An Introduction to Bibliometrics: New Development and Trends
By Rafael Ball
4/5
()
About this ebook
An Introduction to Bibliometrics: New Development and Trends provides a comprehensible, readable and easy to read introduction to bibliometrics. Importantly, the book surveys the latest developments of bibliometrics (such as altmetrics, etc.) and how the field is likely to change over the next decade. In the literature, bibliometrics is generally discussed from one of two perspectives: (1) Purely mathematical/statistical or (2) Its sociological implications. Both approaches are very far from how most users want to apply bibliometrics. This book fills that need by providing tactics on how bibliometrics can be applied to their sphere of scientific activity.
- Provides readers with an understanding of bibliometric indicators, including their background and significance, classification in quantitative performance, and an evaluation of science and research
- Includes an overview of the most important indicators, their areas of application, and where and when they should and should not be used
- Discusses future trends in the quantitative performance evaluation of scientific research
Rafael Ball
Rafael Ball has been Director of ETH-Library Zuerich , Switzerland, since March 2015. He holds doctorates in biology and science history and studied biology, Slavonic studies and philosophy at the Universities of Mainz, Warsaw and Moscow. He completed a two-year postgraduate qualification as a scientific librarian in 1996 and was head of Central Library in the Research Center Juelich, Germany from 1996 to 2008. Ball was Director of the University Library of Regensburg from 2008 to 2015. He has written and edited numerous publications, and is a dedicated speaker and a lecturer at various universities. His main work and research interests are the library of the future, science communication and scientometrics and the role of the printed book in the digital age
Related to An Introduction to Bibliometrics
Related ebooks
Altmetrics for Information Professionals: Past, Present and Future Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Future of the Academic Journal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Science of Science Policy: A Handbook Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsResearch 2.0 and the Future of Information Literacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRadical Information Literacy: Reclaiming the Political Heart of the IL Movement Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWicked, Incomplete, and Uncertain: User Support in the Wild and the Role of Technical Communication Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVoices from the South: Decolonial Perspectives in International Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLiteracies of Design: Studies of Equity and Imagination in Engineering and Making Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesigning and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Promise and Perils of Writing Program Administration, The Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLibrary Management A Complete Guide - 2021 Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Online Doctorate for Researching Professionals: Program Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKnowledge Evolution and Societal Transformations: Action Theory to Solve Adaptive Problems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuantitative and Statistical Research Methods: From Hypothesis to Results Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Ethics, Qualitative And Quantitative Methods In Public Health Research Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFailing Law Schools Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Action Research from Concept to Presentation: a Practical Handbook to Writing Your Master's Thesis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAvailable Means of Persuasion, The: Mapping a Theory and Pedagogy of Multimodal Public Rhetoric Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProactive Marketing for the New and Experienced Library Director: Going Beyond the Gate Count Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEvaluating Demand-Driven Acquisitions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInformation Literacy: A Gate or a Window? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBecoming Metric-Wise: A Bibliometric Guide for Researchers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChoosing Schools: Consumer Choice and the Quality of American Schools Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsData Analysis in Qualitative Research: Theorizing with Abductive Analysis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLearning From Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Qualitative Literacy: A Guide to Evaluating Ethnographic and Interview Research Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIs That True?: Critical Thinking for Sociologists Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSocial Psychology A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Social Science For You
My Secret Garden: Women's Sexual Fantasies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dreamland: The True Tale of America's Opiate Epidemic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Human Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A People's History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Verbal Judo, Second Edition: The Gentle Art of Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Questions for Couples: 469 Thought-Provoking Conversation Starters for Connecting, Building Trust, and Rekindling Intimacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art of Witty Banter: Be Clever, Quick, & Magnetic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All About Love: New Visions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fervent: A Woman's Battle Plan to Serious, Specific, and Strategic Prayer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Song of the Cell: An Exploration of Medicine and the New Human Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Explain Everything About the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Just Mercy: a story of justice and redemption Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I Don't Want to Talk About It: Overcoming the Secret Legacy of Male Depression Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Come As You Are: Revised and Updated: The Surprising New Science That Will Transform Your Sex Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Like Switch: An Ex-FBI Agent's Guide to Influencing, Attracting, and Winning People Over Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sun Does Shine: How I Found Life and Freedom on Death Row (Oprah's Book Club Selection) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Women Don't Owe You Pretty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5You're Not Listening: What You're Missing and Why It Matters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Living Resistance: An Indigenous Vision for Seeking Wholeness Every Day Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for An Introduction to Bibliometrics
1 rating1 review
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5VERY READABLE, RECOMMENDABLE BOOK, ESPECIALLY FOR THOSE NEW TO THE FIELD.
