Part by Part Synopsis of: Security Council Permit to Bedlam

By Jean-Marc Lebouquin

On 10 and 11 September 2015 both Houses of the 114th Congress debated and voted on a deal negotiated by Barack Obama and Ministers of the Govt. of Iran. The Congress believed the JCPOA, signed in Vienna on 14 July 2015, was the whole "Iran Deal," (it is not). The Congressional Record reveals that not one Congressperson of either Party in either House could have done more than taken a token glance at the JCPOA under debate.
From Nov. 2016 - June 2017 the first 9 of an ongoing series of nuclear weapons related transfers to Iran were approved by the U.N. per the provisions of the JCPOA and in violation of treaty.
Had anyone in the 114th Congress read the JCPOA, it would be known that these planned ongoing approvals of such transfers each rely on a favoring U.S. vote, doled out by the Executive administration.
Obama instigated the process, the next President retains it. The U.S. Govt. votes for a trade each time one comes up. The U.S. Legislature is responsible for ignoring this.
The 115th Congress, not showing much of an attention span, doesn't review and note what the 114th wouldn't look at.
The long "Security Council Permit to Bedlam" explains how U.N. Security Council Resolution 2231, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action; directly establishes an accelerating system under which the Council sponsors and expedites the transfer to Iran, a non-nuclear weapon State, the means to manufacture nuclear weapons, and complete control of these as of 18 October 2030. Source Documentation for everything described in this book is exclusively from unclassified primary sources; i.e. the resolution itself, associated Security Council and International Atomic Energy Agency documents and bulletins, U.S. State Dept records, etc.
That book discusses the process of these transfers, which are intended to be ongoing; and discusses the fact that the United Nations developed and established an official U.N. internal bureaucracy, the "Procurement Working Group," to manage and expedite such transfers over the long term, in what could be construed as the most extreme violation of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (Nuclear non-Proliferation Treaty, NPT) ever attempted on public record to date.
That book documents the resolution in relation to State Sponsorship of Terror; and documents in detail the intentional political ruses, both domestic and international, used as attempts to conceal this obvious and easily documented charade;
How the five permanent members of the Council managed to dupe the non-permanent members of the Council into believing they were voting on something else – and how the U.S. Obama administration completely evaded submitting the authentic text of the resolution to the Congress contrary to United States Law – specifically the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015; Public Law 114–17; 129 STAT. 201, signed into law by then U.S. President Barack Obama himself.
This synopsis is an overview, much more accessible but without the extensive detail and documentation – nevertheless, it hopes to give a more immediate sense of the affair and can be read free all the way through. Even an extensive sample of the long book will only tell one part of the multi-layered story.
The governments in the neighborhood of Iran, those several of which are targeted by that State, have all read and understood the undertakings set forth in United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231; while these governments show restraint, the danger of both conventional escalation and international nuclear weapons proliferation, provoked by Resolution 2231, is ongoing and increasing the longer the provisions of Resolution 2231 continue to be favorably acted upon by the Security Council and the United States.
The highly respected International Court of Justice is the proper venue to petition for remedy from the ongoing violations of treaties and international law currently undertaken by the Unite

• Language: English
• Publisher: Jean-Marc Lebouquin
• Release date: Aug 11, 2017
• ISBN: 9781370265688

Jean-Marc Lebouquin

Jean-Marc LeBouquin is an U.S. Citizen native to deep southern Louisiana. He professes no political party affiliations or loyalties, and qualifies himself as an independent who values foremost the United States Constitution; and is skeptical of unsubstantiated boastful claims Washington partisan politicians make in favor of promoting themselves and the fundraising political party machines that support their re-election campaigns.

Book preview

Part by Part Synopsis of

Security Council Permit to Bedlam

Jean-Marc LeBouquin

Copywrite © 2017 Jean-Marc LeBouquin – cover, title page under same copywrite.

Smashwords Edition

Smashwords Edition, License Notes:

This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This book may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to your favorite ebook retailer and purchase your own copy. Thank you for your very kind regard.

Table of Contents

Purpose of this book

Perspective on a Starting Point

A Brief Foreword

Chapter I – Notice

Chapter I, 1st Portion – Opening a Weapons Market

1st Portion; Part A – Some Basic Parameters of the E3/EU+3 Iran Arrangement

1st Portion; Part B – Stipulated Exact Implementation Timelines for Scheduled Weapons Transactions

1st Portion; Part C – A Quick Primer on IAEA Inspections of Iranian Mining and Milling Facilities

1st Portion; Part D – Other Essential Treaties to Ignore & Laws to Terminate

1st Portion; Part E – Concealing the Source of a Security Council Sponsored Potential Arms Race

1st Portion; Part F – Gun Play Without Exception

1st Portion; Part G – Glittering Hopes for a Glamorous Arms Trade

Chapter I, 2nd Portion – Big Town; Best Dirty Politics

2nd Portion; Part A – Scrambling for Internet Celebrity and Identity

2nd Portion; Part B – How Can People do Such Crazy Things?

