Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Very Special Ships: Abdiel-Class Fast Minelayers of World War Two
Very Special Ships: Abdiel-Class Fast Minelayers of World War Two
Very Special Ships: Abdiel-Class Fast Minelayers of World War Two
Ebook531 pages6 hours

Very Special Ships: Abdiel-Class Fast Minelayers of World War Two

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Very Special Ships is the first full-length book about the Abdiel-class fast minelayers, which were considered the fastest and most versatile to serve in the Royal Navy during World War II. This book spans the scope of the class from alpha to zulu as they operated in many roles, most famously as blockade runners to Malta, transporting items as diverse as ammunition, condensed milk, gold, and VIPs. To provide a complete picture of this important class of ships, Very Special Ships examines the origin and history of the minelayers, describes the design and construction of each ship in the class, details the operational history of the ships during World War II, and concludes with the post-war careers of the surviving ships.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateNov 15, 2015
ISBN9781591147275
Very Special Ships: Abdiel-Class Fast Minelayers of World War Two

Related to Very Special Ships

Related ebooks

Wars & Military For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Very Special Ships

Rating: 3.8333333 out of 5 stars
4/5

3 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Very Special Ships - Arthur C Nicholson

    DEDICATION

    To F N ‘Norman’ Goodwin, author of Midshipman RNR, who encouraged me to write about the fast minelayers,

    and

    To all the Men Who Served in the Fast Minelayers and to their Fast Minelayers Association

    Copyright © Arthur Nicholson 2015

    Credited drawings copyright © Eric Leon 2015

    First published in Great Britain in 2015 by

    Seaforth Publishing,

    Pen & Sword Books Ltd,

    47 Church Street,

    Barnsley S70 2AS

    www.seaforthpublishing.com

    Published and distributed in the

    United States of America and Canada by

    Naval Institute Press

    291 Wood Road

    Annapolis, Maryland 21402-5034

    www.nip.org

    This edition is authorized for sale only in the United States of America, its territories and possessions and Canada.

    First Naval Institute Press eBook edition published in 2016.

    ISBN 978-1-59114-727-5 (eBook)

    British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

    A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library

    Library of Congress Control Number: 2015946697

    All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing of both the copyright owner and the above publisher.

    The right of Arthur Nicholson to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

