Neutriarchy

By Dragoljub Todorovic

Book by Dragoljub Todorovic, 125 pages Dragoljub Todorovic was born in 1985, in former Yugoslavia/Serbia. He consider himself to be cosmopolitan. He has been involved in writing since the age of 12. He is a writer, poet, multimedia worker who was also included in some social movements. During his life, he attended many international seminaries and published a variety of articles on the subject of politics, economy and human rights. He published a non-fiction book about economy in 2004. In the meantime, he continued to publish his articles and poetry, and participated in many international projects and programs. Although he always loved art, this was his first attempt to gain a better perspective of his inner art potentials.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Brighton
• Release date: Oct 14, 2013
• ISBN: 9783942200967

Book preview

DEPTHS

PREFACE

This was an interesting venture. But above all, the author must distance himself from the text itself. He appears as a medium of what was going through the air that he inhaled. It was only the scrivener of all that the cosmos was sending to the mundane air. So, any accident or panic in the real-material sense is utterly ran-dom and innocent. Because, these are not the words of the per- son addressed by the positive norms as the author, but of higher voice whose call this so called author successfully decoded and translated into the earthly language understandable to human beings! Many stories and terms will remain mysterious to the author himself, because he’s just studied the language of the cosmos. Maybe the end of this reading, if any, will remain unknown until the end as the cosmos.

You can only breathe it. Briefly and in the future (the most similar to her earthly form)…

TEXTUAL PART

FREEDOM TODAY

The ancient people could not feel the necessity of freedom or to appreciate its advantages, their social organization led them to the desire for freedom, which is quite different from the freedom that this system offers to us. The freedom of the old was comprised in the collective, but at the same time what the old understood as »freedom« meant a kind of collective freedom and subjugation of the individual to the authorities. Each individual act was subjected to the strict supervision, and nothing was left to the individual’s independence. Having the role of a citizen, the man decides on peace and war, and as an individual he was under surveillance. In modern nations, one is independent in his private life, being sovereign even in the freest countries only formally, and his sovereignty is limited. All the former states were closed and as the inevitable consequence, the spirit of these countries was combative and forced to fight against each other or to be silent threat to each other in the event of peace. The war was a constant interest, and as a necessary result, all of these states had their own slaves. On the other hand, there was a trade. Historical experience shows us that the end of the war always came back human to trade, or a milder and more secure relationship. Trade, created as a response to historical wars, more and more replaces the war.

The aim of the modern nations is security in the private enjoy-ment. Free institutions resting on the historical experience and knowledge would have to continue to survive. Social power injured in every sense the human individual’s independence, but no need for it. The appearance of the nation revealed only part of the abstract sovereignty. If we live in modern times, freedom that corresponds to modern times is desirable. Individual freedom is the true modern liberty and political freedom should be there as its guarantee to a minimum. Political freedom which offers to all citizens without distinction the most sacred interests, and establishes between them a kind of intellectual equality which is known as the glory and power of that part of humanity, because it strengthens his spirit and refines his thoughts.

THIS IS NOT FICTION

This is not fiction, this is the only reality in an attempt to high-light and flag some other dimension. May what you feel and dream be a fiction, and you all already seen? The wrong term, and thus domesticated. And again, because people do not sufficiently permeate and they do not want to penetrate into each other.

This is not fiction, it is art. Rather, it is fiction, what is considered real and realistic. This is true and invisible reality, everything that does not speak and yet say at the end of their own. That is an area that does not expire and is not announced. A vast heigth and intact depth. This is art without exhibits, intangible ceremony, art where all are the artists, whatever they may be and whatever you do …

What is the law for. What are the court and judges for. What is the jury for…if truth is incomprehensible, if justice is different …

What are we for, what is life for…if we are not really ourselves …

What time for, what are dream and reality for… If this all comes down to stagger during sleep …

And why always the »what« questions, when all your »what« ends with »nothing« …

What are all these words for… I guess because of everything …

NEUTRIARCHY

It has been obvious now and then that manking liked to swim in the bipolar world and everything it brings. Were women so uninterested in power and ready to rule out of shadow, and easily released matriarchy to expire, or the nature of men had more ambitious views of the world… Only, in neither of systems, it seemed that human beings haven’t fully found thei place. The historical division between male and female, today more than ever seems outdated, but routine and fear not to return to some more derivative ways of communion simply bring us back from pur intentions and thoughts that we must change something.And definitely, the time for that arrived. It is ridiculous to continue to endure (and even more to insist) and be passive towards a form that still lives as a patriarchy, at the same time working on the same-sex mariage, freedom of changing names, last names… Simply, mankind has had a tendency towards neutro and as such it has to be reformed on all necessary fields and still confirm the sovereignty of patriarchy. 

Signals and guidelines leading to this reversal, gender transformation and sexual Renaissance would have to be in the spirit of the neutriarchy. And even the revolution of transition from one to the other would have to be anything but revolution itself (in the classical sense of the word). In the eternal bipolar frictions, both victories and surrenders could be found. Neutriarchy as a transition that would allow equal rights, in the spirit of its laws, should by its introduction and existence really be neutral, ie. would not know either conquered or defeated. He would not distinguish male from female, that is a man from other areas of life, truth from lies. He would consolidate the necessities of life with nature, and in all processes that make the man and his habits reduced to normality. The processes that preceded and followed that would be a revolution and the revolution itself. Everything would take on a different course. People would then be born completely free, without being imposed by their name, heritage, faith, commitment. As such they would be devoid of jealousy, greed and a sense of sweetness due to many restrictions. Such a breath of air and an atmosphere that wouldn’t lead them on the mentioned the sins. Every living would experience complete harmony. The food chain and procreation would disappear. Simply, everything that lives would breathe and let go the eternity.

MY UN

Somewhere on the coast of Westdream avenue, with all 77 flags and small flags … A lot of differences from the existing, the seat of some multi-dimensional realm, of quite another sphere; there are no the chairmen, nor anyone has the right of veto, there is no discussion about wars, famine, climate changes… Now comes only a response to a letter they received… you guess from whom.

»Dear Earthlings, far from despising and underestimating you, we only want to point out the important differences between us and you, and there is, you must agree, a lot of them. Any request that your planet sent to the UN of the Multi-dimensional Empire of the Our Galaxy is discussed with great care. Just a little bit confusing is the signature of the person you are calling the Chairman. Is it possible that one speaks for all. I think this will be the main attraction of our Empire. We don’t have such a situation, there is an agreement at all levels and in all matters. However, do not raise our hands and vote for some kind of PROS and CONS. In our country, peace is the imperative, and perhaps the because of that the cosmic force separated us from you a million light years. In a letter to us, you ask from us to respond as soon as possible. Since we do not know what you use to measure that »time«, we can tell you in advance that we do not know what it is, let alone its characteristics. You have wars. In the cosmic encyclopedia (admittedly very poor) we found that it means moving and bustling of space dust. Do you need someone who will shred the powder, or cover the boiling lava? You say that you are worried by hunger. You explain to us the sense of the lack of food, and you explain the »food« as something to be eaten, and the »dish« as something that is brought into the mouth to be lived. Despite our consulting with Cosmic ency-clopaedia and the Cosmic Space Community of Southeastern Galaxies, we were unable to decipher your terms, but we assume that this is something typical for the undeveloped parts of the South Eastern Galaxies. If we are looking for what is called food, we can supply you only by the substances inhaled in our empire, but we are afraid that during the transport of these