superstitious Gabriel is,’ continued Jammes. ‘However, he is always polite, and, when he meets the Persian, he just puts his hand in his pocket and touches his keys . . . Well, the moment the Persian appeared in the doorway, Gabriel gave one jump from his chair to the lock of the cupboard, so as to touch iron! In so doing, he tore a whole skirt of his overcoat on a nail. Hurrying to get out of the room, he banged his forehead against a hat-peg and gave himself a huge bump; then, suddenly stepping back, he skinned his arm on the screen, near the piano. He tried to lean on the piano, but the lid fell on his hands and crushed his fingers. He rushed out of the office like a madman, slipped on the staircase and came down the whole of the first flight on his back. I was just passing with Mother. We picked him up. He was covered with bruises and his face was all over blood. We were frightened out of our lives, but, all at once, he began to thank Providence that he had got off so cheaply. Then he told us what had frightened him. He had seen the ghost behind the Persian, the ghost with the death’s-head, just like Joseph Buquet’s description!’

Jammes had told her story ever so quickly, as though the ghost were at her heels, and was quite out of breath at the finish. A silence followed, while Sorelli polished her nails in great excitement. It was broken by little Giry, who said: ‘Joseph Buquet would do better to hold his tongue.’

‘Why should he hold his tongue?’ asked somebody.

‘That’s Ma’s opinion,’ replied Meg, lowering her voice and looking about her, as though fearing lest other ears than those present might overhear.

‘And why is it your mother’s opinion?’

‘Hush! Ma says the ghost doesn’t like being talked about.’

‘And why does your mother say so?’

‘Because . . . because . . . nothing . . . ’

This reticence exasperated the curiosity of the young ladies, who crowded round little Giry, begging her to explain herself. They were there, side by side, leaning forward simultaneously in one movement of entreaty and fear, communicating their terror to one another, taking a keen pleasure in feeling their blood freeze in their veins.

‘I swore not to tell!’ gasped Meg.

But they left her no peace and promised to keep the secret, until Meg, burning to say all she knew, began, with her eyes fixed on the door: ‘Well, it’s because of the private box . . . ’

‘What private box?’

‘The ghost’s box!’

‘Has the ghost a box? Oh, do tell us, do tell us! . . . ’

‘Not so loud!’ said Meg. ‘It’s Box Five, you know, the box on the grand tier, next to the stage-box, on the left.’

‘Oh, nonsense!’

‘I tell you it is . . . Ma has charge of it . . . But you swear you won’t say a word?’

‘Of course, of course . . . ’

‘Well, that’s the ghost’s box . . . No one has had it for over a month, except the ghost, and orders have been given at the box-office that it must never be sold . . . ’

‘And does the ghost really come there?’

‘Yes . . . ’

‘Then somebody does come?’

‘Why, no! . . . The ghost comes, but there is nobody there.’ The little ballet-girls exchanged glances. If the ghost came to the box, he must be seen, because he wore a dress-coat and a death’s-head. This was what they tried to make Meg understand, but she replied: ‘That’s just it! The ghost is not seen. And he has no dress-coat and no head! . . . All that talk about his death’s-head and his head of fire is nonsense! There’s nothing in it . . . You only hear him, when he is in the box. Ma has never seen him, but she has heard him. Ma knows, because she gives him his programme.’

Sorelli interfered: ‘Giry, child, you’re getting at us!’

Thereupon little Giry began to cry: ‘I ought to have held my tongue . . . If Ma ever got to know! . . . But it’s true enough, Joseph Buquet had no business to talk of things that don’t concern him . . . it will bring him bad luck . . . Ma was saying so last night . . . ’

There was a sound of heavy and hurried footsteps in the passage; and a breathless voice cried: ‘Cecile! Cecile! Are you there?’

‘It’s Ma’s voice,’ said Jammes. ‘What’s the matter?’

She opened the door. A respectable lady, built on the lines of a Pomeranian grenadier, burst into the dressing-room, and dropped groaning into a vacant armchair. Her eyes rolled madly in her brick-dust-coloured face.

‘How awful!’ she said. ‘How awful!’

‘What? What? . . . ’

‘Joseph Buquet . . . ’

‘What about him?’

‘Joseph Buquet is dead!’

The room became filled with exclamations, with astonished outcries, with scared requests for explanations . . .

‘Yes, he was found hanging in the third-floor cellar!’