    Drawings by Eric Leon

    Typeset and designed by Mousemat Design Limited

    CONTENTS

    Acknowledgements

    Preface

    Introduction

    1. Mines, Minelaying and Minelayers: Origins to the Eve of the Second World War

    2. Getting It Just Right – Designing the Abdiel Class

    3. The Royal Navy Readies for Mine Warfare in the Second World War

    4. The Abdiel Completes and Proves Her Worth: Home Waters and the Mediterranean, 1941

    5. The Latona Takes to the Water and Sails around the Cape, 1941

    6. Pawns of Coalition War – The Abdiel and Latona on the Tobruk Run, 1941

    7. The Manxman Enters the Fray: Malta Runs and a Disguise, 1941

    8. The Welshman Joins the Manxman: Laying Mines for the Scharnhorst and Gneisenau, 1941–1942

    9. The Abdiel and then the Manxman to the Indian Ocean, 1941–1942

    10. The Welshman and the Manxman to Malta’s Rescue, 1942

    11. The Manxman, Welshman and Abdiel Wreak Havoc in the Mediterranean, 1942–1943

    12. Hard Times for Fast Minelayers in the Mediterranean, 1942–1943

    13. The Repeat Abdiels Take Shape, 1941–1943

    14. The Ariadne Completes and Shows the Flag in the Pacific, 1943–1945

    15. The Apollo Rounds Out the Six and Becomes a Yeoman Minelayer, 1944–1945

    16. War’s End

    17. Peacetime

    18. Epilogue and Honours

    Appendix: Plans, Camouflage and Models

    Notes

    Sources

    Index

    Colour plate section between pages 64 and 65

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    IN this task, the author has received the generous help of many, many people. I would like to specifically mention the fine detective work of Sue Savidge of Winchester, a relation of the Author’s wife Sandy. At the risk of leaving someone out, he wishes to acknowledge the generous assistance of the following people: Richard Alcock; Douglas Austin; Commander Erminio Bagnasco; Jo Bailey; Gertrude Barrett; Alec Bateson; Maurizio Brescia; Jane (née Friedberger) and Michael Bretherton; Jim Calcraft; Peter Cannon, Petty Officer, Royal Australian Navy, HMAS Canberra; Christian Carpenter; Joseph Caruana; Ron Checketts; Andrew Choong, National Maritime Museum, Woolwich; Julie Cochrane; David Davies; Elizabeth K Dickson; Michael Eisenstadt; Meredith Elsik; Contrammiraglio Maurizio Ertreo; Angela Evennett; Robert Ferry; Hans Frank; Mark Friedberger; Frederick Galea; Jock Gardner, Naval Historical Branch; Edward Barry Gibson, 4th Lord Ashbourne; Rachel Gill, Tyne & Wear Archives; Ian Goodwin; Norman Goodwin, RIP, & son Tim Goodwin; Jeremy Grindle; Catherine Hamilton née Robertson; Jean Hannant née Cowie; Brian Hargreaves, World Ship Society and Warships; Detlef Hartwig; Dolores Ho; Harley and Peta Hodges; Heather Johnson, National Museum of the Royal Navy; Mark Johnston; Alexander Kasterine; Christopher Langtree; Eric Leon; Ken Maher, RIP; L O Maurer; Helen Mavin, Imperial War Museum; Michael McAloon, Naval Historical Branch; Alison Metcalfe, National Library of Scotland; Jeremy Michell, National Maritime Museum, Woolwich; John Mizzi; Ray Moore, Fast Minelayers Association; Victoria Northridge, Imperial War Museum; Charles Orr Ewing; Trevor Piper; Francesca Pitaro, Associated Press Corporate Archives; Robin and Flickie Pleydell-Bouverie; Diana Porter; Anthony Price; Steven Prince, Naval Historical Branch; Bill Pye; George Robbert; Jane Rosen, Imperial War Museum; Sue and Mark Savidge; Randy Short; Peter C Smith; Sue Sullivan, Navy News; Bob Swartz; Leanne Tamaki, 28maoribattalion.org; Ronald Thake; Jack Tully-Jackson; Lt. Cmdr. Ben Warlow, RN; Corinna Westwood, Isle of Wight Heritage Service; Jacqueline Whiting née Ferry; Alastair Wilson; Jennifer Wraight, Admiralty Library.

    To anyone he has inadvertently left out, and there is surely someone, the author sincerely apologises. The author of course takes full responsibility for any and all errors in this work.

    PREFACE

    THE fast minelayers of the Abdiel class have fascinated me since I was in my teens and somehow ran across Tom Burton’s Warship Profile No. 38. They still do, more than forty years later. They truly were ‘very special ships’, a title admittedly inspired by Patrick Beesly’s books Very Special Intelligence and Very Special Admiral.

    I still revere that Warship Profile, but a 48-page booklet could not tell all the many amazing stories about these ships and the men who served in them. I have tried to include as many as I could find and I have no doubt missed some, but it is in the grand scheme of things that some stories are recorded and some are not and some are more easily found than others.

    The story of six ships operating in many different places at once does not lend itself to purely linear storytelling and the organisation of the book’s chapters reflects that. The alternative was to tell each ship’s story one after the other and the book’s first draft was actually so organised, but fortunately Julian Mannering of Seaforth Publishing thought this form of organisation better. The author is very pleased to have Seaforth publish this book.

    Part of the magic of the fast minelayers is their handsome appearance. The choice of photographs, some of which have been published before but many have not, and the superlative if not stunning artwork of Eric Leon, are designed to celebrate their appearance as well as to help tell their story. The photographs include most of the wartime commanding officers of the fast minelayers and some of their officers and crew.

