Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Ulysses
Ulysses
Ulysses
Ebook1,002 pages28 hours

Ulysses

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

James Augustine[ Aloysius Joyce (2 February 1882 – 13 January 1941) was an Irish novelist and poet, considered to be one of the most influential writers in the modernist avant-garde of the early 20th century. Joyce is best known for Ulysses (1922), a landmark work in which the episodes of Homer's Odyssey are paralleled in an array of contrasting literary styles, perhaps most prominent among these the stream of consciousness technique he utilised. Other well-known works are the short-story collection Dubliners (1914), and the novels A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man (1916) and Finnegan’s Wake (1939). His other writings include three books of poetry, a play, occasional journalism, and his published letters. Ulysses is a modernist novel by Irish writer James Joyce. It was first serialised in parts in the American journal The Little Review from March 1918 to December 1920, and then published in its entirety by Sylvia Beach in February 1922, in Paris. It is considered to be one of the most important works of modernist literature, and has been called "a demonstration and summation of the entire movement". According to Declan Kiberd, "Before Joyce, no writer of fiction had so foregrounded the process of thinking."However, even proponents of Ulysses such as Anthony Burgess have described the book as "inimitable, and also possibly mad". (Excerpt from Wikipedia)
LanguageEnglish
Release dateJan 31, 2016
ISBN9783958644014
Author

James Joyce

James Joyce (1882–1941) was an Irish poet, novelist, and short story writer, considered to be one of the most influential authors of the 20th century. His most famous works include Dubliners (1914), A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man (1916), Ulysses (1922), and Finnegans Wake (1939).

Read more from James Joyce

Related to Ulysses

Related ebooks

General Fiction For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Ulysses

Rating: 4.053607305544422 out of 5 stars
4/5

2,994 ratings109 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This recording is better than I ever would have imagined. A superb job by the readers.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Oh, that, "apathy of the stars." I am wistful and amazed.

