What an Alzheimer’s Controversy Reveals About the Pressures of Academia
A prominent research paper is under review for possible fraud. Why is it so hard to correct the record?
by David Robert Grimes
Jul 29, 2022
4 minutes
For scientists, publication in is a career high-water mark. To make its pages, work must be deemed exceptionally important, with potentially transformative impact on scientific understanding. In 2006, a of Alzheimer’s disease by the lead author Sylvain Lesné met those criteria: It suggested a new culprit for the illness, a molecule called Aβ*56, which seemingly caused dementia symptoms in rats. The study has since accrued more than 2,300 citations in the scientific literature and inspired years of follow-up work. But an investigation of the original paper and many others by Lesné, , identified numerous red flags indicating the possibility of data fraud. ( has added a
You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.
Start your free 30 days