Areopagitica and Other Prose Works

By John Milton and C.E. Vaughan

An uncompromising defender of liberty as well as a sublime poet, John Milton published the "Areopagitica" in 1644, at the height of the English Civil War. The impetus arose from Parliament's Licensing Order, which censored all printed materials and ultimately led to arrests, book burnings, and other authoritarian abuses. Milton's polemic, strengthened by biblical and classical allusions, remains enduringly significant and ranks among the world's most eloquent defenses of the right to free speech.
In addition to the "Areopagitica," this collection of Milton's most significant prose works includes "Of Education," a tract on educational reform; "Meditation Upon Divine Justice and The Death of King Charles the First," a rationale for the overthrow of the monarchy; "The Doctrine and Disciple of Divorce," in which the author urges the enactment of a virtually unheard-of reform allowing divorce for incompatibility and the right of remarriage; and "Autobiographical Extracts," featuring highlights from Milton's memoirs.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Dover Publications
• Release date: Oct 18, 2016
• ISBN: 9780486816500

John Milton

John Milton was a seventeenth-century English poet, polemicist, and civil servant in the government of Oliver Cromwell. Among Milton’s best-known works are the classic epic Paradise Lost, Paradise Regained, considered one of the greatest accomplishments in English blank verse, and Samson Agonistes. Writing during a period of tremendous religious and political change, Milton’s theology and politics were considered radical under King Charles I, found acceptance during the Commonwealth period, and were again out of fashion after the Restoration, when his literary reputation became a subject for debate due to his unrepentant republicanism. T.S. Eliot remarked that Milton’s poetry was the hardest to reflect upon without one’s own political and theological beliefs intruding.

Book preview

DOVER THRIFT EDITIONS

GENERAL EDITOR: SUSAN L. RATTINER

EDITOR OF THIS VOLUME: JIM MILLER

Bibliographical Note

Areopagitica and Other Prose Works, first published by Dover Publications, Inc., in 2016, is an unabridged republication of selections from Areopagitica and Other Prose Works of John Milton, originally published in 1927 by J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd., London, and E. P. Dutton & Co., New York. The Introduction by C. E. Vaughan is also included.

International Standard Book Number

ISBN-13: 978-0-486-81125-3

ISBN-10: 0-486-81125-5

Manufactured in the United States by RR Donnelley

81125501 2016

www.doverpublications.com

Contents

Introduction

Areopagitica

Of Education

The Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce

Meditations upon Divine Justice and the Death of King Charles the First

Autobiographical Extracts

Introduction

THE AREOPAGITICA WAS published in November 1644. Its immediate occasion was the order of June 1643, by which Parliament re-established the censorship of the Press. Milton’s main object is to show the absurdity and iniquity of this measure, and to press for its repeal. But he does not confine himself within these comparatively narrow limits. Again and again, particularly in the latter part of the treatise, he deliberately breaks through them, to prove that freedom of speech and freedom of action are not evils to be tolerated, but blessings essential to the life and progress of any nation.

Thus the Areopagitica falls into its place among the other prose writings of Milton. Like them, it assails the principle of authority and tradition; like them, it is based on the principle, Above all things, Liberty. To plead the cause of freedom was, as he himself says, the sole aim of all he wrote during the twenty years that followed the meeting of the Long Parliament. The form of the plea differs, but its principle is always the same. In one group of writings, it is for political freedom that he fights; in another, for the right to revise the moral and social code, current at any stage of human progress; in a third, he calls on the nation to establish a freer form of ecclesiastical government. And here, in the Areopagitica, he passes behind all these questions to that which lies at the root of all; and pleads that without freedom—without the liberty to reject, to choose and, where need is, to innovate—there can be no health in the moral and intellectual life either of the individual or the nation.

Hence the Areopagitica is something much more than a mere member of a series. It supplies the principle without which the other, and more special, arguments would have but little value; it lays the foundation upon which, in the last resort, the others rest. Give me the liberty, Milton writes, to know, to utter, and to argue freely, according to conscience, above all liberties.

