Earth Has a Cold Heart

By Neil Christianson

ELIJAH’S MESSAGE

The Book of Mormon teaches the New World’s native population descended from an immigrant Jewish tribe. So the Mayan, who see the Zodiac changing on 21 December 2012 (Newton says 2060), must be a remnant of that tribe. A tribe that brought with it knowledge of the ancient condensed model—the one used by biblical prophets to forecast future events. So, out of curiosity, let’s update the old condensed model to today’s knowledge of the physical characteristics of the primary constituents in molecular clouds and see where it leads.

We know planetary bodies condense in molecular clouds containing hydrogen, helium and ice-coated dust. But for hydrogen to condense, it must radiate heat to the background temperature of space (3 Kelvin). Under normal conditions, hydrogen condenses to a liquid at 20 Kelvin; but if cooled to 9 Kelvin (molecular cloud temperature) it goes directly to a solid, whose molecules are free to rotate, thus, giving it a fluid quality. Solidification gives up heat that radiates to the surface of the molecular cloud and on to the vast heat sink of space. Once lost that heat cannot be regained, so hydrogen stays in a quasi-solid form. A solidifying frenzy builds a gigantic ball of ice-coated dust particles incased in quasi-solid hydrogen, which is permeated with entrapped helium. Solid hydrogen is a refrigerant, so through a series of warming periods and Ice Ages a condensed planet pumps its hydrogen core down to a temperature just above absolute zero—to its metallic state.

Of further interest, at 2.17 Kelvin entrapped helium becomes a superfluid that conducts heat perfectly—heat in is equal to heat out. Also, its constant superfluid movement orchestrates the growth of a pure hydrogen crystal deep in the condensing body. That pure hydrogen crystal constitutes a natural nuclear reactor. So to continue, we must look to the physics of nuclear reactions. Under ever increasing pressure an atom in an innermost hydrogen-hydrogen molecule captures its electron to become a neutron. The original molecule then becomes a deuterium atom. Two deuterium atoms join to form a molecule, whose fusion expels a good amount of heat, which is whisked away by superfluid helium to the planet’s surface; but, the major heat producer (5 times greater than deuterium-deuterium fusion) is the fusion of a deuterium-tritium molecule—a fusion that powers stars. Unfortunately, when this type of fusion takes place in a small planetary body, its cold fusion furnace goes thermonuclear blowing that planet apart—leaving naught behind but a telltale dust ring. Gamma-ray bursts from such explosions occur daily from wholly random directions in the sky.

Now, an explosion of a planet in our galaxy is of no real consequence to life on Earth; but, if in our solar system its gamma-rays will kill bacteria needed for life—triggering mass extinctions. In their observation of Quetzalcoatl, their feathered serpent (known to us as Venus, who has a surface temperature greater than that of a self-cleaning oven—undoubtedly caused by fusion), Mayan astronomers foresaw a change to the world’s zodiac. His explosion is prophesied to be seen from Israel; so, let’s review what Immanuel said about the last days by reading Mathew, chapter 24, 15-30 and Mark, chapter 13, 14-26; then, consider what will happen when Venus blows. Gamma rays will hit half the Earth’s surface in an irregular pattern, because some rays will be blocked by debris. We will have to hurry to mountain caves to escape incoming debris. The debris cloud will block the Sun’s light and, in turn, the moon will be dark. When chunks of debris near Earth their reflected light will look like the stars of heaven are falling.

Now, by simply considering the existence of the 360 degree acceleration of horizontal gravity in the geodesists’ flattening equation, the above condensed model becomes a viable alternative to the current hot-core model.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Neil Christianson
• Release date: Mar 10, 2010
• ISBN: 9781452403175

Neil Christianson

Neil B. Christianson (an 80 year old veteran of the Korean con¬flict) obtained his engineering de¬gree from Seattle University—a Jesuit school. He re¬tired after a successful aerospace engineering ca¬reer in 1988. He and his wife, "Dodo," now live in Peoria Ari-zona, where he continues to work on a cold-core model for all planetary bodies.Earth sciences piqued his interest, during the heady days of moon walks, when he was chief engineer for the Titan II weapon system. For years he tried unsuccessfully to define an Earth-machine with a hot-core to answer surface observations. However, early models defied consistent definition—all the parts would not mesh. In an attempt to fathom this in-consistency, he set his mind theory free; but, held fast to known physical facts. This shifted his quest to the basic con¬stituents of molecular clouds—wherein stars and planets are known to grow.Article searches led him to the unique physi¬cal characteristics of quantum solid hydrogen, compressed ice and superfluid helium. He blends these characteristics into a working sys-tem's definition of a naturally formed heat pump, whose ex¬pansion and contraction strokes fit well with surface observa¬tions

Book preview

Earth Has a Cold Heart

by

Neil B. Christianson

Copyright Neil B. Christianson 2010

SMASHWORDS EDITION

All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the above publisher of this book.

