Audiobook9 hours
Analogia: The Emergence of Technology Beyond Programmable Control
Written by George Dyson
Narrated by Donald Corren
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
4/5
()
About this audiobook
In Analogia, technology historian George Dyson presents a startling look back at the analog age and life
before the digital revolution—and an unsettling vision of what comes next.
In 1716, the philosopher and mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz spent eight days taking the cure with
Peter the Great at Bad Pyrmont in Saxony, seeking to initiate a digitally-computed takeover of the world. In his classic
books, Darwin Among the Machines and Turing’s Cathedral, Dyson chronicled the realization of Leibniz’s dream at the
hands of a series of iconoclasts who brought his ideas to life. Now, in his pathbreaking new book, Analogia, he offers a
chronicle of people who fought for the other side—the Native American leader Geronimo and physicist Leo Szilard,
among them—a series of stories that will change our view not only of the past but also of the future.
The convergence of a startling historical archaeology with Dyson’s unusual personal story—set alternately in the
rarified world of cutting-edge physics and computer science, in Princeton, and in the rainforest of the Northwest
Coast—leads to a prophetic vision of an analog revolution already under way. We are, Dyson reveals, on the cusp of a
new moment in human history, driven by a generation of machines whose powers are beyond programmable control.
before the digital revolution—and an unsettling vision of what comes next.
In 1716, the philosopher and mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz spent eight days taking the cure with
Peter the Great at Bad Pyrmont in Saxony, seeking to initiate a digitally-computed takeover of the world. In his classic
books, Darwin Among the Machines and Turing’s Cathedral, Dyson chronicled the realization of Leibniz’s dream at the
hands of a series of iconoclasts who brought his ideas to life. Now, in his pathbreaking new book, Analogia, he offers a
chronicle of people who fought for the other side—the Native American leader Geronimo and physicist Leo Szilard,
among them—a series of stories that will change our view not only of the past but also of the future.
The convergence of a startling historical archaeology with Dyson’s unusual personal story—set alternately in the
rarified world of cutting-edge physics and computer science, in Princeton, and in the rainforest of the Northwest
Coast—leads to a prophetic vision of an analog revolution already under way. We are, Dyson reveals, on the cusp of a
new moment in human history, driven by a generation of machines whose powers are beyond programmable control.
Related to Analogia
Related audiobooks
The Knowledge Machine: How Irrationality Created Modern Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Mind at Play: How Claude Shannon Invented the Information Age Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Chip: How Two Americans Invented the Microchip and Launched a Revolution Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Internet Is Not What You Think It Is: A History, a Philosophy, a Warning Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rise of the Machines: A Cybernetic History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Technological Singularity Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Alice and Bob Meet the Wall of Fire: The Biggest Ideas in Science from Quanta Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lightness Being: Mass, Ether, and the Unification of Forces Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5AI Narratives: A History of Imaginative Thinking about Intelligent Machines Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPlato and the Nerd: The Creative Partnership of Humans and Technology Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Demon in the Machine: How Hidden Webs of Information Are Solving the Mystery of Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Introduction to Information Theory: Symbols, Signals and Noise Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Machines of Loving Grace: The Quest for Common Ground Between Humans and Robots Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tubes: A Journey to the Center of the Internet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Alignment Problem: Machine Learning and Human Values Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Pattern on The Stone: The Simple Ideas That Make Computers Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stories, Dice, and Rocks That Think: How Humans Learned to See the Future–and Shape It Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Feeling of Life Itself: Why Consciousness Is Widespread but Can't Be Computed Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Models of the Mind: How Physics, Engineering and Mathematics Have Shaped Our Understanding of the Brain Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Thinking Machines: The Quest for Artificial Intelligence--and Where It's Taking Us Next Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Transformer: The Deep Chemistry of Life and Death Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Beyond Measure: The Hidden History of Measurement from Cubits to Quantum Constants Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What Algorithms Want: Imagination in the Age of Computing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Brief History of Intelligence: Evolution, AI, and the Five Breakthroughs That Made Our Brains Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Humans Need Not Apply: A Guide to Wealth and Work in the Age of Artificial Intelligence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Computers For You