In urging this plea, Milton, as has been said, takes both the narrower and the wider ground. On the narrower question, the duty of the State towards the Press, there should be no censorship, he argues, before publication; and after publication, no punishment save on the legally proved counts of libel or blasphemy. With these two exceptions, the former of which, at any rate, is recognised no less in our own day than in Milton’s, the Press should be absolutely free. Free, because restriction, even the most unsparing, is powerless to check many, and those the most dangerous, abuses. Free, because it is a barrier to learning and an insult to the individual author. Free, because it is a system first devised by the Papacy and the Inquisition, and therefore justly hateful to all high-minded and truth-loving men.

But it is when he comes to the wider and the higher ground that Milton rises to his full strength. What is it, he asks, that makes all restrictions upon the freedom of thought, and therefore of the Press, so unwise and so harmful? It is because freedom of thought and utterance is the first condition of individual rectitude and of national progress. And this is true no less in the world of action than in that of speculative thought. No man can be sure that he has found the truth, until he has compared it with all possible forms of error. No man can be sure that his will is firmly set towards the good, until he has gone forth into the battle and proved his armour against all possible forms of evil. It is the same in conduct as it is in speculation. In both, the individual soul is responsible; in neither can it shuffle off its responsibility upon the infallibility or the authority of others. It is the individual reason, the individual will, that alone counts; and the essence of both is individual choice and individual decision. Destroy these, and we have destroyed the one thing that gives value to the trust of life we have received from God; we have struck at that which makes the very being of the soul; we have killed will and reason as it were in the eye.

So also with the life of the nation. That life does not consist in obedience to any code, however unquestioned, nor in the acceptance of any creed, however venerable. It lies in the sum of moral and spiritual activity to be found in the whole body of the people. In the first instance this is the activity of the individual citizens. But there could be no greater mistake than to suppose that Milton stops short with that view of the matter. No man could have been less ready to regard the individual as an isolated unit; no man could have laid greater stress on the collective life of the nation, or have breathed into it a fuller meaning.

That without unity there can be no such thing as national life, is manifest. The only question is, of what sort that unity is to be. Is it to be imposed artificially from above, or to spring as a natural growth, by its own law, from beneath? In the former case, Milton urges, we shall have a false unity, the unity of death. It is only by accepting the latter principle, and accepting it unflinchingly, that we can hope to win the true unity, the unity of life. By the one method we shall never rise beyond a rigid external formality, a stark and dead congealment of wood and hay and stubble. By the other, if we could but lay aside our intolerance, if we could but find among us the bond of peace, we shall, through all these neighbouring differences, or rather indifferences, attain to the highest unity which man is capable of reaching, the unity of the spirit; we shall find ourselves grown into a knowing people, a nation of prophets, of sages and of worthies. Our perfection, as the perfection of human brotherhood always must, will consist in this, that out of many moderate varieties and brotherly dissimilitudes, that are not vastly disproportional, arises the goodly and the graceful symmetry that commends the whole pile and structure. Now, as always, the true life of a nation is to be sought not in uniformity but in harmony—a harmony of differences.

This, however, is not all. In the life of a nation, yet more than in that of the individual, we have to think not only of the present but of the future. The men of one generation can never look at truth with the same eyes as their fathers. The world changes; the field of knowledge and of action widens; and we, if we will be true to our trust, must enlarge our outlook in response. In one age the change will be more rapid, in another less. But, quick or slow, it is always going forward. Progress is inevitable, and it is for our health. Were it to cease, all that is worthy to be called life would cease with it; we should sicken into a muddy pool of conformity and tradition. And without freedom—the liberty to know, to utter and to argue freely—progress, like life itself, would be impossible to a nation.

