Global Voices

Access the Unfreedom Monitor database

The relational database of the Unfreedom Monitor researchOriginally published on Global VoicesThe Unfreedom Monitor is an Advox initiative to deepen our understanding of the relationship between technology and authoritarian power. In the first phase of this project, researchers working in 11 countries and four key themes conducted analysis of incidents,...

Originally published on Global Voices

Image courtesy Ivan Sigal.

The Unfreedom Monitor is an Advox initiative to deepen our understanding of the relationship between technology and authoritarian power.

In the first phase of this project, researchers working in 11 countries and four key themes conducted analysis of incidents, narratives, and media items, to explain acts of digital authoritarianism and the discourse around them. This research accompanied and supported a briefing paper, case studies by country and theme, and a series of stories.

The analysis is based on Global Voices’ Civic Media Observatory methodology. Researchers identify and track key themes and narrative frames that emerge around events, trends and other phenomena. By using the same method of analysis across countries and thematic contexts, researchers are able to bring comparative power to their work.

Subscribe to Undertones, the Civic Media Observatory's newsletter

Advox is pleased to share the dataset that underpins this research on technology and authoritarianism. The dataset illuminates the connections between technologies of control used to bolster authoritarian governance and the claims that governments use to influence and manipulate the opinions and attitudes of populations.

The dataset is hosted on Airtable and offers numerous points of entry for curious readers and researchers interested in exploring relationships within the data. For more details on how to navigate the dataset, click here.

The dataset illuminates the relationships between incidents, media items, media sources, narratives, themes, technologies of control, people and entities of interest, and locations. For instance, exploring the impact of a narrative frame, readers can click to see which people/entities espouse this frame and then continue to see what other narratives they have expressed. It is possible to see whether narrative frames are applicable to more than one country, and, if so, which media items express them.

This phase of Unfreedom Monitor research was conducted between January and March 2022. We documented incidents about the use of technology that controlled or harmed rights in Brazil, Ecuador, Egypt, India, Morocco, Myanmar, Russia, Sudan, Tanzania, Turkey, and Zimbabwe. We also explored four cross-cutting themes: data governance, speech, access, and information.

Phase II launched in June 2022, with the addition of new countries: Ecuador, Tanzania, Venezuela, El Salvador, and Hungary. We will continue to update the public dataset throughout the course of the research.

Please sign up for our newsletter, This week at Advox.


Please visit the project page for more pieces from the Unfreedom Monitor.

Originally published in Global Voices.

More from Global Voices

Global Voices5 min read
Taliban Bids On Sports In Afghanistan To Gain Legitimacy At Home And Abroad
The calculated strategy of the Taliban to promote specific sports is aimed at projecting a sense of normalcy and asserting their authority.
Global Voices4 min read
Southeast Asian Media Groups Cite Need For Press Freedom In Dealing With Extreme Weather Events
Southeast Asian media groups organized panels, protests, and pointed reports about the state of media freedoms in the region.
Global Voices4 min read
Government Bid To Ban ‘Glory To Hong Kong’ Protest Song Approved By Appeals Court
The judges said that internet platforms are ready to accede to the government’s request if there is a court order.

Related Books & Audiobooks