This book is nonfiction. The concepts expressed herein are solely those of the author. They are not supported or approved by any government agency, private institute or religious organization.

Smashwords Edition License Notes

This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each person you share it with. If you're reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then you should return to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the author's work.

Published by Neil B. Christianson

On SMASHWORDS

I dedicate this book to my wife, Dodo, who has put up with my obsession for over 57 years.

ISBN 978-1-4524-0317-5

Earth Has a Cold Heart Copyright © 2010

by Neil B Christianson

*****

CONTENTS

Introduction

1. The Scientists’ Conspiracy

2. Finally, An Open Window

3. Magnetic Fields

4. A look at gravitational accelerations

5. An Updated Descartes' Model

6. Closing of the Age

7. Speculation and Mythology

8. As Of Olden Times

Disconnect Summary

AUTHOR

*****

INTRODUCTION

Up until the end of the eighteenth century, science and religion were as one. All that changed with Immanuel Kant's new theory—a solar system formed through gravitational attraction. But, theorists may have acted to hastily in their acceptance of Kant’s theory, because today, demonstrated physical characteristics of hydrogen, helium and ice-coated dust breathe life back into the René Descartes’ ancient condensed model.

Resurrection of the condensed model owes its life to the fine work of progressive thinking scientists, who have written extensively on their research and theoretical speculations. Their work first piqued my interest in 1972, the year a complimentary copy of Continents Adrift arrived from Scientific American. I was taken with its articles and read them over and over. What especially struck me was the honesty of the scientists, who meticulously pointed out where physical facts failed to track with their theories.

Now, I am not a physicist or a scientist, but I am an aerospace engineer. As such, I am accustomed to working with empirical data, derived from diligent observation of physical phenomena. Yet, I've found through experience that when a system fails to act as defined, the basic definition of the overall system may be at fault. The current hot-core model of Earth's interior, I contend, is an errant system's definition. The hot-core model takes into account most aspects of observed physical facts, such as, the strong physical evidence of volcanism, but fails to answer questions posed by seismic wave patterns. Seismic wave velocities are known to increase directly with the density of the material they pass through. Yet at Earth's mid-radius, their speeds drop off drastically. However, theorists tell us that density continues to increase—all the way through the inner core. Some speculate the density of the inner core increases to more than one and a half times the density of iron, which is said to occupy the core. They base their conclusions not on laboratory demonstrated results, but rely solely on previously advanced theories.

Theories are but speculative extrapolations. As such, they deserve to be challenged over and over as new evidence is brought to light or thinking evolves to shake their credibility. Today's web of accepted planetary formation theories account for a good part of the observed physical phenomena. Yet, always there remains some disconnect or some area of study yet to be investigated. Disconnects thread their way through speculative answers to: Why is the Earth layered? Why did the dinosaurs die? Why has the Earth gone through so many violent upheavals? What brings on Ice Ages? What drives the magnetic field? What spreads ocean crust? What stops lava flows? And, what moves tectonic plates? Can a single causal system be found to provide a unified answer for these questions—or must we live with disconnects?

After many readings of Continents Adrift, I sensed the combined phenomena, exhibited by the seismic Earth-machine, harbored a definable, single causal system. A system that obeys the laws of physics, fits well with observations, and pulls most all disconnects neatly into a unified whole. Then one morning, I awoke from a dream of a cold-cored Earth-machine to answer those disconcerting disconnects that hampered my total acceptance of the hot-core model. But, my cold-cored Earth-machine flew in the face of obvious physical evidence—volcanism. I thought about this problem for some months until one night I had another dream. In this dream, I strolled through my mind's library. To my dismay, my mind's library had many empty shelves. I took this as a sign that I had much reading to do before I could totally define a cold-cored Earth-machine.