In Milton’s day the progress offered to men lay especially in the field of religious and moral thought. The task of that generation was to carry forward the work begun by Wyclif and Luther: it went to the reforming of Reformation itself. In this task Milton took a larger and more fruitful share than any of his contemporaries. He did not content himself with pleading for this or that particular doctrine; but, with irresistible reasoning and splendid eloquence, he defended the principle, then regarded by most men as abominable, on which all of them depend. With undaunted courage he put the previous question, that which must be solved before any special reform, particularly on matters of faith and conduct, can gain a hearing. And, once for all, he answered it. From the moment the Areopagitica was published, the acceptance of progress, as the primary law in all matters whether of conduct or of reason, was merely a question of time.

It has sometimes been regretted that the only one of Milton’s prose works widely read at the present day should be that which enforces a commonplace so universally accepted as the duty of toleration. The regret is needless. Toleration, in the negative sense, may now be generally admitted. We may no longer disfranchise or burn our neighbour because he differs from us on matters of philosophy or religion. That, however, is apt to be the extent of our toleration; and it is a very small part of the liberty for which Milton pleads. To him liberty is not a negative, but a positive, idea. It is a thing not to be given grudgingly, but to be welcomed as the guiding principle both of the collective and of the individual life. Never to rest until we have learnt both to think and act for ourselves, never to flag until, so far as in us lies, we have fired others with the same faith in man’s will and in man’s reason—that is the ideal of Milton. And that is an ideal which is hardly nearer to fulfilment in our day than it was in his. Now, as then, the first desire of many is to find a Pope for themselves, and, when they have found him, to impose him upon others. Now, as then, there is not any burden that some would gladlier post off to another than the charge and care of their religion, and of their intellectual life. Now, as then, men are commonly too timid to speak the secret convictions of their heart. Of Milton’s generous faith, of his trust in the energy of progress and his insistence on the duty to prove all things, there is small trace indeed. Our belief in liberty is too often from the lips outwards; neither in its scope nor in its grounds will it bear comparison with Milton’s. And so long as this is so we cannot say that the Areopagitica, in which more than in any other of his prose writings his whole soul finds utterance, has yet done its work. The iron yoke of outward conformity hath yet left a slavish print upon our necks.

We have seen the occasion of the Areopagitica, and its place among the other works of Milton. We have seen the scope of its argument and its enduring significance. It remains only to mark its position in the literature and thought of the time; both in style and matter it has a place by itself.

In style the Areopagitica, like the other prose works of Milton, marks the last stage of that Latin influence which, half a century earlier, had been stamped on English by the genius of Hooker. The long sentence, the sonorous cadence, of Milton’s prose could hardly have been what they were, had not he, like Hooker before him, steeped his mind in the writings of the great Latins, and particularly of Cicero. Yet there is a palpable difference between Hooker’s way of treating the Latin period and that in which it is adapted by Milton. In Hooker the periodic structure—the architectural pile, in which the subordinate clauses are grouped symmetrically and with strict logical sequence around the principal sentence—is taken over bodily, or only with such modifications as the nature of an uninflected language, like the English, imperatively requires. The result is magnificent, but it is undeniably an exotic. In Milton the long sentence remains; on occasion, it becomes even longer. But the subordination of clause to clause is largely broken through. Its place is taken by a far looser structure, of which the guiding principle is co-ordination. The style of Milton, if technical terms may be forgiven, is in the main not syntactic but paratactic; not a synthesis of clauses, but an agglomeration. It may be that in style, as in thought, he was swayed by the freer model of the Greek masters. It may be that he was merely yielding to the force which must sooner or later have broken a mould always too stiff and unbending for the natural genius of our language. In any case, the change of structure—a change that no ear can fail to catch—gives a freedom and flexibility which, in his hands, blends fittingly with the pomp and majesty of the very different type from which he started. No writer can be more majestic, none has a readier command of caustic phrase in the plainest vernacular, than he. It is the ease with which he passes from the one type of phrase and rhythm to the other, or rather the instinctive mastery which fuses both types into one, that gives distinction of movement and colour to the style of Milton. It is this also that makes his writings a landmark in the history of English prose. They bear witness to the waning of the Latin influence. They mark the transition from the Ciceronian period of Hooker to the short sentence of Dryden and the moderns.