Book preview
An Introduction to Bibliometrics - Rafael Ball
India
Chapter 1
Preface
Abstract
Bibliometrics emerged to support librarians in their daily work, and this was the concept behind the first bibliometric analysis. However, as a method to evaluate the scientific achievements of people and institutions, bibliometrics became a child of mass-produced science, which emerged after the Second World War. Now, bibliometrics’ core theme is the quantification of scientific output, gauging the performance of institutions and people, with all the uncertainties involved in evaluating such things. Today the availability of free Internet, and the development of scientific communication and social networks simultaneously necessitate rethinking the measurement and determination of scientific output. Additionally, knowledge and evaluation of the respective publication cultures is required.
Keywords
History of scientometrics; Publication cultures; Introduction to bibliometrics Preface
In 2016, bibliometrics turned one hundred years old. It is not a new invention by the media company, Thomson Reuters (now Onex and Baring Asia), which generates a vast turnover with its various databases, such as the Science Citation Index, and makes a fortune. Nor was it invented by the media group Elsevier, the Science Citation Index's only serious competitor, which inundates universities with a whole series of science evaluation products today.
Instead, bibliometrics emerged from the idea of supporting librarians in their daily work, selecting literature, and optimising holdings management. This was the underlying concept behind the first bibliometric analyses and also the approach adopted by the American chemist, Eugene Garfield, who began to evaluate papers systematically in the 1950s based on the literature used and cited.
In the first half of the twentieth century, questions regarding the type and frequency of scientific publications, and how science works and publications come about were therefore not exactly important issues and even less the subject of quantitative study methods for scientific output, like bibliometrics today.
In any case, the output from scientists during this period was completely immaterial. Good professors had many students, received a sizeable amount of so-called student funding and, at least in Germany, lived off incomes that were among the highest in society [1]. In the early twentieth century, the director of a major bank earned around a third less than a university professor.
At this time, and against the aforementioned backdrop, the written research output in the form of books and papers or talks was not really relevant. Only those who had something to say were heard: They wrote books, gave talks and published scientific papers in journals, which were slowly beginning to catch on.
Those who didn't, however, did not have a problem and, above all, did not have to fear any repercussions. In those days, target agreements on a minimum number of scientific publications per year, as has long been commonplace at many medical and scientific institutes, were unimaginable.
As a method to evaluate the scientific achievements of people and institutions, bibliometrics therefore also became a child of mass-produced science, which emerged after the Second World War. As the number of scientists, the fragmentation of the disciplines and therefore also the demand for specialised publication organs, journals, book series and conferences skyrocketed, the number of publishing houses and especially publications also increased. And so, it was merely a question of time before there was a need to record and evaluate the written output of scientists and their institutions.
First of all, bibliometrics measures the number of papers published by an individual, for instance. This is the easy part as it does not yet require any suppositions and still yields direct information, such as that a scientist has published 200 papers and five books in his or her career. Attempting to gauge the quality and significance of the articles and books, however, is a much trickier business. Here, bibliometrics opted for a simple route that is still applied in practice to this day: A publication is all the more important the more it is perceived. To quantify this perception, bibliometrists chose citation as the indicator: A publication that is cited frequently in other publications is an important publication, a publication that is cited rarely or not at all less so.
Once a paper is published, other scientists cite it and the entire process is measured and written down. The almost endless variation of the indicators currently discussed in bibliometric literature, which has become so extensive that it is virtually impossible to overlook, does not alter the fact that the original principle has remained the same to this day. The fundamental assumption of bibliometrics essentially means that an article is all the more important the more frequently it is cited.
Anyone who fails to follow this basic assumption cannot use bibliometrics; Anyone who justifiably rejects this basic assumption will not be able to generate any insights from bibliometrics.
Moreover, comprehensive databases (which used to be published as printed directories) that record the respective citations are needed so they can be evaluated. As mentioned earlier, Eugene Garfield started the systematic evaluation of papers back in the 1950s and this has blossomed into a vast collection of data, upon which the majority of bibliometric analyses are