‘It’s the ghost!’ blurted little Giry, as though in spite of herself; but she at once corrected herself, with her hands pressed to her mouth. ‘No, no! . . . I didn’t say it! . . . I didn’t say it! . . . ’

All around her, her panic-stricken companions repeated, under their breaths: ‘Yes . . . it must be the ghost! . . . ’

Sorelli was very pale: ‘I shall never be able to recite my speech,’ she said.

Ma Jammes gave her opinion, while she drained a glass of liqueur that happened to be standing on the table: ‘The ghost must have had something to do with it . . . ’

The truth is that no one ever knew how Joseph Buquet met with his death. The verdict at the inquest was ‘natural suicide’. In his Memoirs of a Manager, M. Moncharmin, one of the joint lessees who succeeded Messieurs Debienne and Poligny, describes the incident as follows:

A grievous accident spoilt the little party which Messieurs Debienne and Poligny gave to celebrate their retirement. I was in the managers’ office, when Mercier, the acting-manager, suddenly came darting in. He seemed half mad and told me that the body of a scene-shifter had been found hanging in the third cellar under the stage, between a set piece and a scene from the Roi de Lahore. I shouted: ‘Come and cut him down!’

By the time I had rushed down the staircase and the Jacob’s ladder, the man was no longer hanging from his rope!

So this is an event which M. Moncharmin treats as natural. A man hangs at the end of a rope; they go to cut him down; the rope has disappeared. Oh, M. Moncharmin found a very simple explanation! Listen to him:

It was just after the ballet; and leaders and dancing-girls lost no time in taking their precautions against the evil eye.

There you are! Picture the corps de ballet scuttling down the Jacob’s ladder and dividing the suicide’s rope among themselves in less time than it takes to write! When, on the other hand, I think of the exact spot where the body was discovered – the third cellar underneath the stage – I imagine that somebody must have been interested in seeing that the rope disappeared after it had effected its purpose; and time will show if I am wrong.

The horrid news soon spread all over the Opera, where Joseph Buquet was very popular. The dressing-rooms emptied and the little ballet-girls, crowding round Sorelli like timid sheep around their shepherdess, made for the foyer through the ill-lit passages and staircases, trotting as fast as their little pink legs could carry them.

CHAPTER 2

The New Margarita

On the first landing, Sorelli ran against the Comte de Chagny, who was coming upstairs. The count, who was generally so calm, seemed greatly excited: ‘I was just coming to you,’ he said, taking off his hat. ‘Oh, Sorelli, what an evening! And Christine Daaé: what a triumph!’

‘Impossible!’ said Meg Giry. ‘Six months ago, she sang like a carrion-crow! But do let us get by, my dear count,’ continued the chit, with a flippant curtsey. ‘We are going to enquire after a poor man who has been found hanging by the neck.’

Just then, the acting-manager came fussing past and stopped when he heard this remark: ‘What!’ he exclaimed, roughly. ‘Have you girls heard so soon? . . . Well, please forget about it for tonight, . . . and, above all, don’t let Messieurs Debienne and Poligny know: it would upset them, on their last day.’

They all went on to the foyer of the ballet, which was already full of people. The Comte de Chagny was right: no gala performance had ever equalled this. All the great composers of the day had conducted their own works in turn. Faure and Krauss had sung; and, on that evening, Christine Daaé had revealed her true self, for the first time, to the astonished and enthusiastic audience. Gounod had conducted the Funeral March of a Marionnette; Reyer, his beautiful overture to Sigurd; Saint-Saëns, the Danse macabre and a Rêverie orientale; Massenet, an unpublished Hungarian march; Guiraud, his Carnaval; Delibes, the Valse lente from Sylvia and the pizzicati from Coppélia. Mlle Krauss had sung the bolero in the Vespri Siciliani; and Mlle Denise Bloch the drinking-song in Lucrezia Borgia.

But the real triumph was reserved for Christine Daaé, who had begun by singing a few passages from Romeo and Juliet. It was the first time that the young artist sang in this work of Gounod, which had not yet been transferred to the Opera and which had been revived at the Opéra Comique long after its first production at the old Théâtre Lyrique by Mme Carvalho. Those who heard her say that her voice, in these passages, was seraphic; but this was nothing to the superhuman notes that she gave forth in the prison scene and the final trio in Faust, which she sang in the place of La Carlotta, who was ill. No one had ever heard or seen anything like it.

