Hawking Radiation 4
By Roman Andie
()
About this ebook
Inclusions of HFFs and quantum groups characterised by quantum phases q= exp(i2pi/n) are very interesting and quantum Pascal triangle is characterised by such a phase and gives quantum variant of binomial coefficient as a result. One can imagine quantum variants for integers characterising all kinds of combinatorial objects: Do quantum variants of objects make sense in some sense? Probably some mathematicians has pondered also this question.
Only few days ago I realised that in order to have "quantum quantum theory" as a tool to describe finite measurement resolution, it is better to have quantum variants of fermionic quantum anti-commutation relations for the induced spinors. They have been formulated as I learned in five minutes from web.
These anticommutation relations however demand 2-D space/space-time! But just the well-definedness of em charge almost-forces 2-D string world sheets! And number theoretic arguments removes the "almost". In 4-D Minkowski space-time you do not get them!
In over-optimistic mood - officially allowed at morning hours - I can therefore conclude that the observation of anyons in condensed matter systems (assigned with 2-D boundaries) serves as a direct evidence for the localisation of induced spinors at 2-D surfaces and for large h_eff. I must however assume that also partonic 2-surfaces carry them- whether it is so has been an open question for a long time.
Read more from Roman Andie
Hawking Radiation 3 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHawking Radiation 2 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Hawking Radiation 4
Related ebooks
Matter and Memory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mind and the Brain: Being the Authorised Translation of L'Âme et le Corps Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsObjective Reality Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Matter and Memory (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn essay on the foundations of geometry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuantum Meaning: A Semantic Interpretation of Quantum Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Limits of Reason Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMatter & Memory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCircumscription Hypothesis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Big Split, Alternative to the Big Ban, Einstein demystified Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Cosmic Egg Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCosmic symbolism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ignorance and Evil: An Analysis of Racism in South Africa Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAbout Life Book I: Understanding Existence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Edge of Reality: Strings & Things • Dark Energy • Temporal Enigmas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEncircled: Awareness Implying Reality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Unconscious: Interpretation of Dreams, Psychopathology of Everyday Life & Wit and Its Relation to the Unconscious Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study of Numbers: A Guide to the Constant Creation of the Universe Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5With Ease Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShadow-Forge Revelations: Andrew's Adventure Series Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKeystones Of Our World: The Whole World Is Information Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTime and Free Will (Annotated Edition) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Limits of Knowledge Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSentience Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRationalist Spirituality: An Exploration of the Meaning of Life and Existence Informed by Logic and Science Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Square Root of God: Mathematical Metaphors and Spiritual Tangents Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Gravity Cause Explained: Combining it with Electromagnetism and Quantum Physics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Physics For You
A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather than Nothing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Effect: Quantum Entanglement, Science's Strangest Phenomenon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Diagnose and Fix Everything Electronic, Second Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dancing Wu Li Masters: An Overview of the New Physics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Physics of Wall Street: A Brief History of Predicting the Unpredictable Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The First War of Physics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Midnight in Chernobyl: The Untold Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quantum Physics: A Beginners Guide to How Quantum Physics Affects Everything around Us Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Feynman Lectures Simplified 1A: Basics of Physics & Newton's Laws Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Welcome to the Universe: An Astrophysical Tour Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quantum Physics for Beginners Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5String Theory For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Step By Step Mixing: How to Create Great Mixes Using Only 5 Plug-ins Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5What the Bleep Do We Know!?™: Discovering the Endless Possibilities for Altering Your Everyday Reality Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Moving Through Parallel Worlds To Achieve Your Dreams Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Physics I For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The End of Everything: (Astrophysically Speaking) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Physics Essentials For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unlocking Spanish with Paul Noble Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Theory of Relativity: And Other Essays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Flatland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Reality Revolution: The Mind-Blowing Movement to Hack Your Reality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Hawking Radiation 4
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Hawking Radiation 4 - Roman Andie
HAWKING RADIATION 4
Roman Andie
LIGHTHOUSE BOOKS FOR TRANSLATION AND PUBLISHING.
Thank you for reading. If you enjoy this book, please leave a review.
All rights reserved. Aside from brief quotations for media coverage and reviews, no part of this book may be reproduced or distributed in any form without the author’s permission. Thank you for supporting authors and a diverse, creative culture by purchasing this book and complying with copyright laws.
Copyright © 2017 by Roman Andie
Published by Lighthouse Books for Translation and Publishing.
Interior design by Pronoun
Distribution by Pronoun
ISBN: 9783592132250
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Hawking Radiation 4 by Roman Andie
At 7:05 AM, Anonymous said...
