Lao PDR: Accelerating Structural Transformation for Inclusive Growth
()
About this ebook
Read more from Asian Development Bank
Poverty in the Philippines: Causes, Constraints, and Opportunities Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Handbook on Battery Energy Storage System Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Game Changers in Asia: 2020 Compendium of Technologies and Enablers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Integrated Solid Waste Management for Local Governments: A Practical Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWaste to Energy in the Age of the Circular Economy: Best Practice Handbook Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSmart Ports in the Pacific Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMicrosoft Excel-Based Tool Kit for Planning Hybrid Energy Systems: A User Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHybrid and Battery Energy Storage Systems: Review and Recommendations for Pacific Island Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWaste to Energy in the Age of the Circular Economy: Compendium of Case Studies and Emerging Technologies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Energy Storage in Grids with High Penetration of Variable Generation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreen City Development Tool Kit Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilippines: Public-Private Partnerships by Local Government Units Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSustainable Tourism After COVID-19: Insights and Recommendations for Asia and the Pacific Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHandbook for Rooftop Solar Development in Asia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Practical Guide to Concrete Pavement Technology for Developing Countries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInnovative Infrastructure Financing through Value Capture in Indonesia Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Methodology for Estimating Carbon Footprint of Road Projects: Case Study: India Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPublic Financial Management Systems—Indonesia: Key Elements from a Financial Management Perspective Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Indonesia: Energy Sector Assessment, Strategy, and Road Map Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRepublic of the Philippines National Urban Assessment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuidelines for Wind Resource Assessment: Best Practices for Countries Initiating Wind Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnabling Inclusive Cities: Tool Kit for Inclusive Urban Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCarbon Pricing for Energy Transition and Decarbonization Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHandbook on Microgrids for Power Quality and Connectivity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCAREC Road Safety Engineering Manual 1: Road Safety Audit Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeployment of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Minigrids Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe COVID-19 Impact on Philippine Business: Key Findings from the Enterprise Survey Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Roadmap for Carbon Capture and Storage Demonstration and Deployment in the People's Republic of China Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Lao PDR
Related ebooks
Good Jobs for Inclusive Growth in Central Asia and the South Caucasus: Regional Report Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeveloping Agriculture and Tourism for Inclusive Growth in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAzerbaijan: Moving Toward More Diversified, Resilient, and Inclusive Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnergy Efficiency in South Asia: Opportunities for Energy Sector Transformation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRedefining Strategic Routes to Financial Resilience in ASEAN+3 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLeveraging Benefits of Regional Economic Integration: The Lao People’s Democratic Republic and the Greater Mekong Subregion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVegetable Production and Value Chains in Mongolia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolicies for High Quality, Safe, and Sustainable Food Supply in the Greater Mekong Subregion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEconomic Indicators for Southeastern Asia and the Pacific: Input–Output Tables Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSkills Gaps in Two Manufacturing Subsectors in Sri Lanka: Food and Beverages, and Electronics and Electricals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSustainable Energy Access Planning: A Framework Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKazakhstan: Accelerating Economic Diversification Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCompendium of Supply and Use Tables for Selected Economies in Asia and the Pacific Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAid for Trade in Asia and the Pacific: Promoting Connectivity for Inclusive Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGender Equality and Social Inclusion Diagnostic of Selected Sectors in Nepal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsia in the Global Transition to Net Zero: Asian Development Outlook 2023 Thematic Report Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBangladesh: Consolidating Export-led Growth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCountry Diagnostic Study on Long-Term Care in Mongolia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRealizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsian Water Development Outlook 2020: Advancing Water Security across Asia and the Pacific Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rural Connectivity Investment Program: Connecting People, Transforming Lives—India Gender Equality Results Case Study Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPractical Guidebook on Data Disaggregation for the Sustainable Development Goals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Sri Lankan Economy: Charting A New Course Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBoosting Gender Equality Through ADB Trade Finance Partnerships Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSASEC Vision: Myanmar Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCambodia: Energy Sector Assessment, Strategy, and Road Map Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRealizing the Potential of Public–Private Partnerships to Advance Asia's Infrastructure Development Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Business Development For You