    P.S. I have since read texts by Julian Rios and Enrique Vila-Matas who devoted novelistic approaches to Ulysses that ultimately steer the reader back to Bloom and Dedalus. I know of no other groundswell that continues to percolate and excite.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Well worth wading through, if you have some annotations or at least Cliff's Notes on hand - at the very least to pick up on the references that don't make any sense to anyone who wasn't living in Dublin in 1916. The analogy that Joyce draws between the journeys of Odysseus to a day in the life of one ordinary man is very powerful, even though we work backwards through his life and at the end we probably know more about Leopold Bloom than perhaps any character in any book. The streams of consciousness that comprise most of the book seem appropriate to get a clear feel for Bloom's state of mind, and the play style of the hallucinogenic Circe scene works well. Perhaps the climaxes of the book occur when the ghosts of their dead loved ones visit both Bloom and Stephen Dedalus. But Joyce also drops in what appear to be random styles of writing, particularly in the Cyclops chapter, and the question-answer style of Ithaca is fairly difficult to follow. Does it add to the book? Not that I can see. There are also constant lists of what appear to be nothing in particular; other conspiracy-minded books (Focault's Pendulum, Illuminatus) hint at their respect for Joyce and provide similar lists; coupled with the coded letters that Bloom writes in the book I think it's pretty likely that at least some of the lists contain secret messages. Bloom is clearly a Freemason - I don't see how anyone could say otherwise. I didn't take the trouble to try to translate the messages but it seems a pretty good bet that the key to the code is in the line N. IGS./WI.UU. OX/W. OKS. MH/Y. IM., which is the coded address of the woman to whom Bloom sends letters.The long stream-of-consciousness of Molly Bloom that ends the book is also very telling concerning Bloom; a look at him through the eyes of the person who probably knows him better than anyone else. I'm not sure I find the hints of reconcilation convincing, but I don't see that a divorce or angry recriminations are in the Blooms' future either. And I'd be surprised if our Everyman hero ever has a huge resolution, or third act, an end to his drama, because I think that is precisely what Joyce tries to avoid. His hero will remain ambiguous forever. And in the end, isn't that what we really can expect?
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    6stars? 100? My favorite book? Kinda. The book I've read the most? Definitely. This is a book you can read 10, 20 times and get something new out of it each time. There are dozens of books written about this book, and they add something too, but the thing itself is (really) thoroughly enjoyable. Still shocking in form after all these years, this is as good as a novel can be.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Inside the cover of this Second Hand copy a previous owner has written "June 2013, Got to page 12 Only". In some way it is the ultimate literary critique.I first read Joyce's book as a callow youth in my first year at Uni: Couldn't get into it - a way too intellectual, too self-indulgently, unleashing that 'stream of consciousness' prose style for my patience & understanding in that era of my life.Bought & read a copy in my thirties (decades ago) - it made much more sense, but there were still whole passages of Joyce's lyrical gallivanting with the English language that still had me perplexed & irritated.So, here am I (retired, time to take an in-depth, considered view on the alleged masterpiece) and read its 680 pages: Verdict - it's a damn clever piece of writing that really stretches the boundaries of word-play and its visionary erudition challenges almost every concept of what constitutes a literary novel - Joyce is extremely talented & this tome about one day bristles with extraneous vivid idiosyncratic bouts of words in scenes that need the most intense concentration to make sense of them: Is all that effort worthwhile? Is it genius at work?I'm not clever enough to make a judgement: I do know it figures in the top25 of most 'great' literature lists - BUT, for me it doesn't make my personal top50 'great reads' & there I suppose is something of the difference between the literary critics and the much wider, less intellectual readership of novels - if a reader struggles to make head or tail with many of the passages then that is NOT a 'great' read and nor is it necessarily an important literary read.James Joyce's Ulysses can be judged, I suspect, as TOO CLEVER BY HALF for many of us!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is an experimental novel for it’s time that follows a Dublin school teacher, Stephen Daedalus through the events of June 16th, 1904. It is a pretty ordinary day. The cast of characters is large, with Molly Bloom and her husband Leopold dwelt on quite thoroughly. To sum up this is a major classic of English literature, and quite fun to read. First Published February 2, 1922.inished January 18th, 1971.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I signed up for a lecture on how to enjoy reading Ulysses, and eagerly bought the book. I decided to start reading a few pages before the lecture....got to page 60 (of 933) and was notified that the seminar was cancelled! Nonetheless, I decided to proceed without professional help.The novel takes place over a single day as we follow Leopold Bloom and Stephen Dadelus on their meanderings in Dublin. There isn't much plot; the book is a character study of Bloom, modeled after Odysseus, and also an exploration of writing techniques to show how different ways of telling a story change the perspective of the reader and the characters themselves. It was more enjoyable than I'd expected and, several days having passed since I finished it, I am still coming to appreciate aspects of Leopold Bloom's character that I may have missed. Hard to rate....it's a masterpiece of style for sure, but sometimes confusing and so long!
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I started off thinking Ulysses was a pile of incoherent drivel, even though I'd never got past the first page. At 20 I would sit in the uni bar getting pissed and slagging off literary types and lecturers who mentioned it (some of them were pretentious posers; some of them weren't). At 30 I decided to put up or shut up by actually reading it so that I could explain why it was incoherent drivel. The result was that I was drawn into it and have read it five times cover-to-cover. Like a lot of challenging literature, it requires a bit of life experience to get into.The funniest bit in 'Ulysses' is when he's browsing a second hand book store for a book for his wife. As nice as she is, Bloom obviously knows she's not really on his intellectual/reading level. He decides to look for the kind of romance, Mills&Boon, type books for her. In the whole novel of course, the narrative style has it that the description of action, his thoughts, what he's reading, and his speech are all rolled together in the same syntax. So it's funny when he comes across a book, flicks to a random page and it says something like 'and she wore her