Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    A Journal of the Plague Year: Being Observations or Memorials of the Most Remarkable Occurrences, as well Public as Private, which happened in London during the last Great Visitation In 1665
    A Journal of the Plague Year: Being Observations or Memorials of the Most Remarkable Occurrences, as well Public as Private, which happened in London during the last Great Visitation In 1665
    A Journal of the Plague Year: Being Observations or Memorials of the Most Remarkable Occurrences, as well Public as Private, which happened in London during the last Great Visitation In 1665
    Ebook306 pages5 hours

    A Journal of the Plague Year: Being Observations or Memorials of the Most Remarkable Occurrences, as well Public as Private, which happened in London during the last Great Visitation In 1665

    By Daniel Defoe

    3.5/5

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    This novel is a fictionalized account of one man's experiences of the year 1665, in which the Great Plague struck the city of London. Although it purports to have been written only a few years after the event, it actually was written in the years just prior to the book's first publication in March 1722. Defoe was only five years old in 1665, and the book itself was published under the initials 'H. F.' The novel probably was based on the journals of Defoe's uncle, Henry Foe.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherWilder Publications, Inc.
    Release dateJun 10, 2015
    ISBN9781633849587
    A Journal of the Plague Year: Being Observations or Memorials of the Most Remarkable Occurrences, as well Public as Private, which happened in London during the last Great Visitation In 1665
    Author

    Daniel Defoe

    Daniel Defoe was born at the beginning of a period of history known as the English Restoration, so-named because it was when King Charles II restored the monarchy to England following the English Civil War and the brief dictatorship of Oliver Cromwell. Defoe’s contemporaries included Isaac Newton and Samuel Pepys.

    Read more from Daniel Defoe

    Related to A Journal of the Plague Year

    Related ebooks

    General Fiction For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      “Lord Have Merrcy On London”

      May 14, 2020

      “Lord Have Merrcy On London”
      8 min read

    • Article

      Reviews

      Jul 27, 2021

      Reviews
      4 min read

    • Article

      Alcohol Insanity:

      Oct 8, 2021

      Alcohol Insanity:
      7 min read

    • Article

      Books & co

      Aug 12, 2022

      by Lindsey Fitzharris Many of us have heard of Gillies, the innovative doctor who – beavering away in the secluded grounds of Queen Mary’s Hospital, Sidcup, Kent – revolutionised the surgery undertaken to restore the faces of servicemen horrifically

      5 min read

    • Article

      Your LETTERS

      Sep 11, 2020

      I was inspired to write in to you to encourage beginners to family history always, always, always to look at original documents. I have been looking back at my branch of the Dunn family in Bermondsey, who seemed to have the habit of calling their off

      6 min read

    • Article

      The Würzburg Witch Trials

      Jan 31, 2024

      The Würzburg Witch Trials
      3 min read

    • Article

      Going Into Lockdown

      Jan 19, 2023

      Going Into Lockdown
      5 min read

    • Article

      Killers In The House Of God

      Dec 23, 2020

      Killers In The House Of God
      7 min read

    • Article

      When Christmas Was Cancelled

      Dec 13, 2023

      When Christmas Was Cancelled
      3 min read

    • Article

      A Back In Time

      Apr 5, 2019

      A Back In Time
      4 min read

    • Article

      Punishment From On High

      Jan 19, 2023

      Punishment From On High
      3 min read

    • Article

      Plots, Pikes, Plague And Puritans

      Feb 9, 2021

      Plots, Pikes, Plague And Puritans
      6 min read

    • Article

      The Shadow Of Death Descends

      Jan 19, 2023

      The Shadow Of Death Descends
      5 min read

    • Article

      Samuel Pepys

      Sep 18, 2020

      Samuel Pepys
      5 min read

    • Article

      Saints, Relics And Processions

      Aug 13, 2022

      Saints, Relics And Processions
      12 min read

    • Article

      Death Without Ceremony

      May 5, 2020

      Death Without Ceremony
      6 min read

    • Article

      Your LETTERS

      Nov 13, 2020

      Your LETTERS
      5 min read

    • Article

      Q&A YOU ASK, WE ANSWER

      Oct 28, 2021

      Q&A YOU ASK, WE ANSWER
      8 min read

    • Article

      England killed Van Dyck

      Aug 24, 2022

      England killed Van Dyck
      4 min read

    • Article

      Campaigner. Iconoclast. Absent Friend. LGBTQ People Who Changed The World

      Feb 15, 2024

      NOMINATED BY GABRIELLE STOREY Christina, queen regnant of Sweden from 1632 until her abdication in 1654, was one of the most learned women of the 17th century. Her sexual identity and orientation have been the cause of much debate due to her cross dr

