Transparency in Philanthropy: An Analysis of Accountability, Fallacy, and Volunteerism
By John Tyler
()
About this ebook
Recent calls for more transparency in private philanthropy have increased the need for philanthropic organizations to carefully plan and think about what information they will release to the public and how they will do it. To help organizations answer these questions, The Philanthropy Roundtable has published a new book by noted legal scholar John Tyler, general counsel of the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, titled Transparency in Philanthropy: An Analysis of Accountability, Fallacy, and Volunteerism.
Philanthropic organizations are obligated to provide certain types of transparency—the types that are required by the federal tax system and by state laws aimed at maintaining the donor’s intent. But current heightened calls for more transparency are based on other rationales: Transparency is a good unto itself and more should be required of all institutions; more transparency is needed to further ensure that philanthropy serves “public purposes”; more transparency will counteract the “power asymmetry” between foundations and grantees; and more transparency is necessary to evaluate philanthropic effectiveness. In this book Tyler argues that none of these rationales justifies additional legally imposed philanthropic transparency, which is what advocates demand.
Even though there is not much of a legal argument for requiring more philanthropic transparency, there are good arguments for organizations being transparent on a voluntary basis. This would be not a wholesale disclosure of information but measured transparency, undertaken in light of a foundation’s mission and the potential costs that would go along with that disclosure. John Tyler’s intent in Transparency in Philanthropy is to encourage philanthropies and nonprofits to plan their transparency strategy and to do so carefully and thoughtfully.
“With increased calls for more transparency from philanthropic organizations, this book is a useful and timely resource to help organizations create and navigate their plans for transparency,” said Adam Meyerson, president of The Philanthropy Roundtable. “Every philanthropic organization should read this book and think about what might be worthy of consideration moving ahead in a world dominated by a growing appetite for information.”
In an accompanying companion guide, Tyler poses questions to the reader that help an organization create a checklist of issues to consider when making their transparency plans.
These questions include:
• What kind of organization are you? What is your mission? How large is your board and who is on it?
• How can your foundation benefit from disclosing more information? Do you feel a need to cultivate a better understanding of your activities in your community?
• What costs and risks will you incur in disclosing more information? How much time and money can your organization devote to disclosing information to the public? Could the information unfairly harm the reputations of your grantees?
• What benefits and costs do tools like an annual report, a full website with social media and other tools pose for publicizing information?
Read more from John Tyler
How Public is Private Philanthropy? Separating Reality from Myth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsState of the Union Addresses Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Transparency in Philanthropy
Related ebooks
Citizen Lobbyists: Local Efforts to Influence Public Policy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgenda Setting: A Wise Giver’s Guide to Influencing Public Policy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Practice of Human Development and Dignity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPublic Policy and the Internet: Privacy, Taxes, and Contract Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Philanthropy in Democratic Societies: History, Institutions, Values Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Does Policy Analysis Matter?: Exploring Its Effectiveness in Theory and Practice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSocial Movements for Good: How Companies and Causes Create Viral Change Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Duality of Social Enterprise Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCollaborative Governance: Private Roles for Public Goals in Turbulent Times Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA–Z for Nonprofit Organizations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStrategies for Governing: Reinventing Public Administration for a Dangerous Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Corporate Social Mind: How Companies Lead Social Change from the Inside Out Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings1. Uncovering the Treasures of Africa: A Guide to Documenting Indigenous Knowledge Management: 1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Worker Cooperative People Skills: Cooperation Skills for Startup, Operations, Growth and More Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Nonprofit Management Casebook: Scenes from the Frontlines Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMedia Between Culture and Commerce: An Introduction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShared Services Cooperatives: A Qualitative Study: Exploring Applications, Benefits & Potential Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCitizenship and Governance in a Changing City: Somerville, MA Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplied Wisdom for the Nonprofit Sector: Eight Practical Insights for Leaders Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCSR Corporate Social Responsibility A Complete Guide - 2021 Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNavigating The Grant Industry Handbook Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFighting Corporate Abuse: Beyond Predatory Capitalism Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Please Delete: How Leadership Hubris Ignited a Scandal and Tarnished a University Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Lobbying and Advocacy Handbook for Nonprofit Organizations, Second Edition: Shaping Public Policy at the State and Local Level Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFinancial Leadership for Nonprofit Executives: Guiding Your Organization to Long-Term Success Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of the Public Authority: Statebuilding and Economic Development in Twentieth-Century America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGoing Local: Decentralization, Democratization, and the Promise of Good Governance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Community Table: Effective Fundraising through Events Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Law For You
Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Trans: When Ideology Meets Reality Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Legal Words You Should Know: Over 1,000 Essential Terms to Understand Contracts, Wills, and the Legal System Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/58 Living Trust Forms: Legal Self-Help Guide Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Win Your Case: How to Present, Persuade, and Prevail--Every Place, Every Time Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Everything Guide To Being A Paralegal: Winning Secrets to a Successful Career! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Wills and Trusts Kit For Dummies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Estate & Trust Administration For Dummies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeath in Mud Lick: A Coal Country Fight against the Drug Companies That Delivered the Opioid Epidemic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Legal Writing in Plain English: A Text with Exercises Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Law For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The ZERO Percent: Secrets of the United States, the Power of Trust, Nationality, Banking and ZERO TAXES! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Paralegal's Handbook: A Complete Reference for All Your Daily Tasks Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Socratic Method: A Practitioner's Handbook Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Criminal Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe LLC and Corporation Start-Up Guide: Your Complete Guide to Launching the Right Business Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Executor's Guide, The: Settling a Loved One's Estate or Trust Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWith Liberty and Justice for Some: How the Law Is Used to Destroy Equality and Protect the Powerful Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of Tom Wheelwright's TaxFree Wealth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNo Stone Unturned: The True Story of the World's Premier Forensic Investigators Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Secrets of Criminal Defense Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Win In Court Every Time Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Think Like a Lawyer--and Why: A Common-Sense Guide to Everyday Dilemmas Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Everything Executor and Trustee Book: A Step-by-Step Guide to Estate and Trust Administration Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Family Trusts: A Guide for Beneficiaries, Trustees, Trust Protectors, and Trust Creators Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Transparency in Philanthropy
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Transparency in Philanthropy - John Tyler
Transparency in Philanthropy
An Analysis of Accountability, Fallacy, and Volunteerism
By John Tyler
Smashwords Edition
Copyright © 2013, The Philanthropy Roundtable. All rights reserved.
Table of Contents
Preface
Acknowledgements
Introduction
Chapter I: Philanthropic Transparency and Accountability to Government
A. Accountability to Law and the Tax Code: The Four Conditions that Underlie the Tax Treatment Compact
B. The Quid Pro Quo Fallacy: What are we Getting in Return?
C. The Misnomer of Philanthropic Stakeholders
D. Accountability to Donor Intent
Chapter II: Philanthropic Transparency in Context: Fallacies of the Four Most Common Arguments
A. Transparency for Its Own Sake
B. Transparency for the Sake of Public Benefit and Social Good
C. Transparency to Correct Purported Power Asymmetry
D. Transparency as a Tool for Measuring Effectiveness
Chapter III: Voluntary Philanthropic Transparency: Telling Your Story and Keeping the Public Trust
A. Benefits of More Expansive Voluntary Disclosure
B. Cautions Regarding Voluntary Disclosure
Conclusion
Select Bibliography and Further Reading
About the Author
About The Philanthropy Roundtable
Preface
Engaging in philanthropy, as a donor or manager, involves hard work and hard choices. But recent years have seen new difficulties for philanthropists, in the form of challenges to the legitimacy of private philanthropy itself. Philanthropy and philanthropists are said to ignore the poor, abuse the privileges that our tax system accords to charity and donors, and deny the American public its proper authority in allocating philanthropic funds. For individuals who have chosen to incur the costs of engaging in philanthropy, these charges are extremely disturbing.
The Philanthropy Roundtable, because of its commitment to private philanthropy in America, has given a high priority to examining these charges.
Whether called attacks, threats, defenses, discussions, debates, dialogue, conversations, recommendations, or suggestions, public discourse about philanthropy over the last decade and more may be characterized in part as a search for definition of how philanthropy serves and should serve, and in some cases ultimately express, America’s social, economic, and political systems. That discourse has, at times, been impaired by ambiguity of language and terminology and lack of discipline concerning principles.
In America, disagreements about values, strategies, priorities, and their relative importance are to be expected and even encouraged. It is through such disagreements that we often search.
It is to protect these disagreements and the progress they produce that our nation was and is grounded in principles and processes that foster checks and balances, federalism, separation of powers, self-determination, and liberty. Philanthropy should not be immune from such disagreements, but neither should it be a mere pawn subject to public winds and whims. Philanthropy’s relevance to our nation is too important, and its potential contributions to our future too valuable, to allow it to be relegated to marionette status. Therefore, the current disagreements about American philanthropy deserve greater clarity about guiding principles, more disciplined respect for roles and contributions, and less ambiguity about terminology.
It was with these objectives in mind that my colleague Evelyn Brody and I accepted The Philanthropy Roundtable’s 2008 invitation to write about the legal foundations of an important part of the current debate—the question of whether foundation and charity assets may properly be characterized as public money.
The question was, in one sense, merely a matter of terminology, but the words had too often begun to be applied literally, arguing these assets were public money in the strictest sense and, thus, should be subject to government or quasi-government control. What was a seemingly innocuous semantic matter had been elevated to one of material consequence.¹ The Roundtable’s invitation resulted in a monograph (now available in a second edition), a supplemental law review article, and various essays and presentations that debunked the public money
myth and, we hope, contributed to the dialogue about the philanthropic and charitable sectors.²
Another, related, charge in the debate over the legitimacy of private philanthropy is the contention that philanthropic organizations are insufficiently transparent
to public view. The present monograph examines this charge.
