India Today

INDIA’S GROWING WEALTH DIVIDE

The rich-poor divide in India has never been a secret. If anything, it has only grown wider. The fact only got reaffirmed in a paper released recently by the World Inequality Lab, a Paris-based research organisation. The country’s top 1 per cent income and wealth shares have reached historical highs and are among the highest in the world. By FY2023, the findings reveal, the top 1 per cent of Indians held a 22.6 per cent share in the country’s income and 40 per cent of its wealth.

Inequality is said topost-Independence till the early 1980s, after which it began rising and has skyrocketed since the early 2000s, according to the paper, titled ‘Income and Wealth Inequality in India, 1922-2023: The Rise of the Billionaire Raj’. The top 1 per cent earned an average of Rs 53 lakh per annum in FY23, as much as 23 times the average Indian, who earned Rs 2.3 lakh annually. Average annual incomes for the bottom 50 per cent and the middle 40 per cent stood at Rs 71,000 (0.3 times the national average) and Rs 1.65 lakh (0.7 times the national average), respectively. The richest 9,223 individuals (of 920 million Indian adults) earned an average of Rs 48 crore a year, or 2,069 times the average Indian’s income.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from India Today

India Today8 min read
The Real Pawar Struggle
For the 6,200-odd voters of Katewadi, a village in the Baramati Lok Sabha constituency that goes to the polls on May 7, the decision on who to vote for is not incumbent on any discussion on the merits and demerits of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
India Today1 min read
Action Notes
↘ Project BJP as anti-Bengal by highlighting cessation of central funds under NREGA, PMAY-G ↘ Hold on to women beneficiaries of state welfare schemes ↘ Clearing part of due wages under NREGA till Dec. 2021, promise to pay PMAY-G money ↘ Consolidating
India Today2 min read
Centennial Man
K.G. Subramanyan was one of the most important artists of the post-independence Indian Modernists. Differently from the Progressives of Bombay and others, KG (as he was widely known) was also a bridge between Santiniketan Modernism and the energetic

Related