finest gowns for him, she would do anything, for Raoul', and he just pisses himself, deciding there and then:“This is it. This is the book. This one.”Then a few pages later, the quote crops up again in his mind (much like things come back to us after a while when doing something completely unrelated) and he laughs about it again. A very interesting outline of the psychological process.Random thoughts:- Interestingly enough, Joyce was very influenced in on the porno-lit side, by Leopold Von Sacher-Masoch's Venus im Pelz. Joyce was a diagnosed schizo, which disease, at the beginning, made for one of the world's great Kustwerke, Ulysses, but in its way-out stages made for his garbled nonsense, "Finnegans Wake", as well. There is, really, too much of a good thing. Too much mouse running up your clock, jumbles up your hickorydickory beyond comprehension;- To me "Ulysses" is still the #1 laugh-out-loud novel of all time, worth every minute of effort---and the best critical intro is still Ellmann's relatively small but high-impact "Ulysses on the Liffey." Read that first and you'll instantly enjoy 90% of the tough parts. Still laughing about the Irishman dragged away for setting a cathedral on fire. "I'm bloody sorry I did it," says he, "but I declare to God I thought the archbishop was in there."- How could you not love Leopold Bloom? He talks to his cat. He eats with relish the inner organs of beasts and fowls, which "give to his palate a fine tang of faintly scented urine". He wonders if it would be possible to cross Dublin without passing a pub. He surreptitiously observes the marble goddesses in the lobby of the National Museum to see if they have anuses. He buys pornographic novels for his wife, masturbates on a public beach without getting caught, and picks the winner at Ascot without even trying. The most endearing character in all literature.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    The life of the everyman in a single day in Dublin is the basic premise of James Joyce’s Ulysses, yet this is an oversimplification of the much deeper work that if you are not careful can quickly spiral down into a black hole of fruitless guesswork and analysis of what you are reading.Joyce’s groundbreaking work is a parallel to Homer’s The Odyssey though in a modernist style that was defined by Joyce in this novel. Though the primary character is Leonard Bloom, several other important secondary characters each take their turn in the spotlight but it is Bloom that the day revolves around. However any echoes of Homer are many times hidden behind Joyce verbosity and stream-of-conscious writing that at times makes sense and at times completely baffles you. Even with a little preparation the scale of what Joyce forces the reader to think about is overwhelming and frankly if you’re not careful, quickly derails your reading of the book until its better just to start skimming until the experience mercifully ends.While my experience and opinion of this work might be lambasted by more literary intelligent reviewers, I would like to caution those casual readers like myself who think they might be ready to tackle this book. Read other modernist authors like Conrad, Kafka, Woolf, Lawrence, and Faulkner whose works before and after the publication of Ulysses share the same literary movement but are not it’s definitive work.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    I can definitely respect Joyce as an author, but I just LOATHE the stream-of-conscious technique! And Leopold Bloom makes a great character, but Stephen Dedalus is such a whiny mess. I always knew I wanted to read this to say that I have, but it was like a punishment. Modernism is easily my LEAST favorite movement. James Joyce is amazingly talented and I can appreciate his impact on literature, but this book just doesn't do it for me.(Sidenote: I much prefer Dubliners.)
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    So let's see. This book really isn't all as difficult as its cracked up to be, only one chapter really stumped me (Chapter 3, if I remember correctly). And past honors courses in high school I don't have much of an English education to speak of, so I don't think I'm speaking from an ivory tower of smartness either. The trick is to not worry if you don't catch a line (or paragraph), but to instead just pick up what you can, and what I could pick up was well and enough for me to understand what was going on most of the time and enjoy it thoroughly. The prose is rather wonderful in its loopy perambulations about the city, and the words are great for people who like words. I find the more straightforward chapters work for me better than the more gimmicky chapters (e.g. "let's write this chapter as newspaper articles!", "let's write this chapter as a Q&A!"). The more straightforward chapters are really some of the most beautifully organic prose I've come across, encompassing more of the various vagaries of everyday human existence than most other folks try. That one doesn't understand bits and pieces all over is only fair; if one was dropped into someone else's mind all of a sudden, there'd be lots of bits they wouldn't get as well. This is a book pointing toward a new way of writing books, of writing prose. Its 7:25 in the morning and I approve!
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Though this book has received some relatively low ratings, I feel the need to defend the book after having spent 6 weeks reading it.Ulysses isn't a book to recommend to someone who isn't a "reader;" it's a difficult book, and it would be extremely difficult to follow what is happening if you didn't have some background (we used the Ulysses Annotated to guide us, a book that is just as big as Ulysses itself).What Ulysses IS, however, is a book which recasts one of the most famous heroes of all mythology as the prototypical everyman. The story of the Odyssey, of Ulysses, Odysseus and Penelope, is recast, and Joyce attempts to Hellenize Ireland. That is only half of his project, however. The other half of the project is his attempt to "write a book that professors will be discussing for 200 years." It's nearing the 100 year mark (it will be in 2022) and I think it's safe to say that Joyce accomplished what he set out to do: when the time is taken to really understand what the book is saying, not to just read through it in an attempt to cross it off of some list, it becomes clear why this book is on the top of lists, and why it's so important, even if it is extremely frustrating at times.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    I read it. I read the whole thing. Every frickin' word. Do I appreciate some of the inroads he has made for literature? Yes. Do I appreciate his language play and knowledge? Yes. Do I nod knowingly at his allusions and historical awareness? Yes. Do all of these combine to give this book such high praise? NO. It feels like someone you are vaguely acquainted with telling you about their dreamscape. Save your time and select a different classic into which to delve.