A Short Course in Automorphic Functions
()
About this ebook
The book presupposes only the usual first courses in complex analysis, topology, and algebra. Exercises range from routine verifications to significant theorems. Notes at the end of each chapter describe further results and extensions, and a glossary offers definitions of terms.
Related to A Short Course in Automorphic Functions
Titles in the series (100)
A History of Mathematical Notations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Analytic Inequalities Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5First-Order Partial Differential Equations, Vol. 2 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInfinite Series Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Laplace Transforms and Their Applications to Differential Equations Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Theory of Approximation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMethods of Applied Mathematics Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Catalog of Special Plane Curves Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Dynamic Probabilistic Systems, Volume II: Semi-Markov and Decision Processes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMathematics in Ancient Greece Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Calculus Primer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFirst-Order Partial Differential Equations, Vol. 1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5History of the Theory of Numbers, Volume II: Diophantine Analysis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdvanced Calculus: Second Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Calculus Refresher Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Calculus: An Intuitive and Physical Approach (Second Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Differential Geometry Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Topology for Analysis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Introduction to Lebesgue Integration and Fourier Series Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNumerical Methods Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Theory of Games and Statistical Decisions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mathematics for the Nonmathematician Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Differential Forms with Applications to the Physical Sciences Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Geometry: A Comprehensive Course Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fourier Series and Orthogonal Polynomials Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElementary Matrix Algebra Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Applied Multivariate Analysis: Using Bayesian and Frequentist Methods of Inference, Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVectors and Their Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Adventurer's Guide to Number Theory Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related ebooks
Entire Functions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSemi-Simple Lie Algebras and Their Representations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Morse Theory. (AM-51), Volume 51 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Complex Integration and Cauchy's Theorem Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAbelian Varieties Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Introduction to Lebesgue Integration and Fourier Series Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSome Topics in Complex Analysis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLectures on Modular Forms Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsModern Multidimensional Calculus Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReal Variables with Basic Metric Space Topology Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Gauge Theory and Variational Principles Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Exercises of Tensors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAlgebra: Polynomials, Galois Theory and Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRings and Homology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsymptotic Expansions Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Algebraic Extensions of Fields Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLectures on Boolean Algebras Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Complex Variables Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5An Introduction to Differential Geometry - With the Use of Tensor Calculus Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Elementary Functional Analysis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Algebraic Methods in Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Advanced Geometry of Plane Curves and Their Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComplex Variables Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAlgebraic Geometry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLie Groups for Pedestrians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Homotopy Theory: An Introduction to Algebraic Topology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRepresentations of Finite Groups Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCantor, Russell, and ZFC Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Abstract Analytic Number Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Mathematics For You
Introducing Game Theory: A Graphic Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Basic Math & Pre-Algebra For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Calculus For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Algebra - The Very Basics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Geometry For Dummies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Basic Math Notes Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quantum Physics for Beginners Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Game Theory: A Simple Introduction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Algebra I Workbook For Dummies Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Everything Guide to Algebra: A Step-by-Step Guide to the Basics of Algebra - in Plain English! Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mental Math Secrets - How To Be a Human Calculator Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Everything Everyday Math Book: From Tipping to Taxes, All the Real-World, Everyday Math Skills You Need Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5See Ya Later Calculator: Simple Math Tricks You Can Do in Your Head Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Calculus Made Easy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Elements of Euclid for the Use of Schools and Colleges (Illustrated) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Golden Ratio: The Divine Beauty of Mathematics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Is God a Mathematician? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5ACT Math & Science Prep: Includes 500+ Practice Questions Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Thirteen Books of the Elements, Vol. 1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRelativity: The special and the general theory Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Mind for Numbers | Summary Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5GED® Math Test Tutor, 2nd Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAlgebra I For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for A Short Course in Automorphic Functions
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
A Short Course in Automorphic Functions - Joseph Lehner
FUNCTIONS
[ I ]
Discontinuous Groups
An analytic function f is called automorphic with respect to a group Γ of transformations of the plane if f takes the same value at points that are equivalent under Γ. That is,
for each V ∈ Γ and each z ∈ D, the domain of f. If we want to have nonconstant functions f, we must assume there are only finitely many equivalents of z lying in any compact part of D. This property of Γ is known as discontinuity.
The most important domain for f from the standpoint of applications is the upper half-plane † H. Now from (1) with f analytic in H we deduce that V is analytic in H and maps H into itself. It is natural to require that V be one-to-one in order that V−1 should be single-valued. Hence F is a linear-fractional transformation. The group Γ will therefore be a group of linear-fractional transformations, or as we shall call them, linear transformations.
The present chapter is devoted to a study of discontinuous groups of linear transformations.
1.Linear Transformations
1A. A linear transformation is a nonconstant rational function of degree 1; that is, a function
where α, β, γ, δ are complex numbers and z is a complex variable. The function w is defined on all of the complex sphere Z except z = −δ/γ and z = ∞. With the usual convention that w/0 = ∞ for u ≠ 0, we have
and we obtain w(∞) by continuity:
In particular, −δ/γ will be ∞ if and only if γ = 0, and in that case α/γ = ∞: the infinite points of the two planes then correspond under the mapping w.
