Ayn Rand Cult
By Jeff Walker
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
Jeff Walker
Jeff Walker - An avid creative writer of short story fiction titles in the genre of science fiction, speculative fiction and supernatural thrillers. Currently he resides in a small rural town with his wife and two young children in Ontario, Canada. He majored in art and creative writing in high school, and then, attended college to pursue a career in Graphic Design. After a few set backs and career changes, he is returning to his love of writing and art. He enjoys writing fan fiction, collecting movie memorabilia, and spending time with his family and friends. His first short story eBook published was - The Cure (November 3, 2011 on Kindle/March 3, 2013 on Kobo) and then two more short stories followed - Incident On Bio-Moon Five (March 13, 2013 on Kindle/January 28, 2014 on Kobo) and The End Of Time (Aug. 31, 2012 on Kindle/Feb. 18 2013 on Kobo). These stories where then collected into his first full book, both in Ebook and Print - Distant Saga Trilogy: A Short Story Collection (August 2, 2015 on Kindle/Kobo - Republished Date, year on Kindle/Kobo - Revised Edition Date, Year on Kindle/Kobo/Blurb).
Read more from Jeff Walker
The Mysterious World Of Professor Darkk And Miss Shadow The Long Lost War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Jungle Planet Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArrow Through Space: A Science Fiction Short Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Ayn Rand Cult
Related ebooks
Ayn Rand Explained: From Tyranny to Tea Party Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5With Charity Toward None: An Analysis of Ayn Rand's Philosophy Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5A Brave New World (Book 2 of War's End) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEcce Homo (The Autobiography of Friedrich Nietzsche) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Behind the Shock Machine: The Untold Story of the Notorious Milgram Psychology Experiments Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Senior Year: Memories of the Class of 1983 of North Miami Senior High School Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Real Life Taxi Driver: A Biography of Arthur Herman Bremer (The Real Inspiration of Travis Bickle) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAtheist Manifesto: The Case Against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We Have Overcome: An Immigrant’s Letter to the American People Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSon of Sam: A Biography of David Berkowitz Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inception and Philosophy: Ideas to Die For Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManson Exposed: A Reporter’s 50-Year Journey into Madness and Murder Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Objectivism in One Lesson: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Ayn Rand Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Young Hitler I Knew: A Boyhood Friend Recounts Growing Up with the Future Fuhrer of the Third Reich Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Reagan Era: A History of the 1980s Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Interpretation of Dreams Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSatan's Silence: Ritual Abuse and the Making of a Modern American Witch Hunt Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freud: The Making of an Illusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Winter Dreams: Short Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Anti-Christ Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Happy Hooker: My Own Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrankenstein and Philosophy: The Shocking Truth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBreaking Bad and Philosophy: Badder Living through Chemistry Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The I Hate Trump Book: Past, Present & Future* Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Essential Friedrich Nietzsche Collection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVillage Atheists: How America's Unbelievers Made Their Way in a Godly Nation Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Cult City: Jim Jones, Harvey Milk, and 10 Days That Shook San Francisco Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What's Wrong with the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerica’s Persecuted Minority: Big Business Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Literary Biographies For You
Don't Panic: Douglas Adams & The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Man of Two Faces: A Memoir, A History, A Memorial Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Pity the Reader: On Writing with Style Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Glass Castle: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dry: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Maybe You Should Talk to Someone: the heartfelt, funny memoir by a New York Times bestselling therapist Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Oscar Wilde: The Unrepentant Years Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dad on Pills: Fatherhood and Mental Illness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lincoln Lawyer: A Mysterious Profile Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWriting into the Wound: Understanding trauma, truth, and language Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hunger: A Memoir of (My) Body Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5People, Places, Things: My Human Landmarks Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Devil and Harper Lee Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Moveable Feast Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Writer's Diary Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Party Monster: A Fabulous But True Tale of Murder in Clubland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shakespeare: The World as Stage Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Deliberate Cruelty: Truman Capote, the Millionaire's Wife, and the Murder of the Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Real Lolita: A Lost Girl, an Unthinkable Crime, and a Scandalous Masterpiece Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Distance Between Us: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Confessions of a Bookseller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5James Baldwin: A Biography Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Very Best of Maya Angelou: The Voice of Inspiration Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Writers and Their Notebooks Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Agatha Christie: An Elusive Woman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Molly Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Murder Your Life: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Woman Who Could Not Forget Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5These Precious Days: Essays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Ayn Rand Cult
21 ratings4 reviews
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The author makes a convincing argument that the Randian movement is a cult. However, the author politicizes the book by making unsubstantiated political claims, which do not bolster his argument. For example, claiming that "natural rights theory" was discarded by libertarians by the nineties (based on some libertarian's opinion) is unsubstantiated hearsay, and detracts from the author's Randian cult argument. Natural rights theory was and still is very much alive and well within the American libertarian community, along with the NAP. The Rothbard references definitely convinced me that Rand's movement is a cult. Also, chapter 10 does a good job of providing evidence that Rand's "Objectivism" was hardly, if at all, original (if it wasn't already obvious).