Ultralearning: Master Hard Skills, Outsmart the Competition, and Accelerate Your Career Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hard Asks Made Easy: How to Get Exactly What You Want Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Start a Business for Beginners: A Complete Guide to Building a Successful & Profitable Business Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The 22 Immutable Laws of Branding: How to Build a Product or Service into a World-Class Brand Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Attitude Is Everything Workbook: Strategies and Tools for Developing Personal and Professional Success Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nolo’s Guide to Single-Member LLCs: How to Form & Run Your Single-Member Limited Liability Company Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe $100 Startup by Chris Guillebeau: Summary and Analysis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Oneness vs. the 1%: Shattering Illusions, Seeding Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Magic of Tiny Business: You Don’t Have to Go Big to Make a Great Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap...And Others Don't Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Business Plan Checklist: Plan your way to business success Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Nolo's Quick LLC: All You Need to Know About Limited Liability Companies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Summary of Graham Cochrane's How to Get Paid for What You Know Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Hard Truth About Soft Skills: Soft Skills for Succeeding in a Hard Wor Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Power: Why Some People Have It—and Others Don't Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freelance to Freedom: The Roadmap for Creating a Side Business to Achieve Financial, Time and Life Freedom Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fear Less: Face Not-Good-Enough to Replace Your Doubts, Achieve Your Goals, and Unlock Your Success Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The 30 Laws of Flow: Timeless Principles for Entrepreneurial Success Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Moneyless Man: A Year of Freeconomic Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capital in the Twenty-First Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Great by Choice: Uncertainty, Chaos, and Luck--Why Some Thrive Despite Them All Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of the Rest: How Entrepreneurs in Surprising Places are Building the New American Dream Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Emigrant Edge: How to Make It Big in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of Elaine Pofeldt's The Million-Dollar, One-Person Business Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings212 The Extra Degree: Extraordinary Results Begin with One Small Change Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Rocket Fuel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Lao PDR
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Lao PDR - Asian Development Bank
Chapter 1
Economic Performance and Key Development Challenges
1.1 Introduction
The Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) is a small landlocked economy endowed with natural resources, such as minerals, hydropower, and forest products, which have all been instrumental in sustaining higher economic growth in the last decade. After the Communist revolution in 1975, the country had a centrally planned economic system. However, economic performance during this era remained subdued and by the beginning of 1986, the state-led development strategy virtually collapsed. With the inception of the New Economic Mechanism (NEM) in 1986 the government came up with various economic and structural reforms that laid the foundation for transition to a market-oriented economy. Since then, the Lao PDR has shown remarkable progress in consistently building itself into a market-oriented economy. Economic growth during 1986–2016 averaged around 6.5% per annum and the size of its gross domestic product (GDP) increased by six times. The strong growth led to a rise in the per capita income from $170 in 1986 to $2,353 in 2016. Poverty incidence based on the national poverty line declined substantially from 46% in 1992 to 23.2% in 2011–2012.
In sustaining the high growth trajectory, resource-based products and increasing volumes of foreign direct investment (FDI) have played a crucial role. The reliance on resource-based products as an engine of growth has no doubt maintained higher growth; however, job opportunities were insufficient because of these products’ capital-intensive nature. At the same time, the high economic growth has not attracted private investments that are large enough to expand job opportunities in other sectors, thus posing a threat to inclusiveness of growth in the medium to long run. Despite higher GDP growth, the Lao PDR in 2017 is still classified as a least developed country (LDC). The challenges ahead would, therefore, be to keep the momentum of high economic growth, attract larger private investment, while also provide decent job opportunities in the manufacturing and more productive services sectors.
The rapid and sustained growth has changed the structure of the output—the share of agriculture in GDP declined while that of services and industry increased. However, this structural change has had little impact in changing the composition of employment. While the industry sector’s contribution to economic growth has increased, it remains dominated by resource-based products and unable to provide job opportunities. As a matter of fact, the share of industry in total employment has rather declined over time. On the other hand, while the services sector has helped increased jobs, its contribution remains low while most of the jobs fall under low value-added services. With only limited jobs created by the industry and services sectors, the low-productivity agriculture sector is left to absorb the majority of the labor force. Overall, there has been little movement from low-productivity to high-productivity sectors and, consequently, most of the labor force is employed in low-productivity sectors.
In 1986, the Government of the Lao PDR embarked upon the NEM. With the implementation of the NEM, the Lao PDR’s economy transformed gradually from being centrally planned to being market-oriented. The reforms introduced under NEM resulted in a domestic economy that was able to integrate gradually into the world. Overall, the opening of the economy has helped achieve higher economic growth and improve the status of the Lao PDR in the international arena. Since the inception of market-oriented policies and economic reforms, the Lao PDR has shown significant progress and has maintained robust economic growth.