A major topic of contention in the current discourse has been the question of how much and what kind of transparency, openness, or disclosure should be required of philanthropic enterprises. Discussion of this question has been particularly confused and hampered by the absence of linguistic, theoretical, and even practical clarity. The goals of this monograph are similar to those of the not public money
monograph: to consider ways in which the concept of transparency
has been used in discussions about philanthropy and to propose an analytical framework for the term and the concepts it denotes. The hope is that this monograph can contribute to optimizing the potential of philanthropy by facilitating better understanding of how the term transparency
and its underlying concepts have been generally applied to philanthropy,³ including ways that both threaten and confuse. Another goal is to increase appreciation for the complex nature of the topic, the need to respect and balance competing principles, the usefulness of relative degrees of transparency, and the benefits of disciplined decision-making that takes into account financial, opportunity, and other costs.
Ultimately, it is my hope that this monograph and discussions of it can help lead to a clearer definition of and appreciation for the role of philanthropy in America’s social, economic, and political systems, particularly as transparency can facilitate or impede those roles and strengthen philanthropy’s contributions to those systems.
Acknowledgements
I am particularly thankful to David Back, Evelyn Brody, Laura Butzel, Marion Fremont-Smith, Adam Meyerson, Sue Santa, Carl Schramm, Dane Stangler, Alison Aikele Hawkins, and of course Suzi Garment for their conversations, debate, edits, and insights that contributed immensely to shaping and improving this work. I also appreciate contributions from the following participants with whom I interacted on panels at sessions on philanthropic transparency at conferences and meetings hosted by The Philanthropy Roundtable, Independent Sector, and the Aspen Institute: Darin McKeever from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Andrew Schulz from the Council on Foundations and now with Foundation Source, Brad Smith from Foundation Center, Marcus Owens from Caplin & Drysdale, Christopher Gates from Philanthropy for Active Civic Engagement, Paula Ellis from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, Jack Horak from Reid and Riege, Cindy Lott from the National State Attorneys General Program at Columbia Law School, and Rick Cohen from Nonprofit Quarterly. The monograph also benefited from conversations with those present at a gathering in fall 2012 convened by the Kettering Foundation and Philanthropy for Active Civic Engagement on philanthropic transparency. Finally, the Searle Freedom Trust provided funding to the Roundtable for the publication and distribution of the monograph, and I am especially grateful for the trust’s financial and other support.
Introduction
Discussions about transparency in philanthropy have been going on since the days of Julius Rosenwald, Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and J. Howard Pew. On one hand, Rosenwald and Carnegie seemed to embrace degrees of openness if for no other reason than the fact that their modus operandi required communities to raise money to supplement funds which they committed for building schools and libraries. Julius Rosenwald wrote about and encouraged the giving away of wealth during one’s lifetime. Carnegie did the same, although some suggest that Carnegie wanted publicity
rather than openness in order to rehabilitate the harm to his reputation attributable to decisions made while building the railroad and steel industries. Rockefeller and Pew, on the other hand, seemed to desire less or no visibility for their philanthropy during their lives because of religious convictions and a desire for privacy. In each case, the discussions and decisions were essentially private, even though both Carnegie and Rosenwald publicly sought to influence how their peers and legacies approached philanthropy.
More recent discussions about transparency in philanthropy have expanded well beyond donors and their advisors. Now, the conversation occurs across a much broader spectrum that includes, and is even dominated by, policymakers and regulators at both the state and federal levels along with academics, grantees, journalists, bloggers, commentators, associations, watchdog groups, data miners, tweeters, Facebookers, and others. While such an observation suggests a pervasiveness of dialogue, it may be that donors, boards, and managers of many philanthropic enterprises have not engaged enough in the discussions, whether those that affect the field broadly or even with regard to their specific organizations.
Each of these sets of conversations—among the great industrial-age philanthropists, policymakers, media, the public, foundations, etc.—has much in common, particularly in that they all involve notions of transparency, openness, or disclosure. However, involving notions
of transparency is not the same as those notions
having commonality or being the same. The failure to recognize and address that distinction can be a significant problem for the field, for individual entities and their donors, leaders, and managers, and even for those who want to inspire transparency.
More specifically, it is likely that nearly all or at least most people would agree that there is value to be gained from degrees of transparency in philanthropy. However, that broad agreement collapses when confronted by the all-important details and realities of implementation in practice. Among these details are questions about what is expected to be open (e.g., board meetings, decision-making meetings, individual grant assessments, etc.), as determined by whom (e.g., government or private persons or entities), to what degrees or with what limitations, to what ends (e.g.,