Conscience of a Conservative
4/5
()
About this ebook
Read more from Barry M. Goldwater
Conscience of a Conservative (Rediscovered Books): With linked Table of Contents Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Conscience of a Conservative Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Conscience of a Conservative Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Conscience of a Conservative
Related ebooks
The Libertarian Mind: A Manifesto for Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Conservative: Knowing What to Keep Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Libertarianism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Conscience of a Conservative Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Conservatism: An Invitation to the Great Tradition Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5American Awakening: Identity Politics and Other Afflictions of Our Time Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Centrist Solution: How We Made Government Work and Can Make It Work Again Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreedom in Chains: The Rise of the State and the Demise of the Citizen Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unjust: Social Justice and the Unmaking of America Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5God and Man at Yale: The Superstitions of 'Academic Freedom' Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Closing of the American Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Problem with Socialism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Free Market Revolution: How Ayn Rand's Ideas Can End Big Government Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Liberalism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reflections on the Revolution in France Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Indispensable Milton Friedman: Essays on Politics and Economics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommon Sense Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Witness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Up From Liberalism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Omnipotent Government Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Russell Kirk's Concise Guide to Conservatism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Libertarian Reader: Classic and Contemporary Writings from Lao Tzu to Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Age of Entitlement: America Since the Sixties Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hayek's The Road to Serfdom: A Brief Introduction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Federalist Papers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Exit Right: The People Who Left the Left and Reshaped the American Century Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Stakes: America at the Point of No Return Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Public Policy For You
Love Your Enemies: How Decent People Can Save America from the Culture of Contempt Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5No Visible Bruises: What We Don’t Know About Domestic Violence Can Kill Us Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Blow Up a Pipeline: Learning to Fight in a World on Fire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Facing Reality: Two Truths about Race in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Short History of Reconstruction [Updated Edition] Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Prepare for Climate Change: A Practical Guide to Surviving the Chaos Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reefer Madness: Sex, Drugs, and Cheap Labor in the American Black Market Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Walkable City: How Downtown Can Save America, One Step at a Time Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Least of Us: True Tales of America and Hope in the Time of Fentanyl and Meth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dreamland: The True Tale of America's Opiate Epidemic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nobody: Casualties of America's War on the Vulnerable, from Ferguson to Flint and Beyond Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capital in the Twenty-First Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Talking to My Daughter About the Economy: or, How Capitalism Works--and How It Fails Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Chasing the Scream: The Inspiration for the Feature Film "The United States vs. Billie Holiday" Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Truth About COVID-19: Exposing The Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Just Mercy: a story of justice and redemption Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Affluent Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Price We Pay: What Broke American Health Care--and How to Fix It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bowling Alone: Revised and Updated: The Collapse and Revival of American Community Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Diversity Delusion: How Race and Gender Pandering Corrupt the University and Undermine Our Culture Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Men without Work: Post-Pandemic Edition (2022) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5It's Even Worse Than You Think: What the Trump Administration Is Doing to America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Horsemen of the Apocalypse: The Men Who Are Destroying Life on Earth—And What It Means for Our Children Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Conscience of a Conservative
11 ratings5 reviews
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An important little book. The cold warmonger pages (last section only) are outdated, but the rest of the book is a refreshing discourse, whether you agree or not is hardly the question. You just don't hear politicians speak like that anymore - and you won't be able to listen to them in the same way anymore either...
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Coming from a moderate, left-leaning political perspective this was surprisingly refreshing. Goldwater is neither or , but rather elegantly to the point and makes truth not political correctness his aim in this concise piece. I certainly did not agree with all the points Goldwater made-for instance that everyone, regardless of income level, should be taxed the exact same- but I certainly respected him for holding and defending his principles. Additionally it is interesting to see how Goldwater was much in favor of integrating schools back in the 60s but his point of contention was that it was illegal for the federal government to force that. The weaker parts of Goldwater's book is that he seems to be married to his libertarian philosophy to a fault. Refreshing and good for anyone needing a change of pace to their regular political leanings.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I thought this was an excellent book! I believe it is a great read for anyone who wants to learn more about the conservative point of view on a variety of policies and issues.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Another great installment in the series about Jacky Faber, ship's boy, fine lady, privateer, and possible slave? This completely unbelievable adventure (really, how much trouble can one girl get into?) is highly entertaining. L. A. Meyer has no trouble keeping up the status quo with Jacky's misadventures and does not disappoint in the fourth book of the series.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Of these five tales, four of them are bone-chillingly good. My favorite is "Witches Hallow," and then the title piece. The only reason the book didn't earn the full five stars was that weak last story.
Book preview
Conscience of a Conservative - Barry M. Goldwater
Conscience of a Conservative
©2014 Wilder Publications
Cover image © Can Stock Photo Inc. / patrimonio
All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner without written permission except for brief quotations for review purposes only.
ISBN: 978-1-63384-202-1
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: The Conscience of a Conservative
Chapter 2: The Perils of Power
Chapter 3: States' Rights
Chapter 4: And Civil Rights
Chapter 5: Freedom for the Farmer
Chapter 6: Freedom for Labor
Chapter 7: Taxes and Spending
Chapter 8: The Welfare State
Chapter 9: Some Notes on Education
Chapter 10: The Soviet Menace
CHAPTER ONE
The Conscience of a Conservative
I have been much concerned that so many people today with Conservative instincts feel compelled to apologize for them. Or if not to apologize directly, to qualify their commitment in a way that amounts to breast-beating. Republican candidates,
Vice President Nixon has said, should be economic conservatives, but conservatives with a heart.