As a rational function, w is regular in Z except for a simple pole at z = −δ/γ. Suppose γ = 0. Then necessarily δ ≠ 0, α ≠ 0 (because of αδ − βγ ≠ 0) and
Hence dw/dz = α/δ ≠ 0 and w is conformal at every finite z. At infinity we must use the uniformizing variables z′ = l/z, w′ = 1/w; then we find that
and w′ is conformal at z′ = 0, which by definition means that w is conformal at z = ∞.
If γ ≠ 0, we have
hence dw/dz ≠ 0 and w is conformal except possibly at z = −δ/γ, z = ∞. At z = − δ/γ we must use the variables z′ = z + δ/γ, w′ = 1/w:
so that (dw′/dz′)z = 0 ≠ 0. At z = ∞ the correct variables are z′ = 1/z, w′ = w and we get
yielding the same conclusion.
Solving (2) for z we get
which is also a linear transformation and so is defined on the extended w-plane. The mapping z → w is therefore onto and hence one-to-one, and we may write z = w−1.
Putting these results together we can assert:
THEOREM. The linear transformation (2) is a one-to-one conformal mapping of all of Zon itself.
For this reason a linear transformation is also called a confortnal automorphism of Z.¹
If two linear transformations are equal,
for all z, then each function has the same zero and the same pole, and this gives †
from which
It follows that λ = μ: two equal transformations have proportional coefficients, and the converse is obviously true. But multiplying the coefficients of a transformation by λ multiplies its determinant by λ². This permits us to normalize the transformation by requiring its determinant αδ − βγ to be 1. We shall do this from now on: a linear transformation is a function
where a, b, c, d are complex numbers. We usually write (3) in the form w = Tz.
Occasionally we shall make use of functions of the form (2)—that is, linear fractional mappings with nonzero determinant not necessarily equal to 1. Such functions will be called bilinear mappings.
by defining, for w = Tz, u = Sw,
That is, the product of two linear transformations is simply their composition regarded as mappings. ‡ It is seen that STz is a linear transformation if we recall that the determinant of STz is the product of the determinants of Sw and Tz and so is 1. We have observed that each transformation has an inverse that is again a linear transformation, and the transformation Iz = z = (1 . z + 0)/(0 . z is a group.
As we saw above, a linear transformation Tz is equal to each of the transformations (ρT)z, ρ ≠ 0, and to no others. Since det T = det (ρT) = ρ² det T = 1, we must have ρ = ±1. A linear transformation, therefore, determines its coefficients up to a factor of ±1. It is then reasonable to associate to the linear transformation (3) the two matrices ±T, where
Moreover, the product of two linear transformations corresponds to the product of their matrices, as one calculates easily.
with the group of all 2 × 2 unimodular matrices with complex entries, a group we shall denote by QC or SL(2, C). Indeed, if we define
then f is a mapping from Qc , and
that is, f is a homomorphism onto. Its kernel certainly includes ±I, where † I = (1 0 | 0 1), and, by what has been said, can include nothing else. Hence
The identification of QC is permissible provided we identify each T ∈ ΩC with −T.
Let T ∈ QC and let S be a bilinear mapping. Then STS−1 ∈ ΩC. In general, if T has a certain property with respect to a set A, then STS−1 has the same property with respect to the set S(A). This enables us to assume, for example, that a certain special point is ∞, etcetera. The transition from T to STS−1 is merely a change of coordinates in the plane.
One of the best-known properties of a linear transformation is that it maps a circle or straight line onto a circle or straight line. This can be seen as follows. The equation
with A, C real, includes all circles (A ≠ 0) and all straight lines (A = 0). Writing z = (aw + b)/(cw + d), ad − bc = 1, and substituting, we find
where
Since A′ and C′ are obviously real, this is also the equation of a circle or straight line.²
1B. Linear transformations are classified by their fixed points (solutions of Tz = z). When c ≠ 0 in T = (a b | c d), the fixed points are given by the equation
There are two finite solutions z = ξ1, ξ2 of this equation:
where χ = a + d is the trace † of T. (Note use of ad − bc − 1 in this calculation.) The two fixed points are coincident if and only if χ = ±2; then the transformation is called parabolic.
LEMMA. 1. The trace is invariant under T → ATA−1, where A is a nonsingular matrix.
This follows at once from χ(AΒ) = χ(ΒA).
When c = 0, we have T∞ = ∞; that is, ∞ is always one fixed point. T is then
and b/(d − a) is the other fixed point if d ≠ a. When d = a, T reduces to
a translation, and we arbitrarily call ∞ the second fixed point. The two fixed points are coincident. Thus T is parabolic and we observe that χ = 2, as it should be. A parabolic transformation with fixed point ∞ is a translation, and conversely. Finally, if b = 0, T is the identity.
There are never more than two fixed points unless T is the identity. A corollary of this remark is the following: if three distinct points z1, z2, z3 have the same images under S and T, then S = T. For S−1T fixes each zi and so is the identity.