From an analytical point of view, the economic and structural reforms introduced under NEM can be categorized into two stages: a preparatory stage in 1986–2000, and a period of high economic growth in 2000–2016. During the preparatory stage, the reforms aimed to transform the economy gradually into a market-based economic system. To this end, the government introduced various economic and structural reforms, which focused on establishing a legal and institutional framework and maintaining price stability. Prices and production control were deregulated and various incentives provided to develop a vibrant private sector. The government allowed private investment and took measures to attract FDI. In this regard, a law on foreign investment promotion and management in 1988 was passed, allowing 100% foreign ownership of investments. The law was subsequently revised in 1994. Other areas of reforms included improving the agriculture sector, revitalizing state-owned enterprises (SOEs), and enhancing the efficiency of the banking and finance sectors. The government also introduced reforms to replace the multiple exchange rates system with a unified exchange rate. In addition, it took significant measures to improve the banking sector, and it established the Bank of the Lao PDR (BOL) in 1990 (Oraboune 2012). Economic growth during 1986-2000 remained around 5.6% per annum.
From the early 2000s onward, during the period of high economic growth in 2000-2016, five-year national socioeconomic development plans (NSEDP), have played a central role in transforming the national strategic goals and the priority development programs into action plans. In 2002, the Industrialization and Modernization Strategy (2001–2020)—which was part of the government’s 2020 development vision—was introduced to help develop the industry sector. In addition, the government focused its efforts on hydropower, mining, agricultural production, tourism, and construction material (Jajri 2015). These reforms created favorable conditions for industrialization, which was supported initially by growth in manufacturing, particularly textiles and garments. From 2000 onward, resource-based sectors made up the bulk of industrial value added. GDP growth increased further and the economy grew at 7.2% per annum during 2000–2016 (Figure 1.1).¹
Figure 1.1: GDP Growth Rate and per Capita Income, 1970–2016
GDP = gross domestic product, RHS = right-hand side.
Source: United Nations Statistics Division. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/default.htm (accessed August 2017).
From the supply side, industry and services became the major drivers of growth. On the other hand, the contribution of agriculture declined over time. The contribution of industry to GDP growth surged from 25.6% during 1986–2000 to 37.6% in 2000–2005. It rose further to 46.9% in 2005–2010 and reached 52.0% during 2010–2016. Overall, during the period of high economic growth in 2000–2016 industry contributed 46.0% to GDP growth. As mentioned, resource-based products dominated the industry sector, and the share of resource-based industry (mining and electricity) in industrial value added surged from 25.4% in 2000 to 54.1% by 2015 (Figure 1.2).
Figure 1.2: Share of Resource-Based Industry in Industrial Value Added, 2000–2014
Note: Nonresource industry = manufacturing and construction, resource-based industry = mining and electricity.
Source: Computations based on ADB. 2016. Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2016. Manila.
The reliance on resource-based products, such as hydropower and mining, contributed significantly toward economic growth. However, because these sectors were capital intensive in nature, they were not a significant source of employment. Consequently, industry’s employment share declined from 8.7% in 2001 to 8.1% by 2010.
In 1986–2000, the services sector’s contribution toward economic growth was 37.1%, which rose to 39.1% in 2000–2005 and remained around 36.2% in 2005–2010. During the high-growth period of 2000–2016, the overall contribution of services remained on average at 37.1%. Within the subsectors of services, the growth rate of wholesale and retail trading, public services, and transport and communication remained strong.
The contribution of agriculture to GDP growth declined substantially—from 37.0% during the preparatory stage in 1986–2000 to 17.0% during the high-growth period in 2000–2016. An examination of the different subperiods indicates that agriculture contributed about 23.3% toward GDP growth in 2000–2005, 16.8% in 2005–2010, and 10.4% in 2010–2016 (Figure 1.3).
Figure 1.3: Contribution to GDP Growth, 1986–2016 (percentage points)
GDP = gross domestic product.
Source: Computations based on World Bank. World Development Indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators (accessed August 2017).
From the demand side, household consumption continued to dominate contribution to GDp growth. The share of household consumption in GDP remained around 90% during 1970–2000. However, from 2001 onward it started declining and in 2001–2015 averaged around 66%. During the same period, the share of investment in GDP increased from 11.4% to 31%. The share of exports, which was 11.8% in 1970–2000, increased further to 23.8% during 2001–2015. Against the backdrop of higher economic growth and to meet the growing consumption and investment demand, imports also surged from 21% to 32% (Figure 1.4).
Figure 1.4: Sectoral Share in GDP, 1970–2015
GDP = gross domestic product.
Source: United Nations Statistics Division. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/default.htm (accessed January 2017).
1.2 Major Economic Developments: 1975–2016
1.2.1 Background and Centrally planned economy (1975–1985)
The Kingdom of Laos was a constitutional monarchy that ruled from 1953 until 1975. However, against the backdrop of political changes in Viet Nam and Cambodia in April 1975, the monarchical government was abolished. Subsequently, in December 1975, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic was proclaimed, which then adopted a centrally planned economic system.
