Unbelievers: An Emotional History of Doubt
By Alec Ryrie
3.5/5
()
Unavailable in your country
Unavailable in your country
About this ebook
Why have Western societies that were once overwhelmingly Christian become so secular? Looking to the feelings and faith of ordinary people, the award-winning author of Protestants Alec Ryrie offers a bold new history of atheism.
We think we know the history of faith: how the ratio of Christian believers has declined and a secular age dawned. In this startlingly original history, Alex Ryrie puts faith in the dock to explore how religious belief didn’t just fade away. Rather, atheism bloomed as a belief system in its own right.
Unbelievers looks back to the middle ages when it seemed impossible not to subscribe to Christianity, through the crisis of the Reformation and to the powerful, challenging cultural currents of the centuries since. As this history shows, the religious journey of the Western world was lived and steered not just by published philosophy and the celebrated thinkers of the day – the Machiavellis and Michel de Montaignes – but by men and women at every level of society. Their voices and feelings permeate this book in the form of diaries, letters and court records.
Tracing the roots of atheism, Ryrie shows that our emotional responses to the times can lead faith to wax and wane: anger at a corrupt priest or anxiety in a turbulent moment spark religious doubt as powerfully as any intellectual revolution. With Christianity under contest and ethical redefinitions becoming more and more significant, Unbelievers shows that to understand how something as intuitive as belief is shaped over time, we must look to an emotional history – one with potent lessons for our still angry and anxious age.
Alec Ryrie
Alec Ryrie is professor of the history of Christianity at the University of Durham. His most recent books are Unbelievers: An Emotional History of Doubt (2019) and (ed.) Christianity: A Historical Atlas (2020).
Read more from Alec Ryrie
Unbelievers: An Emotional History of Doubt Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Related to Unbelievers
Related ebooks
The Case for Religion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnitarianism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Enlightenment and religion: The myths of modernity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChristian History: An Introductiom to the Western Tradition Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Faithful Doubt: The Wisdom of Uncertainty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Puzzle of Sex Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHoly Communion in Contagious Times: Celebrating the Eucharist in the Everyday and Online Worlds Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWomen and Men After Christendom: The Dis-Ordering of Gender Relationships Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Welsh Witch: A Romance of Rough Places Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Short History of Christianity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIs Religion Irrational? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA People's Church: A History of the Church of England Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThat Was The Church That Was: How the Church of England Lost the English People Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Introduction to the Study of Comparative Religion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnderstanding Religious Conversion: The Case of St. Augustine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Great and Holy War: How World War I changed religion for ever Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Moral Dilemmas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFundamentalism and Gender: Scripture—Body—Community Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRespecting Life: Theology and Bioethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChristianity and Islam Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBible Matters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy Women Believe in God Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChanging Shape: The Faith Lives of Millennials Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond the Altar: Women Religious, Patriarchal Power, and the Church Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Influence of the Bible on Civilisation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLook to the Rock: The Catholic League and the Anglican Papalist Quest for Reunion Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Religious Rivalries in the Early Roman Empire and the Rise of Christianity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Birth of Modern Belief: Faith and Judgment from the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No Darker Rooms Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProof of the Existence of God: An Evidentiary Truth Based on Science, Moral Values, and Philology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Atheism For You
The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of The God Delusion: by Richard Dawkins | Includes Analysis Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Atheist Manifesto: The Case Against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We of Little Faith: Why I Stopped Pretending to Believe (and Maybe You Should Too) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy We Believe in God(s): A Concise Guide to the Science of Faith Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Deceptions and Myths of the Bible Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5United Aspects of Satan: The Black Book Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Darwin's Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Atheist Handbook to the Old Testament: The Atheist Handbook to the Old Testament, #1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lies Have Ruined the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Satanic Narratives - A Modern Satanic Bible Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Atheist Handbook to the Old Testament: The Atheist Handbook to the Old Testament, #2 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDid Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Founding Myth: Why Christian Nationalism Is Un-American Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Emancipation of a Black Atheist Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Flying With the Spaghetti Monster; the Pastafarian Handbook Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Age of Atheists: How We Have Sought to Live Since the Death of God Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Atheist Universe: The Thinking Person's Answer to Christian