Hawking Radiation
4
Roman Andie
Lighthouse Books for Translation and Publishing
HAWKING RADIATION 4 BY ROMAN ANDIE
Copyright 2017© by Lighthouse Books for Translation and Publishing.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission in writing of the writer, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence, or under terms agreed upon with the writer. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the following email
Email: info@lighthousebooks.org
ISBN 13: 9783592132250
ISBN 10: 3592132250
You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.
5. Number theoretic universality for cognitive representations
1.By number theoretic universality p-adic zero energy states should be formally similar to their real counterparts for option B. For option A the states between which real—p-adic transitions are highly probable would be similar. The states would have as basic building bricks the elements of the Yangian of the super-symplectic algebra associated with these strings which one can hope to be algebraically universal.
2.Finite measurement resolution demands that all scattering amplitudes representing zero energy states involve discretization. In purely p-adic context this is unavoidable because the notion of integral is highly problematic. Residue integral is p-adically well-defined if one can deal with π.
p-Adic integral can be defined as the algebraic continuation of real integral made possible by the notion of p-adic manifold and this works at least in the real—p-adic intersection. String world sheets would belong to the intersection if they are cognitive representations as the interpretation of fermions as correlates of Boolean cognition suggests. In this case there are excellent hopes that all real integrals can be continued to various p-adic sectors (which can involve algebraic extensions of p-adic number fields). Quantum-TGD would be adelic. There are of course potential problems with transcendentals like powers of π.
3.Discrete Fourier analysis allows to define integration in angle degrees of freedom represented in terms of algebraic extension involving roots of unity. In purely p-adic context the notion of angle does not make sense but trigonometric functions make sense: the reason is that only the local aspect of geometry generalize characterized by metric generalize. The global aspects such as line length involving integral do not. One can however introduce algebraic extensions of p-adic numbers containing roots of unity and this gives rise to a realistic notion of trigonometric function. One can also define the counterpart of integration as discrete Fourier analysis in discretized angle degrees of freedom.
4.Maybe the 2-dimensionality of cognition has something to do with the fact that quaternions and octonions do not have p-adic counterpart (the p-adic norm squared of quaternion/octonion can vanish). I have earlier proposed that life and cognitive representations resides in real-p-adic intersection. Stringy description of TGD could be seen as number theoretically universal cognitive representation of 4-D physics. The best that the limitations of cognition allow to obtain. This hypothesis would also guarantee that various conserved quantal charges make sense both in real and p-adic sense as p-adic mass calculations demand.
posted by Matti Pitkanen @ 6:53 AM
8 Comments:
At 5:22 AM, Anonymous said...
It is joy to see how TGD keeps on evolving and boldly asking genuine questions.
For further evolution, as an informant of a bundle of conscious experiences I can’t identify with 2-dimensionality of cognition, and I suggest that that idea might simply arise from an entangled state with primarily visual sentient-cognitive state, (as also theory
literally and etymologically means, from Greek verb theaomai, to watch, from which theater etc. are derived) ie. from cognitive entanglement and filtering with space-time sheet of sentience with visual 2D-character (binary mapping into lighted (and colored) pointillistic(!? a la certain impressionit painters) points vs. unlighted/dark points
A conscious body-sense feel of empathy (cf. negentropic entanglement) has very different geometric connotation from visual sensing. I, as an informant of this ‘thusly’ conscious experience, can best describe this as infinitely(?) dense point at heart chackra, where conscious sensations of good feel
and bad feel
locally alternate in various mixtures and intensities, surrounded with field-like extentions, for which the best mathematical analogy so far has been some kind of Dehn-ball. The ‘ball’ aspect sensing happens in 3-D and/or 4-D, and the ball-like field consists of n-dimensional dimension lines (cf. worm holes
) allowing heart-local non-local
empathy of good feel / bad feel entanglements also with other sentient beings and conscious informants.
According to most functional ethical theory and practice I’m aware or, the ‘good feel’ is the norm (universe=god=love) and the ‘bad feels’ are exceptions to the rule arising from breaking of strong entanglements aka attachments
, such as actual loss of a love, or fear and worry of loss projected to some other space time sheet than ‘now’. Informant expressions such as heart-broken
and without him/her/it
, there’s an empty space within me", etc. gain very literal spatio-temporal interpretations. On the other hand, according to critical-ethical theory of global-local, the Universal Source of ‘good feel’ is already and always inside each heart and each and every point in space-time, and can be also consciously sensed-experienced when filters that cover it are removed.