Now, I am not the first to have such dreams. René Descartes relates when he lay down to sleep on November 10, 1619, he was still filled with excitement and completely absorbed by the thought of having discovered that very day the foundations of a marvelous science. His discovery that day had been in the field of mathematics. However, Descartes was a firm believer in the Church approved, creation model of planetary bodies condensed from dirty universal ether. He meditated frequently on this subject and I believe his dreams that night show his deep belief in the condensation process. His belief is also reflected in his layered cross section of the Earth, which was developed before seismic wave data became available; his innermost core was composed of star-like matter, the shell above the core was of dense matter, above the dense matter shell was a metallic crust, above the metallic crust was water and then gas, which was all enclosed in a stony crust.

In the course of that night he had three consecutive dreams. In his first dream, he allegedly saw shrouded bodies (ghosts) swirling about him as he walked through the streets. He was so horrified by the vision that he had to bend over on his left side in order to reach his objective, for he felt a very great weakness in his right side and was unable to hold himself up. Ashamed at having to walk in this fashion, he made a great effort to straighten himself, but he was struck by a violent wind. The wind seized him like a whirlwind and made him spin around three or four times on his left foot. It was not this, however, that frightened him most. He found it was so difficult to advance that he was afraid of falling at every step. The gates to a college appeared and he entered to seek refuge and help his affliction. He tried to reach the college chapel, where he hoped to pray, but, realizing that he had passed by an acquaintance without greeting him, he wished, out of politeness, to turn back. But, his attempts to do so were frustrated by the violence of the wind, which was drawing him toward the chapel. He then spotted another man in the college courtyard, who called out to him, Mr. Descartes, if you are seeking Mr. N..., I have something for him. Descartes thought it was a melon from some exotic land. He was astonished that the man stood upright, as did the people who had gathered around the man, whereas on the same spot he had to walk unsteadily, canted over to his left, because of the wind that had several times threatened to throw him over.

Another dream followed the first after several hours of fitful sleeplessness. He thought he heard a shrill and violent report, which he took to be a thunderclap. Terrified, he opened his eyes to a room filled with a multitude of fiery sparks. This dream had occurred a number of times before this night, so he did not find it as frightening as his first. Soon after he had a third dream, which was not so terrible as the other two.

In this last dream he found a book on his table. Not knowing who had placed it there, he opened it and was delighted to see that it was a dictionary. He thought it might be very useful to him. The next instant another book was there, just as new to him as the first and its origin equally unknown. It was a collection of poems by different authors, titled Corpus Poet arum, etc. He was curious to find out what it contained, and on opening the book he saw the line Quod vitae sectabor iter? At the same time he saw a man, who he did not know, who showed him a poem beginning with the words Est et non, and extolled its excellence. Descartes told him that he knew the poem, which was among the idylls of Ausonius and it was included in the big collection of poems which lay on his table. He wanted to show it to the man and began turning the pages, boasting that he knew the arrangement and order perfectly. As he was looking for the place, the man asked him where he got the book. Descartes answered that he could not tell him how he came by the book, but a second before he had had in his hands another book, which had just disappeared, without his knowing who had brought it or who had taken it away again. He had hardly finished speaking when the book reappeared at the other side of the table. He noticed, however, that the dictionary was no longer complete, though earlier it had appeared to be so. Meanwhile he found the poems of Ausonius in the anthology of poets, which he was running through; but, being unable to find the poem beginning Est et non, he told the man that he knew an even more beautiful poem by the same author, beginning Quod vitae sectabor iter? The man begged to let him see it, and Descartes was diligently looking for it when he came upon a number of small portraits—copperplate engravings—which made him exclaim at the beauty of the book; but, it was not the same edition as the one he knew; whereupon the man and the two books vanished.

You may be wondering what dreams have to do with science? You will learn as you read Earth Has A Cold Heart that Descartes' dreams track well with the condensation and solidification of hydrogen, helium and ice-coated dust—three main constituents of molecular clouds. Descartes frequently pondered how it all came to be. Therefore, I believe his first dream to be a brief encapsulation of the condensation of the parental molecular cloud into shrouded orbs freely whirling about. The strong wind of his dream is the birth of the Sun (Chapel or pagan home of God). Although in his dream the wind appears to blow toward the Sun not away from it, it may be that he was drawn toward the newborn Sun by a force he was as yet unaware of—Newton's gravity. He himself was the Earth, which is tilted over on its spin axis. The melon was the Moon which the Earth carries with it on its orbit around the Sun. The acquaintance passed by was one of Earth's neighboring planets passing by in space.

His second dream represents a universe made up of many stars (galaxies) that we perceive only as specks of light—sparks that twinkle.