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I concur with the other two reviewers here. Anyone who thinks there is anything wonderful or special about Ayn Rand and her philosophy she labeled "objectivism" really needs to read this book. You will find out that she was a narcissist and her 'philosophy' will only ultimately appeal to someone who has similar if not worse psychological problems. Her black and white view of the world is as simplistic and ultimately mind-destroying as the most insane religious cult to which one could compare it. Reason as god and Ayn Rand as the definer of Reason? - Really? - that is so very wrong - and insanely absurd.
1 person found this helpful
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In the very beginning of his book, Jeff Walker aptly points out that people either heavily get into Ayn Rand in their teens -- or not at all. I first read FOUNTAINHEAD and ATLAS SHRUGGED at 31 and, while seriously impressed by her political and economic clairvoyance, was puzzled by her bizzarre view of humans and human nature and her desire, demonstrated in both novels, to steamroll over anybody who didn't fit her definition of a hero. Besides, I never understood how could a philosopher who preached individualism and self-reliance attract tens of thousands of adoring followers. Ayn Rand's ideal was not a follower, therefore, the followers could not, by definition, live up to her ideals or have her respect (which they didn't). Jeff Walker does a very thorough job of answering just that question. Yes, his theory may be considered debatable. It's an opinion, and he argues it convincingly and with style. He even preempts the insults, such as you may find below, by pointing out that when people identify too closely with their system of beliefs, they have no choice but defend them tooth and nail from any hint of cognitive dissonance. The politically correct, who wear their bleeding hearts on their sleeves, react just as hysterically to any fact they find uncomfortable. It's a fanatic's way. Walker's book is written with humor and decency, it's an easy and enjoyable read (and I don't read much nonfiction), and it has guts. The more you know about Ayn Rand from objective sources, the more sense Walker's book makes.
2 people found this helpful
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This fascinating book reinforces an observation I have made over the years: that the ideas of individuals once institutionalized, become perverted and reinvented by those who claim to be the authentic followers of the guru who invented them. Certainly this is true of most religious leaders from Christ to Joseph Smith. It is happening to Robert Greenleaf, and it certainly happened to Ayn Rand, although in the case of the latter she may have had a hand in encouraging the transformation and idolatry.
Heresy and orthodoxy become important concepts once ideas have been codified and institutionalized: anyone with the temerity to suggest revisions or alternatives becomes a heretic and traitor. (Interestingly, the word traitor has religious roots. It comes from a Latin word meaning "handers-over," those Christians who obeyed the Diocletian order to hand over the Scriptures so they could be destroyed. Whether these traditores could receive communion again caused a major schism in the church. Over course one has to belong to an organization and to believe its basic tenets in order to be heretical or a traitor. Hence the difference between heretic and infidel.) Walker is no fan, but I think he makes the same error Philip Johnson did in his attack on intellectuals, condemning their philosophies because they were unable to personally live a blameless life. Walker denounces Rand because the did not often live the life she expounded in her books and he blames her for the iconographic adoration of her adolescent followers. Walker insists that only adolescents looking for a philosophical underpinning were susceptible to her beliefs, perhaps a questionable assumption, but one difficult to challenge given a paucity of data. More to the point he criticizes her for being essentially a derivative thinker (haven't most philosophers derived or based their thinking on the work of others?) and he says her books have little literary value. Ayn Rand, according to virtually everyone who knew her, was charismatic and unconflicted in her beliefs and that alone attracted many, often the young, to her. If she had a major flaw, it was her adoption of an orthodox position that considered views other than hers to be "unreasonable" and "unobjective," and to prevent the movement from developing its own orthodoxy.
There is an apparently inherent contradiction between her celebration of individualism and self-reliance and the Objectivist movement itself, but that is in the nature of all movements and perhaps a great reason to avoid them, be they religious or philosophical. Ayn Rand's heroes were the antithesis of followers, but I suspect that humans are biologically programmed to want to adhere to groups and to define themselves by that group, and to identify too closely with the set of beliefs, the orthodoxy of the group, and to want to exclude and brand as heretics those who refuse to adhere to the group's principles. It's true of the religious right and the radical left. The irony is that most movements eventually become so enamored of the trappings of their orthodoxy that they lose sight of the original beliefs of the founder, in fact, they often become irrelevant. But that's why we have libraries, to help everyone challenge their assumptions.
Clearly, the book is a vindictive, personal attack that will be ignored by Objectivists (who should read it, if only for the discussions of orthodoxy and heresy) and lauded by those who can't stand Rand. I found it a lively, if shrill, examination of the history of a movement founded by a passionate, if personally flawed, individual who, rightly or wrongly, has influenced a large number of people through a body of interesting novels; an examination of a movement to came to practice the opposite of the principles its leader espoused. **I know "their" is incorrect here, but it seems a nice gender-neutral compromise, surely much better than his/her or just "her" or "his", so I think it's time for the English orthodox police to admit this use of "their."
minor corrections 1/15/101 person found this helpful