Fundamentalism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Biblical Literacy: The Most Important People, Events, and Ideas of the Hebrew Bible Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Disproving Christianity: and Other Secular Writings Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5God Is Great: Bible Rebuttal to Christopher Hitchens Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5American Crusade: How the Supreme Court Is Weaponizing Religious Freedom Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Homemade Atheist: A Former Evangelical Woman's Freethought Journey to Happiness Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGodless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shit Happens: Implications of Physicalism in Satanic Philosophy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Thou Shalt Not Believe Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Unveiled: How the West Empowers Radical Muslims Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Caught in the Pulpit: Leaving Belief Behind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Unbelievers
10 ratings1 review
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I enjoyed reading the book for its historical content and anecdotes. The author is engaging and writes well. But it was not what I thought it would be. I kept asking myself, when is the author going to make his point?In the introduction, the author asks: What if people stopped believing and found that they needed arguments to justify their unbelief?The author also states in the introduction that it is not only religious belief which is chosen for instinctive, inarticulate, intuitive reasons. So is unbelief. He says that the crucial juncture in the history of atheism is the period before the philosophers made it intellectually respectable. I.e., there is pre-Enlightenment atheism and post-Enlightenment atheism. Those who came before the Enlightenment were atheists for emotional reasons. This history continued through the Enlightenment but became hidden because philosophers gave unbelievers sophisticated rationalizations to hide the emotional non-rational reasons for their unbelief.The author mines the pre-Enlightenment past to find the real emotional reasons for disbelief before Westerners became tainted by philosophers’ high-minded justifications for disbelief which masked their true reasons.The author provides a series of descriptions of seventeenth century unbelievers in the Christian god in an attempt to show that that most people who were unbelievers did so for emotional rather than rational reasons. He doesn't establish his thesis in my opinion. There are a lot of problems with his thesis. Two that stand out for me are the confusion of some with all and the confusion of cause and effect.It is easy to find examples of people who believe all sorts of things for emotional reasons. There are also examples of people who believe or disbelieve many things for rational reasons as well. Some is not all.Some people report seeing their deceased loved one after death. Margaret Thatcher is one of them. It doesn’t mean a person actually came back from the dead. For emotional reasons, some believe that they did. Others know that this is impossible and that they were hallucinating. They disbelieve for rational reasons. The examples the author uses to illustrate disbelief based on emotion actually seemed to me to be very good reasons for not believing rather than ad hoc confabulations used to justify unbelief. He reports one person as saying that he had never seen a person come back from the dead. Others were angry at the corruption of the clergy. You have to remember that Christianity is the only religion that claims that once you become a believer, God himself through the Holy Spirit indwells you and helps you overcome your fallen nature through a process of sanctification. Seeing the corruption of the clergy would seem to me to be a very good refutation of that idea and would tend to make one an unbeliever. Not everyone is a philosopher or reads philosophy, but that does not mean that they don’t have very good rational reasons for disbelief. The brute facticity and immense weight of a mundane godless world constantly confronts every human being. It can be a slow grinding process. The world not making sense is a very good reason for not believing. Because it is not articulated through a sophisticated philosophy and eventually expresses itself through an emotion does not mean that it is non-rational. It is a very rational conclusion. It is believers who make the ad hoc rationalizations. Oh, it is god’s will. It is part of his plan. There’s a higher purpose. His ways are unknowable…on and on until belief falls before a thousand cuts…cause and effect.In the final chapter, the author jumps from the seventeenth century to today and wonders why the world is giving up on Christianity.Gee...maybe it's that people no longer interpret the world through a magical lens. It is like the old-hag beautiful-woman optical illusion. We have flipped from viewing the world magically to viewing it through a secular-scientific lens. Seeing a thunderbolt hit the ground near you is not viewed as a sign from god as Martin Luther viewed it. We look at people who have 'messages from god' as mentally ill and not as prophets. If you take evolution seriously, you think that humans evolved and were not created in god's image. Science has demystified and disenchanted the world. Why is this so hard to get? Humans may need religion. We may need a larger story to give our lives meaning. For most, science doesn’t provide that. But it doesn’t mean we need a religion like Christianity based on magic and miracles and a historical narrative that has been largely falsified (see The Historical Jesus Question: The Challenge of History to Religious Authority (2001) by Gregory W. Dawes). The larger subtext of the book seems to be the claim that we hold our ultimate beliefs for non-rational reasons. This is a common theme among modern Christian thinkers trying to rationally justify their adherence to Christianity. In their opinion, since all ultimate commitments are held for non-rational reasons, they are immunized from refutation since they are not doing anything that everyone else is doing (tu quoque). Being a Christian is no more or less rational than being an unbeliever. However, unless our ultimate commitments are open to revision, then we are being dogmatic and one has to give up the claim to being rational. A book that makes this point explicitly using Protestantism as an example of a rational belief system that degenerated into an ideology is Retreat to Commitment, by W.W. Bartley. Another is Hans Albert's book Treatise on Critical Reason.We’ve seen the atrocities that belief can produce. Maybe it’s time to give disbelief a chance.