    Making no claim to be the best or the only one able to tell the story of the fast minelayers – though I am a step-relation to Captain John S Cowie, a figure in the story – the author nevertheless hopes to have done them and the men who served in them justice.

    My main regret is that this project has taken so long to come to fruition. There are now very few men of the fast minelayers left. May we remember them, as well as the men who served in them but who are no longer with us.

    Arthur Nicholson

    San Antonio, Texas USA

    May 2015

    INTRODUCTION

    ON 13 August 1940, as the Luftwaffe was unleashing the Blitz on Britain, Captain Edward Pleydell-Bouverie RN sat down to write a letter to his wife Pearl to tell her of his appointment to HMS Abdiel, the name ship of a new class of warship that was then fitting out at J S Stephens & Co at Cowes on the Isle of Wight. Unable to contain himself, he wrote in part:¹

    All well. I’ve been very busy here . . . I go to a ship, it is signed + sealed. Name is ‘Abdiel’ and she is brand new, won’t be ready for a little while in fact. More than that I can’t say but she’s of a new type and can (or will) go like the very devil. I’ve very pleased I must say to get things settled a bit and . . . this outfit will, I think, be a most independent command in many ways and with every chance of a bit of excitement. You must contain yourself for the rest until Friday.

    The Captain had his new ship and his new command perfectly pegged. The Abdiel would indeed ‘go like the very devil’, he was often to have a ‘most independent command’ and he and the crew of the new Abdiel were to experience much more than a ‘bit of excitement’. The very same things could well be said of the other ships of the Abdiel class.

    To many, the term ‘minelayer’ is hardly exciting and to some the term ‘fast minelayer’ might sound like an oxymoron. Certainly Norman Goodwin was not expecting much when in March of 1941, as a sixteen-year-old midshipman, he was ordered to report to a new ship, the Abdiel. Having no idea what sort of ship she might be, he was sent to look for her at Gourock on the River Clyde. Upon his arrival there, he was told that she was a fast minelayer, but only the ‘minelayer’ part of the name registered with him. Surveying the ships, he later recalled, ‘There was nothing that looked anything like my conception of a minelayer. I imagined that she would look more like a merchant ship than a warship. I felt a little disappointed. Mine-laying sounded rather a dull occupation.’ All the way in the launch out to the ship, ‘I kept wondering which ship we were going to. It was something of a shock when I realised we were going alongside a grey three-funnelled ship, too big for a destroyer and too small for a cruiser.’ Once aboard, he quickly realised that she was a unique ship and that he had joined an exclusive and elite club that was manned almost completely by regular Royal Navy personnel.²

    The fast minelayers were indeed unique, and in that way alone theirs was a bold design. No other ship in any other navy combined their high speed with their capacity to carry not only a useful mine load but much, much more. In the heat of battle and arduous service, their captains and crews turned out to be extraordinary. And, contrary to what Midshipman Goodwin had assumed, minelaying did not turn out to be such a dull occupation, at least not in the fast minelayers.

    The Admiralty had high hopes for the fast minelayers and their hopes would be more than fulfilled. The Abdiels were not only fully capable of fulfilling the mission they were designed for, offensive minelaying, but they could also perform many other tasks their designers could have scarcely imagined, such as blockade running, transporting VIPs and more, tasks that mining expert Captain John Cowie would refer to as ‘extraneous’. They would carry out the arduous tasks assigned to them in every ocean and in many of the seas, at storied places like Crete, Tobruk and Malta, in the English Channel, off Normandy and Norway and in the Pacific. In short, the Abdiel class fast minelayers were a brilliant success.

    This is their story and the story of the men who sailed in them.

    CHAPTER 1

    MINES, MINELAYING AND MINELAYERS

    Origins to the Eve of the Second World War

    THE Abdiel class fast minelayers were extraordinarily versatile ships, which could do much more than lay mines, but it is safe to say they would not have been built if not for the existence of the naval mine. Like its cousin the landmine and unlike its cousin, the torpedo, the naval mine has never been considered a glamorous weapon. At times, some powers have even thought of the naval mine as a downright ungentlemanly or wicked way of waging war. Others, however, embraced it immediately and those who at first despised it then came to embrace it.

