Reason

Affirmative Action Loses in Court

THE END OF affirmative action in university admissions has been prophesied since 2003, when the Supreme Court issued its decision in Grutter v. Bollinger. In the majority opinion, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote that “25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today.” That reckoning has now arrived, and five years earlier than predicted: In June, the Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that public universities must stop favoring certain applicants, and disfavoring others, based on their race or ethnicity.

“Eliminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it,” Chief Justice. “In other words, the student must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual—not on the basis of race.”

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Reason

Reason3 min read
An Early Test for Alzheimer’s
SHOULD YOU BE allowed to take a blood test that could tell you if you’re already at risk of Alzheimer’s disease? Last year, Quest Diagnostics began offering a consumer-initiated blood test for $399 (not covered by insurance) that detects the buildup
Reason2 min readIntelligence (AI) & Semantics
Key AI Terms
AI (Artificial Intelligence): The simulation of human intelligence processes by machines, especially computer systems, including learning, reasoning, and self correction. Gen AI (Generative AI): A subset of AI that creates new content, such as text,
Reason11 min read
The Night I Asked Chatgpt How To Build A Bomb
IT DIDN’T OCCUR to me to ask ChatGPT for a bomb recipe until I heard that ChatGPT would not give me a bomb recipe. That felt like a challenge. This was when the chatbot was relatively new, and various activists and pundits were complaining that its “

Related Books & Audiobooks