Still more important is the Areopagitica in the history of thought. Milton has been called, with some truth, the last of the Elizabethans; he certainly unites, as none before him had done, two dominant tendencies of Elizabethan thought. For the last fifty years the nation had been split into two hostile camps. In one were found the men of intellect and imagination, in the other the men of religion. Between the two there was always a deep-rooted distrust, and often open war. Of the earlier writers, Spenser alone can be said to have suspected that there was anything in common between the movement that had given new life to English poetry and the movement that had poured fresh energy into the faith and morals of the nation. Yet at bottom the two movements, the Renaissance and the Reformation, were one; and the strange thing is not that they should eventually have been reconciled, but that they should ever have been thought, as they were universally thought, to be opposed. The former took account only of intellectual and imaginative satisfaction; the latter was ready to stake everything on moral and spiritual truth. The former saw in art and science nothing but a quickening of the energies of man; the latter turned with impatience from all that was not directly and manifestly the revelation of God. Neither saw more than half the truth. The poets forgot that no human knowledge or activity is perfected till it has learnt to see all things in God. The Puritans forgot that God is to be found in the outward world of nature and of beauty no less than in the inward communion of the spirit. Thus both poet and Puritan—the latter, no doubt, yet more than the former—fell into one-sidedness and exaggeration. Neither the one nor the other, if we except Shakespeare, who is an exception to all rules, drew all that might have been drawn from the great movement of their time. Neither the one nor the other attempted to interpret that movement as a whole.

It is the significance of Milton that, coming at the close of a period marked out beyond all others by many-sidedness of energy, he was the first to comprehend that energy in all its bearings. In sympathy with all diversities of human character he stood far below the great dramatists of the preceding generation. But in keenness of intellect and instinctive sense of beauty he was surpassed by none of them; and he was consumed by an ardour of religious faith to which none of them approached. Thus, entering fully both into the Reformation and into the Renaissance, he was able, as no man before him had been, to see that each movement was the completion of the other and that both sprang from a common root.

Knowledge is good, art is good—he pleads—each for its own sake. But their full strength and their true worth will never be seen till we have come to regard each of them as a revelation of God, as the scattered fragments which it is our duty to mould together into an immortal feature of loveliness and perfection. Religion, too, is a great possession. But no religion, that is not for ever on the watch to purify and enlarge itself by appropriating all that knowledge and all that imaginative art have to offer, can claim to have risen to the full measure of its stature, or hope to save itself from sickening into a muddy pool of conformity and tradition. To see God through the world of truth and beauty that He has made, to search the world without ceasing for the gradual unfolding of His purpose, that is the whole duty of man; and with less than the whole he ought not to be content.

The Areopagitica is an imperishable monument to the nobility of Milton’s personal creed. It is an uncompromising plea for the rights of reason and of progress. But it is no less memorable because it blends the intellectual keenness of the Renaissance with the religious ardour of the Reformers and the Puritans, and so interprets the whole spiritual life of the age that begins with Tamburlaine and the Faerie Queene and closes with Paradise Lost and Samson Agonistes.

C. E. VAUGHAN

AREOPAGITICA

ANALYSIS OF THE ORDER OF PARLIAMENT (JUNE 14, 1643), AGAINST WHICH THE AREOPAGITICA WAS DIRECTED

1. The Preamble recounts that many false . . . scandalous, seditious, and libellous works have lately been published, to the great defamation of Religion and government; that many private printing-presses have been set up; and that divers of the Stationers’ Company have infringed the rights of the Company.

2. It is therefore ordered by the Lords and Commons in Parliament, (1) that no Order of both or either House shall be printed except by command; (2) that no Book, etc., "shall from henceforth be printed or put to sale, unless the same be first approved of and licensed by such person or persons as both or either of the said Houses shall appoint for the licensing of the same; (3) that no book, of which the copyright has been granted to the Company, for their relief and the maintenance of their poor, be printed by any person or persons without the license and consent of the Master, Warden, and assistants of the said Company; (4) that no book, formerly printed here, be imported from beyond seas, upon pain of forfeiting the same to the Owner of the Copyright, and such further punishment as shall be thought fit."

