Land Administration In Urhobo Division Under Colonial Rule 1935 – 1960
()
About this ebook
Related to Land Administration In Urhobo Division Under Colonial Rule 1935 – 1960
Related ebooks
The City of God: BOOKS XIII-XXII Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTwo Treatises of Government Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Simon Baker's Ancient Rome Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsColonial Conspiracies in Africa Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLeviathan, Or the Matter, Forme, and Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiastical and Civil Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTwo Treatises Of Government Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Republic (Translated by Benjamin Jowett with an Introduction by Alexander Kerr) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Social Contract, Essays by Locke, Hume and Rousseau Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSubaltern Morality: a Postmodern Vision Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe National Gain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Philosophy of Benjamin Disraeli Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHuman Rights and Humanitarian Intervention: Legitimizing the Use of Force since the 1970s Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitics: A Treatise on Government Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Christianity and Positivism (Barnes & Noble Digital Library): A Series of Lectures to the Times on Natural Theology and Apologetics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFalse Start in Paradise Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsContesting Caprivi: A History of Colonial Isolation and Regional Nationalism in Namibia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDignity Rights: Courts, Constitutions, and the Worth of the Human Person Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Commonwealth of Oceana Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Liberty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Allure of Capitalism: An Ethnography of Management and the Global Economy in Crisis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow Ideas Shape Urban Political Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWilliam Jay and the Constitutional Movement for the Abolition of Slavery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Complete Works of Cornelius Tacitus Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClassics in Political Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary Of "The Concept Of Political Power In Max Weber's Work" By Emilia Castorina: UNIVERSITY SUMMARIES Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Prince - original version: (Rouge edition) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
History For You
The Secret History of the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Indifferent Stars Above: The Harrowing Saga of the Donner Party Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5100 Things You're Not Supposed to Know: Secrets, Conspiracies, Cover Ups, and Absurdities Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Richest Man in Babylon: The most inspiring book on wealth ever written Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Explain Everything About the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Grief Observed Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The End of the Myth: From the Frontier to the Border Wall in the Mind of America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Surprised by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Time Traveler's Guide to Medieval England: A Handbook for Visitors to the Fourteenth Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Library Book Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Whore Stories: A Revealing History of the World's Oldest Profession Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters--And How to Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lessons of History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5100 Amazing Facts About the Negro with Complete Proof Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5She Came to Slay: The Life and Times of Harriet Tubman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wordslut: A Feminist Guide to Taking Back the English Language Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Awakening: Defeating the Globalists and Launching the Next Great Renaissance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dance of the Dissident Daughter: A Woman's Journey from Christian Tradition to the Sacred Feminine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Land Administration In Urhobo Division Under Colonial Rule 1935 – 1960
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Land Administration In Urhobo Division Under Colonial Rule 1935 – 1960 - Emudiaga Onoriode Ebbah
Land Administration in Urhobo Division under Colonial Rule 1935 – 1960
By
Emudiaga Ebbah
Department Of History
Faculty of Art
Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.
Supervisors:
Prof. Gwadabe, M.M.
Prof. Sani, U.M.
March 2016
Land Administration in Urhobo Division under Colonial rule, 1935 – 1960
By
Emudiaga Ebbah
MA History
Ma/23368/2012/2013
A Project/Thesis/Dissertation Submitted to the School of Postgraduate Studies, Ahmadu Bello University in Partial Fulfillment for the Award of Masters in History
Department Of History
Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria
Supervisors:
Prof. Gwadabe, M.M.
Prof. Sani, U.M.
March 2016
Declaration
I declare that the work in this project/thesis/dissertation entitled Land Administration in Urhobo Division under Colonial Rule 1935 – 1960 has been carried out by me in the Department of History. The information derived from the literature has project report/thesis/dissertation was not previously presented for another degree or diploma at this or any other institution.
____________________________________________
Emudiaga EbbahDate
Certification
This project report/thesis/dissertation entitled LAND ADMINISTRATION IN URHOBO DIVISION UNDER COLONIAL RULE 1935 – 1960 by Emudiaga Onoriode Ebbah meets the regulation governing the award of the degree of Masters in History of Ahmadu Bello University and is approved for its contribution of knowledge of literary presentation.
_____________________________________________
Chairman, Supervisory CommitteeDate
________________________________________________
Member, Supervisory CommitteeDate
_________________________________________________
Member, Supervisory CommitteeDate
_________________________________________________
Head of DepartmentDate
________________________________________________
Dean, School of Postgraduate StudiesDate
Acknowledgement
I hereby acknowledge my supervisor professor Gwadabe, M. M. for his contributions to the thesis. His corrections and input has been very useful to this work. I want to also use this opportunity to thank my second supervisor Professor Umar, S.U. for taking his time to read the thesis.
I thank my brother Emokinovo and Onovwakpome Eguono Ebbah for their assistance. My thanks also go to Mr. Joseph Ejemare and my father Mr. Ruke Ebbah for reading the work and making their suggestions. I also use this opportunity to thank those whose books/works has been used for this thesis. Above all I thank the almighty God for his blessing.
Dedication
This Thesis is dedicated to Nancy Duja Ebbah, all the Staffs of Northern Historical Research Scheme (NHRS) and students and lecturers Department of History Ahmadu Bello University Zaria.