Daaé revealed a new Margarita that night, a Margarita of a splendour, a radiance hitherto unsuspected. The whole house went mad, rising to its feet, shouting, cheering, clapping, while Christine sobbed and fainted in the arms of her fellow-singers and had to be carried to her dressing-room. A few subscribers, however, protested. Why had so great a treasure been kept from them all that time? Till then, Christine Daaé had played a good Siebel to Carlotta’s rather too splendidly massive Margarita. And it had needed Carlotta’s incomprehensible and inexcusable absence from this gala night for little Daaé, at a moment’s warning, to show all that she could do in a part of the programme reserved for the Spanish diva! Now what the subscribers wanted to know was, why had Messieurs Debienne and Poligny applied to Daaé, when Carlotta was taken ill? Did they know of her hidden genius? And, if they knew of it, why had they kept it hidden? And why had she kept it hidden? Oddly enough, she was not known to have a professor of singing at that moment. She had often said that she meant to practise by herself in future. The whole thing was a mystery.

The Comte de Chagny, standing up in his box, listened to all this frenzy and took part in it by loudly applauding. Philippe Georges Marie Comte de Chagny was just forty-one years of age. He was a great aristocrat and a good-looking man, above the middle height and with attractive features, in spite of his hard forehead and his rather cold eyes. He was exquisitely polite to the women and a little haughty to the men, who did not always forgive him his social successes. He had an excellent heart and an irreproachable conscience. On the death of old Count Philibert, he became the head of one of the oldest and most distinguished families in France, whose arms dated back to the fourteenth century. The Chagnys owned a great deal of property; and, when the old count, who was a widower, died, it was no easy task for Philippe to accept the management of so large an estate. His two sisters and his brother Raoul would not hear of a division and waived their claim to their respective shares, leaving themselves entirely in Philippe’s hands, as though the right of primogeniture had never ceased to exist. When the two sisters married, on the same day, they received their portion from their brother, not as a thing belonging to them, but as a dowry for which they thanked him.

The Comtesse de Chagny, née de Moerogis de La Martynière, had died in giving birth to Raoul, who was born twenty years after his elder brother. At the time of the old count’s death, Raoul was twelve years old. Philippe busied himself actively with the youngster’s education. He was admirably assisted in this work, first by his sisters and afterwards by an old aunt, the widow of a naval officer, who lived at Brest and gave young Raoul a taste for the sea. The lad entered the Borda training-ship, finished his course with honours and quietly made his trip round the world. Thanks to powerful influence, he had just been appointed a member of the official expedition on board the Requin, which was to be sent to the Arctic Circle in search of the survivors of the D’Artois expedition, of whom nothing had been heard for three years. Meanwhile, he was enjoying a long furlough, which would not expire for another six months; and already the dowagers of the Faubourg St-Germain were pitying the handsome and apparently delicate stripling for the hard work in store for him.

The shyness of the sailor-lad – I was almost saying his innocence – was remarkable. He seemed to have but just left the women’s apron-strings. As a matter of fact, petted as he was by his two sisters and his old aunt, he had retained from this purely feminine education manners that were almost candid, stamped with a charm which nothing had yet been able to sully. He was a little over twenty-one years of age and looked eighteen. He had a small, fair moustache, beautiful blue eyes and a complexion like a girl’s.

Philippe spoilt Raoul. To begin with, he was very proud of him and pleased to expect a glorious career for his junior in the navy, in which one of their ancestors, the famous Chagny de La Roche, had held the rank of admiral. He took advantage of the young man’s leave of absence to show him Paris, with all its luxurious and artistic delights. The count considered that, at Raoul’s age, it is not good to be too good. Philippe himself had a character that was very well-balanced in work and pleasure alike; his demeanour was always faultless; and he was incapable of setting his brother a bad example. He took him with him wherever he went. He even introduced him to the foyer of the ballet. I know that the count was said to be ‘on terms’ with Sorelli. But it could hardly be reckoned as a crime for this nobleman, a bachelor, with plenty of leisure, especially since his sisters were settled, to come and spend an hour or two after dinner in the company of a dancer who, though not so very, very witty, had the finest eyes that ever were seen! And, besides, there are places where a true Parisian, when he has the rank of the Comte de Chagny, is bound to show himself; and, at that time, the foyer of the ballet at the Opera was one of those places.

Lastly, Philippe would perhaps not have taken his brother behind the scenes of the Opera if Raoul had not been the first to ask him, repeatedly renewing his request with a gentle obstinacy which the count remembered at a later date.

