Poisons, Their Effects and Detection: A Manual for the Use of Analytical Chemists and Experts
()
About this ebook
Read more from Alexander Wynter Blyth
Poisons: Their Effects and Detection A Manual for the Use of Analytical Chemists and Experts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPoisons: Their Effects and Detection A Manual for the Use of Analytical Chemists and Experts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Poisons, Their Effects and Detection
Related ebooks
A History of the Medicines We Take: From Ancient Times to Present Day Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNutritional Toxicology V1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDictionary of Poisons Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Natural Toxins: Characterization, Pharmacology and Therapeutics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Opium Habit Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Collection of Classic Gothic Novels Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVenomous Animals and Their Venoms: Venomous Vertebrates Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOpium Culture: The Art and Ritual of the Chinese Tradition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Secret Pestilence: A Mystery Novel of the Aids Outbreak Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOrchids as Aphrodisiac, Medicine or Food Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Poison Trials: Wonder Drugs, Experiment, and the Battle for Authority in Renaissance Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Untoward Effects of Drugs - A Pharmacological and Clinical Manual Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Power of the Poppy: Harnessing Nature's Most Dangerous Plant Ally Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Chronic Pain Handbook Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPoisons, Their Effects and Detection: A Manual for the Use of Analytical Chemists and Experts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOrigins of Clinical Chemistry: The Evolution of Protein Analysis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProgress in Chemical Toxicology: Volume 3 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuide to Foodborne Pathogens Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIndex to Reviews, Symposia Volumes and Monographs in Organic Chemistry: For the Period 1961-1962 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAliphatic Compounds: A Modern Comprehensive Treatise Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Chemistry of Synthetic Dyes V7 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhytochemicals in Plant Cell Cultures Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Handbook of Hazardous Materials Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMolecular Methods for Virus Detection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Yeasts: Yeast Technology Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Radionuclides in the Environment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEvolution of Primary Producers in the Sea Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Introduction to Biochemistry Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Index to Reviews, Symposia Volumes and Monographs in Organic Chemistry: For the Period 1963-1964 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Classics For You
The Bell Jar: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Animal Farm: A Fairy Story Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Learn French! Apprends l'Anglais! THE PICTURE OF DORIAN GRAY: In French and English Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Warrior of the Light: A Manual Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fellowship Of The Ring: Being the First Part of The Lord of the Rings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5East of Eden Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Silmarillion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rebecca Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Flowers for Algernon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Things They Carried Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Heroes: The Greek Myths Reimagined Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Old Man and the Sea: The Hemingway Library Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Farewell to Arms Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Princess Bride: S. Morgenstern's Classic Tale of True Love and High Adventure Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We Have Always Lived in the Castle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As I Lay Dying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lathe Of Heaven Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Two Towers: Being the Second Part of The Lord of the Rings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jonathan Livingston Seagull: The New Complete Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Canterbury Tales Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hell House: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wuthering Heights (with an Introduction by Mary Augusta Ward) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5For Whom the Bell Tolls: The Hemingway Library Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Odyssey: (The Stephen Mitchell Translation) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Good Man Is Hard To Find And Other Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Confederacy of Dunces Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ulysses: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Titus Groan Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Poisons, Their Effects and Detection
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Poisons, Their Effects and Detection - Alexander Wynter Blyth
Alexander Wynter Blyth
Poisons, Their Effects and Detection
A Manual for the Use of Analytical Chemists and Experts
Published by Good Press, 2022
goodpress@okpublishing.info
EAN 4057664577177
Table of Contents
PART I.—INTRODUCTORY.
I.—The Old Poison-Lore.
II.—Growth and Development of the Modern Methods of Chemically Detecting Poisons.
PART II.
I.—Definition of Poison.
II.—Classification of Poisons.
III.—Statistics.
V.—Life-Tests; or the Identification of Poison by Experiments on Animals.
VI.—General Method of Procedure in Searching for Poison.
VII.—The Spectroscope as an aid to the Identification of certain Poisons.
PART III.—POISONOUS GASES: CARBON MONOXIDE—CHLORINE—HYDRIC SULPHIDE.
I.—Carbon Monoxide.
II.—Chlorine.
III.—Hydric Sulphide (Sulphuretted Hydrogen) .