      6 min read

    • Article

      Where There’s A Will…

      May 12, 2023

      Where There’s A Will…
      11 min read

    • Article

      Your Letters

      May 13, 2022

      Your Letters
      5 min read

    • Article

      Q&A YOU ASK, WE ANSWER

      Mar 16, 2023

      Q&A YOU ASK, WE ANSWER
      6 min read

    • Article

      The End of Witchcraft

      Jan 31, 2024

      The End of Witchcraft
      8 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for A Journal of the Plague Year

    3.5/5

    16 ratings22 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 3/5
      This book contains the phrase "Bring out your dead". It also has a scene where a man is put alive onto the dead cart, at which he remarks "But I an't dead though, am I". If those aren't reason enough to read it, then I don't know what is. My understanding is that historians are unable to tell exactly where the line between truth and fiction lies. This edition is lightly modernised, which perhaps slightly spoils the effect of reading an original document but it is very cleverly written, as if by one who doesn't habitually write. He introduces the story of the three brothers several times before he actually tells it. Ultimately, I think the book is a victim of its own success as once the brothers' story is told it becomes repetitive and rather tiresome.
    • 4/5
      With Ebola outbreaks on the news and debates on vaccinations on every blog, it seemed like a perfect time to return to one of the original records of a disease outbreak. I was particularly curious to read this book because it was mentioned multiple times in “On Immunity”. The author of Robinson Crusoe wrote this fictionalized account of a man who lives through the bubonic plague in England in 1665. Defoe was only 5-years-old at that time, but his account is considered one of the most accurate ones of the plague. Defoe looks at the plague through the eyes of one man. He’s forced to decide if he should stay or go when the outbreak begins. So many people fled, but some didn’t realize they had already been infected. They carried the plague with them to other towns. Some people who were sick would throw themselves into the pits of the dead and wait their death out. The book is surprisingly interesting for a nonfiction account written centuries ago. Defoe talked about the actually details of how the outbreak was handle. For example, when one person in a family got sick, the rest of the family was kept in their house with a guard posted out front or other times they were all sent to the sick house, where they often became infected even if they weren’t sick before. Random Tidbits: The scene from “Monty Python and the Search for the Holy Grail” where they are yelling out “Bring out your dead!” was a real thing. People went around with carts and actually yelled that out to collect the dead bodies. The standard of burying people six feet under was also established at this point. It used to be a very arbitrary depth before the plague.BOTTOM LINE: It’s less about the plague itself than it is about the study of a society in duress. It was fascinating to see the different ways people reacted. Their fight or flight tendencies haven’t changed much over the last 300 years.
    • 4/5
      Some people reading this might think it is non-fiction, and Defoe strives to make it seem as if written by a guy who lived through the year 1665 in London. It seems pretty realistic and Defoe did research to make the book seem as factual as possible. The plague was a terrible affliction, and while many fled London there were many heroic people who stayed and kept the conditions from being much worse. The book is pretty didactic, but not disturbingly so. The language is kind of convoluted at times but when I finished the book I thought it well worth reading, even if during the reading it seemed heavy-handed at times. Defoe says the Great Fire of London, which occurred the next year--1666--was a blessing because it enabled many to have jobs after the economic disaster which was the plague.
    • 2/5
      Yep... Defoe's returns continue to diminish. This reminds me of Dostoevsky's 'House of the Dead,' since both books are absolutely riveting for the first 100 pages or so: you get an immediate impression of what it's like to live in a plague-ridden London (or Russian prison); you get drawn in by the odd 'life is stranger than fiction' moment, but then, before you know it, you're reading exactly the same thing two or even three times for no particular reason other than the narrator's inability to revise his own work. If you know much about the way plague was treated by the early moderns, you won't be surprised by too much here.