On that evening, Philippe, after applauding the

Reviews for The Phantom of the Opera

[sturlington_1 · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

A deformed man, obsessively in love with a young singer, haunts the Paris Opera House.I listened to this classic as an audiobook, a first for me (other than kids' books). I think this was a good way to experience the book, as I didn't worry so much over the French names or phrases, or the archaic writing style, and instead just absorbed the story as best as I could. It's kind of a potboiler, isn't it? I'm sure I missed some details, but it was entertaining while walking or riding in the car. I hope to continue to "read" more classics using this method.Listened to the audiobook in 2015.

[the1butterfly · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

I consider The Phantom of the Opera to be a retelling of the "Beauty and the Beast" fairy tale. The phantom in this version is kind of a creepy stalker guy. We get depth in some aspects missing in the musical (although we do not have the depth of feeling that the musical conveys), but really, if you want a good retelling of this story, read Susan Kay's Phantom. Leroux gets credit for the story line, but his writing is just as boring as that of other authors whose works have been turned into really awesome musicals- Victor Hugo and Charles Dickens. Were men of that general period just completely incapable of writing?

[rickyhaas · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

I felt this book was a little disappointing. I wasn't really interested in any of the characters until the end of the novel and even at that point I only really liked Raoul and the Persian. Christine was just so stupid and the Phantom was so annoying with his whole "I'm ugly; pity me!" There wasn't any point in the book where I really wanted to read it until the end as it was building up towards the climax. Then just I was starting to feel like this book was actually going to be great, Gaston Leroux gave it an awful ending. I'm only going to give this book 3.5 stars and I would only recommend to fans of Gothic Literature or movie.

[vyode_1 · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

sat unread for years.this translation ( or prose style ) is not the easiest or most engaging to read. but after slogging it through it's a little bit better than expected/anticipated

[bcushman-1 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

This is the one and only time you will hear me say 'I liked the movie/play better' Because I did. Its still an enjoyable book, very creepy and romantic but I miss the music. Maybe if I listen to the soundtrack while I read it?

[krau0098 · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

I love the musical but had never read this book before. So I downloaded it to my Kindle for free. The formatting was okay on the Kindle version but all of the color plates were missing with an insert stating (color plate here). Overall the story itself was wonderful and really added to my understanding of the musical.I think just about everyone should be familiar with this story. It is the story of an Opera Ghost who is mentoring Christine Daae to become a great opera singer. Of course when the Opera Ghost's wishes are not met by the new managers who run the opera house a series of disasters befall the opera company. Christine becomes increasingly entangled with the Opera Ghost and her childhood sweetheart, Raoul, tries his best to save her.The book starts out a bit slow. It is told from the point of view of an investigator who is trying to piece together the whole story behind the Phantom of the Opera. Things really pick up as the Opera Ghost starts to torment people and Christine and Raoul start their false engagement.My favorite part was the last third of the book when Raoul and the Persian are trying to navigate the area beneath the theater.This book fills out some major parts of the story that you don't get in the musical. There is a lot more background on Raoul and Christine's childhood. More time is spent explaining the past of the Opera Ghost, Eric, and what made him the way he is. At the very end the investigator details how all of the ghostly things that happened in the story were done. Also the scenes under the opera house are much more vicious, involving a incredibly unique torture chamber, threats to flatten a few blocks of Paris, and more.I was surprised at how engaging the writing style was. This was not a tough book to read at all, it was incredibly engaging and easy to read. There is a sly sense of humor in parts of the book and I found myself laughing out loud a couple times. I really enjoyed it.My only complaint (and my husband's complaint) is that I kept humming parts of the musical as I read the book! If you are a fan of The Phantom and the Opera musical definitely check out this book; it makes parts of the musical make a lot more sense. It is much more interesting and creative and engaging than the musical too! The first third of the book is kind of slow but if you can make it though that, the rest of the book is definitely worth it!

[leperdbunny · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

Title: The Phantom of the OperaAuthor: Gaston LerouxGenre: Horror, Mystery# of pages: 336 pagesStart date:End date:Borrowed/bought: boughtMy rating of the book, F- [worst] to A [best]: ADescription of the book: This story was set in a Paris Opera House in 1880. The story is of the Opera Ghost, a tale recounting the Phantom of the Opera, whom fell in love with Christine Daae.Review: I loved the Phantom of the Opera movie, and I've been meaning to read this for a while. The underground lair of the Phantom was described a lot more and seemed more sinster- down to the torture room that the Phantom had. The background that described the Phantom was much different than what was portrayed in the movie/play. Towards the middle of the book he seemed very sinister, and was probably the creepiest part in the book. I hated Christine and Raoul's relationship at times, they seemed petty. Christine also seemed naive- which was intentional I am sure, so at times, she got on my nerves. My favorite characters were the new owners/managers. They were probably my favorite part of the book. I don't want to spoil the end- but it was a surprise to me!