One further comment, I associate intending with ‘focus’, and as the word in-tention suggests, the movement has more pointed character than that of planar mapping. If needs that give rise to intentions arise adelically, the most self-suggestive geometry of intentional targeting to fulfill the adelically metabolic need would be ideles. Or just ‘id-gesture’, as the Latin version of Freud goes. Note that when walking, the intention to not stumble and fall, and when stumbling, step dancing faster than conscious thought, is very carefully focused on the point of balance. :)
At 6:35 AM, Matpitka@luukku.com said...
To Anonymous:
I have been very critical about string models. But I must admit that they have caught something very profound about the structure of existence. String world sheets and partonic 2-surface could be seen as maximal cognitive representations that one can have. One can of course have a lot of them.
One extremely nice feature is that conformal invariance implies the reduction of WCW for string world sheets and partonic 2-surfaces to the confromal moduli space for them. They are finite-dimensional and I have already applied these spaces in p-adic mass calculations.
Too many independent arguments lead to these objects so that I can only accept them. Strong form of holography, well-definedness of em charge, octonionic spinor structure making possible 8-D twistorilization, and commutativity of tangent spaces of objects in the intersection of reality and p-adicities, non-existence of p-adic variants of quaterions and octonions, fermions as correlates of Boolean cognition and the arguments forcing the to string world sheets, and so on….
The Book analogy is at work again. String world sheets define the back of the book with space-time surfaces in various p-adic number fields as pages.
It is surprising that the notion of negentropic entanglement allows also to seriously discuss about the quantum correlates of ethics and moral rules. In standard physics one has only events. NMP makes it possible to talk about deeds.
The question about precise form of NMP leads directly to the key question about which spiritual people have discussed for millennia: why God does allow Evil. I guess that the weak form of NMP allowing genuine free will in good and bad is the only mathematically consistent option.
At 7:14 PM, Anonymous said...
One feels and thinks that it would be nicer deed if one’s mode of experiencing would be received as empirical phenomenology that an explanatory function such as theory formulation aims to explain, instead of excluding and limiting theoretically allowed possible experience on grounds of theoretical presuppositions.
Neural networks have a filtering function, and yes, they have stringy character. We do not, however, presume or insist that full-body sentience (cf. e.g. magnetic bodies) and consciousness in themselves reduce to neural networks alone, rather, neural networks and their filtering and representing function in relation to conscious experience deserve also explanation and description as part of the larger picture, where view of inner
and outer
extensions of rationals is becoming less dualistic, and neural networks can’t be said to be absolute requirement for sentience and conscience (cf. plants, mushrooms, headless chickens, etc.).
Theory of mental representations
has a more natural place at the level of neural networks than at the level of space-time sheets and undivided whole of sentience-consciousness, which has more ‘map=landscape" character than that of representation of externalized objects.
At 8:15 PM, Matpitka@luukku.com said...
To Anonymous:
I see this somewhat differently.
When one thinks seriously about physics and consciousness, one sooner or later starts to talk about ontology, even when one is physicist;-). In my case new ontology emerged gradually: space-time as 4-surface of imbedding space, WCW, subjective existence as quantum jumps between objective existences, zero energy ontology, hierarchy of Planck constants, p-adic physics as physics of cognition (note that I have no dropped and intention
;-)), WCW.
Even worse;-), if one is seriously building what one might call unification, eventually also the word epistemology
creeps in, and one must seriously ponder what one can know. Uncertainty Principle to the discoveries of physical epistemology.
These two words are practically all that I know about philosophy as an academic discipline. Therefore I do not know the name of branch of philosophy studying what can be not only known but also expressed using language, that is mathematically. Let us temporarily call the field of philosophy X-ology.
In TGD framework the first X-logical discovery is the realisation that although space-time surface is 4-D and seems that all that we can say mathematically about quantum physics is expressible mathematically in terms of string world sheets and partonic 2-surfaces. Strong form of holography is another manner to say this. Or strong form of general coorinate invariance which explains it. Note that this is much more than string models can say - one would have only string world sheets.
One can have space-time surfaces full of string world sheets and get arbitrary precise description of space-time but it is not of course the same space-time anymore.
What one can known and say define what I call cognitive representations. X-ologist wold say that these string world sheets carrying fermions serving as correlates of Boolean cognition. They reside in the intersection of realities and p-adicities where also life and love as negentropic entanglement reside. These cognitive representations would defining all that universe can say about itself using language.
This is very practical statement. In principle one can build quantum physics predictions by using only the data associated with partonic 2-surfaces and string world sheets. Even better, conformal equivalence classes are enough. Infinite-D WCW is effectively reduced to finite-D spaces of moduli. In case of string world sheets just the positions of edges and angles at them! This is gigantic simplification and gives realistic hopes about calculable theory ( that is allowing to express mathematically what is