Commentary: There is no real evidence that stop-and-frisk helps reduce crime
by Aziz Huq and Richard McAdams, Chicago Tribune
Nov 29, 2022
3 minutes
Imagine your doctor tells you that you have a serious wasting condition. Your physician prescribes a powerful kind of therapy that has serious side effects similar to chemotherapy’s. You ask what evidence there is of the therapy’s benefits. Your physician cheerfully says there’s none. She is prescribing the therapy because it has long been used — not because there’s real evidence that it does any good.
This, in essence, is what commentators in Chicago, Philadelphia and elsewhere have recently proposed for the perennial challenge of gun violence: Return to
You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.
Start your free 30 days