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Is somebody pulling me leg? This is considered by many to be one of the greatest literary accomplishments in human history. I am not ignorant, but I could barely make heads or tails out of this gibberish. I believe the intent of the author was to work in every word from the dictionary no matter how archaic - one way or the other. I did keep referring to a dictionary to see if he was even using words and I was amazed to find that he was not just making them up. I only finished reading it to be able to say that I did. Until I had read about 25% of the book I still believed my eyes would be opened, the curtain of my blindness would be lifted and I would have a spiritual awakening of some sort. I was bamboozled. Seriously, don't waste your time if you are considering reading what amounts to be a dictionary that was not written in alphabetical order.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Utterly perfect.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    The magnificent, complex novel, detailing one day (16 June 1904) in Dublin. This is a magnificent, wonderful, detailed, human story. Nothing could be better, funnier, or sadder.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Yes, Ulysses is all that has been said about it, great piece of literature and just difficult enough for the reader is required at least some effort to get something out of it - getting it all would be impossible, so do not bother too much. Maybe it was too difficult or maybe I didn't try hard enough, but although I got the "greatness", Ulysses didn't touch me as anything else than part of the history of humankind. But I'm willing to try again, maybe after twenty years.(I just have to add that I read the Finnish translation and although Ulysses is considered "impossible to translate", Pentti Saarikoski's translation was beautiful and he was in his element playing with the vocabulary and language, and I got the feeling that translating Ulysses wasn't even difficult for him, he simply enjoyed it too much to let the difficulties bother him.)
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This book was FABULOUS. A book with an undertone of conflict and suffering (conflict against the state, against religion, against the fellow man) (and suffering in guilt, ennui, and isolation). The collective subconscious and stream-of-consciousness writing is brilliant.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I became increasingly frustrated with this book on my first reading, and when I hit Molly's unpunctuated ramble at the end, I just felt like Joyce was screwing with me and resolved not to finish it. Five years later, I'm giving it another go, and enjoying it a lot. But I started out liking it the first time, too. We'll see where I end up this time.(A couple of weeks later...)I felt like I had more of the hoity-toity literary background necessary to enjoy Ulysses this time around. Did I enjoy it? Hard to say. I enjoyed it in the same way I might enjoy watching every episode of The Prisoner in sequence: there's some good stuff in there, but after a bit, it just became a feat of endurance.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I've tried it and it wasn't for me. Reached the 200 page mark last night and felt weighed down by the 500 still to go. I haven't understood what I've read it isn't actually a pleasure. I'm very pleased I've tried, I'm disappointed in myself for not completing it but what would I achieve by reading something I'm not enjoying? I'm not sure what Joyce was aiming for with the audience for this book but it isn't your average reader and I'm sure it wouldn't be the average reader of the times. Extremely challenging to follow and I think listening to this read on audio may make a big difference.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    In fall 2012 I took a seminar class on James Joyce, and of course no class on Joyce would be complete without reading Ulysses. We spent the last half of the semester on Ulysses, and now that I've reviewed both Dubliners and Portrait of the Artist, I think it's finally time for me to talk about my experiences with Joyce's most famous/infamous novel.Ulysses picks up approximately one year after Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man ends, and begins with our old friend Stephen Dedalus, who is navigating the world of Dublin, working as a teacher, and still trying to be an artist in a place that continuously leaves him feeling isolated, alone, and without a home. While the first three chapters focus on Stephen, the rest of the book focuses on a new character, the famous Leopold Bloom, a Dublin Jew who, after eating a breakfast of mutton kidney, leaves the house to go about his daily business, all-the-while knowing that his wife, Molly, is planning an affair later that afternoon. That knowledge, the isolation he feels from his fellow Dubliners, the death of his young son ten years ago, and many other things weigh on his mind as we follow him about the affairs of his day. His path crosses and recrosses that of Stephen, and eventually the two outcasts finally meet and have a real conversation. Taking place in slightly less than 24 hours, Ulysses is an epic of the ordinary, a single day that contains every conceivable high and low.Now, if you've ever heard anything about Ulysses, I'm sure you've heard that it's nearly impossible to read. It has gained a nearly mythic status in the bookish world as an impenetrable wall of stylistic experimentation and dense allusion. The only hope for the intrepid reader is to consult many guides and source-books that will lead them through the labyrinth. To be honest with you, this is partially true. There were plenty of times when I didn't know what was happening, and I assure you that I missed most of the allusions and references to historical events. And yes, I did use a guide when I read it, which was a big help. More importantly, I also had a class full of people to discuss each chapter with and to keep me on schedule. (I do recommend reading this book with a friend. It's more fun that way.) But I want to make one thing very clear:The myth is only partially true.Because while I did not catch many of the allusions and references, I mostly understood what was happening in terms of plot and location. While I may not have understood the meaning of every sentence, I did understand the meaning of most paragraphs. And while I didn't always see exactly how each stylistic invention connected thematically to Bloom's journey, I could certainly appreciate the beauty and craft of Joyce's writing. Reading Ulysses is like being at the ocean; you have to let the waves of text wash over you without trying to analyze every single piece of sand. Understanding every single allusion is not necessary to enjoy the novel as a whole. You might miss a few of the jokes, but I promise you will be ok. The guide I used and which I would highly recommend, James Joyce A to Z, had brief summaries of each chapter in terms of plot and any major thematic elements, and that is all I needed in order to thoroughly enjoy myself. I think that oftentimes we as readers get too caught-up in "getting" the book that we forget to really read it. Ulysses is, first and foremost, an experience. If you get too caught up in trying to "understand" it, you'll miss all the fun.Fun? Yes, fun, because Ulysses is a deeply funny, witty, engaging, and beautiful book. First of all, Joyce is a phenomenal writer, and it would be a challenge to find a novel with more beautiful or more varied writing than this one. Some passages are