Literature Review: Openness - Exploring Conceptualisations of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Collaboration and Peer Learning in Higher Education.

By William Van Zyl

Abstract:

Concepts of 'openness' in education hinge on interactions between individuals and organisations and boundaries within which these interactions exist. The future development of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) technologies of Higher Education rests on the critical decisions of 'openness' ('open' & 'free' education). The conceptualisations are largely influenced by those responsible for making political, economic and social decisions. I argue that NZ is currently in a favourable position to take advantage of P2P technologies because it has the basic infrastructure to support collaborative technologies (digital interconnectivity-Web 2.0 moving into Web 3.0).  This literature review explores the value of philosophical perspectives or 'foundational schools of thought on openness' from theorists such as Karl Popper, Michel Foucault, and Jürgen Habermas  - which act as a measuring stick in this literature review to gauge the position of NZ HE's 'open' education within a global tertiary education context.

'Openness' and the concept of 'neoliberalism' in the two main philosophical theories of Michel Foucault on Governmentality ('biopower') and Jürgen Habermas on Communicative Action are at the heart of the 'democratisation of the knowledge economy' debate. There is no point of convergence when comparing the theory of Foucault and Habermas. Foucault is mainly concerned with providing a genealogical account of the diffusion of power (political & economical), whereas Habermas is concerned with creating a political philosophy based on the recognition of the communicative capacities of rational human beings, which Foucault neglects.... 

P2P technologies implemented by some OECD countries compared to NZ shows that NZ HE is utilising and implementing P2P technologies (VLE's, video, podcasts, vodcasts, microblogging, and Moodle) successfully and effectively to enhance peer teaching and learning. I reason, with specific reference to the fundamental notion of the 'openness school of thought', that the P2P learning and teaching technologies in NZ HE are well developed, and NZ takes every opportunity to develop and refine the infrastructure and software available. The Neoliberalist ('laissez fair') approach refers to an economic system in which transactions between private parties are free from government interference such as regulations, privileges, tariffs, and subsidies (Peters, 2011; Olsen & Peters, 2005). I reason that this approach in HE shows agendas that are seeking profit over altruism. The paradigm of education as 'social good' within the knowledge economy (knowledge to be shared) is at the heart of the philosophical approach in this paper. Peters (2011) suggests that what is required is a change in 'ethos'. "It is not the confidence and trust of the markets but rather the development of trust that comes with the radically decentered democratic collaboration that epitomises distributed knowledge, political and energy systems" (Peters, 2011, p.182).

Keywords:

 Peer-to-Peer Collaboration (P2P), Peer Learning (PL), Peer Assisted Learning (PAL), Openness,  Neoliberalism, Post-Neoliberalism, Higher Education (HE), New Zealand (NZ), Conceptualisation, Governmentality & Biopower (Foucault), Communicative Action (Habermas), Microblogging, Twitter, and P2P Technologies.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Five House Publishing
• Release date: May 29, 2018
• ISBN: 9780473438371

William Van Zyl

The author had an interesting and unique childhood. Not travelling abroad - as you would expect - but venturing into the fields, bushes, tools sheds and mysterious underground tunnels around his neighbourhood. His happy place was - and still is - tinkering with ideas, science, and new possibilities. Many times while cycling he will get new ideas; he brings the unexpected, the unique, the creative in a flurry on a page or in a sketch. To this day he dreams of vicious wars and sophisticated weaponry in an innocent child's scout cave. He loves diagrams, timelines, cross sections, sketches, and details of sinister and hidden concepts and ideas; always looking for a new mystery to decode and to encode. He investigates and explores extravagant thoughts which he includes in children's books, stories and articles; he loves to include philosopher’s perspectives, articles,  intriguing stories, and poetry in his writing. Academic and research work are also his forte. He always offers a simple but practical explanation within an engaging context. Not your ordinary thinker! A lifelong scholar and teacher. 

Book preview

\\fs1\staffhome$\Teachers\williamv\Documents\BOOK literature review for publishing - Aleh & covers\1.jpg

Copyright © 2018 by William Van Zyl

Literature Review: Openness - Exploring Conceptualisations of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Collaboration and Peer Learning in Higher Education. 

All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof

may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever

without the express written permission of the publisher

except for the use of brief quotations in a book review.