President Eisenhower announced during his first term, I am conservative when it comes to economic problems but liberal when it comes to human problems.
Still other Republican leaders have insisted on calling themselves progressive
Conservatives.* These formulations are tantamount to an admission that Conservatism is a narrow, mechanistic economic theory that may work very well as a bookkeeper’s guide, but cannot be relied upon as a comprehensive political philosophy.
[*This is a strange label indeed: It implies that ordinary
Conservatism is opposed to progress. Have we forgotten that America made its greatest progress when Conservative principles were honored and preserved.]
The same judgment, though in the form of an attack rather than an admission, is advanced by the radical camp. We liberals,
they say, are interested in people. Our concern is with human beings, while you Conservatives are preoccupied with the preservation of economic privilege and status.
Take them a step further, and the Liberals will turn the accusations into a class argument: it is the little people that concern us, not the malefactors of great wealth.
Such statements, from friend and foe alike, do great injustice to the Conservative point of view. Conservatism is not an economic theory, though it has economic implications. The shoe is precisely on the other foot: it is Socialism that subordinates all other considerations to man’s material well-being. It is Conservatism that puts material things in their proper place—that has a structured view of the human being and of human society, in which economics plays only a subsidiary role.
The root difference between the Conservatives and the Liberals of today is that Conservatives take account of the whole man, while the Liberals tend to look only at the material side of man’s nature. The Conservative believes that man is, in part, an economic, an animal creature; but that he is also a spiritual creature with spiritual needs and spiritual desires. What is more, these needs and desires reflect the superior side of man’s nature, and thus take precedence over his economic wants. Conservatism therefore looks upon the enhancement of man’s spiritual nature as the primary concern of political philosophy. Liberals, on the other hand,—in the name of a concern for human beings
—regard the satisfaction of economic wants as the dominant mission of society. They are, moreover, in a hurry. So that their characteristic approach is to harness the society’s political and economic forces into a collective effort to compel progress.
In this approach, I believe they fight against Nature.
Surely the first obligation of a political thinker is to understand the nature of man. The Conservative does not claim special powers of perception on this point, but he does claim a familiarity with the accumulated wisdom and experience of history, and he is not too proud to learn from the great minds of the past.
The first thing he has learned about man is that each member of the species is a unique creature. Man’s most sacred possession is his individual soul—which has an immortal side, but also a mortal one. The mortal side establishes his absolute differentness from every other human being. Only a philosophy that takes into account the essential differences between men, and, accordingly, makes provision for developing the different potentialities of each man can claim to be in accord withNature. We have heard much in our time about the common man.
It is a concept that pays little attention to the history of a nation that grew great through the initiative and ambition of uncommon men. The Conservative knows that to regard man as part of an undifferentiated mass is to consign him to ultimate slavery.
Secondly, the Conservative has learned that the economic and spiritual aspects of man’s nature are inextricably intertwined. He cannot be economically free, or even economically efficient, if he is enslaved politically; conversely, man’s political freedom is illusory if he is dependent for his economic needs on the State.
The Conservative realizes, thirdly, that man’s development, in both its spiritual and material aspects, is not something that can be directed by outside forces. Every man, for his individual good and for the good of his society, is responsible for his owndevelopment. The choices that govern his life are choices that he must make: they cannot be made by any other human being, or by a collectivity of human beings. If the Conservative is less anxious than his Liberal brethren to increase Social Security benefits,
it is because he is more anxious than his Liberal brethren that people be free throughout their lives to spend their earnings when and as they see fit.
So it is that Conservatism, throughout history, has regarded man neither as a potential pawn of other men, nor as a part of a general collectivity in which the sacredness and the separate identity of individual human beings are ignored. Throughout history, true Conservatism has been at war equally with autocrats and with democratic
Jacobins. The true Conservative was sympathetic with the plight of the hapless peasant under the tyranny of the French monarchy. And he was equally revolted at the attempt to solve that problem by a mob tyranny that paraded under the banner of egalitarianism. The conscience of the Conservative is pricked by anyone who would debase the dignity of the individual human being. Today, therefore, he is at odds with dictators who rule by terror, and equally with those gentler collectivists who ask our permission to play God with the human race.
With this view of the nature of man, it is understandable that the Conservative looks upon politics as the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals that is consistent with the maintenance of social order. The Conservative is the first to understand that the practice of freedom requires the establishment of order: it is impossible for one man to be free if another is able to deny him the exercise of his freedom. But the Conservative also recognizes that the political power on which order is based is a self-aggrandizing force; that its appetite grows with eating. He knows that the utmost vigilance and care are required to keep political power within its proper bounds.
In our day, order is pretty well taken care of. The delicate balance that ideally exists between freedom and order has long since tipped against freedom practically everywhere on earth. In some countries, freedom is altogether down and order holds absolute sway. In our country the trend is less far advanced, but it is well along and gathering momentum every day. Thus, for the American Conservative, there is no difficulty in identifying the day’s overriding political challenge: it is to preserve and extend freedom. As he