The Generalship Of General Henri E. Navarre During The Battle Of Dien Bien Phu
()
About this ebook
Major Bruce H. Hupe
See Book Description
Related to The Generalship Of General Henri E. Navarre During The Battle Of Dien Bien Phu
Related ebooks
Vietnam Studies - Allied Participation In Vietnam [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Evolution Of Joint Operations During The Civil War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArmored Warfare In The Jungle Environment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFall Gelb And The German Blitzkrieg Of 1940: Operational Art Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHelicopters in Irregular Warfare: Algeria, Vietnam, and Afghanistan [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Pentomic Era: The US Army between Korea and Vietnam Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDEFENDING THE DRINIUMOR: Covering Force Operations in New Guinea, 1944 [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVietnam Studies - The Development And Training Of The South Vietnamese Army, 1950-1972 [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReflections On The Vietnam War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Normandy Campaign: An Analysis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrafalgar And Jutland: A Study In The Principles Of War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEyes Behind the Lines: US Army Long-Range Reconnaissance and Surveillance Units [Revised Edition] Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Special Operations In The American Civil War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProvide by Parachute: Airdrop In Vietnam, 1954-1972 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLessons Learned From Advising And Training The Republic Of South Vietnam’s Armed Forces Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrench Indochina War: Reflections for Strategic Resilience Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond The Gap: A Historical Perspective On World War II River Crossings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Imjin and Kapyong Battles: Korea, 1951 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Evolution Of Artillery Tactics In General J. Lawton Collins’ US VII Corps In World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy The North Vietnamese Launched A Major Military Offensive During Tet 1968 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow Armies Grow: The Expansion of Military Forces in the Age of Total War 1789–1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFighting And Winning Encircled Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCoalition Warfare: An Uneasy Accord Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Soul of Armies: Counterinsurgency Doctrine and Military Culture in the US and UK Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConvoy Ambush Case Studies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy Some Wars Never End: The Stories of the Longest Conflicts in History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Development Of German Doctrine And Command And Control And Its Application To Supporting Arms, 1832–1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGerman General Staff In World War I Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Last Hussar Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Wars & Military For You
Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Heart of Everything That Is: The Untold Story of Red Cloud, An American Legend Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When I Come Home Again: 'A page-turning literary gem' THE TIMES, BEST BOOKS OF 2020 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The History of the Peloponnesian War: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Afghanistan Papers: A Secret History of the War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Washington: The Indispensable Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Plane in the Sky: An Oral History of 9/11 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Faithful Spy: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Plot to Kill Hitler Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/577 Days of February: Living and Dying in Ukraine, Told by the Nation’s Own Journalists Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for The Generalship Of General Henri E. Navarre During The Battle Of Dien Bien Phu
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Generalship Of General Henri E. Navarre During The Battle Of Dien Bien Phu - Major Bruce H. Hupe
This edition is published by PICKLE PARTNERS PUBLISHING—www.picklepartnerspublishing.com
To join our mailing list for new titles or for issues with our books – picklepublishing@gmail.com
Or on Facebook
Text originally published in 1994 under the same title.
© Pickle Partners Publishing 2014, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.
Publisher’s Note
Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.
We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.
THE GENERALSHIP OF GENERAL HENRI E. NAVARRE DURING THE BATTLE OF DIEN BIEN PHU
by
BRUCE H. HUPE, MAJ, USA
B.A., University of California, Davis, California, 1981
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS 4
ABSTRACT 5
CHAPTER ONE — INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY 6
Subordinate Questions 6
Background and Context of the Problem and the Research Question 7
Definitions 8
Thesis Limitations and Delimitations 10
Significance of the Study 10
Research Design and Method 11
Thesis Structure 11
CHAPTER TWO — GENERAL NAVARRE AND THE ROAD TO DIEN BIEN PHU 13
The Man 13
Navarre’s Mission 15
The Navarre Plan 17
Strategic considerations 20
Previous Battle 21
CHAPTER THREE — THE BATTLE OF DIEN BIEN PHU 25
The Setting 25
The Combatants 27
The Choice of Dien Bien Phu 28
The Air Battle and Navarre’s Logistics 34
Navarre’s Command Organization 40
Before the Battle 43
Phase I. Battles for the Northern Outposts 46
Phase II, Reinforcement and Reorganization 49
Phase III. Furious Combat 50
Phase IV. Suffocation 53
Phase V. General Attack. The Final Assault 54
After the Battle 55
CHAPTER FOUR — ANALYSIS OF THE GENERALSHIP OF HENRI NAVARRE 56
Conceptual Skills 57
Forecasting 57
Decision Making 59
Creativity 60
Intuition 61
Competency Skills 63
Perspective 63
Endurance 64
Risk Taking and Coordination 65
Assessment Skills 68
Communications Skills 69
Interpersonal Skill 69
Listening and Language skills 71
Teaching 72
Persuasion 74
Summation of the Analysis 75
CHAPTER FIVE — CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY 77
Suggestions for Further Study 79
REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER 80
BIBLIOGRAPHY 81
Primary Source Material 81
Secondary Source Material. Government Publications 81
Secondary Source Material Books 82
Secondary Source Material, Periodicals 83
ABSTRACT
This study examines the generalship of the French Commander-in-Chief in Indochina, General Henri E. Navarre, during the battle of Dien Bien Phu in 1954. This thesis employs a model of generalship from the United States Army doctrinal publication, Field Manual 22-103, Leadership and Command at Senior Levels, to analyse the actions of General Navarre. Through the application of the model, this thesis tests whether American doctrine supports or refutes the judgment of history. The conclusion reached is that the defeat of the French forces at the battle of Dien Bien Phu was largely due to a failure of senior level leadership on the part of General Henri E. Navarre.