ISBN: 978-0-473-43837-1

Five House Publishing (New Zealand)

Second Publishing 2018 (Edited))

https://fivehousepublishing.com/

Literature Review: Openness - Exploring Conceptualisations of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Collaboration and Peer Learning in Higher Education.

Abstract:

Concepts of ‘openness’ in education hinge on interactions between individuals and organisations and boundaries within which these interactions exist. The future development of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) technologies of Higher Education rests on the critical decisions of ‘openness’ (‘open’ & ‘free’ education). The conceptualisations are largely influenced by those responsible for making political, economic and social decisions. I argue that NZ is currently in a favourable position to take advantage of P2P technologies because it has the basic infrastructure to support collaborative technologies (digital interconnectivity-Web 2.0 moving into Web 3.0).  This literature review explores the value of philosophical perspectives or ‘foundational schools of thought on openness’ from theorists such as Karl Popper, Michel Foucault, and Jürgen Habermas  - which act as a measuring stick in this literature review to gauge the position of NZ HE’s ‘open’ education within a global tertiary education context.

‘Openness’ and the concept of ‘neoliberalism’ in the two main philosophical theories of Michel Foucault on Governmentality (‘biopower’) and Jürgen Habermas on Communicative Action are at the heart of the ‘democratisation of the knowledge economy’ debate. There is no point of convergence when comparing the theory of Foucault and Habermas. Foucault is mainly concerned with providing a genealogical account of the diffusion of power (political & economical), whereas Habermas is concerned with creating a political philosophy based on the recognition of the communicative capacities of rational human beings. Foucault neglects this notion of Habermas. I reason that openness and collaborative networks for teaching and learning are powerful tools for HE in NZ if it is ‘free’ (or low cost) and open. NZ has been part of a neoliberal ‘experiment’ (1980 to the 1990’s) where political, economic and social structures were reformed.  NZ was influenced by ‘Reaganism (USA)’ and ‘Thatcherism (UK)’ – these are Neoliberal approaches which include elements of ‘free market’ principles, privatisation and minimum interference with the private sector (individualistic concepts).

P2P technologies implemented by some OECD countries compared to NZ (New Zealand) shows that NZ HE (Higher Education) is utilising and implementing P2P technologies (VLE’s, video, podcasts, vodcasts, microblogging, and Moodle) successfully and effectively to enhance peer teaching and learning. I reason, with specific reference to the fundamental notion of the ‘openness school of thought’, that the P2P learning and teaching technologies in NZ HE is well developed, and NZ takes every opportunity to develop and refine the infrastructure and software available.

The Neoliberalist (‘laissez fair’) approach refers to an economic system in which transactions between private parties are free from government interference such as regulations, privileges, tariffs, and subsidies (Peters, 2011; Olsen & Peters, 2005). I reason that this approach in HE shows agendas that are seeking profit over altruism. The paradigm of education as ‘social good’ within the knowledge economy (knowledge to be shared) is at the heart of the philosophical approach in this paper. Peters (2011) suggests that what is required is a change in ‘ethos’. It is not the confidence and trust of the markets but rather the development of trust that comes with the radically decentered democratic collaboration that epitomises distributed knowledge, political and energy systems (Peters, 2011, p.182).

It is clear in that NZ HE tertiary institutions are becoming more ‘open’ through sharing resources, for example, the Research Commons (Waikato University), nzresearch.org.nz, OpenDOAR (Authoritative Directory of Academic Open Access Repositories), and ROAR (Global Registry of Open Access Repositories), and other.

I also show how indigenous Māori culture embrace concepts of ako [reciprocal learning/teaching] and Te Whāriki [‘a woven mat for all to stand on’] which is illuminated in social media (Twitter), as an empowering platform for connected learning. The P2P networks within a collaborative digital ‘communicative’ framework provide the ‘woven mat of co-created experiences and knowledge’ (devolved-communicative action principle) as an alternative to a neoliberalist approach (‘Reaganism/Reaganomics & Thatcherism’). Finally it is recommended that a ‘community’ paradigm and the reinstitution of the ‘welfare state’ (education for the good of all), away from the current ‘individualistic’ approach where the wealth (and knowledge) does not trickle down to the large ‘base’ section (typical pyramid hierarchy) of society, be