    Although the popular image of a naval mine as a sphere with deadly horns is sometimes accurate, the subject is much more complicated than that and can be extremely technical. The terminology of naval mines can be rather involved. A naval mine is a ‘submarine mine’, an underwater explosive device set off by a ship that touches it (in the case of a contact mine) or that activates it by the ship’s magnetic field (in the case of a magnetic mine), the noise of the ship (in the case of an acoustic mine) or the pressure created by a passing ship (a pressure mine). Magnetic, acoustic and pressure mines are ‘influence’ mines, as opposed to ‘contact’ ones. ‘Moored mines’ are connected by a ‘sinker’ to the seabed, while ‘ground mines’ lie themselves on the seabed and ‘drifting mines’ – well – drift on or just below the surface of the water. ‘Controlled mines’ are set off by someone on dry land, as opposed to ‘independent mines’ which explode when they receive the necessary stimulus (such as contact, noise, magnetic signature or pressure) from a passing ship. For the sake of completeness, explosive devices attached by someone to or placed on the seabed under the hull of a ship are sometimes called ‘mines’, such as the devices used by the Italians and the limpet mines by the British.

    To make matters even more confusing, mines were once called ‘torpedoes’, but what is now called a torpedo or more properly a ‘locomotive’ torpedo, is a device that is launched from a surface ship, aircraft, submarine or shore battery and that uses steam, electricity or oxygen to propel itself against a ship (with a contact exploder) or under a ship (in the case of a magnetic exploder).

    As it involves British fast minelayers, the terminology is not quite so complicated. The Abdiels laid ‘mines’, as in independent, submarine mines, both of the contact and the influence (magnetic and acoustic) variety and of the moored (contact or magnetic) and ground (magnetic or acoustic) variety.

    Whatever it is called, the naval mine is a relatively recent development in naval warfare. Putting aside explosives placed on the surface of the water and pointed in the direction of a ship, which date back to the Dutch in 1585, and concentrating just on those designed to attack a ship below the waterline, the first real pioneer in naval mining was an American, David Bushnell. Bushnell designed a one-man submarine with an explosive charge to be placed against the underwater hull of a warship. On 7 September 1776 Bushnell’s American Turtle, manned by a Sergeant Ezra Lee, attacked the frigate HMS Eagle off New York. The submarine’s drill was unable to penetrate the ship’s copper bottom to attach the explosive and Lee had to give up the attempt, but the explosion of the charge caused some excitement among the British observers. For purposes of contemporary naval mining, Bushnell’s main contribution was to be the first to set off gunpowder underwater.¹

    The first real moored contact mine was designed by another American, the inventor Robert Fulton, in about 1810, after he had tried to peddle various mine-like devices first to Napoleon and then to the British, both of whom were horrified by the weapons, and then to the Americans. Fulton’s intentions were pure enough – he wanted to make war too horrible to pursue – but he only succeeded in furthering the development of a weapon that just made it worse. He may have coined an early name for the mine – the ‘torpedo’.

    Enter yet another American inventor, Colonel Samuel Colt, who was born in 1814 and as early as 1829 conceived an idea for a system of controlled mining called a ‘harbor defense battery’ while he was studying in a laboratory in Massachusetts. After patenting his revolver, Colt returned to his ‘torpedo’ idea, one of his favourites. In spite of the vehement opposition of ex-President John Quincy Adams, Colt eventually obtained US Government funding for a series of mine demonstrations on a series of unfortunate vessels. The first one took place on 4 July 1842 and the fourth and last one, on 13 April 1844, shattered a 500-ton ship under full sail. All of the demonstrations were successful and were well attended by dignitaries. Colonel Colt thus proved his mining idea, but by 1844 the US Government had little need of the weapon and did not adopt it. Colt instead made a fortune from his revolvers and passed away in 1862.²