      This penguin edition has some things going for it, starting with an amazing cover illustration and ending with Anthony Burgess' old introduction which is now an appendix. I suspect that's there because Burgess does what an introducer ought to do: describes a bit about Defoe's life and times, a bit about the book you're about to read, and a very slight interpretation of that book (here: 'can we preserve the societies we build?') The editor of this volume, on the other hand, gives us a semi-rapturous 'analysis' of Defoe's use of 'place' in the book, which sounds interesting until you read the book and realize that it's utterly tendentious.

      Literary fashion is an odd beast- wouldn't it have made more sense to redo Roxana than to redo this?
    • 4/5
      World War Z long before it was written--a narrative description of the year the plague hit London--this novel was originally printed and accepted as a factual description of what was happening in the streets of London when plague came across the English Channel.
    • 3/5
      Daniel Defoe is a fascinating writer. He can write a marvelous melodrama and then create a novel that reads as if it is non-fiction. This fictional documentation of the great plague of 1665 in England is quite remarkable. Apparently some historians think it is better than actual documentation in its ability to convey the progression and social repercussions of this horrifying black death. He carefully lays out the slow unraveling of the societal fabric. He seems to say that fear and suffering result in chaos and irrational behavior. The desire to survive drives people to behave in ways they would not otherwise even consider or believe themselves capable of. I have to say that the power of this book seems, unfortunately, as relevant now as ever. With an Aids epidemic, Ebola epidemic, and threats of biological warfare in our lives, it is a pretty scary insight into the likely chain of events should some form of massive biological threat present itself. This was not a fun read, but very thought provoking.
    • 3/5
      I find it difficult to give this a rating not only because of what it is--a book that straddles the fiction/non-fiction line, written centuries ago--but also because of the reasons I read it. I wasn't looking for the story, but for insight into the time period, the science and the language and the people and the geography. It's part anecdote and part statistic, and it makes me wonder what it would have been like to be a contemporary reader of something like this, when it felt like an authentic representation of something that could conceivably happen again tomorrow and not a fictionalized account of something that we no longer fear...or if we do, not at all in the same way or context.
    • 4/5
      Despite its age, this is a well written, very readable account of the the 1665 Great Plague of London. Although in actuality just historical fiction, the account is accurate enough to provide the reader with a meaningful understanding of the event.My only complaint is that, by the second half of the book, DeFoe becomes mired in repetition, hence at times I found my attention waning.All in all, a very interesting account.
    • 4/5
      Defoe's fictionalized first-person account of plague in 17th-century London. Rivetting.
    • 3/5
      I must admit to a morbid fascination with accounts of natural disasters, harrowing exploration tales and historical plagues. This ostensibly first-hand account of the 1665 visitation of the Black Death upon London, written by Daniel DeFoe, certainly fits nicely into that genre. I say “ostensibly”, because while Defoe was alive at the time of the event, he was a very young child and wrote this work in 1722. Therefore, while we can be assured that many of the accounts therein are largely accurate, it would be stretch to label it as strictly non-fiction.This is not a spellbinding or even captivating read. It is full of statistics and seemingly never ending references to specific neighborhoods and precincts as existed in London at the time. Much of the book is taken up with body counts and comparisons of mortality from time to time in the different areas of London and its environs. As most people have no geographic knowledge of the area, this is largely wasted, except to realize that, “Gee, a lot of people died in Whiteside, but not so many in Wapping.”Sprinkled throughout this relatively short work (under 200 dense pages), are interesting anecdotes, and this is the beauty of the book; the actions and reactions of everyday people to the scourge within their midst. How did the authorities address the problem? What was the medical knowledge and prevailing treatments as existed at the time? What did people in London do when commerce and society effectively broke down? What did they do to acquire food? How were the bodies disposed of? All intriguing and practical questions that are asked and answered herein.Given the factual and dry nature of most of the prose, coupled with the early 18th century writing style, I cannot recommend this work to the casual reader or one looking strictly for entertainment or to pass the time. Even an aficionado of the genre will likely be hard pressed to profess an unreserved endorsement of the book as anything other than what it is; a dry, at times enlightening, account of the Black Death’s impact on the city and citizens of London, written in close proximity to the event itself.
    • 4/5
      Daniel Defoe, while only five when the plague ravaged London in 1665, writes a first hand fictional narrative of a citizen who remained in the city throughout the pestilence based upon parish/church records and personal accounts. The telling is consumed with misery, yet I was surprised at how well government officials were able to keep order during such an extreme and uncontrollable calamity. Many well-off families fled to the countryside leaving behind a primarily poor populace. The government, church, and private citizens donated significant funds to provide necessities for those without thus preventing riots. The redonk amount of dead were buried by and the even more numerous sick were cared for by the poor. Defoe details many attempts to escape, alleviate, and contain the disease by city officials acting on the advice of respected physicians and by quacks looking to make a quick profit - largely to no avail. I was, however, impressed with the level of understanding the physicians had of the disease. If a similar scenario occurred today, I believe we would be fucked since the populace was largely controlled by their resignation to God's fury.