Historically, the Lao PDR has a lot in common with Viet Nam and Cambodia. As former French colonies, they shared a common currency under the colonial rule. They also adopted a Soviet-style central planning system in the 1970s. However, with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the subsequent loss of Soviet aid in the early 1990s, they began the process of economic and political reforms, paving the way for their transition from a centrally planned to a market-oriented economic system. The pace of reforms in all the three economies was quite different with regard to the degree of openness, international integration, and economic performance. Initially, these economies spent considerable time conducting reforms within the framework of a centrally planned economic system before transitioning into a market economy. For example, in Viet Nam, the Doi Moi
movement in 1986 signaled the end of the centrally planned economic system. This coincided with the introduction also in 1986 of the NEM in the Lao PDR, which ushered its transition toward a market economy (Shimomura et al. 1994).
As a landlocked economy and the least open of the three economies, the Lao PDR gradually started introducing reforms. During its economic transformation, the government pursued an annual plan covering 1976–1977, a three-year plan for 1978–1980, and a series of five-year plans for 1981–2015. In 1975–1985, the Lao PDR pursued a centrally planned economic system. Under this regime, prices and exchange rates were determined by the government and all the industry and foreign trade sectors were nationalized. However, in the initial years of the centrally planned economic system, the country faced remarkable difficulties, and economic management during this era remained weak. At the end of 1976, socialism was introduced and relations with the West and with Thailand were abandoned, resulting in massive urban unemployment and hyperinflation to the tune of 400%.
A large amount of the assistance from Western countries was interrupted, and the foreign exchange operating fund of the International Monetary Fund, which supported budget deficit and helped settle balance of payments, was also halted. During that time, both the budget and balance of payment deficits were financed with assistance from the former Soviet Union. The subsequent droughts in 1976–1977 and the floods in 1978 made matters even worse. Moreover, sudden termination of aid from the United States (US), disruption of cross-border trade from Thailand’s economic blockade, and the peasants’ resistance to the introduction of taxation and collectivization of agriculture aggravated economic difficulties further. Increased regulations from the government also reduced the number of traders and entrepreneurs (Shimomura et al. 1994). These series of events had an adverse impact on the economy, causing it to remain stagnant with GDP growth in 1976–1979 reaching almost zero. There was a little increase in per capita income from $72 in 1976 to $83 in 1979 and standard of living remained low.
To avert the situation, the Central Committee of the Lao People’s Revolutionary Party in 1979 announced economic reforms. Both individuals and private enterprises were allowed to engage in commercial activities. The government also took steps to reduce the number of constraints on domestic and international trade. Subsequently, with the launch of the first Five-Year Plan in 1981–1985, these reforms gained momentum. The plan emphasized the self-supply of food, establishment of transportation and telecommunication networks, promotion of industrialization, and improvement of human resources development. Since the Lao PDR had a low starting base, economic growth during 1981–1985 remained strong and the economy grew at 7.9% per annum. Per capita income increased from $122 in 1981 to $163 in 1985. Despite higher economic growth, however, the major objectives of the plan, such as attaining self-sufficiency and a balanced and diversified agriculture structure, could not be achieved. Consequently, the economy continued to face high budget and trade deficits and little progress in human resources development (Shimomura et al. 1994).
1.2.2 Transition to the Market Economy (1986)
By the beginning of the 1980s, the centrally planned economic system virtually collapsed, bringing about the Lao PDR’s transition toward a more open and market-oriented economy. In 1986, the government introduced various economic reforms and introduced market-oriented economic policies under the NEM, with the aim of setting up the legal and institutional framework and restoring price stability. Other areas of reforms focused on improving the agriculture sector, revitalizing SOEs, and enhancing the efficiency of the banking and finance sectors. The main objective of the NEM was to establish an economic system that is open to international trade and foreign investment. In this context, the government decentralized the economic system and promoted the development of the private sector, deregulating prices and introducing production controls. Managerial and financial autonomy was also granted to SOEs. The multiple exchange rate system was also unified and the fiscal and banking sectors improved. These reforms created a more favorable environment for private sector development and helped the Lao PDR actively participate in the global economy (Phimphanthavong 2012).
To support its transition toward a market-oriented economy, the government introduced additional reforms under the second Five-Year Plan (1986–1990), which elaborated the policies and guidelines for a smooth transition. One of the major areas of reforms was to bring the multi-exchange rate system into one unified exchange rate in 1988. Most of the restrictions on domestic and external trade were relaxed. The banking and finance sector reforms were milestones that were initiated in 1988 when the mono-banking system was replaced with a two-tier banking system. The BOL was established in 1990, while the commercial banking activities were separated from the central banking functions. The government also gave considerable operational and financial autonomy to all SOEs (Kyophilavong