The Philosophy of Evolution Together With a Preliminary Essay on The Metaphysical Basis of Science
()
Related to The Philosophy of Evolution Together With a Preliminary Essay on The Metaphysical Basis of Science
Related ebooks
Mental Philosophy: Including the Intellect, Sensibilities, and Will Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA System of Logic [Halls of Wisdom] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Philosophy of Right & The Philosophy of Law: Hegel's Views on Legal, Moral, Social & Political Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNatural Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Concept of Nature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA System of Logic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Inquiry into the Human Mind: On the Principles of Common Sense Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntroduction to Logic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ontology, or the Theory of Being Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Christ Science of Being Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCosmic symbolism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Hegel's Phenomenology of Mind: System of Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Phenomenology of Mind: System of Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rise of Scientific Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Phenomenology of Mind Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mind and the Brain: Being the Authorised Translation of L'Âme et le Corps Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCreative Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Concept of Mind Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Thinking Universe: Energy Is Thought Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Twelve Part Lecture Series Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnalysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Science of Human Nature A Psychology for Beginners Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYorick's World: Science and the Knowing Subject Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Principles of Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMetaphysical Foundations of Natural Science by Immanuel Kant - Delphi Classics (Illustrated) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Critical History of Greek Philosophy [Halls of Wisdom] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScience and Philosophy - A Fresh Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntuition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for The Philosophy of Evolution Together With a Preliminary Essay on The Metaphysical Basis of Science
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Philosophy of Evolution Together With a Preliminary Essay on The Metaphysical Basis of Science - Stephen H. (Stephen Haskins) Carpenter
Project Gutenberg's The Philosophy of Evolution, by Stephen H. Carpenter
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
Title: The Philosophy of Evolution
and The Metaphysical Basis of Science
Author: Stephen H. Carpenter
Release Date: December 23, 2009 [EBook #30743]
Language: English
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE PHILOSOPHY OF EVOLUTION ***
Produced by David Edwards, Martin Pettit and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
book was produced from scanned images of public domain
material from the Google Print project.)
THE
PHILOSOPHY OF EVOLUTION
TOGETHER WITH A PRELIMINARY ESSAY ON
THE METAPHYSICAL BASIS OF SCIENCE.
TWO PAPERS
Read before The Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters at the Annual
Meetings of February, 1873 and February, 1874.
BY
STEPHEN H. CARPENTER, LL. D.,
Professor of Logic, etc., in the University of Wisconsin, and President of the
Department of Speculative Philosophy in the Wisconsin
Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters.
[Reprinted From the Academy's Transactions.]
MADISON, WIS.:
ATWOOD & CULVER, PRINTERS AND STEREOTYPERS.
1874.
THE METAPHYSICAL BASIS OF SCIENCE.
All knowledge is essentially one. The object-matter upon which intellect exerts itself, does not affect the subjective act of knowing. Physics, when stripped of that which is merely contingent, becomes metaphysics. Physical science deals with object-matter, and discusses the signs by which nature communicates her message—that is, phenomena. Metaphysical science has to do with the subject-mind, and discusses the meaning of the message. The one converts God's hieroglyphics into easily-intelligible language; the other translates this language into Idea. If this be true, there must be a unity of method in all science, however great the diversity of the object-matter investigated. This method is subjectively determined, that is, by the constitution of the mind, and not by the particular form of matter upon which intellectual energy may be exerted. If there is an essential unity in all knowledge, it is because there is a corresponding unity of method in all mental activity. It is only when we look upon what is to be known, that truth separates into sciences; but particular truths become particular sciences only under assumed relations to the whole of which they form a part.
Objectively considered, science is classified knowledge; subjectively viewed, it is the laws or principles according to which knowledge is classified. Every actor implies an act—every thinker a thought. We may therefore universally make this dual classification, according as we view the mental operation involved, or the attributes of objects which form the subject of thought. The possibility of science is conditioned upon the possibility of classification. Mere knowledge is not science, as the world ought to have learned by costly experience. Even classified knowledge may not be science; it becomes science not through previous classification, but in the act of being classified, and therefore only as the principle of classification is apprehended—that is, only as the particular application of the law of generalization is distinctly recognized. A man may know a book and know nothing more; he knows the science only when he is capable of making the book for himself. Mere knowledge thus differs from science in that the one is held only by the apprehensive powers of the mind, while the other passes beyond these into the reflective or ratiocinative. Pure science, then, must be wholly abstract. The forms and substances of Nature with which the scientific student deals, are only the discrete figures of the young mathematician, to be thrown aside with advancing knowledge. Matter is only the staff on which the mind leans, while too feeble to go alone. It is not the finely chiseled statue that renders a man a sculptor; it is the conception which is therein embodied. A day-laborer may have cut the stone, but only the artist could conceive the idea. So in science, we care but little for the particular results at which we arrive, compared with the laws, according