    • 3/5
      A rambling account of the London plague of 1665, repetitious and at times rather dry - but nonetheless a fascinating insight into the disaster. Includes death figures from the bills, anecdotes and rumours, opinion and contradictions, and is at times (unwittingly?) funny. With the constant references to the infected, I couldn't help but reread the plague as a zombie apocalypse - ironically, the account bears this rather well.
    • 4/5
      My reactions upon reading this in 1990.I expected a more straight forward, organized narrative full of more anecdotes and not any references to what public policy and private behavior should be in the next plague epidemic. I found Defoe's narrative disorganized. (As the critic points out in the introduction, this leads versimilitude to an ostensible common man's journal, but it's not really planned -- just a feature of Defoe's rushed, first-person style.). Defoe never really seems to make up his mind whether it was a good idea to quarantine plague victims in their homes. On the other hand, Defoe gives us some compelling anecdotes of the plague and a balanced portrait of the good and evil of government and private responses to the epidemic. It's also interesting to see Defoe's mind grapple with some questions: is it faithless to flee London or is it wrong not to do all to save oneself? It's interesting to see Defoe try to reconcile the contemporary theory of the plague's infectiousness with how it actually spread. And it's interesting to see, in passing, a reference to some of the doctors of the time believing that the plague is due to "living Creatures ... seen by a microscope of strange monstrous and frightful Shapes." But Defoe says he doubts this, a glimmering of the bacteriological theory of disease.
    • 2/5
      Gave up. Boring. Not a fan of journalistic-style fiction, really.
    • 4/5
      Although ostensibly fiction, this is very much written as a non-fictional memoir of one man's experiences during the Great Plague of 1665 (who signs off at the end as H F - Defoe himself was only five years old when the plague happened). Defoe usually calls it "distemper" rather than "plague". The full gamut of human emotions and experiences are revealed in this slightly rambling, but very human narrative. You get a real feeling of colourful incident and emotion, but there are a lot of statistics as well. Good stuff. 4/5
    • 3/5
      An interesting and believable account of the plague of 1665. It's difficult to be sure how much is fact and how much fiction, but it feels like it's based on a true account.Some of the interesting things are the effect of the plague on the businesses and trades, and the measures put in place by the Mayor and magistrates to give work and distribute alms which did a lot to reduce the problem and may have prevented a riot.It's a bit repetitive in places, with the same point often being made a few times. The lack of chapters also makes it more difficult to read than would otherwise be the case.
    • 4/5
      This is a fictional account of one man's experience of the plague year. It is utterley fascinating and while Daniel Defoe was only 5 at the time of the plague it is surely drawn from the experiences/notes of near relatives? There is great detail of the management of the people and the infection with detailed statistics which are rather frightening to think about. He describes the desperation of the people and the lengths they go to in that desperation. According to the author there were numerous charletons in London selling quackery and uncountable tales of robberies during this horrendous time. There are tales of evil-doers tempered with the praise of the dignitaries and of the good souls who helped the poor in any way possible. This is well worth reading
    • 4/5
      I would rate this book 4 stars but for the errors in the edition I was reading (Barnes & Noble Library Of Essential Reading). Regardless of whether this book is fiction, history or a blend between the two, it is a very interesting account of the Great Plague of London, and if the subject interests you, I would recommend reading it.
    • 4/5
      Daniel Defoe provides a unique view of the 1665 plague of London. His vivid, if snobbish, depiction of quotidian life is both colorful and enlightening. The reader will have to stumble through 17th century syntax and structure, but the hard work will pay off.
    • 5/5
      This was assigned in an undergrad Stuart history class. I was incensed that we were having to read a NOVEL! Well, I was stupid, indeed. This is a fine, revealing look at the horrors that people experienced in 1666.
    • 3/5
      Kind of slow moving and repetitive in parts, not to mention long-winded. It was interesting, but I won't be rereading it.
    • 4/5
      Understated as it is, this fictional 'documentary' of the Plague Year is gripping. Compelling and eminently readable, it gives an almost businesslike account of the Plague's imagined horror.As birchmore pointed out, there are fascinating authorial techniques at work. Early in the story, the saddler establishes his claim as a truthful source not only by his sober and skeptical tone, but by his constant reference to the actual Bills of Mortality. Then, as the story progresses, the narrator, firmly established in the reader's confidence, begins to cast doubt on their legitimacy and accuracy - realistically heightening the fears of catastrophe. Even as a modern reader, it's difficult not to succumb to the Journal's appearance of truth. As far as I'm concerned, that's an extraordinary testimony to Defoe's brilliance.