PART IV.—ACIDS AND ALKALIES.
I.—Sulphuric Acid.
II.—Hydrochloric Acid.
III.—Nitric Acid.
IV.—Acetic Acid.
V.—Ammonia.
VI.—Caustic Potash and Soda.
VII.—Neutral Sodium, Potassium, and Ammonium Salts.
PART V.—MORE OR LESS VOLATILE POISONOUS SUBSTANCES CAPABLE OF BEING SEPARATED BY DISTILLATION FROM NEUTRAL OR ACID LIQUIDS.
I.—Hydrocarbons.
II.—Camphor.
III.—Alcohols.
IV.—Ether.
V.—Chloroform.
VI.—Other Anæsthetics.
VII.—Chloral.
VIII.—Bisulphide of Carbon.
IX.—The Tar Acids—Phenol—Cresol.
X.—Nitro-Benzene.
XI.—Dinitro-benzol.
XII.—Hydrocyanic Acid.
XIII.—Phosphorus.
PART VI.—ALKALOIDS AND POISONOUS VEGETABLE PRINCIPLES SEPARATED FOR THE MOST PART BY ALCOHOLIC SOLVENTS.
DIVISION I.—VEGETABLE ALKALOIDS.
DIVISION II.—GLUCOSIDES.
DIVISION III.—CERTAIN POISONOUS ANHYDRIDES OF ORGANIC ACIDS.
DIVISION IV.—VARIOUS VEGETABLE POISONOUS PRINCIPLES—NOT ADMITTING OF CLASSIFICATION UNDER THE PREVIOUS THREE DIVISIONS.
PART VII.—POISONS DERIVED FROM LIVING OR DEAD ANIMAL SUBSTANCES.
DIVISION I.—POISONS SECRETED BY LIVING ANIMALS.
DIVISION II.—PTOMAINES—TOXINES.
DIVISION III.—FOOD POISONING.
PART VIII.—THE OXALIC ACID GROUP OF POISONS.
CERTAIN OXALIC BASES—OXALMETHYLINE—OXALPROPYLINE.
PART IX.—INORGANIC POISONS.
I.—PRECIPITATED FROM A HYDROCHLORIC ACID SOLUTION BY HYDRIC SULPHIDE—PRECIPITATE YELLOW OR ORANGE. Arsenic—Antimony—Cadmium.
II.—PRECIPITATED BY HYDRIC SULPHIDE IN HYDROCHLORIC ACID SOLUTION—BLACK. Lead—Copper—Bismuth—Silver—Mercury.
III.—PRECIPITATED BY HYDRIC SULPHIDE FROM A NEUTRAL SOLUTION. Zinc—Nickel—Cobalt.
IV.—PRECIPITATED BY AMMONIUM SULPHIDE. Iron—Chromium—Thallium—Aluminium—Uranium.
V.—ALKALINE EARTHS.
APPENDIX.
Treatment by Antidotes or otherwise of Cases of Poisoning.
TREATMENT.
DOMESTIC READY REMEDIES FOR POISONING.
INDEX.
POISONS:
THEIR EFFECTS AND DETECTION.
PART I.—INTRODUCTORY.
Table of Contents
I.—The Old Poison-Lore.
Table of Contents
§ 1. It is significant that the root "tox" of the modern word toxicology can be traced back to a very ancient word meaning bow
or arrow,
or, in its broadest sense, some tool
used for slaying: hence it is no far-fetched supposition that the first poison-knowledge was that of the septic poisons. Perchance the savage found that weapons soiled with the blood of former victims made wounds fatal; from this observation the next step naturally would be that of experiment—the arrow or spear would be steeped in all manner of offensive pastes, and smeared with the vegetable juices of those plants which were deemed noxious; and as the effects were mysterious, they would be ascribed to the supernatural powers, and covered with a veil of superstition.
The history of the poison-lehre, like all history, begins in the region of the myths: there was a dark saga prevailing in Greece, that in the far north existed a land ruled by sorcerers—all children of the sun—and named Aeëtes, Perses, Hecate, Medea, and Circe. Later on, the enchanted land was localised at Colchis, and Aeëtes and Perses were said to be brothers. Hecate was the daughter of Perses; she was married to Aeëtes, and their daughters were Medea and Circe. Hecate was the discoverer of poisonous herbs, and learned in remedies both evil and good. Her knowledge passed to Medea, who narcotised the dragon, the guardian of the golden fleece, and incited Jason to great undertakings.
