Ebook396 pages8 hours
Caring: A Relational Approach to Ethics and Moral Education
By Nel Noddings
Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
With numerous examples to supplement her rich theoretical discussion, Nel Noddings builds a compelling philosophical argument for an ethics based on natural caring, as in the care of a mother for her child.
In Caring—now updated with a new preface and afterword reflecting on the ongoing relevance of the subject matter—the author provides a wide-ranging consideration of whether organizations, which operate at a remove from the caring relationship, can truly be called ethical. She discusses the extent to which we may truly care for plants, animals, or ideas. Finally, she proposes a realignment of education to encourage and reward not just rationality and trained intelligence, but also enhanced sensitivity in moral matters.
In Caring—now updated with a new preface and afterword reflecting on the ongoing relevance of the subject matter—the author provides a wide-ranging consideration of whether organizations, which operate at a remove from the caring relationship, can truly be called ethical. She discusses the extent to which we may truly care for plants, animals, or ideas. Finally, she proposes a realignment of education to encourage and reward not just rationality and trained intelligence, but also enhanced sensitivity in moral matters.
Author
Nel Noddings
Nel Noddings is currently the Jacks Professor Emeriti of Child Education at Stanford University.
Read more from Nel Noddings
Kids in the Middle: The Micro Politics of Special Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Maternal Factor: Two Paths to Morality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Caring
Related ebooks
The Ethics of Care: A Feminist Approach to Human Security Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEmpowering Education: Critical Teaching for Social Change Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Compassionate Justice: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue with Two Gospel Parables on Law, Crime, and Restorative Justice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Schooled Society: The Educational Transformation of Global Culture Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Democratic Education: Revised Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How We Think Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe School and Society and The Child and the Curriculum Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Collected Works of John Dewey: The Complete Works PergamonMedia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer for Philosophy and Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCitizens of Character: New Directions in Character and Values Education Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Transformative Learning in Practice: Insights from Community, Workplace, and Higher Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sociocultural Turn in Psychology: The Contextual Emergence of Mind and Self Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn Search of Deeper Learning: The Quest to Remake the American High School Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemocracy and Education: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBoys and Girls: Superheroes in the Doll Corner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Talk of Love: How Culture Matters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Voices of Harmony and Dissent: How Peacebuilders are Transforming Their Worlds Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Feminist Phenomenology Futures Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Ascent of Affect: Genealogy and Critique Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Dissonant Methods: Undoing Discipline in the Humanities Classroom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWords Made Flesh: Writings in Pastoral and Practical Theology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Idea of a Christian College: A Reexamination for Today’s University Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe School and Society Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommunity: The Structure of Belonging Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Knowing History in Schools: Powerful knowledge and the powers of knowledge Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVita: Life in a Zone of Social Abandonment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Maternal Theory Essential Readings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEcofeminism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Gender Studies For You
Trans: When Ideology Meets Reality Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The End of Gender: Debunking the Myths about Sex and Identity in Our Society Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lost in Trans Nation: A Child Psychiatrist's Guide Out of the Madness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Communion: The Female Search for Love Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All About Love: New Visions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5You're Cute When You're Mad: Simple Steps for Confronting Sexism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Women Don't Owe You Pretty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When Women Kill Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Period Power: Harness Your Hormones and Get Your Cycle Working For You Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vagina: A re-education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Amateur: A True Story About What Makes a Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Chalice and the Blade: Our History, Our Future---Updated With a New Epilogue Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Transforming: The Bible and the Lives of Transgender Christians Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Tabernacles of Clay: Sexuality and Gender in Modern Mormonism Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Genesis of Gender: A Christian Theory Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The War Against Boys: How Misguided Policies are Harming Our Young Men Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Not That Bad: Dispatches from Rape Culture Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Trans Life Survivors Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Boys & Sex: Young Men on Hookups, Love, Porn, Consent, and Navigating the New Masculinity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Letter to a Bigot: Dead But Not Forgotten Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No Apologies: Why Civilization Depends on the Strength of Men Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Caring