    Book preview

    A Journal of the Plague Year - Daniel Defoe

    G8Nabook_preview_excerpt.html|ےǑ侬i -\HbӸZhڷʨT祔Ś'}>|~dw,4lLCteFFxqo4oc<}5c=z6X-_|T߇m}UWՏLJ05Can&!Mϱ }ضxq.MRum[4of462hTc;Kp:>UWGL_j|ɞTIĹUw}쫯ߏ_d!/P[z}zaS~7WLXݻꗷowoջ?|㇛O^y݇7}so՛~MO}Y}|?Wp|)/E0cs8N#ȧTX_(..TIwIVp#{68N E8Vf:Tfb_5)A]{ճTO=ŋx/~Y(l1{hMCSDeqb#O܉vH2.UE2(z;n0^I;u{R8E\![o }}K!5Su LNdefhcaFQ~y6/:tam\.0eY J18̢Q* ]_ڏCWMO]|;aYY&CVG*>Ckyo[[DZԄ__NndjXHcBolw{ 1$2u;: PY#v"Nfd}oEM$8}35}d"K|D61A^;je?E]ZlOx`3PM^؉M4f(JhM*cl}gP6D^eȫna}ؓk9UŐyfq8tMǗ#" ejxZqnOM=y8䯘D YVS#bϭ DC~w##΃'W+#j ,Cr_@lfy6ߏ]Eȏ5E5Djʫ!fO36_}a`Uwo|vGpt/dS0GaŀսhfCTM^*Rl"5177(?)M6پ鸡OKjvM`ؽ ʆcPoKE.C~w0-qjj+3]3 N}ǔd[2C Ddj6~NbpjzUuToKfMq 4 M:V6GobJOeR[ }X,jӿ3r7sdVD؋Y1Pj3tpՁ 2 Na ;i8gۏ34>6M<k=}>[`$9:?,"Ilzw!] ר7~>mԃC@=G/ nT6zcyU \~H潿gq;6Yz-#21V(656_TKI ,iY7D!41K 굶&\2MߴIC9^5-+t ~.ԗ|~8MN׭V&J6mO'Ϡeb9#72 R3bx4qEX਺!)شlS} WƐ,PM 2Cᛚi7һOt)Q?k^m~D!I? |A #oQqFS |E$#1.cL!O}杜$iߌɵ3]wKAeH+5!MưEL.:чo 76Q" ߇FG96'f6؟Ż@brjB+cb@hM4ǴR=eoXl `.th.ms**b2hH{F-Dz$+( >Ğ~B6"JRhyw [bQ^p< +B>gX 1nƯ_<57$+_&_<}HY%>F3G5~k)$?a1hN.P-~d+i&:(=pCl"a$ʴ;^ S3P$xUF2 '|՗_mx+`-0႙/#Ic˯ ir2;)R 1359A+j &h=t Y,Pڕ?x@%?u;UlfHbAgD?Q\_߂$& yY"/x5ς -*|)ػUٸU],O'{BhTQ}DDA/+i KQr)kңH4c.`iSX ydde| OQJ](Bdrnb*Z "ٯU鬲Lq?8c2zT=f6qI N_vf҉}W|0aT+[T7]_  *۱&Y::e?. xZئV.*;/zS(ӖZXp0eA D}2:ʚ^DNt2]=~BoZw7ρ[ hLm3⍛ݰ v.eC?36KY<^: 8TF S}JV\,B6iI*(܃0s>b)6uIr13FK$PO檸mnhQ+7Pt@WCFT q(R\, boV|A%o8#9[6l ]/XVUeu O;v,fM)+{!Fjb怕gZ1+[7|䵬oX wph/94 s([4t-lv8x@$߭\ڽlLDm;',Ƌ۪^JH$v/ki4b5b J3numjL.Pgzֹz;D},x}f;+vLJk2T 1̲3#p 5Mx{>w48*X0ȉ'7c;R i+$TuYf{x S{_Ei/R }y9E @xӂX|Qm'^c5NJ\Jz)ي-݅LwSTL27}bZ{(j|'i1SiԎ6ʦ5>s+,`G3tߝKOxwɮHHf: ףrN57gɛ t,+*5M짂[_]SL(XVnVuҘfc8Ŷz9-q<KI\i(lŒh8zt&y\tAfB %t,l7K(zоd Ve%+&:MåqW%4`jd~*"v5e#6ÞVؿ^IӜ)ͭaavudic 4tdk o%z{N[h@Υ*[tG/2H^xaf|ӝH]\7CPy䋼tƒ46\ b|_GMbqYI_xHӋ e38m[gh\MIԘp/sӂJ+bފ4!ZU(LkGaK 1 je ){/iKY\>ǝ "Zd@=f]J:X[-wC S-6] Xahl\B>6 1ZU ep2hg%nxZ}dP? G)ɣ'#A0,mZeR[r/ &KnnJE%%Hb?]YD bRJdUSN l3 Mˎè4tX ~ir,Km:RHT>b_/&C2(Ҍ9ܞl/-$3HD-7>PbLXGVLbrƶMC[j=Ci ]t/ѦIi6ׄmoOͽ6s\vtj%q R|ή&=j5:^qU+K[t+_ʼ຀]H[[CKtxuLdλiܙks.$WQe]fBew` r8g,BWG1x.) X$rHK+I^@y) $sDDk29bjV`1A? xWjVSF~Kq嘧f7>O"Z%B4F5o8AquwYP:܎̒EMC}39W1c| ƻEr6撜i^-mx[T2͕Ɏ5)t8AӖ,x`"V|{{*j3/w0w1a [ę 3)ox-ӵb'8C֫]?Uz~U]`hHbU79*)aA0#uӻ>]fn=/[GhC},In ê SԉV\b(e2)Riht ?@e.:'\"M ڟse Cwdž,.I[Pz@o?9J,Y}]|h7j7PqmІCV]B;,H"]Db'Լ_zW/֭E(K,GS*,hm]&j q'O 0#ŞOj׭EvJNݚ{ŻR|lMgU@nhi.bH“s4ܒv] r$=T-Q;78kj j DQ0cwqc5(; 9㚷zL}`~΄ү"1ѻxB>&x(Rm ط? LZE@oEs c,3MFl,T4ijF w9Cb!f!.t4<(u '+ј=嶜d2G ̠.12`aDzS|(\.r9CS?Y`cIyE3 c|M*]K銝W`iJ+-KQre+߭*ÂӼLax_xKшpfVMc7.;4% \ЅW ;Øv GBYQ~ދύ֛t"2zWYk 4iZ#KYA8]' 0^㿵* RN)^JTy„RKZ8#oYLH^&ϵidXf ) ijHb@GgJ[R+ɄAM5]Se/aU:[ iZOw?Ң g *ʈ8Y14W7 O+^!X҃Zr[ 9.@cF^%pu=RI/SzdUxdX(Q.M{bcGSJ'̉ ?KYArՎxn[MXVYVrBs khРQO;Or ˖ lsKΖ5WKԙ`D<,`@%M='NMQD>⥷ p4É&KIɺ{/UT2&ӱNv/{Lb,Tu?mypapДh3czҪSa9\;$گBER3-6і(GM,5WhOc ܠ\wz4~ޛyDSVN雐nEj#|{Uë~\s6prhE~ksBٮ~n},6"5Q7t0rK(|hjo<%qdGH}lIخxr*y[ dS\AG ǨWi~![%rаd i'=֠5ُl/v0[COAn[L, ј|esw}gF 9yw6/:.7k~㲑 [*JQR3#sξ_$(ŝSHw͸;\ \UEm\:i+Us/GR1yjeu`߬N>N5] xݷ$Y+hG޾l =R=8 Ywe6{20/[*-}μ}`.2>,G榋) ;b#5BC:UV/̾-֝~uI]53NNos1JP1%h*!__a
    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1