Chapter I, 3rd Portion – Justice Sutherland and the Chaco Region Conflict

Chapter II – Denying the IAEA Access to Iranian Mining and Milling Sites and Operations

Chapter III – Civilian Urban Zone, and Military Battlefield Deployment of Non-Fissile Nuclear Weaponry

Chapter III, 1st Portion – The Urban Terrorist’s Nuclear Option

Chapter III, 2nd Portion – Year 15

Chapter III, 3rd Portion – Easily Subverted International Atomic Energy Agency

Chapter IV – A Universal Bill of Attainder, as Well as Other Offenses

Chapter V – Petition and Remedy .

Chapter VI – What is it Still Doing Here?

Purpose of this book

This book is a part by part synopsis of Security Council Permit to Bedlam, which is a fairly long book; quite a commitment for the reader to take on without having much of a sense of what's in it.

In the old days, when books were made out of paper, one could go into the local book store and read through different portions of an actual book at will to get a sense of it. With e-books – the publisher tends to pick out the reading samples, many according to their various policies – that's kind of what goes on.

It can be somewhat challenging trying to figure out from selective samples of the larger book, Security Council Permit to Bedlam is about. This author feels it is perhaps an unfair challenge to the reader – that's why I decided to write this part-by-part synopsis of the larger book.

Security Council Permit to Bedlam is about how the United Nations, almost overnight; or rather over the course of a few short New York minutes, was transformed on the bright and early Monday morning of 20 July 2015, at the 7488th \Meeting of the Security Council, from an organization dedicated to developing friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples…, into possibly the most organized and best internationally connected hell-hound of a nuclear arms dealing syndicate the world may yet have seen.

That's correct! One minute you're standing in line, waiting for your cup of coffee – nothing complicated or demanding, no double mocha latte with cinnamon soy milk or anything like that here, just plain black coffee please, that's all – and POW; somewhere across town U.N. functionaries are out of their chairs like wildcat hyenas; busily texting their home bases bunkered in mysterious nether regions of their respective countries – messaging the leaderships maybe with: They finally did it, U.S. President Barack Obama and the rest of the E3/EU+3 Iran Cartel finally got around to getting something finished!

The E3/EU+3 Iran Cartel is made up of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the United States, the United Kingdom, the Russian Federation, Germany, the Republic of France and the People's Republic of China, along with the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. That's the group that that is responsible for this whole travesty of an history.

This writing is, of course, not privy to the exact words of any of the various excited messages sent back to Home Offices of the Security Council delegations – that's strictly super-sensitive, totally encrypted diplomatic stuff; naturally.

But what the E3/EU+3 Iran Cartel finally got done was renamed as United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015) – after the conventional United Nations Security Council style of renaming draft proposal resolutions. The resolution contained, contains, as its Annex A, the full document of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) signed in Vienna about a week before on 14 July 2015; as well as the remainder of the resolution which features a number of interesting and substantial provisions scheduling weapons concessions to Iran.

The JCPOA is the lynchpin of the Security Council resolution. The JCPOA contains the lion's share of the provisions detailing how the Security Council is to expedite Iranian acquisitions of nuclear weapons related technologies, goods, facilities support, and various other support services on an on-going basis. All activities associated with these procedures are decided by the Security Council to be exempt from International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) review or examination.

The Security Council established a new internal bureaucracy, the Procurement Working Group, to handle expediting Iranian acquisitions of the above class of inventories. As a result of its efforts thus far; from November 2016 through June 2017 the first nine of an ongoing series of nuclear weapons related transfers to Iran were approved by the U.N. per the provisions of the JCPOA and in violation of treaty. There are more on the way, but the Procurement Working Group only lists the number of these acquisitions once every six months – so that's the latest official count released so far.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231; Paragraph 2 of Annex B: Statement, allows that such approvals could have begun on JCPOA Implementation Day – which would turn out to be 16 January 2016. However, at such an early stage the logistics of submittal of procurement proposals, proposal for acquisitions of such nuclear weapons associated inventories, had not yet been adequately set up.

The first of two procurement proposals were finally submitted on 6 October 2016, and were subsequently approved by the Security Council on 17 November 2016, about a week after the conclusion of the National elections in the United States.

Naturally this whole scheme of converting the campuses, corridors and resources of the United Nations into a staging area for on-going weapons deals goes against the multi-laterally signed Constituent Treaty of the Charter of the United Nations, and the multi-lateral Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) at the very least;

But the Obama-era leaderships of the five permanent Member States of the Security Council Oligarchy, the most influential authors of the E3/EU+3 Iran Cartel arrangement; they've got an angle on almost everything – or so the story seems to go.