Data Science For Dummies: 2nd Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cybersecurity For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Social Engineering: The Science of Human Hacking 2nd Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Artificial Intelligence For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Artificial Intelligence: The Insights You Need from Harvard Business Review Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Once Upon an Algorithm: How Stories Explain Computing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Business Intelligence For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Hacker's Mind: How the Powerful Bend Society's Rules, and How to Bend them Back Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Do Nothing: Resisting the Attention Economy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Computational Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Elon Musk Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Dark Net: Inside the Digital Underworld Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Copywriting: How to Write Copy That Sells and Working Anywhere With Your Own Freelance Copywriting Business Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cuckoo's Egg: Tracking a Spy Through the Maze of Computer Espionage Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quantum Computing: The Transformative Technology of the Qubit Revolution Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Everybody Lies: Big Data, New Data, and What the Internet Can Tell Us About Who We Really Are Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Who's Afraid of AI?: Fear and Promise in the Age of Thinking Machines Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Web3: Charting the Internet's Next Economic and Cultural Frontier Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAI: Rise of the Lightspeed Learners Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Analogia
Rating: 3.750000071428571 out of 5 stars
4/5
14 ratings1 review
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5We have been dealing with unintended consequences of technology for hundreds of years! Yes neural networks rely on internal models we cannot immediately fathom (although actually these days there is a lot of research into probing them to visualise features they are using in their 'deliberations'- deepdream and even pixma are examples of this), this is not that far removed from dealing with the many other complex algorithms and deterministic paths in all complex software, for which there is a large and still evolving canon of methods.The real danger we are currently in with 'AI' and the IoT is the hype driven danger of premature deployment in many situations with potentially serious consequences. Also, inevitably, when the technology doesn't live up to the promises, we will have another AI winter.So is it that the algorithms are doing something other than what the people who designed them designed them to do, or just that they eliminate the need for office workers?If the former, then that's really a problem for the influencers; if the latter, it's the same problem for those being influenced as it always was. Strange that manipulation of the populace has suddenly become this terrifying problem.Anyone who works with technology, and has half a brain, knows that technology isn't even close to becoming beyond control.It's not the technology that's beyond our control, but the companies behind that technology.Programmable beyond control? This is a rather anthropomorphic view. It implies the "technology" is actively pursuing a goal.It isn't. We, the users - the people who have ultimate control, since we know where the OFF switch is - are building machines with the ability to "control" aspects of our lives (such as feeding us an endless supply of FAKE NEWS) and then we are actively setting them to do these things.Nobody has been forced to use Google or social media. Nobody is legally obliged to evade their parental responsibilities for a smartphone. Nobody HAS to let go of the steering wheel of their Telsa. We willingly allow third parties to assume control, just as we have third parties that remove our rubbish, make our takeaways and create of TV programmes (and our TVs). And neither do we feel the need to understand how to do those things, ourselves.However, we must also understand that humanity has not evolved any new intellectual powers over the past 30 years. Given that most people in the 1980s were utterly bamboozled by their video recorders and microwave ovens, it is unrealistic to suggest those same people - or their children and grandchildren - would be any more capable of setting up their Alexa, smart TV, Facebook sharing options or roomba.There are no "algorithms" in existence today that can interpret news headlines with an accuracy anywhere near what would be needed to determine market strategy. At best, modern Natural Language Processing techniques can classify the sentiment of a document (such as the title of a news article, or its content) into "positive" or "negative", etc., categories.Whether this is sufficient to change High Frequency Traders' behaviour is very doubtful. Most probably, the humans in control of the HFTs take action and modify the HFTs' settings, then the HFTs carry out the chosen strategy.In the end these machines are just designed and programmed by people...so how can they be perfect or make perfect decisions when the people who designed them are far from perfect.I barely trust the largest companies in the world to design a usable word processor or an App for booking a haircut...the idea that so many people trust the same geeks to program algorithms to run entire Govt Depts or our financial system is just bizarre.We call it "holding up the sky". Because software is everywhere. Western and Chinese lifestyles are dependent on it to get food to them, to make them electricity, to run almost everything. Much of it is badly written because it must be cheap and good enough software engineers are rare and expensive. More is badly written because no-one can make clear decisions on how it should behave for those engineers to implement. Hardware is just as bad; to be cheap enough, protocols are only half implemented. Much of it is designed by software much of that ad-hoc and difficult to use...But now, somehow, it all HAS to work.No, technology evangelism based on technology-fuelled capitalism has evolved beyond our control.It's a pity there are no modern equivalents of Leibniz. The separation of science and philosophy that has become the inevitable modern paradigm (due in part to the sheer extent and mathematical depth of modern knowledge), does not serve humanity well. This separation is best evidenced in the leading (at least most resourced) hypothesis of modern science – Multiverse Theory. What would Leibniz make of what Multiverse or the Measurement Problem might offer as a conception of the universe (or is it 'multiverse')? Might he suggest that the emperor is without clothing?