Let us first suppose ξ1, ξ2 are finite and distinct (c ≠ 0, χ² ≠ 4). Set up the transformation W = W(z),
W has fixed points ξ1 and ξ2, and if W(∞) = w(∞) where w = Tz, then W will be the same transformation as w. Since w(∞) = a/c, this gives κ = (a − cξ1)/(a − cξ2). As thus calculated, κ is always finite, for ξ2 = a/c combined with (6) would yield ad − bc = 0. We call
the normal form of w = Tz; κ is called the multiplier of T. But 1/κ may also be regarded as the multiplier of T since we can write the transformation in the form
In other words, whether we regard κ or 1/κ as the multiplier depends on which fixed point is labeled ξ1 and which ξ2. As a way out of the ambiguity let us define the multiplier to be the pair (κ, 1/κ).
Since κ + κ −¹ is a symmetric function of ξ1, ξ2, it must be a rational function of the coefficients of (6). A calculation using ξ1 + ξ2 = (a − d)/c, ξ1ξ2 = −b/c yields
LEMMA. 2. The multiplier is invariant under T → ATA−1, where A is a bilinear mapping.
Indeed, (9) and Lemma 1 give κ + κ−1 = κ′ + κ′−1, where κ′ = κ(ATA−1), Hence κ − κ′ or κκ′ = 1. Thus the multiplier of T′ is the pair (κ′, 1/ κ′), which is the same as the pair (κ, 1/ κ).
When c = 0 but χ² ≠ 4, there is but one finite and one infinite fixed point, and the normal form of T is
We find that (9) is still valid (remember ad = 1). Hence Lemma 2 holds. Next, assume ξ1 − ξ2 ≠ ∞ (that is, c ≠ 0, χ = ±2). The transformation
where the sign before c is the sign of χ, has the unique fixed point ξ1; moreover w(∞) = T(∞). Therefore (10) is the normal form for a parabolic transformation with finite fixed point. When ξ1 = ξ2 = ∞, the normal form is
We arbitrarily define κ = 1 in these cases in order to satisfy (9) and verify Lemma 2.
Lemma 2 has now been proved for all linear transformations.
On the assumption that T is not parabolic, κ can have any value other than 0 or 1. Writing κ = ρeiθ, ρ > 0, 0 ≤ θ < 2π, we classify as follows:
When T is parabolic, κ = 1 and χ = ±2. In the nonparabolic case we use (9) and deduce the following;
THEOREM. A necessary and sufficient condition that T be elliptic, hyperbolic, or parabolic is that χ be real and | χ | < 2, | χ | > 2, or | χ | = 2, respectively. A necessary and sufficient condition that T be loxodromic is that χ be nonreal. The transformations T and ATA−1, A a bilinear mapping, are simultaneously elliptic, hyperbolic, etcetera.
In this book we shall have no use for loxodromic transformations.
Exercise 1. A linear transformation T is periodic of order n if and only if n > 1 is the smallest integer for which Tn = I. Prove that T is of order n if and only if T is elliptic and its multiplier is a primitive nth root of unity. Show that the trace of T is 2 cos πl/n, (l, n) = 1, where (l, n) is the greatest common divisor of the integers l and n.
Exercise 2. Let T be nonelliptic. If for some z and some sequence (n) → ∞ we have Tnz → z0, then z0 is a fixed point of T. Is the result true for elliptic T?
1C. In this book we shall be concerned almost entirely with linear transformations that map the upper half-plane H on itself. Such transformations correspond to matrices with real entries. Indeed, if T is in this class, it maps the real axis E on itself (by continuity of T and T−1). Now z ∈ E only if z and so T . Since the mapping T determines its coefficients up to a factor of ±1, we either have a = ā, …, d or a = −ā, …, d = −d; that is, either a, b, c, d are all real or all are pure imaginary. But in the latter case we would have
and T(i) ∉ H. Hence a necessary condition that T preserve H is that it have real coefficients. This condition is clearly sufficient, since a linear transformation with real coefficients obviously preserves E, and because of the determinant condition † it maps H into H.
Call ΩR the subgroup of ΩC consisting of matrices with real entries. We have proved
THEOREM 1. T ∈ ΩR if and only if T preserves H.
An element of ΩR will be called a real transformation or a real matrix. It is clear that a real transformation preserves the real axis as well as the lower half-plane. A real transformation is never loxodromic; it is elliptic, hyperbolic, or parabolic according as χ = a + d is, in absolute value, less than 2, greater than 2, or equal to 2. An elliptic transformation has two conjugate nonreal fixed points; a hyperbolic transformation has two real fixed points; a parabolic transformation has one real fixed point.
A fixed circle of T is a circle or straight line that is mapped on itself by T. The easiest way to discuss the fixed circles is to make a nonsingular transformation z → z′ of the plane that carries the fixed points of T to 0 and ∞ or, in the case of parabolic T, carries the fixed point to ∞. In the first case T becomes T′z′ = κz′ with the same κ as in T (see IB, Lemma 2). When T is elliptic, κ = eiθ, and T′ is a rotation about the origin; the fixed circles are circles with center at the origin and each fixed circle is orthogonal to the family of rays through the origin—that is, orthogonal to the family of lines joining the fixed points. When