Abstract
This thesis is base on the process of land use, control and land acquisition in Urhobo Division. It looks at the history of land from 1935 when the Division was created and terminated at 1960 which symbolized a new era in Nigeria History. Studies were carried out on the social, political and economic activities before 1935, it was done to correct various misconception held by people who still believe that land was always owned by the family. This study has shown that land administration in Urhobo Division has been changing with its socio-political and economic development. In the pre-colonial era when land was under the control of elders / Urhobo Traditional institutions, land was owned and used by the family/ community, it could not be sold as it was an ancestral property. Users only had right to use land as permanent corps like palm trees were owned by the community. The economy was subsistence one and where food crops were planted. With the conquest and domination of Urhobo Division, followed by the introduction of colonial education, taxation, health policies etc. the use of land , its regulation and acquisition changed, cash crops were introduced. Land however developed into a state property in 1960 when Nigeria became independent.
Table of Contents
Declaration
Certification
Acknowledgement
Dedication
Abstract
Table Of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Statement Of Problem
Justification Of Study
The Scope Of The Study
Research Methodology
Theoritical Framwork
Aims And Objectives
Literature Review
Conclusion
Chapter Two
2.1 Introduction
2.2The Geography Of The Area
The Peopling And Tradition Of Origin Of The Urhobo
(2.3) Urhoboland Before Colonial Conquest
(2.4) Land Administration On The Eve Of Colonial Rule
Chapter Three
(3.1) Introduction
(3.2) The Rationale For The Conquest Of Urhoboland
(3.3) Nature Of Colonialism
(3.4) The Conquest Of Urhoboland
(3.5) Evolution Of Urhobo Division
Colonial Land Policy In Southern Nigeria
Chapter Four
4.1 Effect Of British Colonial Policy On Land In Urhobo Division
4.2Mode Of Acquisition Of Land In Colonial Period
4.3The Value Of Land
The Failure Of Colonial Lease System
4.6 Land Tenure Under Colonial Rule
Chapter Five
5.1Introduction
General Conclusion
Bibliography
Maps
Chapter One
Introduction
This proposal is a study of the land administration in Urhobo Division. It involves the administrative pattern and the mode of acquiring land in Urhobo Division from 1935 – 1960.
Land is the external part of the top soil, the mineral resources within; which includes the Flora and Fauna. Before colonial rule, land in Urhobo land was an ancestral property. It could not be sold as it was believed to be the home of the earth spirit and the soul of the ancestors[1]. Land brought among the Urhobo clans a sense of self respect, confidence and unity. It was used for burying the dead, for building town halls (Ogua or oro), market squares and for the purpose of re-creations like wrestling, storytelling and for outdoor games. The Urhobo people depended on land for survival. Each member of the respective community cultivated a piece, after the oldest man has divided them into plots. In Iyede for example, farming was done along the respective quarters. Farming activities were regulated to control the degree of fertility[2]; when farming was closed in one quarter strangers from the close quarter were allowed to farm in quarters that were still open but the use of palm nut of the community by strangers was strictly prohibited as palm nut was a commodity which was collectively owned. The same can be said of fish ponds .It was only available for use when it was opened by the Ovie (king) and his council.
The mode of transfer of land was by inheritance, gifts, pledges and individuals going into the forest to clear. There has been a gradual attenuation of the force of tradition in land tenure system of the Urhobo settlements. These changes were gradual as land was evolving towards individual ownership. This was made possible by continuous inheritance which led to redistribution of land. It was at this stage that the colonial state came to transform the area.
In the last quarter of the 19th century, Britain and other European powers scrambled and invaded for territories in Africa in such a bold manner that has no precedence in world history. The British colonization of Urhobo settlement in particular was one of the significant historical events which have changed the economy of land. The question that now arises is why did it occur? A number of reasons have been given for the rationale behind the colonial conquest and occupation of Urhobo land. The major interest in Urhobo settlement arose as a result of the abundant palm produce. Captain Gallway in October made a survey of the Urhobo oil market along the River Ethiope with the view of establishing a colonial constabulary post[3]. The British needed raw materials like palm oil and groundnut to help them run their machines and produce finished products for oversea markets.
The introduction of colonial rule changed the mode of administration, ownership and control of land. For the sake of administration land was divided into native land, crown land and public land. Native land was the land controlled by the local government; which consists of the warrant chiefs, clerks and messengers. The native land acquisition was promulgated to serve the native and non native alike. On the other hand crown land was the land which government laid claim to by lease while public land was land owned by government, taken and used for building railway and roads. The above adjustments led to commoditization of land. This period was characterized by the production of cash crops. Taxes were imposed and this forced the people to plant rubber and produce palm trees so as to earn money. The development of various land ordinances like the Native Land Acquisition Proclamation (1902), the Crown Land Management (1906) and Native Ordinance were some of the structures which preceded the Land Use Act of 1978, a post colonial land law which offered new mechanisms for development.
Statement of Problem
Before colonial rule, land was an ancestral property. This was the order of things. The people tilled the soil and used all available resources inherent in it. To the Urhobos, land was a source of unity, confidence and self respect. Land was regulated by the clan elders and the Ovie for the purpose of orderliness. Land was in abundance and sufficient for use. This was because elders divided land to family members on annual bases. The senior takes the first choice and the others wait for their turn. In this society land disputes were solved briskly as available plots claimed from nature was well known by the elders. All Elders (Okpako) met in the house of the most senior man to constitute a regulation on palm produce. One Olotu was selected in every quarter of a clan. His work was to protect palm trees in the village. An offence of trespass on land was tried and the guilty person was fined. This system of administration ensured that land and its resources are in abundance for the use of every citizen.
The arrival of the colonialist changed the order of things; they introduceda new system of indirect rule. Administration by indirect rule as theorized by Mahmood Mamdani rested on the Chief, the nature of the land, the native court and the state. Mamdani showed that the Chiefs were vested with control over land which reinforced their power over the people who