just heart-stopping in their elegance. I literally stopped and reread some passages just so I could hear them again; they were that beautiful. Others were incredibly technically impressive, showing Joyce's amazing command of the English language (and others). Joyce's amazing skills as a writer mean that he is capable of making the wittiest puns and the funniest satires I have ever read. No, really. From the pub to the graveyard, from political arguments to prostitution, from the romantic novel to the epic catalog, there is nothing that Joyce can't laugh at. I never thought I would say this, but Ulysses literally made me laugh out loud. But of course this novel isn't all fun and games. There are tender, honest moments here more touching than nearly anything else put into print. There is heartbreak here, not of the cheesy faux-tragic kind that you find in a Nicholas Sparks novel, but honest emotion felt by ordinary people in situations that are all too real. Though Ulysses very often made me laugh, on a number of occasions it also made me cry. It touched me, because it spoke to that part of me (and, I think, of many of us) that knows what it's like to feel alone, regretful, and lost. That realism, that honesty of emotion and situation, is what sets Ulysses apart. The strange style, the encyclopedic allusions, the weird diversions, all of these serve to represent reality in all of its complexity, beauty, and sadness. Ulysses is funny, crafty, beautiful, and heartbreaking, but it is all of those things because it is real.If you've ever read my reviews before, you'll notice that this one is rather different. This time I haven't talked very much about technique or writing style, though really this would be the perfect novel to do that. And part of me does want to pull out my analytical brain and tell you all about Joyce's tricks and techniques and themes. I would feel accomplished for breaking down such a complex novel, and you would maybe feel like you learned something. But I don't think I'm going to do that this time. This time I think I'm going to focus on other things.Because despite all the intellectual enjoyment I got from untangling and discussing the themes and techniques, and despite the aesthetic enjoyment I found in Joyce's language, what struck me the most about Ulysses was its emotional honesty, especially in the characterization. For the first three chapters I felt nothing but empathy and pity for Stephen. I wanted to be his big sister, to comfort him, to let him know that he wasn't alone and that he could make it. And then I met Leopold Bloom, and slowly, cautiously, not without reservation, I fell for him, completely and utterly. Not in a romantic way, but as a human being, an all-too-real human being who had emotions and quirks that I could see and understand like those of an old friend. I fell in love with the way that he always tries to figure things out, to calculate, explain, and reason, even if his explanations are often incorrect, more pseudoscience than real science. I fell in love with his desire to please everyone, to make everyone happy, to avoid conflict wherever possible. I love that he maintains his optimism despite everything that happens to him. I love the way he always walks on the sunny side of the street, is conscientious about his money, and loves to eat good food. I wanted nothing more in the world than for him to actually meet Stephen, because I needed to see what would happen when these two characters whom I cared so much about finally met. And yes, sometimes Bloom creeped me out a little with his thoughts about sex or bodily functions. Sometimes I got annoyed with him for being so passive, and I yelled at him to stop being such a pushover already. But when he had the chance to finally show some courage, I cheered him on with all of my heart, and when he stood up for Stephen my heart nearly burst I was so proud of him. Leopold Bloom was so lonely, so hopeful, and so real, and in the end it was the force of his character (and, to a lesser extent, Stephen's) that really made Ulysses shine.Ulysses is a novel that takes place in a single day, and yet somehow seems to encompass the whole world. It's strange and difficult and sometimes frustrating, and to be honest I wouldn't recommend it to those who don't like their books to be a puzzle or who get frustrated when they don't understand what is going on. But if you do like a challenge, then I think you'll find that every frustration in Ulysses is paid back a thousand times over in beauty and enjoyment. I promise that you won't catch everything on your first read-through; I know I didn't. But that did not take away from my enjoyment of the novel in the slightest. I know I'll come back to it some day, maybe a chapter at a time here or there, and that no matter when or how often I return it will always have something new to offer me.Rating: 5+Recommendations: Don't get too weighed down with guides. Just read it and enjoy it, and check chapter summaries or historical events if you get lost. Ulysses is an experience, so just dive in.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Impenetrable
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I found an old hardcover edition - with the legal judgment that it was not pornographic - in a rarely used cabin when i was in summer camp. I was 13 going on 14. I had long enjoyed various version of Homer's Odyssey and thought this was just another. I was wrong. The writing was amazing. I read it all the way through. It changed my life, my world view, and everything.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I was able to knock this out in about 5 weeks, on my first try. I used an old copy of A Reader's Guide to James Joyce by Wm Tyndall for reference, along w Sparknotes. If I could only have one book on a deserted island, this would prob be it.Still quite confused by the whole book. Each chapter having a different writing style is a bit unsettling. It is imperative to read it until the end, because the last two chapters really give you perspective. I read most of it on a Kindle, and kept pace in a Gabler edition.My favorite character was Bloom. What a whack job, what a silly man. Stephen didn't do much for me. Have to process the story a bit more, because it was intense. JJ makes up some crazy/funny words.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A brilliant book to read and reread, but not a book to love with the heart, more with the brains. Great variety in styles, themes, some experiments are a succes, others not. This is not about Dublin on 1 day, by 1 person, no, on the contrary, the multiple points of view are essential! It's kind of cubustic view on reality. A few of the topics Joyce touches: what is truth, what is reality? How can you know reality? And how, as a human, can you cope with this reality?