Rating: 3.375 out of 5 stars
3.5/5
12 ratings1 review
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5This is an oft cited (and criticized) book in Feminist Ethics. It is one of the earlier attempts to develop a theory of care (to contrast with the justice perspective). She shares in common with previous feminist ethicists a commitment to theorizing about real life (particularly women's lives), and she shares a feminist ontology that understands individuals as constituted by and through relation ("relational selves"). Noddings believes with others that a revaluation of care is necessary both in personal and public relationships, however she primarily focuses on the personal. Her paradigmatic case of caring-for is the mother/child relationship, but she includes teacher/student as well. As such her account of caring is primarily an account of an asymmetrical relationship. It is also a sentimentalist account--our obligations to care stem from our commitment to sustaining relationships and connectedness (reason is not a motivating, but may be a loosely guiding principle).It is this reader's belief that Noddings has more or less adopted Martin Buber's "I and Thou" wholesale and is attempting to (re)work it into a feminist ethic. Buber famously identified two orientations towards this world: There is the I-it relationship in which the "it" is rationalized and instrumentalized for the I's use. (The It here can be a person, as well as idea, object, etc). It is the ordinary world of ordinary things. The second orientation (the "primary" one, in the sense that it lends the I-it relationship MEANING), is the I-You relationship. According to Buber this relationship, when it is entered into is wholly reciprocal, unmediated, essentially timeless/ahistorical. In other words it is essentially a transcendent relationship with a You. When we are engaged with the You, the You "fills our firmament." Another way of saying this is that nothing exists outside the I-You relationship when one is in the relationship.Noddings cites Buber amply, and yet she seems to miss fundamental features of his thinking, which could actually help to correct her own account. First, I believe she misses almost entirely the world of I-it, which is the background "reality" as it were, of the world. She wants to establish the I-You as the primary relationship because it is the most fundamentally caring. But Buber himself does not think we can sustain ourselves in an I-You capacity. We can, as it were, drink from its well and be nourished, but we cannot live on You alone. It is too all-engrossing of a relationship, and after all we have things like dishes to do and art to make. But Nodding takes just this engrossment as a central feature that cannot be gotten rid of (in fact she prefers 'engrossment' with the other to 'empathy.' But engrossment is incredibly problematic. Most obviously it runs the risk of being too myopic, but it also leaves the one-caring liable (and perhaps even obligated) to sacrifice herself selflessly for the one cared-for. Buber's I-Thou relationship is predicated on reciprocity, and thus he thinks a true I-Thou relationship is remarkably rare, and thus all the more to be cherished. Noddings wants to claim that the caring relationship she is talking about is reciprocal (she claims it is), but it is not reciprocal in the strong sense that Buber means. Noddings is at pains to show that caring cannot be called complete unless the caring is recognized by the cared-for. This allows her to claim a thin notion of reciprocity, but it doesn't amount to much. How can infants truly "reciprocate"? Noddings' emphasis on unequal relationships prevents her from exploring a more robust notion of reciprocity, which is needed since the majority of our adult relationships are voluntary and more equalized.The last thing I will mention is Noddings very clever, but ultimately strange claim that we enhance the ethical ideal of caring in ourselves through feeling joy in relation to others. She derives joy (this is the clever part) from an inversion of Sartre. Sartre believed that our existential aloneness leads to develop a (quasi-metaphysical) anxiety. Noddings, who construes human beings as existentially bound in relation, decides that this leads to a (quasi-metaphysical, mostly magical/woo woo) joy in this fact. (Why this follows, I'm not sure). This experience of joy is supposed to replenish us to continue our acts of caring-for. First, I'm not sure you can derive joy purely from a natural fact of our existence such as relatedness. There are plenty of natural things that I don't take joy in. For instance,I have to take a shit sometimes, but that doesn't mean I relish it. Similarly, Noddings seems to be assuming that all care-givers (or most anyway) are actually GOOD and competent care-givers. But why should we assume that? Not everyone has children because they planned it, and some parents are just shitty parents. Some kids don't get the right care they need because their parents have to work 3 jobs to make ends meet, and some kids don't get the right care because their fathers are locked away in jail for non-violent crimes. In other words, bad caring happens all the time, and it's not clear to me that Noddings' happy-hoorah-probably-white-middle-class parenting happens for plenty of children. Maybe it should, but if she's developing an ethic of care based on "lived experience" then she needs to acknowledge that social structures actually militate against caring for many (especially) marginalized women/men.
Book preview
Caring - Nel Noddings
HNa book_preview_excerpt.html }rWttH J۲$HIERAҥyK c%2Qy!?U}K}¼MLϭ^{_2{ɓ .@W|ɿ|z:|&F;n\w2;l:λ?˃O/F^?/9}{,;?d?~8;;?_Ϯduron/]^xs}suq}9=X+|r۽Z?uU-.|}h\Nr[l]]VղY?|ŇeN0j|%_BMWMYd]y5v˼iW~[\F^{WA.CUy7ɧ좓y板k2~K*_>7X^F7+_Ujꍟg?D-z-++d˖JN'2`#&sJt͡'ٽʾ}ng6uE?;cW("\/Nx^gF&y,1}7rkf+B_/&ٓG?QI߸F>"U'N|ɳ/=:#Ϟ~4.ϚQj{wyY/e':Joz&d}.W=+]owW2Q߸(qcӵ䟫YyG_z׳__ra<5j4hܓWw7g?>wus.SEcc%qE
-HKt~hj5TaǸ9k=PY(ZT 1bZ?h7dC:?%͝#kէ0¹R"ì@_yӅ)Kص\7NV䩽jwU[{Zs§+'UBFHAg'L:¯A*w8.[9^"vISZ獡N`DȎ ko!gCZCjbzz߽x0A JN]:];Z_"ݏF9kId_[`_j~:1fWUm9T$ݍ(9#
צGr}]j+_^ԙ vuҫ^6nKL)[|5=zwzww"7,o6G[!=fo]Vv.Xo]kn=+g?ax9[82W.l`?\\3\PKQ5<:[ML+wxXPf(]3