John Morgan, Fool or Fraudster

By Alan Power

A Dissertation regarding the abuse of author Alan Power and his work by a criminal called John Morgan for his disgusting commercial ends

• Language: English
• Publisher: PROBITY PRESS LTD
• Release date: Sep 11, 2014
• ISBN: 9780957573864

Book preview

JOHN MORGAN: FOOL OR FRAUDSTER

A Dissertation

Alan Power

Copyright © Alan Power 2014

Probity Press Ltd

8 St George’s Street, Douglas, Isle of Man, IM1 1AH

www.probitypress.com

The right of Alan Power to be identified as the author of the work has been asserted herein in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved.

This eBook is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, resold, hired out or otherwise circulate without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser.

ISBN 978-0-957573-87-1

JOHN MORGAN: FOOL OR FRAUDSTER?

INTRODUCTION

Responding to Morgan makes me feel unclean despite only defending the truth; it seems sordid replying to such personal abuse. But I must answer this nasty man, otherwise you may never know the truth and British enlightenment about their supposed democracy will remain muted; MI6 will win the day.

0n 29th November 2013 John Morgan from Australia, who began releasing his boring and useless books about Diana in 2006 (The same year he claimed to begin writing), took the opportunity to publish a criminal assault against the Princess Diana Conspiracy and concomitantly re-launch his books. He calls it a review. I believe you will see it as a vicious and felonious stratagem.

Let us focus on the main issues; why did Morgan write this disgusting tirade of abuse in his so called review when it is easy to prove it is embedded with gargantuan and unadulterated lies about the The Princess Diana Conspiracy and me. Morgan says I am a liar, false, deceptive; these disgusting and false comments needed my response.

He says I manufacture and alter evidence and my book is falsely stated to have been written over a decade. This is all an insulting and abusive pack of lies as I prove in this dissertation. But on what basis does Morgan present these banal and false statements. There isn’t any evidence because it isn’t true so, once more, it will have come from Morgan’s baseless opinions or deliberate corruption. The different evidence I utilize is from these three years of work that I did (2003-2006) before Morgan began copying down inquest transcript detail in 2007 that he agrees is corrupt. This is the crucial, earlier evidence that the inquests avoided or sanitised but that I use to criticise and question the inquest’s position. It is what makes my book so dangerous because I have the means to challenge the inquests and why MI6 want it in the bin. Morgan calls this evidence my Power Constructs because he doesn’t possess it so he says it’s false.

With the advent of The Princess Diana Conspiracy Morgan’s entourage saw an opportunity to use my book’s success to advertise their failed rubbish; attack me and gain some attention or remain in obscurity. They knew The Princess Diana Conspiracy achieves what Morgan set out to achieve but miserably failed to do. Morgan’s books haven’t withstood scrutiny and you would continue to reject them as you have for eight years, but he might entice people into buying some. If police challenge him, he will claim honest mistakes and hope to remain unscathed. But Morgan is either oblivious to his books being useless or is keen to assist MI6 whose prime objective is to destroy me and my book, thus denying justice for Diana. He also doesn’t realise that his books don’t improve with age but become even less relevant.

The majority of my book’s interposed errors were corrected in the eBook two weeks before Morgan’s corrupt review was even published (please later note the reasons for these errors). He needed to persuade you there was justification for writing his vile tirade of abuse in order to be exculpated from your denunciation. He knew people wouldn’t tolerate the abuse of those who genuinely seek justice for Diana. This attack from Morgan’s entourage reduces the effect of a book that seriously disturbs the establishment; he has no interest in justice but seeks, with his co-conspirators, to build his bank balance. But as you read, please follow the logic that this attack embraces yet another facet; it reeks of MI6 and their sordid ways. MI6 support Morgan because he extolls their views; it’s all he has (i.e. he supports the flawed inquests). He