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Well, I tried but I have to declare that I am abandoning my attempt to read Ulysses. I gave it a good go, 200 pages (well over my usual 100 page limit), but I've come to realise that I JUST DON'T CARE WHAT HAPPENS. Reading it has become a chore, and reading should NEVER be a chore. Maybe the mistake I've made has been to read the thing while sober,because it dawned on me that the whole thing is like the ramblings of a drunk in a bar. (Given the legends surrounding Joyce and his penchant for booze it's not a huge leap to suggest that that is exactly what this book is.) Anyway, while on the one hand I feel a certain degree of failure at not being able to see this thing through, there is also the relief in knowing that I don't have to read it ANYMORE.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I haven't read this since college, more than 50 years ago. I remember the beginning and the end and not much in between. Difficult reading, but worth it. I read the book due to Kevin Birmingham's book on the publication history of Ulysses.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    "Ulysses" by James Joyce (1934) is a novel about the interaction of social responsibility and personal desires. It focuses primarily on three characters: Stephen Dedalus a self-absorbed scholar attempting to find his artistic voice, Leopold Bloom who tries to meet his social responsibilities in a culture that is not completely accepting of him, and Molly Bloom (Poldy's wife) who struggles with her feminine destiny. The novel parallels the structure of Homer's "Odyssey" that chronicles the 10 year struggle of Odysseus to return from war in Troy to his home in Ithaca. Ulysses, the Latin translation of the Greek name Odysseus, is Leopold (Poldy) Bloom who travels the streets of Dublin one Thursday on June 16, 1904. His goal is to accomplish his daily task of meeting his family's economic needs, forming social alliances with Dubliners (including Stephen), and satisfying his own drives for understanding and fulfillment. Odysseus sought to reunite with his wife and assess her fidelity in his absence, and Bloom looks forward to the end of the day when he returns to his home at 7 Eccles Street, concerned about his wife's unfaithfulness. "Ulysses" is remarkable in its descriptive detail of the physical and psychological environments of Dublin and its characters. The feelings related to immersion in the living Irish city are so strong that there may be some irrational fear of being unable to return to current life. The entrance into the reality of the lives of Stephen, Molly, and Poldy is uncanny as readers become physically and psychically connected to characters. It is a matter of proximity. You lose your own personality as you accompany these people when they converse, walk the streets, visit stores, drink and philosophize, reveal themselves in stream of consciousness monologues, argue, pursue bacchanalian extremes, and have private battles with loss and melancholy. The reader `sees' everything that day, the external locations and the inner worlds of the characters, with the "ineluctable modality of the visible." This is the direct and complete experience of Joyce's art without the restriction of our own frame of reference, history, obligations, and wants. It is intimidating to realize that your own life is changing, that part of your personal history now contains a new day of your own existence - you have extended your life for a day. Many people throughout the world celebrate a second birthday on June 16 (Bloomsday). After publication of "Ulysses," I believe that James Joyce (like a few other artists) spent the rest of his life amazed at his creation. As he lay dying in hospital waiting for his wife to return to his bedside, he had to wonder where his inspiration originated, where he summoned the ability to give the gift of another day of life to us all. The reader can benefit most from "Ulysses" by preparing to read it. Read (re-read) Homers "Odyssey." Pay close attention to the structure, the symbolic content, and the psychology of Odysseus. Odysseus was a flawed hero, externally brave but also self-serving and blind to parts of his own personality (like Bloom). Use "Ulysses Annotated" by Don Gifford to help guide you through the detail of theology, philosophy, psychology, history, rhetoric, and the physical layout of Dublin. This reference work is very good because it allows readers to have their own experiences by providing only supplementary content (facts) that help to understand the myriad allusions presented in the text. I suggest that you enjoy the many beautiful styles of prose presented in the 18 episodes pausing to quickly glance at the definitions in your opened copy of "Ulysses Annotated." Then before reading the next episode, go back and read the complete explanatory entries in this reference book. Give yourself a couple of months to enjoy the novel and add this new day to your life.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I don't really know what to say—perhaps: I "read" all of it, "got" maybe half of it, "liked" less than a quarter?For the reading, I approached it with trepidation, as words like "unreadable" and "incomprehensible" have often been bandied about. I didn't find it unreadable. It was difficult at times—the constantly changing writing styles, the profusion of pronouns instead of names, the common use of foreign languages, the...umm, irregular?...punctuation—all make this tough sledding at times, but it's difficult to read, not unreadable.As for the getting, I think that much of the novel simply shot right past me. I'm reasonably familiar with The Odyssey and was able to follow that macro structure of the book. However, I know that much of the allusion and innuendo simply did not register in this book about which Joyce once said he "put in so many enigmas and puzzles that it will keep the professors busy for centuries arguing over what I meant." I understand that there are entire books...large books...devoted to explaining what is going on in Ulysses. Well and good, but that's more work than I'm willing to put into a book I didn't enjoy that much.And, as for that, the truth is that I like stories in my stories, and I didn't enjoy Joyce as a story teller. There's no real question he's good at limning characters. There's even less doubt that the man had a command of the English language that was not short of dazzling. However, we never established a rapport with each other as writer and reader. I would find a portion of it interesting or funny and start to immerse, only to run into twice as many pages of text that I found mind-numbing in their opacity.Does the fault lie with me? I'm willing to concede that it does simply because I cannot judge. I don't have the knowledge or training to decipher this work. I can only say much of the reported depth escaped me, evidently lost in unseen allusions and obscured by experimental writing techniques. For those familiar with Clarke's maxim on advanced technology and magic, here is my own variant: "Any literature, sufficiently abstruse, is indistinguishable from the un-profound."In the end, I'm glad I read it so that I have an opinion rather than just hearsay. I would suggest that readers try it and decide for themselves, even if that means invoking the 50 Page Rule—it is, after all, often billed as one of the greatest books ever. However, for me it was neither moving, nor enlightening nor enjoyable. I'm content to be a cultural Philistine on this one.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Fantastic, amazing, poignant, funny, daring, excruciating, provocative. Read it once on your own, and then read it again in tandem with Burgess' guide. Read it one hundred times and you will always find something new. Best. Novel. Ever.