His third dream let him know he could not obtain the information to draw a complete picture of a solar system. Unlike my dream of a bare-shelved library that could be filled with diligent study, Descartes was shown an incomplete dictionary and a book of poems, yet to be written.

Now, some forty years after my affliction with the cold-cored Earth-machine—after many hours of studies in geology, astronomy and cosmology; pouring over the findings of space probes; a review of ancient mythology and psychic readings; an immersion into particle physics to learn how matter is put together; and a number of early morning refinements of my original Earth-machine model—I stand secure enough to offer you a universal model for cold-cored planetary bodies. I call my model the updated Descartes' model, because it builds on his model. To understand my new model you need only basic physics and mathematics, with which to grasp the physical characteristics of hydrogen, helium and ice. Their physical characteristics have been thoroughly demonstrated at high pressures and low temperatures, so my model requires no additional testing to justify its design. However, only you can judge its feasibility.

Chapters 1, 2 and 3, review man's progress in Earth science and astronomy. Chapters 4, 5, 6 and 7, combine demonstrated physical characteristics of hydrogen, helium and ice into processes that build galaxies, solar systems and our planet Earth. Chapters 8, uses ancient creation tales to reveal the knowledge of the ancients. If you are well versed in the history of scientific discovery, you can skim reading through to Chapter 4.

*****

CHAPTER 1

THE SCIENTISTS’ CONSPIRACY

In solitary laboratories scientists strive to find the true nature of things. Their dedication fills me with awe. It is with heavy heart, then, that I make bold to accuse them of duplicity. A harsh charge you say? Yes. But, duplicity seems the only word to describe their conspiracy to down play scientific disconnects that go contrary to the total acceptance of their planetary body formation theories; theories that replaced the ancient condensed cold-core model that was last taught by René Descartes (1596-1650). In their disjointed collection of theories, I include the Big Bang that is alleged to have created all matter, the gathering together of that matter into galaxies, and the gravitational collapse of molecular clouds to form the stars, planets and moons of solar systems. By either setting aside or stretching the laws of physics they knowingly overlook, by my count, twenty-six scientific disconnects. So convinced are they of their model's infallibility that they gloss over a growing wealth of evidence that the ancient process of condensation plays a vital role in the collapse of a molecular cloud.

Their conspiracy began on the eve of the nineteenth century. Freedoms won around the world in bloody revolutions broke traditional God-Kingship alliances. This break stirred scientist's sentiments toward wresting science from the clutches of the Church. But to break totally from the Church, scientists needed a new set of theories for solar system formation; one that could counter the old condensed model. A rush of wild, speculation ruled the day—as many new ideas as were those burgeoning Protestant sects. And, like Protestant sects, scientists itched to achieve complete autonomy.

Because of his fellow scientists' drive toward autonomy, Pierre Simon de Laplace¹ tossed sleeplessly. He, the world's greatest mathematician, was being pressed to choose between the Church approved model of a solar system condensed from an ether—an ancient idea that had been taught for over 5000 years—or break with his Church and State to throw his scientific weight behind Immanuel Kant’s model driven solely by Newton's gravity. His beloved science begged to be free. His colleagues pressed for a decision. His professional standing hung in the balance. His religion tore at his soul—Laplace had trained as a cleric, so if his choice damaged his Church, its consequences would greatly trouble his soul. He expressed his apprehension with, I have lived long enough to know what I did not once believe—that no society can be upheld in happiness and honor without the sentiment of religion².

Arguments for and against thwarted his sleep. His mind raced, Had not Johannes Kepler, in 1619, vindicated Galileo's advocacy of the Copernician solar system, which now holds sway over the Church approved Ptolemaic or Earth centered system? Church elders fumed in confusion. Then, Descartes' model of a solar system, condensed and solidified from a universal ether, suffered a telling blow when in 1686 Sir Isaac Newton showed the scientific world that there was no need, as had been thought, for an ether to hold the planets in their places. His newly defined force, gravity, did the job quite well; all on its own. In response, the Church had mounted only a half-hearted response. Laplace mused, 'Newton's force is still the talk of scholars, even after one hundred years. By Newton's force, was I not able to show mathematically that a system of planets could indeed govern itself in peaceful stability without the help of God?' Now, the rumor of Kant's 1755 model, of a system formed solely by gravitational attraction, was raising havoc with the last vestiges of Descartes’ Church approved model. Is this, then, not the opportune time to free science from religion?

He closed his eyes, but his mind would not be still, "Had not Aristotle observed