In the expedition of the Argonauts, the poets loved to describe Hecate’s garden, with its lofty walls. Thrice-folding doors of ebony barred the entrance, which was guarded by terrible forms: only the initiated few, only they who bore the leavened rod of expiation, and the concealed conciliatory offering of the Medea, could enter into the sanctuary. Towering above all was the temple of the dread Hecate, whose priestesses offered to the gods ghastly sacrifices.
§ 2. The oldest Egyptian king, Menes, and Attalus Phylometer, the last king of Pergamus, were both famous for their knowledge of plants. Attalus Phylometer was acquainted with hyoscyamus, aconite, conium, veratrum, and others; he experimented on the preparation of poisons, and occupied himself in compounding medicines. Mithradetes Eupator stood yet higher: the receipt for the famous theriaca, prepared in later years at an enormous price, and composed of fifty-four different ingredients, is ascribed to him. The wonderful skill shown by the Egyptians in embalming and technical works is sufficient to render it fairly certain that their chemical knowledge was considerable; and the frequent operations of one caste upon the dead must have laid the foundations of a pathological and anatomical culture, of which only traces remain.
The Egyptians knew prussic acid as extracted in a dilute state from certain plants, among the chief of which was certainly the peach; on a papyrus preserved at the Louvre, M. Duteil read, Pronounce not the name of I. A. O. under the penalty of the peach!
in which dark threat, without doubt, lurks the meaning that those who revealed the religious mysteries of the priests were put to death by waters distilled from the peach. That the priests actually distilled the peach-leaves has been doubted by those who consider the art of distillation a modern invention; but this process was well known to adepts of the third and fourth centuries, and there is no inherent improbability in the supposition that the Egyptians practised it.
§ 3. From the Egyptians the knowledge of the deadly drink appears to have passed to the Romans. At the trial of Antipater,[1] Verus brought a potion derived from Egypt, which had been intended to destroy Herod; this was essayed on a criminal, he died at once. In the reign of Tiberius, a Roman knight, accused of high treason, swallowed a poison, and fell dead at the feet of the senators: in both cases the rapidity of action appears to point to prussic acid.
[1] Jos. Ant., B. xvii. c. 5.
The use of poison by the Greeks, as a means of capital punishment, without doubt favoured suicide by the same means; the easy, painless death of the state prisoner would be often preferred to the sword by one tired of life. The ancients looked indeed upon suicide, in certain instances, as something noble, and it was occasionally formally sanctioned. Thus, Valerius Maximus tells us that he saw a woman of quality, in the island of Ceos, who, having lived happily for ninety years, obtained leave to take a poisonous draught, lest, by living longer, she should happen to have a change in her good fortune; and, curiously enough, this sanctioning of self-destruction seems to have been copied in Europe. Mead relates that the people of Marseilles of old had a poison, kept by the public authorities, in which cicuta was an ingredient: a dose was allowed to any one who could show why he should desire death. Whatever use or abuse might be made of a few violent poisons, Greek and Roman knowledge of poisons, their effects and methods of detection, was stationary, primitive, and incomplete.
Nicander of Colophon (204-138 B.C.) wrote two treatises, the most ancient works on this subject extant, the one describing the effects of snake venom; the other, the properties of opium, henbane, certain fungi, colchicum, aconite, and conium. He divided poisons into those which kill quickly, and those which act slowly. As antidotes, those medicines are recommended which excite vomiting—e.g., lukewarm oil, warm water, mallow, linseed tea, &c.
Apollodorus lived at the commencement of the third century B.C.: he wrote a work on poisonous animals, and one on deleterious medicines; these works of Apollodorus were the sources from which Pliny, Heraclitus, and several of the later writers derived most of their knowledge of poisons.