[erolene · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

Coming as a person who has seen and loves the movie/musical, The Phantom of the Opera was not at all what I was expecting. First of all, Gaston Leroux has an interesting style of writing, making this book seem almost more like a documentary than a novel. He makes you feel like these people were real and he's just the one telling their story. Secondly, the characters were so different from the movie... and I hate to say this about a classic, but I like how they were portrayed in the movie better. Raoul seemed almost ridiculously emotional and apt to do just about anything and Christine was even more naive than she was in the movie. The Phantom's character was a little bit more explained, but I still had a hard time feeling sorry for him. He's a very talented individual, yet he feels he has the right to kill people just because he's disfigured? All in all, considering it was free on my Kindle and was fairly short (Not much over 200 pages, I'd say), it was a worthwhile read, if only to add a bit more background to the story.

[stouthearted_1 · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

What is interesting about this novel in light of the Andrew Lloyd Webber musical, is that the novel seems devoid of a hero. Erik, the Phantom, is a murderous psychopath. His muse, Christine, is a fragile wreck, and her lover Raoul is described as childish and whiny by the author. Yet, the gothic tale is very suspenseful, and we almost don't know who to root for. Erik's background is fascinating, and his genius almost overshadows his murderous rampages. The decent beneath the Opera House is very compelling in its mystery and suspense. Leroux's strength is in his scenic descriptions. It is through flashbacks that we best sympathize with the characters, as the author's dialogue does his characters no favors. For fans of the musical, much more is explained between the relationship between Madame Giry and the Phantom, how Christine came to the Opera, and, best of all, how the Phantom constructed his underground lair. His description of the impressive hideaway blows the Broadway scenery right out of the water.

[chihirona · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

This story was mysterious.The phantom was terrible man.But he was poor man, too.

[laugal-2 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

I read this after seeing the musical. I would never have read the book if not for the musical.Not my style of read.But I did read it many years ago and found it too "dark". I realize the Phantom had a life of tragic circumstances and lived as a result of society and its fears. It was well written and is a classic. I would suggest it be read. I just found it disappointing after seeing the musical.

[robble_1 · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

This book gives us an insight into the depravities and, conversly the beauties of humanity. The ugliness of the phantom is contrasted with the beauty of his music and understandably, Christine feels an undeniably pity for him, whereas the naive Raoul only feels anger towards him. One of the best characters that was left out of the musical version was the Persian, who presents important background into the phantom's life. This book totally made me cry at the end!

[factory_1 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

This story is very famous. I had not read though I knew the title of this story. This story is a talk that centers on the true colors of the ghost that appears in the opera house. Because the story of the original had been easily brought together as for this book, it was very comprehensible. Because characters' names were French, it was not easy to have read. This title is very fear but story was very interesting!

[kristymk18-1 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

2.5 StarsI saw (one of the many) movie[s] when I was a kid and the opera itself about 12 years ago and I have to say I enjoyed the opera better than the book. As a book, it is just strange and odd with lots of long descriptions and telling and few scenes with dialogue. Played out on stage this is amazing, but I struggled reading through it

[ameliaiif · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

lucky for you, Mr. Leroux, Andrew Lloyd Webber came along and made your bad writing into a world-phenomenon musical. his phantom is way more likeable, his raoul is less dorky, and all the stupid subplots disappear! i give this an extra star just because your story did spawn the most amazing, beloved musical of all time.

[sweetsarah_1 · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

Ohhh this is one of the best books i have ever read. i love how the phantom is so madly inlove wiht christe that he will do anything and nothing will stop him from loving the beautiful melodies that spring out of Christine Daae's voice. not even Roul will stop him

[andyray_1 · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

The book is better than the movie(s) or, to be more precise, it is excellent in print and the second movie with Andrew Lloyd Weber's score in it was excellent as in that art form. In this book, we see excellent development of the phantom, opeera ghost, or Erik, and fairly good development of the dahomey and some other secondary figurfesk, but the hero and heroine (the count and christine) are flat, picture-like characters and act mostly as a foil to Erik's jekyl and hyde personality.Of course, it was written in French and the publishers didn't bother to give us the name of the translator. This is a pity as I believe he or she did a marvelous job.