    Other nations, however, began to take some interest in the weapon, notably Imperial Russia. During the Crimean War of 1854–5, the Russians employed mines developed by a Professor Jacobi and by the Nobel family to defend the ports of Kronstadt in the Baltic and Sevastopol in the Black Sea. While nosing around the defences off Kronstadt on 9 June 1855, the British paddle warship Merlin struck first one and then another mine, giving her the dubious distinction of being the first warship damaged by enemy mines. HMS Firefly came to her assistance after the first explosion, only to strike a mine herself. The Merlin’s only leak came from a fractured drainpipe, but eight sheets of copper were blown off her hull and inside she suffered considerable shock damage, with ‘almost everything moveable in the ship displaced’. The Firefly’s hull was undamaged, but inside bulkheads were ‘thrown down’ or displaced and every bit of crockery broken. When HMS Vulcan struck a mine on 20 June, the Royal Navy had had enough, and the next day began carrying out the first minesweeping operation in history, recovering thirty-three ‘infernal machines,’ the standard British term of the day for sea mines.³

    It was their use in the American Civil War that provided the real spur to the development of mines as a viable weapon of naval war. The Confederates used mines in great numbers to defend their harbours against the Union blockade. Confederate mines were called ‘torpedoes’ and when Admiral David Farragut shouted, ‘Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!’ during the battle of Mobile Bay, he was referring to Confederate naval mines. In December 1862, Confederate mines accounted for the first warship to be sunk by such weapons, the Union ironclad Cairo. In all, thirty-seven Union and Confederate ships were sunk or disabled by mines during the war.

    Colonel Samuel Colt, a...

    Colonel Samuel Colt, a pioneer of the naval submarine mine. (Robert Swartz)

    An engraving depicting the mining of...

    An engraving depicting the mining of the Merlin and Firefly off Kronstadt in 1855. (Author’s collection)

    The successful use of naval mines by the Russians and the Confederacy led to increased international interest in the weapon, but the United States lost the lead in the field to other nations. Advances in mine design were greatly assisted by the introduction of guncotton in 1870, long after its invention by a Swiss chemist in 1846.

    This new form of warfare was not at first welcomed by the Royal Navy, as it threatened its freedom of movement and its command of the seas. Nevertheless, in 1876 the Royal Navy commissioned its Naval Torpedo School at the old HMS Vernon, where, despite British aversion to the very idea of mines, the Royal Navy began to develop its own mines. In an important innovation, the Royal Navy invented the ‘plummet’ version of the ‘automatic sinker’, which allowed mines to be laid in varying depths of water but to rest at a pre-set distance under the water.

    The Royal Navy’s bias against mines changed considerably with the Russo-Japanese war of 1904–5, which marked the first use of independent mines as offensive tactical weapons.⁵ On April 13, 1904, Japanese mines laid near Port Arthur by the 745-ton Koryo Maru⁶ sank the Russian battleship Petropavlovsk, with 652 dead, including the Russians’ best naval commander Admiral Makarov. Just a month later, on 15 May, mines from the Russian minelayer Amur accounted for two Japanese battleships, the Hatsuse and the Yashima, also off Port Arthur, with the loss of 493 lives in the Hatsuse.⁷ The 15,000-ton Hatsuse was a serious loss; built by Armstrong in Britain, she was armed with four 12in and sixteen 6in guns and was one of the newest battleships in the Japanese fleet.⁸ Before the war ended in 1905, enough Russian and Japanese warships had been sunk or damaged by mines to impress every naval power, including Great Britain.

    The naval mine had truly arrived, but its success also led to efforts to regulate this abhorrent (to some) weapon. Questions about the employment of this relatively new weapon caused the major maritime powers to attend a Hague Conference on the subject in 1907, but the resulting ‘Convention Relative to the Laying of Automatic Submarine Contact Mines (No. VIII)’⁹ was not strong enough or well enough observed, to stem the use of the weapon.