Dioscorides (40-90 A.D.) well detailed the effects of cantharides, sulphate of copper, mercury, lead, and arsenic. By arsenic he would appear sometimes to mean the sulphides, sometimes the white oxide. Dioscorides divided poisons, according to their origin, into three classes, viz.:—
1. Animal Poisons.—Under this head were classed cantharides and allied beetles, toads, salamanders, poisonous snakes, a particular variety of honey, and the blood of the ox, probably the latter in a putrid state. He also speaks of the "sea-hare." The sea-hare was considered by the ancients very poisonous, and Domitian is said to have murdered Titus with it. It is supposed by naturalists to have been one of the genus Aplysia, among the gasteropods. Both Pliny and Dioscorides depict the animal as something very formidable: it was not to be looked at, far less touched. The aplysiæ exhale a very nauseous and fœtid odour when they are approached: the best known of the species resembles, when in a state of repose, a mass of unformed flesh; when in motion, it is like a common slug; its colour is reddish-brown; it has four horns on its head; and the eyes, which are very small, are situated between the two hinder ones. This aplysia has an ink reservoir, like the sepia, and ejects it in order to escape from its enemies; it inhabits the muddy bottom of the water, and lives on small crabs, mollusca, &c.
2. Poisons from Plants.—Dioscorides enumerates opium, black and white hyoscyamus (especially recognising the activity of the seeds), mandragora, which was probably a mixture of various solanaceæ, conium (used to poison the condemned by the people of Athens and the dwellers of ancient Massilia), elaterin, and the juices of a species of euphorbia and apocyneæ. He also makes a special mention of aconite, the name of which is derived from Akon, a small city in Heraclea. The Greeks were well aware of the deadly nature of aconite, and gave to it a mythical origin, from the foam of the dog Cerberus. Colchicum was also known to Dioscorides: its first use was ascribed to Medea. Veratrum album and nigrum were famous medicines of the Romans, and a constituent of their "rat and mice powders;" they were also used as insecticides. According to Pliny, the Gauls dipped their arrows in a preparation of veratrum.[2] Daphne mezereon, called by the Romans also smilax and taxus, appears to have been used by Cativolcus, the king of the Eburones, for the purpose of suicide, or possibly by taxus
the yew-tree is meant.[3]
[2] Pliny, xxv. 5.
[3] De Bello Gallico, vi. 31.
The poisonous properties of certain fungi were also known. Nicander calls the venomous mushrooms the evil fermentation of the earth,
and prescribes the identical antidotes which we would perhaps give at the present time—viz., vinegar and alkaline carbonates.
3. Mineral Poisons.—Arsenic has been already alluded to. The ancients used it as a caustic and depilatory. Copper was known as sulphate and oxide; mercury only as cinnabar: lead oxides were used, and milk and olive-oil prescribed as an antidote for their poisonous properties. The poison-lehre for many ages was considered as something forbidden. Galen, in his treatise On Antidotes,
remarks that the only authors who dared to treat of poisons were Orpheus, Theologus, Morus, Mendesius the younger, Heliodorus of Athens, Aratus, and a few others; but none of these treatises have come down to us. From the close similarity of the amount of information in the treatises of Nicander, Dioscorides, Pliny, Galen, and Paulus Ægineta, it is probable that all were derived from a common source.
§ 4. If we turn our attention to early Asiatic history, a very cursory glance at the sacred writings of the East will prove how soon the art of poisoning, especially in India, was used for the purpose of suicide, revenge, or robbery.
The ancient practice of the Hindoo widow—self-immolation on the burning pile of her husband—is ascribed to the necessity which the Brahmins were under of putting a stop to the crime of domestic poisoning. Every little conjugal quarrel was liable to be settled by this form of secret assassination, but such a law, as might be expected, checked the practice.
Poison was not used to remove human beings alone, for there has been from time immemorial in India much cattle-poisoning. In the Institutes of Menu, it is ordained that when cattle die the herdsman shall carry to his master their ears, their hides, their tails, the skin below their navels, their tendons, and the liquor oozing from their foreheads. Without doubt these regulations were directed against cattle-poisoners.
The poisons known to the Asiatics were arsenic, aconite, opium, and various solanaceous plants. There has been a myth floating through the ages that a poison exists which will slay a long time after its introduction. All modern authors have treated the matter as an exaggerated legend, but, for my own part, I