The all-open-for-public-viewing ruses used, by the Obama-era five permanent Member States of the Security Council Oligarchy membership, to argue and explain away the illegitimacy of the activities spelled out in the JCPOA and the rest of the resolution are sometimes surprisingly puerile and simplistic; and at other times quite complex – either way these have to be examined as traps for the unwary.

The language of the resolution itself is diplomatic and serene, sometimes evasive and false in its assertions (as we shall examine); but civilized sounding – almost enough to not quite cover over the Paleolithic viciousness of the regressive misanthropes who invented the disgrace.

The ruses used are some times mixed with each other, and of necessity in the narrative, are addressed, and reappear in combination, in various parts of the book.

This is one of the reasons for this part-by-part synopsis – it is to give an overall sense of the workings of this whole squirmy plot. This author fears that a sample reading of Security Council Permit to Bedlam, even a substantial sample of the book, might be confusing and unfair to the reader; there would be no overall sense of the motivations and the actions being described at any one point. A substantial sample of the long book is available on the internet, naturally. Hopefully, after reading this synopsis, the reader might be able to jump into the sample and already feel somewhat oriented as to what is being discussed.

* * * * *

ON APRIL 17, 2015, in a Joint Press Conference between himself and Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi conducted from the East Room of the White House; Barack Obama informed the Italian Prime Minister, and the U.S. and foreign press in attendance, of his (Obama’s) own singular interpretation of The Constitution of the United States:

…The second concern [about a vote in the Congress with regards to Obama’s Iran Deal"] I had was just an issue of presidential prerogatives. … This is not a formal treaty that is being envisioned. And the President of the United States, whether Democrat or Republican, traditionally has been able to enter into political agreements that are binding with other countries without congressional approval…

[This quote is archived and can be found at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/04/17/remarks-president-obama-and-prime-minister-renzi-italy-joint-press-conference]

The above declaration by President Obama, and other sayings of his much like it, caused a flurry of excitement in a U.S. news media always eager to catch on to one of those glimmering pearls of wisdom that would pop out of the White House windows and tumble onto the front lawn from time to time.

The comment raised questions like: Can a President conclude a negotiation with a foreign power that isn't a treaty that requires review from Congress? and Is Obama's 'Iran deal' a treaty or just an Executive Agreement of some sort – or something like that or what?

Questions like these amounted to the means for the news media to dote and write endless copy on speculative conjecture regarding what the status of Obama's Iran Deal might really be; this when at the time such questions were being asked, the deal had not yet been published. The questions were nebulous, arousing enthusiastic theorizing pertaining to nothing tangible that anyone could intelligently comment on.

Later, once the text of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 was made available to the public – the pertinent questions were not (to this writing's knowledge) asked in the press or in the Congress. The pertinent questions are:

– Is the E3/EU+3 Iran Cartel arrangement negotiated by President Obama legal to enforce?

– Is the E3/EU+3 Iran Cartel arrangement negotiated by President Obama a treaty?

The answer to the first question is NO; the Executive Branch cannot legally enforce Obama's agreement or put any part of it into play as it violates international treaty and the United States Constitution. Barack Obama successfully negotiated to establish a Security Council sponsored Procurement Working Group with the mandate to expedite nuclear weapons associated Technologies to a non-nuclear-weapon State. This is in egregious violation of Article I of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which declares:

TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS

ARTICLE I

Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to transfer to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; and not in any way to assist, encourage, or induce any non-nuclear-weapon State to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, or control over such weapons or explosive devices.

This Treaty, one of the fundamental arms control international treaties of the modern era; jointly conceived by the United States and the Soviet Union; made under the Authority of the United States – meaning it met with at least two thirds approval from the Senate and was subsequently signed for, ratified, by a United States President;

This is the treaty that Barack Obama, and the supportive acolyte minions of his administration, chose to violate when they instigated a resolution in the United Nations which establishes Security Council active support for working protocols and procedures expediting approval of the transfer to a non-nuclear-weapon State of the means to manufacture nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices; and to give that non-nuclear-weapon State complete control over those devices as of 18 October 2030;

This is the treaty that Barack Obama, along with the supportive acolyte minions of his administration, chose to violate when they developed United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231; which, as it directs in its text, assists, encourages, and induces a non-nuclear-weapon State to manufacture or acquire control over such weapons or explosive devices.

A U.S. President can generally negotiate an international agreement with a foreign power without having to consult Congress every step of the way. A President cannot negotiate a deal with a foreign Prince or Potentate that violates the United States Constitution. This