    The Japanese battleship Hatsuse...

    The Japanese battleship Hatsuse, sunk by a Russian mine in May 1904. (IWM Q 41327)

    The Royal Navy finally began taking steps toward a minelaying capability. Beginning in 1907, it converted to minelayers seven old Apollo class cruisers, two of which were named the Apollo and the Latona. They could make about 20 knots, were armed with 4.7in guns and could carry 100 mines. They constituted the ‘Minelaying Squadron’ commanded by a ‘Captain-in-Charge Minelayers’ and operated directly under the orders of the Admiralty. The Navy also developed a ‘Service’ type mine with a charge of 325lbs.¹⁰

    At the beginning of the First World War, the Royal Navy was galvanised into action by almost immediate use of offensive minelaying by the Imperial Germany Navy, which had enthusiastically embraced the relatively new form of warfare. Shortly after a state of war broke out between Britain and Germany, the Germans wasted no time and sent the former pleasure steamer Königin Luise across the Channel into waters off the English coast to lay her 200 mines. On the morning of 5 August, she was sighted by HMS Amphion, a scout cruiser of 3440 tons armed with 4in guns,¹¹ and the 2nd Destroyer Flotilla. She hurriedly laid her mines 30 miles off the coast of Suffolk before her pursuers opened fire.

    The Königin Luise fled at her maximum speed of 21 knots and fought back gamely with her light guns, as her 3.4in guns had not yet been fitted. A truly fast minelayer might have escaped, but this one was pounded to pieces after Captain Biermann refused to strike her colours. She finally sank, with much of her crew still aboard and the survivors were picked up by her British pursuers. The next morning, the same British ships unwittingly sailed over part of the minefield and the Amphion struck a mine. After another massive explosion, she foundered in just minutes, taking with her more than 150 of her officers and men and many of the German survivors aboard.

    The naval mining war was on. The first British minelaying operation was carried out on the night of 2 October in the Channel to the north of Ostende by the old minelayers Apollo, Intrepid, Andromache and Iphegenia, who were escorted by destroyers. Two more fields were laid on succeeding nights, with a total of 1064 mines laid. As it turned out, the field interfered with the route to Zeebrugge and part of the first minefield had to be swept.¹² It was a learning experience.

    The cruiser Amphion after...

    The cruiser Amphion after hitting a German mine, 6 August 1914. (IWM Q 57066)

    The battleship Audacious sinking...

    The battleship Audacious sinking after hitting a German mine, 27 October 1914. (IWM Q 48342)

    The first major victim of German minelaying after the Amphion was the British dreadnought battleship Audacious. On 27 October 1914, she was sailing off the coast of Ireland for a gunnery exercise when she struck a single mine laid by the former passenger liner Berlin. After a twelve-hour battle to keep her afloat and tow her to safety, she finally sank by the stern, her magazines exploding as she went down. Unlike the Königin Luise, the Berlin evaded notice for some time, until she finally entered Norwegian waters to evade British ships and was interned.¹³

    Shortly afterwards, naval mines achieved one of their greatest successes. During the Gallipoli campaign, a Turkish steamer named the Nousret laid a mere twenty mines in the path of an Anglo-French naval effort to force the Narrows on 18 March 1915. This seemingly meagre minefield was cleverly laid and caused the sinking of the French pre-dreadnought battleship Bouvet and the British predreadnoughts Irresistible and Ocean. The mines caused the attempt to force the Narrows with warships alone to be abandoned.¹⁴ As a result, Allied and Anzac troops had to be sent in and in the end the campaign in Gallipoli eventually failed miserably. Revenge for the destruction wrought by the humble Nousret was a long time coming, but it did come. In January 1918, mines laid by the Latona sank the once-German-then-Turkish light cruiser Breslau and severely damaged the battlecruiser Goeben in the Aegean.

