VISUAL ARTS
How Man Ray changed fashion’s focus
Page 55 →
RUTH WILSON hitches the skin by her ears to demonstrate how she’d look if she had “those little wires” sewn into her face, by which she means a thread lift. “Just that would make the world of difference,” she says. She is 41 and “everyone” around her talks about Botox “and what to fill their face with”. This is not in response to any question of mine. This is Wilson freewheeling on how confusing she finds the notion of “female empowerment” in 2023. “As an actress, everyone does it. Very few resist. I haven’t done anything – yet. But it’s in my head as like, ‘Well, do you decide not to and therefore potentially look older than your peers? Or do you just give in?’” Yesterday she read in the New York Times that people should get Botox in their 20s to stop wrinkles forming. “I mean, are they joking? I find it so …” she emits a plosive exhale of despair. “It’s mad! It’s massive violence.” Why can’t a woman age on screen? Or age, full stop?
But this is nothing new, she says. Women don’t help ourselves; never have. She plucks examples – Tudor fashion, she says, pretending to cinch her waist with a corset. Or Elizabethans painting their faces with lead-based ceruse that ate their skin and made their hair fall out. “In 200 years, they’ll look back at images of women now going, ‘What were they doing?’ Yet it’s a multibillion-dollar industry. And women are part of that, perpetuating this ‘empowerment’.”
I should say Botox is usually a no-go area in interviews. After all, what film star wants to discuss having “work”? Or,