[kathleen586 · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

I was really enjoying this, and then I found out the translation I am reading is inaccurate and abridged! :(

I guess I'll just have to read it again later. I think I'll wait until the new Mireille Ribière translation comes out in March.

[madepercy-1 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

A timeless classic in the Gothic horror genre, rightly compared with Victor Hugo's Hunchback of Notre-Dame. The afterword mentions an American reviewer's distaste for the opera ghost being merely human, but after seeing many horror movies in recent times where the face of the supernatural being is revealed, I am inclined to prefer the man masquerading as a ghost any time. Apparently Leroux wrote detective novels before this work and the influence is noticeable. The nature of the building and the brilliant descriptions (or more accurately, allusions) to the opera itself recall many a nightmare where one is trapped underground. Leroux had access to the Palais Garnier to research his work and it is obvious in the story. This was an easy and enjoyable read and one I should have completed many years earlier. While I do not usually have a preference for the Gothic genre, this 1910 classic presents a complex mood that, for me, was belied by the images of the phantom singing with Marina Prior that haunted Australian televisions screens throughout the 1990s.

[rebeccaday1 · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

This is definately one of my top books!!!! It gives such good insight on who the phantom was and how he was trained in the illusions that made everyone think he was a ghost. It is very suspenseful and has great action scenes. I would love to see a movie based on the book and not the musical! There is a cheesy attempt of a movie from the 1980's with Robert Englund but is more inspired by the book then based on the book.

[aikon_5 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

This story was difficult to read for me.I thought if the phantom was not him, whether Christine love him or not?I thought he was so poor.

[malbebe · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

Gaston creates a wonderful and dark, fascinating world in the Phantom of the Opera. This book is a quick read, and the story flows with each word. This is the story of Christine, who is a beautiful singer. The Phantom, Erik, falls in love with Christine. He would do anything for her. With Raoul de Chagny in the picture, comes a love triangle. Who will Christine choose to be with? Will she make the right choice when the lives of others depend on her choice? I liked the bond that Raoul and Christine had. The mystery of the whole novel was very intriguing. I wish I could go visit the opera house, and see for myself what Gaston was talking about. Who wouldn't want to go underground and go through a maze of tunnels.The managers were skeptical of the opera ghost, and the things they did added a little bit of comedy. As for the Phantom, he grows on you. He may have had a terrible past but he wants to redeem himself and be happy with someone that loves him. We all want to feel wanted and loved, and this is why I felt sympathetic towards him. There is also a message that goes along the book, but it might give away the entire book so I'll let you figure it out yourself.Four Stars!

[schmal06 · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

I loved this book. It is more a melodramatic love story than the horror story it is made out to be and it's neither the musical nor the black and white silent so it should not be judged based on them. It is dark and passionate and surprisingly very funny.

[applechristensen · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

I didn't know the musical was based on a true story. It's the original true crime novel.

[wanderlust_lost · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

I thoroughly enjoyed this book. I had no idea what to expect as I wasn\'t familiar with any of Leroux\'s other novels and I hadn\'t heard anything about it from anybody else who\'d read it. I fell in love with it from the start. It\'s the perfect Gothic novel. It\'s ingenious, beautiful, and dark. I love it.

[mlle_christina · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

The book really wasn't what I expected, though I did enjoy it. I think maybe this story is better suited to the stage or screen, because it's not the deepest or most developed as far as novels go, but it is a good story and a fun take on the Persephone theme. Lots more details in the book, of course, than in movies, so worth a read for that.

[bkoopman_5 · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

I appreciate the Opera of the Phantom MANY times more now that the holes in the storyline of the opera are patched up. This is an intriguing mystery, a complex story about human frailty, but mostly, it is a lovely love story.

[jenniebooks · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

Love triangle with a ghost. Kept me occupied

[engpunk77 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

This was worth reading. I enjoyed comparing this version to the movies & Broadway version. While I enjoyed the story and found it so much more believable than the latest movie's version, what I gained mostly out of reading this was a deeper understanding of some of the elements of the most recent movie. For example, the director's choice in having a white horse in the basement of the opera house seemed outright stupid and random, but the book had a scene in which he stole Christine's boyfriend's horse so that he could offer her the same... Not an important detail, but I'm just trying to show that the book provides insight into the other versions.

[dysmonia · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

I was obsessed with The Phantom of the Opera in the sixth grade, after our otherwise useless music teacher taught a unit on the actual opera. I then read the book for a reading project in regular class.