Book preview

Ulysses - James Joyce

 72^book_preview_excerpt.htmlێI-+'93BJuQSB7'I2"<:.I# ϗeARfqq7eqbw_??_V!?&\wUm_sӄ몃k}ub[Mg_ ٻzWBw\Ǫq򑡊]u9Y҆aCZ~]o&^z(W;Krqm;_W'MUn}rshq3 ~ !}s{:}^hEW/| j==KA51>e>?!["N,︫?gf<Fuw;=$zk6CLe5}AO>yMx9t{2>"=#wpZN|<'!P[7ȁ{S{'Wbw _aG'5N~8orײcr#Cٝ_Z$'g 8\"}QNr:""O,<T6]~w5T(_ڭnRj4ɢ:eL(/mC~r ;xMS1⮣i>IΙ,Gq6rw9Vn_iG QDտΞh~:W"v T>gת,Ky86^bBxM JlXȂyԶOg=zyCe˞!p.vN ~$O&"D+sQ%CaN6VȤNX ؉ց?6%DB  uE9ۢ<;9aʼn~az CaMqQ9HY!W'σ&NbI%:Hӆ~\8D+N,? n/*:11R^!Pr[yܣla%-SNd˖5NK,E'x%0q 65G90Ʋ4}}I!tUryȍi[Lu#*PTx<@՟eԢw m+$aCur~r#l_V?Ftcȗ DZvȞy "VNl8.*^O %uW5|ۉGȱE'c''A\Չp uNccG?`#ZYHw?  a/Vr'}<)NS[@/@>47b˧12bxeK|qea'DWc_e袜k}lDZk}"ylŎ_ͣ(3X&Wуb=URx->dFՋ>'u^}yDy։<"b59 {yQ܅Ӿײ\xQiyC-D"Kޘ-N[S +_x0+s7spxUȇ~_:sG*n]EbIWnEBd`#WX<+ZyS=nMQ|X}g}\ '΁(NzDjhVHLp""Ւ{[1tVOY|);X^nۍ+$H-dJT_/a%"GqGϲoQ$$P {'x${,gg({KpLnQ?;$/{wU(6Fo tPGŵxN^ܻlizz'C#~8EŁk#Z:DNR#{"eE΅sЫQ 1NgۤйFo%AɽҿxWQb U˗zyJBoyo)(}Pq7)$)5%B;vDN&D70F'yʰ"/b6EM"vj[72!8*ai@Y\eP6duJ6 n3dӦxT0Su$%l‹I٫zm9ѭӥ`llE!4B~ M2"< 'J=Gq-FMMCdir\$~ BāaKBY0@WČB:;1g-=yPUThS_v")X *'Xܜb͟"4'f c _LR yH PMVM^~T`R9N?yE7."Vgw =^'4y"FdVQ;ZjP~efQb ]VN=s*ėL"P7rfw9|N^5aG]-Gx:f62*xGd H "V*ǞCygJ&-Xm\O=, Wr0vb:qM>~_w*Eюgg'#V+ %̓QV"跏Yh0H8"@ԼN>iu&h;ZP3[v_ee Cr^s&f W1-k~y&L}*5)eJL},J( M/GTϢ f#eFDlnH0*Pa^aR)9sܕUwe?xg.fYY#pA490/K3y"X)#'wLqf+G2S 3%P; 5}+HGLN_ 3 ;Nwgg6HD7c6;喏ͽg%ƢFN>!{Љd( |Ufk5^e~hHa*z3+;% L0mxڏHfTd=^g7f'm(v' e!.v8hŽųI`\ Gi E:~ǹc_K;k>IOW?FcPzQL.G Nǧn9oBX bKru2LTHU=rўΊ>u/XyCƴZxl#?6y']&/> x5TvC|G7fO]y|2c)7yk 󼤽ÒcP:>(& c߱Ȇ< / ctVCdm>*\RxDr ;1N'LvANϫRnUVTK8b:$,Lj6I^hhPZ94\܋klVvlt?hmq7ӣ:y;Iq Z%dO|&kGҳ!уXE)-\5V'_{nbR#ޘ9\ZK~@" }:H؝V."Cx:ıT) 3y8v?voCbP9a@];ɍ~ 2Vaޗ} 0oXq\$\t}b8:pŦ.èR@޴Qӭ9^_ݍDձoZ^f\Yn, -(T☴{ki 2OlY\C*8rEs2'>b֋ o܈uOحzx c7F0&)e\g.p:;~"G>M1` _ K0"O?!._k5)q < *hƠnO9ewQxDFd}k${m\mh :=~:#wd:ھ:~G~뾼Z@8]pPv"Êʱa#OM$[lܑf@$*"KKvj7^xTr,pH 66鉅󫠇BOh?5݈q8H7_vqI!DnH y+,exu_@ S ?!?z??C)2®{*C.'PZ,5)`V`l s] `Y|EӁp}_u(ڷ!t-T-NQW6Hѷt^,˟^G]7}ZoE/,<YLN5̭V+-B%w=<Ț]=LSĤ9:e[⋤tsc}yb Q`31|3!o@I)0Z@3(D}T:WDŽ `dQՁIl H p_ 4f <>%J43$-a RUWl3ƳAe^* =6`H4 ~Cp =`gg媙e417n Љ@ܰX/vjZ;> eȩh6,PYNш:x޶t _?!NOr݈iP[R?,ى-eǭg)Ye nB+q% "@9g؁#FBHЭqޣ0*ɜ{ņ ::]NhX4~Bj&Or]S_%=N-$;@Ծ` mc*\>l#Ztު_Xt:j<伹*\.m'paҎ Y.>X_'[5Ʈ<ݛb&(=_%>C$_"q^; CeO6u#;#h'hMNQ )[8";sۗ*RK^{2M+=k3sXPk eT9NSI~!7Z2:;Os~N-[K!ReE҆d?5bG6"7 ppOuЄ<M^שe odw,#E' ~p.QT54lmb'De`}Dk57=8ycNm&*EcSF2-q˩PPKeM~Z_60uߪiRzw7՗?]:ZcSXX}<{`|5V__luwiSIfQnɃTp˱m!.^n@">lbyi`dBnYPf]3f/^BZj QmW=&rYUGFr吞2}'.0.?(Xn 7j/Yq\QcNsܭy]%v?{ f\ L{Kk}mJ!'Q5c1!k:{Mpҋk*+SF(W'$"GsNTDFIZoW D,@yfՔ.uOu` *l-lX]fmNO'"DYMRSp15I5Q!!EKl x 8G9DrOF V&D?Dxa~sAu5Nj N*Vm# 7hv&Au\#GPJ'g7 >םy3>}0-䙸:fG=c:Qo߭{b6 cPmGMҭKK\P!ojG2tzgM2AA6Mjwn8/a&\wiHNSC zleea2-.oX:*VЄ gvgdiA8j^V\h!WBYeLOu\Hٰ,V'o9BplLKOl)XF5|Ⱦ\ H܆M)@B$41v1jTH ,5 qg@;\'mT"үwEv(*'^;[MQ8v9bt30Ll-!FK}xND9# ReT L>)O̴, ="U侉/M|kuj'E6|ӪY%:ցX$rif"[N]&!UL+0.ؿ'kzS&n U%rd h|wM鑌uGR 4#i ,CqaAGb}tcM(R_,dO`1Jlh$JSzӟ'"#?z/*3Ɋz`'yjn="g--[ \x|{J~lelmʷ+:iGC! P[`$aщwD:LA"YYv$Qj? p/$[o,fKa{>{_/h"aD4wHtVW"l\rJ½Nz}5vkljV,tji)_LÁI̫2̼>S/I?0~'8h1ϴbޘj+7o\[!K/ubJRA7 KdDA7rX2q [@ l V!wW1,sbM%p|zOd6sky3D)^XzWYWA^`` Jv7} rhƔGLJf8<α3x-G9BXsZ Ui>gf$::J}5 5[MN[Do*#_!ku&ѮAtZ] HE ѩ<,ORYE,(A1,Ϡ9o,"3Msӌvhu( T G1' wS Q%S$vUjѣcO п<@&A; VW!k&(d rmN>7dtOڠnz ILGNe5g' ؅5RyAI#<9zQF|Ă 7f6E"yIe. ma?!?