CHAPTER ONE — INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY
The defeat of the French forces at the battle of Dien Bien Phu was largely due to a failure in the application of senior military professional skills by the Commander-in-Chief, General Henri E. Navarre. Conventional historical wisdom holds that General Henri Navarre is to blame for the French defeat at the battle of Dien Bien Phu. This thesis tests that commonly held perception by applying a model taken from United States Army doctrine on senior military leadership. The application of this model should confirm the judgment of history by concluding that General Navarre’s professional skills were less than adequate.
The methodology employed in this thesis applies a standard of generalship drawn from the U.S. Army’s Field Manual 22-103, Leadership and Command at Senior Levels. Field Manual 22-103 describes fourteen professional skills that are the yardstick by which senior professionals are judged by their soldiers, other professionals, and even their enemies.
{1} The fourteen skills are classified in three categories, they are: conceptual skills, competency skills, and communications skills. In this thesis, General Navarre’s plans for French military operations in Indochina are the basis for the study of his conceptual skills. Actual events and the execution of those plans are examined to assess his professional competency. Lastly, General Navarre’s relationships to other key members of his command provide the medium for examining his communications skills.
Subordinate Questions
A slightly adapted version of the Command and General Staff College’s Campaign Analysis Methodology provides the basis for key subordinate questions and place the battle of Dien Bien Phu in proper historical context.{2} The subordinate questions are as follows:
1. The historical context
a. When and where did the battle occur?
b. How were the adversaries organized and equipped?
c. Who was General Navarre, what was his background and what can be inferred from his past that affected his actions?
2. The strategic setting
a. What were the French political and military goals? Did the military goals support the national ones?
b. What were the strategic strengths and weaknesses of each side?
3. The operational setting
a. Did the operational military plans support the French strategic objectives?
b. What military operations preceded the battle of Dien Bien Phu and what were their significance?
c. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the French operational plans? What was the rationale for them to fight there and was it sound?
d. What were the effects of logistical considerations at Dien Bien Phu? Were they decisive in determining the outcome of the battle?
e. What was the French organizational command structure at the battle and how did it effect the outcome?
4. The tactical setting
a. What was the French tactical plan, was it sound and how well was it executed? What forces were there and how were they employed?
b. How did terrain, geography and climate effect the battle? How did the French include these factors in their plans?
Background and Context of the Problem and the Research Question
Leadership is an absolutely crucial and definitive aspect of military operations. The preeminent war fighting manual of the United States Army, FM 100-5, Operations, describes leadership as the most essential dynamic of combat power
and further states that the regular study of military doctrine, theory, history and biographies of military leaders are invaluable.
{3} It is in this statement that the importance and validity of this thesis is grounded. In the United States the American involvement in Vietnam is widely studied, but the First Indochina War is less widely known. In February 1977, an academic seminar entitled The Dien Bien Phu Crisis: Franco-American Diplomatic Relations
was hosted at the Wilson Center Library in Washington, D.C., by Professor Dominique Moisi. One of the attendees, Herbert Y. Schandler, a national defense specialist for the Congressional Research Service said, I once asked (General) Westmoreland in Chapel Hill if he had ever studied the French experience in Indochina, and he replied that he had once talked to a French general in Washington.
{4} A closer study of the French experience by the American commander might well have produced useful insights in the later development of U.S. strategy in Vietnam. Students of American military history can learn much by studying the experiences of other nations.
There are numerous historical parallels, as well as many differences, between the French involvement in Vietnam and the American one. Today many historians, political scientists, and military leaders point to a flawed strategy as a fundamental cause for America’s ultimate defeat in Vietnam. This contrasts with the French experience. The battle of Dien Bien Phu was a singular event that finalized the loss of France’s war in Vietnam. It must be studied in terms of the actual tactics used by the combatants. The broader contexts of the operational goals of the French military in Indochina and the military strategy of the French government also bear examination. The views of academics and military and political leaders in assessing the French defeat at Dien Bien Phu provide much of the research material in this study of leadership and military history. The Indochina War collection on microfilm compiled by Douglas Pike at the University of California, Berkeley, has yielded most of the archival primary source documents used. This collection is on file in the Combined Arms Research Library at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.
Definitions
Numerous studies of generalship exist. However, there is no universally accepted definition of generalship. For the purposes of this thesis, generalship is defined as the successful application of senior-level military professional skills. This definition of successful generalship derives from the model used. The United States Army has published Field Manual 22-103, a doctrinal work that, in its own words, serves as an instructional text for developing professionals...is a ready resource for those already serving in senior positions...and serves as a common reference point for the many ongoing initiatives related to leadership and command.
{5} As stated earlier. Field Manual 22-103 describes fourteen professional skills in three categories as the yardstick for measuring senior professionals. Successful generals are senior military professionals who win battles and demonstrate appropriate mastery of these doctrinal professional skills. The skills listed in Field Manual 22-103 are:
The summarized definitions for the specific criteria used in this study are:
Decision making incorporates synthesis and analysis. Synthesis makes the seemingly complex and disorganized meaningful and useful. Data is collected and matched with other data until the pieces fit and results in processed information. Analysis allows generals to view information and judge its importance. Information is taken apart; patterns are established; and priorities for current or future action are constructed. Finally, consistency, timing, and clarity are all key aspects of good decision making.{6}
Forecasting is a general’s broad projection of what an organization needs to accomplish over extended periods of time. It is his conception of the future and is realized through a sound vision and the effective use of staff planners.{7}
Creativity refers to the problem solving skills of general officers. It is the ability to find practical and innovative solutions to difficult military problems.{8}
Intuition is the product of intellect