3. The Stationers’ Company and the officers of the two Houses are authorised to search for unlicensed Presses, and to break them up; to search for unlicensed Books, etc., and confiscate them; and to apprehend all authors, printers and others concerned in publishing unlicensed books and to bring them before the Houses or the Committee of Examination for further punishments, such persons not to be released till they have given satisfaction and also sufficient caution not to offend in like sort for the future.

4. All Justices of the Peace, Captains, Constables and other officers are ordered to give aid in the execution of the above.

A SPEECH FOR THE LIBERTY OF UNLICENSED PRINTING, TO THE PARLIAMENT OF ENGLAND (1644)

THEY, WHO TO states and governors of the Commonwealth direct their speech, High Court of Parliament, or, wanting such access in a private condition, write that which they foresee may advance the public good; I suppose them, as at the beginning of no mean endeavour, not a little altered and moved inwardly in their minds: some with doubt of what will be the success, others with fear of what will be the censure; some with hope, others with confidence of what they have to speak. And me perhaps each of these dispositions, as the subject was whereon I entered, may have at other times variously affected; and likely might in these foremost expressions now also disclose which of them swayed most, but that the very attempt of this address thus made, and the thought of whom it hath recourse to, hath got the power within me to a passion, far more welcome than incidental to a preface.

Which though I stay not to confess ere any ask, I shall be blameless, if it be no other than the joy and gratulation which it brings to all who wish and promote their country’s liberty; whereof this whole discourse proposed will be a certain testimony, if not a trophy. For this is not the liberty which we can hope, that no grievance ever should arise in the Commonwealth—that let no man in this world expect; but when complaints are freely heard, deeply considered and speedily reformed, then is the utmost bound of civil liberty attained that wise men look for. To which if I now manifest by the very sound of this which I shall utter, that we are already in good part arrived, and yet from such a steep disadvantage of tyranny and superstition grounded into our principles as was beyond the manhood of a Roman recovery, it will be attributed first, as is most due, to the strong assistance of God our deliverer, next to your faithful guidance and undaunted wisdom, Lords and Commons of England. Neither is it in God’s esteem the diminution of His glory, when honourable things are spoken of good men and worthy magistrates; which if I now first should begin to do, after so fair a progress of your laudable deeds, and such a long obligement upon the whole realm to your indefatigable virtues, I might be justly reckoned among the tardiest, and the unwillingest of them that praise ye.

Nevertheless there being three principal things, without which all praising is but courtship and flattery: First, when that only is praised which is solidly worth praise: next, when greatest likelihoods are brought that such things are truly and really in those persons to whom they are ascribed: the other, when he who praises, by showing that such his actual persuasion is of whom he writes, can demonstrate that he flatters not; the former two of these I have heretofore endeavoured, rescuing the employment from him who went about to impair your merits with a trivial and malignant encomium; the latter as belonging chiefly to mine own acquittal, that whom I so extolled I did not flatter, hath been reserved opportunely to this occasion.

For he who freely magnifies what hath been nobly done, and fears not to declare as freely what might be done better, gives ye the best covenant of his fidelity; and that his loyalist affection and his hope waits on your proceedings. His highest praising is not flattery, and his plainest advice is a kind of praising. For though I should affirm and hold by argument, that it would fare better with truth, with learning and the Commonwealth, if one of your published Orders, which I should name, were called in; yet at the same time it could not but much redound to the lustre of your mild and equal government, whenas private persons are hereby animated to think ye better pleased with public advice, than other statists have been delighted heretofore with public flattery. And men will then see what difference there is between the magnanimity of a triennial Parliament, and that jealous haughtiness of prelates and Cabin Counsellors that usurped of late, whenas they shall observe ye

Reviews for Areopagitica and Other Prose Works

[antiquary_1 · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

I would like to believe Milton's argumant that, given a fair chance, truth will defeat error, but I am by no means sure history bears it out.