>vՒ)ý/T7z@)!hܲ)Y.ZBQ0*Xbj'=n!5ySf a/V-29yI]RCvZR 1Y{#e쩸=:tQu()_\y0W>Vohaߦ 82 3>)DNU,:"Ab֒z{(+u`]i~ZCtctʂ-<C4pRqDBc+^M/G=*NZ\6}i9v_w{OK5$Wcͷk3@ܣ?h|N P.@< Spʃ/JQocCK.[]ٿf'#I'%Z{]e Mk0t?rmMFXbw_[t1ۇ.4s)A[_Ipk<]a؊JաbTjM` )7c`osu|mvkξ Qy]Q3U-k kˌ(4m3_8%! m_@R/^D%/': Z'4]qe\ n:WSb%6<1إ'Zը#_ z[ @eb~ zK&oNB[#z]9Y0Q!ȕ^r6I{X傲\3bM# dB~H?)vM_.ݪJ':M'D Wl"K7k=^f05Gr+@fސMV- T!ELmU746ROgiL # F%ڕePlg'iZ[#Fis.md_귎iNr/^GdJ)W|Ǧ j_VRΦs! cW}Q<ʤ}Ds3ȞQמbJ#CCA|p͋6KmEGwriIl_Z(B{(QxkIԭE;#bRFܻ%t2SM'iGnN4zhuT].Mٓ}%w{qF^a7:9bƆEmIv9Lih* P# axI~Ec{rڒq8öjԤWS|IzU}tzZۅd~ } 1P}9S/61ҡcsPRoԶYA@c}R/Wf%Αd?$ ÉG$ QSr FUi>`SRL?R5ho p[Y~& 2:ٔH=Tl4NzUދ!n+iˁ{tf(cM謹`12Jl[c&Lm+azTz,w_jTɂMױy)lگ* !t"Sj#5Fu]^Snq9i!weف7Vܕk9VT;T h & t3?\l[T̸477a\ vqKY4d2' PJ{:ࠞybTXK355~06K,bt& }۾\`Ba  Pc>ʷTR! \cDA.\sˮYUS*Fru64cs `sM~bdCXl+- )膽 fM; oN#3WĐZnryt[c)A77|lIK6?w" '_v43p3ePfi:d&HMKڭ)pe؎i(>'#ptx]PiSGp8UNrZ K-4IՉ׋͓^?Yؠ@-I1|DP j0:@]5J3 g?SbqR۔^)(,:00߱IjxQ/B ژD QdrE`)w:JM*IE΀;+? L81_H#GYX+nI]ەwƌُS}N=j¦4ļJVoɇ(1-9k A]M$*S!Rl6 ?u׸vdT@x,y7^kt:گwՅ\_:}!A9ٰ^ J{gTi'74Iwdۃu fj &1 a\oB삗T4hOyX.g.u4bРw%KnGLff׮Mf pV 6PX76sQgXLb'҆Ub3(_1ݩ6+=4<(pC[u(։1/TB>6<ЬXGOh̎&j9V[َx8+5= <>6{mFJ"Ƴ"x(~?ˆrIRyԘE'Xv|Bk`=7iw UjČrȤZYaM#|:Nn& )b?CFubIu_1#acng$ c„i6,k \JQbfq`yB N2b Kzc,ßA#HeL,ed̹C4d Âʖ?gyg;n>KJn%vʄe8bxD&I7mΜA/"{-Ѷ]x";Mvi>\0DzBj =R xQ^ۭұgjn Igb611wI˟Xtasp.!S4#H]Nn`0::?n[G_-T2-%O3SpF jj͇-N [vgi뀙C>Y'$Vc7v}嫾(\˱/ԃ7-aoD XѲW Q|>F0sЋ* ^IeU SGWJRʱcFS#?S0zP^+"/I&vww(,L.ptM$A:t{<)WyI}CI10ynu]{kFZXM^8Oݑ[*R~1fHAߘx/ c\̆–/(6I |X.ɒ`TR>5|d`Yv}Jo:--q[: X}rUo#|/G?4TQ@q>0*7ȋM!!LȂrKzPp16}ȊNM3]g]BQ&frzsRiNn j~MՌ?:GI;lڦ(/~魨,DFqtbR_!vCivq+֣l5߬%n1ֹeSx 4j 1/D*NJ&r N]0E3}Y)XW8֮}m/H<_gI?8?/0%gJE_%IM Aw)?ܺ)]iA/#BR ?ڐ GD/?{ B qUW\]2^ٱ5t:AX0n#֎uߛ1Z$.'Fܞ_ڪ'^Zp'0ʩxPeCSLj ^i.^sN.^:mz}m$KTNChp{KqMȎsjLsPbRt"=Q<>ݫ "e:W=%Qf0+Eno8EPABiroޓӄpaGr 1 93!?ʫÚ`-Hya 9ajg5}8O]I.bsQTؠ(p *ZinKߚ bĢX*/QI {Y(E&`a^rσt-.x(̇l6E` [!S֘(iiȠDEs\ř UiN!~raPƶ^&"'0nj yضT$kd`1$&&K'GE wTUmi/Af4z۾lSbQmz;1&POJէ݆\+xƮR-~g __b4ZErš`: el VC+2* I %0NxRv@!HIvnJ qt9-,VdIB뾄K[@/Իk%dTH0ׂ/>emo .LK~M1CGK.^Ǖƕ,n7u%15gt6dQ =gCJ us I ^lwCef[*V6bp&t>(yzχTtW±K"5="=<U+rOdQUnRꛕFNa@nh˦cof'J*Mw!g~gOxЦqrAMm%B<wg⸈TyeP#uΦ:f憠nuQ3ra ,pgғ}ʧl.0&zvݾe=Ư": \V"6ZM$el3,mIis~x)3aZt$Ty h>gs@LJj4*M ;J6%ȫ1'|/,*_Nd_ҒkΓq`3T6Qq8\'W0vnq 5Δ X' jno˙W [&e_5LHDm!1к*F,Ӕ_q&C@` E۩iKN ]`_;P-gޥӊ6xʂ 3z )+m_11H_Q "6sH٩JvTu<A,]b`D9:<)yԭ) [%IuTWNѫ΋T S&ښGV!) Yn=emdJJ sXnA" "LhʞQb(_2rqo( 2g1xidz}>6 ~2#VA6h{Jw[A3JD'TCqƂvL6aaL+Ŗ@h%kBw. l\,̑AuPhv-?8`È?dscKd?Q\a\6!j[~аS;~kG~bmӏI {l,;)cL_+iyFryáB{JK?Xś}8$)%ca@$> 3yإpZQjjo~IBλ w!iՅSuy'Lڤe~aUTRc1IJ/X#~.Q. [Zo)IRԎ&b2\v$3Sj?֩R K-'H_,3/YqKƅibn?Dka_ ͽh7U;M|M,bd9j OHxMpy gLۻZoY9k)ë*`=k0gGg7"rYn8`^B g&ʾ X5%԰]vi1%fflƔٰ,YNetObt T2'(Y=5J">Sgoܥ[nq Ay;wuMgsLTiyťt +mlH љ =LCIOq@&aQ'J'/аT;% *w_ziڰXH,o7U؛S6QgSAmX<[WԲD7ŸMDq0~u3q:!B=sP@'hO}c@jcq0\Qf!e`Pڪ%jl4!eч>4+ iGg`[V}?btt'ub1ɸ6woSSD1:Nn#Cr[*I)$%!W0c] sGIXȓ$،* IuXK$0 =#haaqT$C)ZERbT_z5bQWemܱ!JJBߴI~V7hf#3yPN$$ZW#ZH 4h\'G`2jlGMo`dNWi$y%2 'GX tD%/|[dq \5OxRgV$#R?iI.;'/\@i{ttJLC+r+d\ݕeé#%.eРS6ai:ƭ;h}ޭ)n RGqv^|Wrfْ9"R4xNĤdX!u hqX}P^⑇f%@0rmmϮY9R &:QBA[ȾP!1% 1Ai6/?*ͱp>0(RZ\LI]H΅@q, QW@4w`Ӟ4xTN!?PP#0!|m18;Bi}+]t;+G9 N^;e C`,.àl'X K5&IԕmAȪs34-V 5?H6$h/U;-lxw/8 |e֬Mx~~WNGTމՑRt -~Fj-4I{4:,wreΧ|MQ$y쵗)O<Jg~Y~|^ޔ!O ?g@-KV,9mN1\{OښM
Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1