    The Royal Navy was encouraged by the possible use of mines against the emerging threat from German U-boats. During the War, the Royal Navy did not design or build any new minelayers, but employed a number of ships converted into minelayers. The most unusual conversion took shape when a ‘Clapham Junction’ maze of mine rails was fitted to the quarterdeck of the ‘large light cruiser’ Courageous, a white-elephant project of First Sea Lord ‘Jacky’ Fisher. At 18,600 tons, she was the largest minelayer ever, with her four 15in guns, she was certainly the most heavily-armed minelayer ever and with a speed of 32 knots, she was one the fastest of any era.¹⁵ Unfortunately, perhaps, she never laid a mine operationally. A few years after the end of the First World War, she and her sister Glorious were converted into aircraft carriers and served as such into the Second World War until their untimely ends.

    The minelayer Latona in...

    The minelayer Latona in 1916. (Imperial War Museum SP 333)

    The most prodigious minelayers in the Royal Navy in the Great War were converted merchant ships, which laid many thousands of mines in defensive minefields designed to entrap U-boats venturing out to attack merchant shipping. Of course, they were too slow for offensive minelaying. The Royal Navy eventually found a different sort of ship for that.

    In 1916 the Royal Navy began to convert destroyers into minelayers and by far the best known and most successful was undoubtedly the Abdiel, a Marksman class flotilla leader. Ordered as part of the 1914 war programme, she was laid down in 1915 and was converted before her completion in 1916 to carry eighty mines. Essentially a large destroyer for her day, she was 324ft overall and displaced about 1600 tons and was armed with 4in guns. She had four funnels and her turbines could generate 36,000 horsepower. She could make 34 knots, much faster than any other minelayer conversion up to that time.¹⁶ She did not have an enclosed mining deck and when carrying mines on the rails on her deck she would erect a screen to hide them, painted to depict the torpedo tubes she would otherwise have been carrying.

    The large light cruiser-minelayer...

    The large light cruiser-minelayer Courageous. (Constance Keogh via Hermione Alcock)

    Shortly after her completion, the Abdiel was attached to the Fleet. On 4 May 1916, she laid one offensive minefield off the Vyl lightship. Under Commander Berwick Curtis, she then played a unique part in the battle of Jutland on 31 May and 1 June. After the rival battlecruiser squadrons and then the two rival battle fleets encountered each other on the afternoon and evening of the 31st, the German High Seas Fleet turned away and the fleets lost contact with each other in the fading light. Admiral Jellicoe sought to cut off the escape routes of the High Seas Fleet and, as one precaution, at 21.32 he ordered the Abdiel to lay a minefield 15 miles off the Vyl lightship,¹⁷ an area through which the German High Seas Fleet would have to pass if it attempted to escape via the Horns Reef.

    It had been intended for the Abdiel to lay this minefield anyway, even before the British knew the High Seas Fleet was at sea and the Abdiel duly laid the new minefield, in two lines of forty mines each, between 01.24 and 02.04 the morning of 1 June. As it turned out, the High Seas Fleet did use that route for its retirement. German minesweepers sent out to meet the returning ships failed to discover the Abdiel’s minefields,¹⁸ and at 05.30 the German dreadnought battleship Ostfriesland hit a mine laid by the Abdiel, though it was likely one from the field she had laid on 4 May. Like other German dreadnought battleships, the Ostfriesland was tough. While she lost one man killed and ten wounded, her torpedo bulkhead held and she only shipped 400 tons of water,¹⁹ and she was able to keep up with the rest of the High Seas Fleet. The incident did create some alarm in the High Seas Fleet and at least one ship started firing its guns at imagined submarines. The Ostfriesland was able to reach port, was repaired and ready for sea again by 29 July.²⁰ She survived the war, only to be transferred to the United States, which sank her in July 1921 in trials with Colonel Billy Mitchell’s bombers. That the Ostfriesland’s sister dreadnoughts did not strike more mines laid by the Abdiel was perhaps due to the limited size of the minefield that could be laid by a minelayer carrying only eighty mines. This was a shortcoming of the first Abdiel’s design that the British would later remedy in a second Abdiel.

    The destroyer-minelayer Abdiel...

    The destroyer-minelayer Abdiel, which was with the Grand Fleet at Jutland. (IWM SP 3155)

    With the German High Seas Fleet rarely venturing out again before the end of the war, the Abdiel continued her minelaying duties, but did not have another opportunity to ply her offensive minelaying skills as she had at Jutland. Her sister Gabriel was similarly converted and a number of other destroyers were converted to minelaying duties before the end of the war. In 1918 the Abdiel was the leader of the 20th Flotilla, based at Immingham, She survived the war and was not sold for scrap until 1936.

    Most importantly for the future of British offensive minelaying, the Grand Fleet’s Admiral Jellicoe was very impressed by the Abdiel’s role in the battle of Jutland. Writing after the war, he referred to her as ‘this most useful little vessel’ and because one of the British submarines Stationed near Horn’s Reef on the morning of 1 June heard several underwater explosions between 02.15 and 05.30, ‘it was judged that several enemy ships had struck mines’. Finally, he noted that she had ‘carried out her duties with the success which has always characterised her work’,²¹ praise that boded well for her unique type of ship.

    The German cruiser-minelayer Brummer...

    The German cruiser-minelayer Brummer. (Author’s collection)

    The Imperial German Navy engaged in minelaying from the first days of the Great War and to it goes the distinction of building the first fast minelayers designed and built as such, the Brummer and Bremse, the former completing just before the battle of Jutland in 1916 and the latter just after. Using turbines ordered for the Russian battlecruiser Navarin, they could develop 33,000 horsepower from coal and oil-fired boilers and were rated at a maximum speed of 28 knots, though 34 knots has been claimed for them. Rated as cruiser-minelayers, their normal displacement was 4385 tons, they were lightly armoured and were armed with 5.9in guns and 88mm anti-aircraft guns. It has been claimed they could carry from 360 to 450 mines, an astounding feat for ships of their size without an enclosed mining deck, but it was probably more like 120.²² With their three funnels and raked bow, the two ships were built to resemble the British Arethusa class light cruisers.

    The Bremse and Brummer did carry out some minelaying operations, without spectacular results, but are best known for attacking and nearly annihilating a British-escorted convoy sailing between Scotland and Norway in October 1917. Their designed appearance worked well; at first mistaken by the convoy escorts for British cruisers, they got in the first shots and quickly sank the British destroyers Strongbow and Mary Rose and then most of the ships in the convoy. Both ships were interned at the end of the war and were scuttled with most of the rest of the High Seas Fleet at Scapa Flow in June 1919.²³

    While the Abdiel was the first fast destroyer-minelayer, the Brummer and Bremse were the first fast cruiser-minelayers, though not blindingly fast or fitted with an enclosed mine deck. The Germans revived their names for ships that served in the Second World War and were equipped for minelaying, but Germany never built anything like a fast minelayer again, instead relying on destroyers and S-boats for that function.

    At the Admiralty, on the other hand, the idea of a fast offensive minelayer had definitely caught on and doggedly hung on. According to a detailed study of the subject, in July 1918 the Admiralty Controller requested a specially-built fast minelayer, based on two cruiser designs then under construction, the large Hawkins class with 7.5in guns or the smaller ‘E’ class with 6in guns (completed after the war as the Emerald and Enterprise). So close to the end of the war, the idea lapsed, but was revived in earnest in 1920.²⁴

    The Admiralty studied various options between the wars and the result was the 6740-ton minelayer HMS Adventure. Laid down in 1922 and not completed until 1927, she was armed with 4.7in guns for anti-aircraft defence and carried 280 mines in an enclosed mining deck. She was designed to make 28 knots, but was too large and slow for offensive minelaying.²⁵ A follow-on design to the Adventure was considered, but in the end did not materialise. The idea lapsed for the time being, but did not quite die.

    Instead, after the Adventure was built the need for offensive minelayers was addressed in other ways. Several classes of standard destroyers were outfitted as minelayers, much as the Abdiel had been

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1